Lexus IS350 faster than Audi S4!

Road and Track online review of IS350 vs Infiniti G35 vs Acura TL.The IS350 won but what was mind boggling is that the 3.5 L V6 IS350 turned out to be faster than the V8 Audi S4(which is incidentally much more expensive). Imagine what a beast the IS-F(V8 5L 425hp) will be!
Read Article

lexusis350lexusis350 - 12/27/2006 1:47:37 AM
-6 Boost
Go Lexus! I always knew that Audi wasn't worth the money. I mean, they aren't that nice, they're expensive, and now, they aren't that fast.


MarkMark - 12/27/2006 6:37:09 AM
+1 Boost
^ Another wonderful and incorrect comment by a stupidly biased Lexus freak.

"Aren't that nice"...., try nicer looking and over all a nicer experiance than a Lexus.

"Aren't that fast"...., a story or two about how some car is faster than an Audi (IN THIS TEST), and you come to the conclusion that Audi's aren't fast??

Idiotic comments which further prove that people in the Lexus camp just can't see the other side of the fence.


MarkMark - 12/28/2006 7:00:55 AM
+3 Boost
Wilco - You are correct. I didn't mean to say the Lexus camp was the only ones. I know that is very applicable to the other camps.


JUGNUJUGNU - 12/27/2006 2:00:53 AM
-4 Boost
It is.IS350 is faster than the Audi S4 V8 and BMW 335i.

And their are rumours of it(3.5 V6)gettig a boost of atleast 40 BHP at it's mid-life facelift sometime next year.2008.

Go Lexus.

JUGNU










MarkMark - 12/27/2006 6:38:56 AM
+1 Boost
Rumors!!! Really, OH MY GOODNESS!! Because we all know that all rumors come true.........um, no.




JRobUSCJRobUSC - 12/27/2006 9:21:28 AM
+6 Boost
uh... no it's not. The 335i is faster than the IS350 in every single online or printed source. And this article is misleading, because the 335i is also faster than the S4, it's just not part of the test because it's not Japanese. The 335i times are virtually identical to the best tested times for the outgoing M3.

BMW 335i stated output 300hp/300lb-ft, actual output 340-350hp/350-360lb-ft, 0-60 4.8 sec, 1/4 mile 13.3 sec

Lexus IS350 output 306hp/277lb-ft, 0-60 5.1 sec, 1/4 mile 13.7 sec

Those figures were from Road and Track, which I chose because they had the BEST times for the Lexus and I wanted to be unbiased. Other sources had the IS slower (some as high as 0-60 in 6.0 seconds, which I don't believe are accurate but they're out there). Conversely every source, including Edmunds.com's Inside Line (which typically posts the slowest times), has pegged the 335i with the figures above. In fact Edmunds had the 335i only 0.1 second slower than the new RS4 in both 0-60 and the 1/4 mile (again, same time as everyone else for the 335i, slightly slower time for the RS4 than everyone else).

They can add 40hp to the Lexus, and it'll be a very fast car. But they're never going to be able to get the torque the 335i has, even if they can match the hp, so it's still going to be behind the BMW speed-wise, or at best they'll be even. Plus I'm sure there's plenty of reserve in the 335i motor, and it's a lot easier to tweak a turbo motor, keep that in mind. That's also ignoring the handling difference between the two, and the fact that you can get the 335i in a manual transmission, and that starting in the spring you can get it with all-wheel drive AND a manual, which I believe is going to be a fantastic car.

They're both excellent automobiles (as are the Audi models that for some reason have been dragged into this). I don't know why everyone has to get all "YEAH MY BRAND RULES YOUR BRAND!!!" every time some new information comes out about one of them.


JRobUSCJRobUSC - 12/27/2006 9:29:50 AM
+4 Boost
ok, after watching the video I'll revise the figures for the IS350: 0-60 4.9 seconds, 1/4 mile 13.5 seconds. Those figures are by far the fastest I've ever seen for the IS, but since they're there and I said I'd use the best figures I could find for the Lexus I'll accept them. Either way that's still slower than the 335i.


JUGNUJUGNU - 12/27/2006 2:04:53 AM
-2 Boost
IS350 will then have around 350 BHP.100BHP per litre.I guess 350BHP IS350 will be capable of staying together with the RS4,if not beating it.

Lexus for life

JUGNU


HeyhuubHeyhuub - 12/27/2006 4:09:24 AM
+2 Boost
Well considering the S4 is almost 5 years old, this isn't so surprising.


phaetonmeisterphaetonmeister - 12/27/2006 8:47:09 AM
-9 Boost
Not a big surprise here, the Lexus should be faster...its a thin skinned tin can! Why not test the 2 wrapping them around a phone pole at about 100km per hour and see who fairs better....

Friends don't let Friends Drive Rice!!!!!!!!


528i528i - 12/27/2006 4:15:40 AM
+3 Boost
only in straight line, not at the corner.

but WOW that's fast for a v6 beating a v8.


99gs40099gs400 - 12/27/2006 10:43:44 AM
+1 Boost
I am not surprise a V6 is faster than a V8 now dayz. Try to race a Is350 , G35 , 335I ves a garbage V8 mustang GT and see what happen !! Better yet throw in a STI and Evo just for fun.


MunichRobMunichRob - 12/27/2006 5:21:44 AM
+2 Boost
"Jugnu" I hate to break it to ya bud, but the 335i is the fastest in it's class which means it's faster than the IS350...In fact the 335i is faster than any Lexus ever produced.

Go put that in your pipe & smoke it.


MarkMark - 12/27/2006 6:43:17 AM
+1 Boost
....and anyways, I haven't found a good unbiased car magazine that I enjoy reading anymore. R&T, C&D, and even MT now!




BillBill - 12/27/2006 7:46:44 AM
+1 Boost
Did they test the IS350 going downhill?


BillBill - 12/27/2006 10:55:29 AM
-2 Boost
But that's...that's CHEATING, MDalle. ;-)


AsitisAsitis - 12/27/2006 12:02:56 PM
+5 Boost
Actually, FYI, a rolling start would be slower.


BillBill - 12/27/2006 4:34:36 PM
-1 Boost
How so?


G35LoverG35Lover - 12/27/2006 10:41:25 AM
+4 Boost
Why did Road and Track include the Acura?


golfer38golfer38 - 12/27/2006 11:56:58 AM
+5 Boost
...Except it finished 2nd...


chewychewy - 12/27/2006 2:03:45 PM
-3 Boost
Yes, the lighter IS350 is a bit quicker than the older and heavier S4. But Road and Track tested the S4 earlier, at a time when they weren't known to produce good 0-60 times. If they test the Audi S4 right now, I bet the S4 would be quicker. most likely under 5 seconds.


Sauceboy01Sauceboy01 - 12/27/2006 3:16:40 PM
+2 Boost
Well, most likely due to AWD powertrain losses with the A4. Although the A4 has more HP it may be putting equal or less HP to the wheels than the IS350.


phaetonmeisterphaetonmeister - 12/27/2006 4:33:24 PM
+1 Boost
Boy, I really attracted all the Lexota Fan Club with my previous comment.........lol


mitchatlexusofmarinmitchatlexusofmarin - 12/28/2006 12:04:15 PM
+2 Boost
Not really- just exposed yourself for an idiot.


BuzzBuzz - 12/27/2006 4:39:16 PM
+2 Boost
I often read these posts and wonder how many of you are legally allowed to drive. Half a second over 400 metres does not determine which vehicle is superior, and the relative advantages of RWD and AWD are entirely subjective. The reason that the IS is so good is because it's a fairly complete package. Those serious little Japanese men at the extremely profitable Lexus HQ must be laughing all the way to the bank at the moment. Rather than measuring your appendages, wait until you're old enoungh to drive these cars before you make these ridiculous statements. Magazine articles can only tell you so much.


mitchatlexusofmarinmitchatlexusofmarin - 12/28/2006 12:06:05 PM
+2 Boost
Lexus will enter the most competitive,
prestigious automobile race in the world.
Over 50 years of Toyota automotive experience
has culminated in the creation of Lexus cars.
They will be the finest cars ever built.

Lexus will win the race because
Lexus will do it right from the start.
Lexus will have the finest
dealer network in the industry.

Lexus will treat each customer
as we would a guest in our home.

If you think you can't, you won't...
If you think you can, you will!
We can, we will.



LarryLarry - 12/27/2006 6:40:24 PM
0 Boost
the BMW 335i is much faster than the whole Lexus lineup hybrids included, also many magazines rated the 330i higher than the IS350, lexus fans try to make their taco bell cars out to much better than what they really are. Futhermore isn't time to replace the sorry looking SC430.


SupraNeverBackSupraNeverBack - 12/27/2006 10:23:51 PM
+3 Boost
When IS350 ran 0-60 ONE second faster than their beloved 330i, they said speed is not important for performance.

Twin Turbo 0-60 4.9s? Supra did that 10 years ago.


JRobUSCJRobUSC - 12/28/2006 2:52:47 PM
0 Boost
yeah only the Supra was a stiff two door sports car with zero luxury. And it cost back then what the 335i does today, so considering net present value of money it was actually a good bit MORE expensive than the 335i (or IS350, G35, et al).

The Supra was an awesome car. Personally I preferred the RX-7 back then, but it was still a great vehicle. It doesn't compare to these cars though, it's not meant to.


JRobUSCJRobUSC - 12/28/2006 3:11:43 PM
+2 Boost
"the IS350 technically outruns the M3 and 335i"? "no one will notice 0.2 seconds"?

I disagree with both. Why? First because the IS350 doesn't outrun either of them, not technically, figuratively, subjectively, or any other "ly". It's slower than both, plain and simple. And second, people whould notice 0.2 seconds. YOU would notice 0.2 seconds. If the Lexus was 0.2 seconds faster than the 335i you'd be posting messages about how amazing the IS350 is and how Lexus destroys all BMWs, because that's what you always do on here. Since it's not faster you say no one will notice the difference and say it's magically "technically" faster.

In this particular example the Lexus is slower. It's still plenty fast, and it does happen to be a little more luxurious and a little cheaper than the 335i. There's your "win". Focus on that.


Matthew1Matthew1 - 12/27/2006 11:09:11 PM
0 Boost
Hmmm, interesting huu76, considering there are no performance figures for the V8 M3!

Also, we must remember that the IS350 has very magazine-friendly gearing, meaning the boys at Lexus wanted to appeal to America's fascination with 0-60 by creating gear ratios with catered to acceleration-spotters, while mid-range acceleration and high-speed drivability is questionable.

Of course, those figures are deeply impressive any way you look at it, but the 335i would still be a faster car in the real world. More torque, better mid-range power, you know, things which are actually important.

It's a good 'impress your mates at the pub' fact, this IS350 acceleration thing, but of no real value to anyone.


vcowmanvcowman - 12/28/2006 1:09:44 AM
+1 Boost
thats great, once its clear that the 335i is hands down faster accuse bmw of cheating by using a turbo. great smoke screen, but the IS is still slower. :)


TL4KELTL4KEL - 12/29/2006 1:12:33 PM
0 Boost
This article is supposed to be about the IS vs. TL vs. Audi - just curious why all of the talk about BMW?

And why hasn't anyone even commented on the TL?? Is the TL not "worthy"? I drive a TL - yes, it's fwd, yada, yada, yada and I do not drive the Type S - but I still have 270 ponies following me around. And I can tell you that I've never driven the IS (but know folks who have them) or the Audi (ditto on comment) - but my TL leaves many, many, many cars far behind from a stand-still take off. It's definitely quick, so I can only imagine how much quicker it is with the Type S suspension, etc. Give Acura a little credit.


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC