Testdrove a 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK200 Kompressor

Testdrove a 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK200 Kompressor
So today I bring the E320 up for a scheduled service, which would take at least an hour and half. Having nothing better to do, I checked out the demo car section for anything new. Nothing. They had a new GL, a silver-colored version but it was a GL320 CDI, which I have already testdriven. Next to that was a base model smokesilver CLK200 Kompressor and beside that was a base model B150 B-Class. I went with the CLK200 Kompressor, naturally.

As much as I love the C209 CLK, this model was particularly boring looking. You heard me, BORING. I wasn't very fond of the smokesilver color and the fact that this classy car was made ugly with plastic hubcaps: winter tires obviously. Why couldn't they have chosen nicer wheels? They've got access to some hot AMG rims or some classy standard Mercedes wheels and they apply these cheap and FUGLY plastic hubcaps. If this was my car, I'd spend money on some nice winter wheels. I'm no cheapo.

Interiorwise, the CLK200 Kompressor showed its base model roots. The cockpit appeared very spartan and "empty". The materials were decent, not class-leading but decent. The facelifted CLK has a much better interior. The wood was really nice but I am not a fan of darker interiors as they feel so "empty and boring" somehow. I personally would have preferred a nice creamy white or khaki colored interior. The seats were comfortable enough and were made out of dark cloth. Side support was decent.

The engine came to life with a nice refined rumble. As was mentioned before, this was a prefacelift CLK200 Kompressor so it was powered by a 163-horsepower supercharged 1.8-l 4-cylinder engine. I've experienced this motor in many Mercedes models and I have nothing but praise for it. Even though it is a 4-cylinder, it has the feel and refinement of a 6-cylinder to it. No vibrations and no rough 4-cylinder sound when you hammer it. Mercedes installed a TWINPULSE system in their 1.8-l 4-cylinders which is composed to counter-rotating-balance shafts which cancel out the inherent instability of 4-cylinders. And the engine response is very good despite the use of forced induction. The motor is also rev-happy and the torque reserves are impressive too. Midrange power is pretty sweet and so is the sprint from 0-100 km/h as you can see in the video. Bottom line: this car is not underpowered at all. Give it a try and you'll be surprised. The engine sound is really nice too, refined, not harsh and rough.

Although the North American-spec CLK isn't known for razor sharp handling, the European CLK is a different car. European-spec Mercedes' tend to have a sportier suspension and steering setup. The suspension on this CLK was more comfort than sport, yet the car still handled well thanks in part to the direct steering response. Corners were not really a problem - and where I live, we have some serious roads that are almost track-like. They bend and twist like on a racetrack, and the CLK performed admireably here. I did push the car to its limits and quickly discovered that body roll becomes quite bad when the CLK is pushed through corners with a madman behind the wheel. But for most aggressive drivers, the handling qualities of this car are more than adequate.

Transmission was a 5-speed automatic, which worked very nicely with the 1.8-l Kompressor engine. It also responded quickly to driver input so driving in a sporty fashion was no problem. I didn't do much manual shifting and left the automatic to handle the gears, which it did very well. The CLK200 Kompressor comes standard with a 6-speed "fuel economy" manual transmission which is still criticized in the German press for lacking in smoothness and precision. Most are bought with the automatic anyway.

Best of all, all these factors combined made the CLK200 Kompressor a very fun car to drive. It might not have the power of the CLK63 AMG, but it was an eager little worker that just made you smile. I expect the facelifted CLK to be much better of course. Hopefully I can drive one sometime. I'd love to get my hands on a CLK320 CDI and a CLK350 and of course the badass CLK63 AMG. What a fun testdrive one of those would make. Still, I was very pleased with the CLK200 Kompressor.

OVERALL: A decent car for those looking for some driving fun while not wanting to pay too much at the pumps. The CLK200 Kompressor combines the agility and refinement of a 6-cylinder with the fuel economy of a 4-cylinder. For an entry level car, the peformance, sport and comfort are completely acceptable. The only downside is that this car is basically a stripper: it's empty of useful options which you'll have to pay extra for.

Videos

0-100 km/h Video: http://media.putfile.com/CLK200K-0-100-kmh

Interior Video: http://media.putfile.com/CLK200K-Interior

LuxuriousLuxurious - 2/14/2007 1:44:33 PM
0 Boost
Mercedes with hubcaps nd no leather!


BillBill - 2/14/2007 2:47:29 PM
0 Boost
The Europeans think differently. Leather isn't such a big deal over on the old continent. A car is still a luxury car despite being equipped with cloth seats.

A shame Americans still think in such primitive terms. Leather = luxury. Primitive, simply primitive.


LuxuriousLuxurious - 2/14/2007 3:03:04 PM
-2 Boost
At least alloy wheels!


MercBasherMercBasher - 2/15/2007 1:08:04 AM
+1 Boost
This vehicle would not sell well in the US, its too basic - hell it probably doesn't have a microwave, barbecue or fridge/freezer as standard equipment. Oh and did I mention the cupholders are too small!


BillBill - 2/14/2007 2:45:06 PM
+2 Boost
Good review, cawimmer430.

When I was in Europe with my wife, we rented a CLK200 Kompressor automatic and I was pleasantly surprised as the eagerness (as you mentioned) of the little engine. The fuel economy was fantastic too at constant highway speeds and I even more amazed at the quietness of the cabin at high speed. You didn't hear the engine scream for example.

This might sound far fetched, but I think a CLK200 Kompressor would do particularly well in the US. Call me crazy, but this is the perfect car for those luxury buyers who live in the big cities and don't need the raw performance of the CLK350 or CLK550 for example.


EvoAudiEvoAudi - 2/14/2007 7:31:24 PM
+1 Boost
sadly MB won't bring lower range models here because it would make them look not as exclusive, like imagine if they brought the SL-350 here(it would sell alot)
but would compromise clk and slk


BillBill - 2/14/2007 3:05:07 PM
+3 Boost
What does that prove?

Look at the panel gaps here: http://autozeitung.de/online/bildDB/37643_1024.jpg

Look about the same size as the ones on the CLK. What does that prove? NOTHING.


BillBill - 2/14/2007 4:12:15 PM
+2 Boost
Exactly my point, 1995e34.


BillBill - 2/14/2007 6:17:14 PM
+3 Boost
Oh come on, Will. Look at the LS interior and compare the gaps it has to the gaps of the CLK interior. No difference at all.

Besides, people have this stupid obsession with "gaps", which mean nothing.


BillBill - 2/14/2007 6:33:02 PM
+3 Boost
I assumed SPICEACE was a Lexus "fanboy", hence my usage of the LS interior, which is a HQ interior.

Good thing we agree. Panel gaps mean nothing.


RupertRupert - 2/14/2007 5:38:13 PM
+4 Boost
it's a punchy engine with the kompressor.
they're about to upgrade the hp too, to something like 175.


mstangpny07mstangpny07 - 2/14/2007 5:42:42 PM
+3 Boost
Thank you, again, for your excellent reviews..


Threepoint1415926Threepoint1415926 - 2/15/2007 3:27:59 AM
+6 Boost
It's a purely American notion that Mercedes Benz's only offerings to the car market are and should be fully luxury oriented. Clearly you've never driven a 240D... or a G280. This car is what it is. Personally, I'd love to see MB-Text come back into style. I love that interior way more then leather. Lasted twice as long, 10 times easier to clean and just as nice on the bottom. Plus, it had a neat smell that I will forever associate with a real Mercedes.


trd1trd1 - 2/14/2007 6:02:08 PM
-2 Boost
this car is pretty bad, the interior is just real ugly and it has no leather.


chewychewy - 2/14/2007 8:18:44 PM
+3 Boost
Nice review again.


neutralneutral - 2/14/2007 8:35:10 PM
+3 Boost
I would love a CLK200 here in America. Good fuel economy, great styling, good handling, etc. Only thing is, Mercedes is a Luxury manufacturer. They shouldn't even offer non-leather interiors or plastic wheel caps. They don't offer that garbage here in America, they shouldn't offer it anywhere else either.

Either way, if this car were offered in the US (with leather and nice wheels), I would love to have one.


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 2/14/2007 11:32:12 PM
+1 Boost
This is an old article, is it not? That looks like the pre-update CLK. The new one has a better bodykit and different rear light clusters.

Anyway, I'd rather have a CLK350. Better power, better luxury, better styling- and what would still be pretty good gas mileage for a luxury car.


Agent63Agent63 - 2/15/2007 12:51:12 AM
+5 Boost
Bill wrote:"A shame Americans still think in such primitive terms. Leather = luxury. Primitive, simply primitive."

----
I agree with you. Leather seats do not mean luxury at all.

For example for some luxury furniture is not even wrapped with leather, instead being cloth. This goes for cars as well.


RupertRupert - 2/15/2007 11:48:28 AM
+4 Boost
why is leather luxury? is leather that much nicer then good cloth or velour? I agree, plastic hubcaps on a clk are a no-no, but it comes with alloys as standard, but these were winter tyres.
is the car any less high quality or well built? Does it compromise the car? No. Leather is an option all the way until the 550 in the CLK. And don't forget some people don't buy leather on ethical or religious reasons (ie Hindus).
I would have leather on a merc/audi/bmw, but it's not a neccessity, and leather on anything less than a volvo is weird, I wouldn't have it.
And the small engine? I'd be happy with it. Under 10 seconds is good enough, especially if you only drive in the city. Good fuel economy too.


BillBill - 2/15/2007 1:07:46 PM
+3 Boost
Probably not. On a car like the S-Class, leather is often seen as something that should be stock. I personally wouldn't mind an S-Class with cloth seats, but at the same time, leather is something that is synonymous with vehicles in this class. Simply put, I wouldn't have bought the S-Class if it came with cloth seats. At the same time though I wouldn't really mind cloth seats either, or at least something like MB TEX.

On a car like the CLK though, especially an entry level model like this one, cloth seats are completely fine in my opinion. I think Europeans also expect leather to be standard on cars like the S-Class nowadays.


RupertRupert - 2/15/2007 3:29:56 PM
+4 Boost
s class is the class where leather is standard, also in the suvs like the ml and q7 have leather standard, but the x5 didn't...think the new one does.
anything below an s class doesn't have leather standard, bar the clk 550, amg cars, m cars, s/rs cars.
to put it another way, an e 550 doesn't have leather standard, neither does a 550 (i think). very popular option of course, but there are some people who won't want it.


RupertRupert - 2/15/2007 5:27:42 PM
+3 Boost
When I say "neither does a 550" I am refering to a BMW.


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC