PT Cruiser replacement

It'll be built in Toluca, Mexico, and sold in Europe as a Dodge and Chrysler at the same time. Both versions will be built on the new Sebring platform, with production scheduled to start in December of 2007, and an on-sale date of early 2008.

Chrysler’s version will likely not arrive before the 2010 model year and may replace the retro-styled PT Cruiser. Wearing completely unique sheetmetal, the Chrysler model will only account for 25% of the total units built.

Size-wise, the new crossover will be larger than Honda’s CR-V, Hyundai’s Santa Fe and the Toyota RAV4 – and hopes to compete directly with Ford’s new Edge in the U.S. The car-based crossover will be offered in a FWD configuration, with AWD optional. We’ve heard lot’s of speculation regarding engines and transmissions but the 3.5-litre V6 (from the Sebring) is guaranteed to be one of the several offerings.


Read Article

S4cabriofoxone - 2/5/2007 9:51:56 PM

+2 Boost

Doesn't look like a PT Cruiser replacement to me.

Too boxy. The grille also isn't very large.

It seems more like a small Chrysler crossover.

There is no need for a Cruiser replacement. As one British magazine said, "the joke has long since faded." The car has lost its appeal, and the HHR came late to the game.

dumpsty - 2/6/2007 8:37:07 AM

+1 Boost

I think Chrysler is trying to get away from the retro design themes. The PT was nice when it came out, but now it's old (and tired) retro. This new crossover should fill a void in Chrysler's lineup adding a midsize sport-ute with available AWD. It should continue a prominent design theme as carried through by the Aspen, 300, and Sebring.

dumpsty - 2/6/2007 8:48:35 AM

+1 Boost

This upcoming crossover has been reported to also replace the aging Pacifica.

DCX may be preparing this concept to replace multiple models (PT Cruiser & Pacifica) like the 300 replaced both the Concorde and 300M.

This would be smart b/c many viewed the PT as too small and unpractical (not a lot of rear cargo space behind 2nd row, no available AWD, aging interior, etc.) & the Pacifica was a bit on the large side, rounded design reminds people of minivans, weak engines, etc.

I guess I have high hopes....

S4cabriofoxone - 2/6/2007 7:05:59 PM

+1 Boost

The Pacifica isn't all that old. It also gets pretty good reviews and sells well. Seeing how crossovers are replacing trucks, it might be fatal for Chrysler not to redesign it.

This crossover wouldn't do a good job taking its place. Familes of five or more love the Pacifica- a lot of versatility, luxury and a car-like ride for a relatively low price. It's much better than even the latest American crossover competitors. This smaller car won't fit seven, will have their mediocre new interior designs, and probably won't ride as well, if the newer models are any indication.

FreeRider - 10/23/2007 7:35:14 PM

+1 Boost

The PT has been the most practical vehical I've owned for years,I had minivans & pickups before & looked at the Pacifica & it didn't seem to have as much room behind the rear seat as the Cruiser did.
I now have a 2008 Avenger since June & I want a PT instead, not a minivan or anything like the Pacifica or anything in the Jeep line.
Where do I sign a petition to Chrysler to continue the PT or something very close to it,not like a Pacifica or Jeep.