Geneva Motor Show Preview: Jaguar XJ unveiled

Geneva Motor Show Preview: Jaguar XJ unveiled
Jaguar will be showing the new Jaguar XJ at the Geneva Motor Show. Minor changes have been made to the Jaguar XJ design wise with intakes, new fog lights and a new bumber on the front. The back also gets a little lip spoiler wing. Jaguar is hoping the minor changes to the car will help increase sales before its major overhaul due in 2010. Engine lineup on the Jaguar XJ includes a 4.2 liter V8 engine, a supercharged 4.2 liter V8 engine that produces 420 horsepower and a ‘R’ badged supercharged 5.0 liter V8 engine producing 500 horsepower.

Stay tuned for the official press release from Jaguar for more information and images.
Read Article

iown1iown1 - 2/28/2007 10:14:42 AM
+3 Boost
Looks terrible. The old design may have been dated but at least it was classic. This looks like some cheesy cheap after market kit.


BimmerFanBimmerFan - 2/28/2007 1:43:06 PM
0 Boost
I have to agree 100%. The old body is classic and really does not need a 21st Century refresh...now it just looks... ricey! D'oH!


BimmerFanBimmerFan - 2/28/2007 1:44:37 PM
-1 Boost
ooops....not ricey (although the side gills are pretty ricey), but rather cheesy.


Murcielago_LP640Murcielago_LP640 - 2/28/2007 11:03:01 AM
+1 Boost
Old one was better


cdokecdoke - 2/28/2007 11:29:50 AM
+1 Boost
Oh my goodness! I hate to say it but it's grotesque. They have started to change things toward the 1960's XJ in a stylistic sense; meaning Ian Callum probably had something to do with it.

Oh! The closer you get the uglier it gets. I want to see the new [redesigned] XJ and I desperatly want to like it, but when things like this come out I find it very disturbing and it worries me a bit.


cdokecdoke - 2/28/2007 6:26:28 PM
0 Boost
Oh hell! AHhhh! What manner of lunacy is this! It also has those cheap looking side mirrors. Someone said this before, but they look like they came off of a Volvo.


JUGNUJUGNU - 2/28/2007 11:34:33 AM
+1 Boost
Not bad.
Front bumper looks like the BMW's M(M5,M6).

BTW the 5.0l V8 supercharge is very impressive.
Hope it comes soon in the XK.That'll definately rival the Ferraris,Astons,BMWs...etc

JUGNU


mini22mini22 - 2/28/2007 11:42:52 AM
+2 Boost
Modern updates on old designs in many cases don't work. I would have grafted the CXF grill on to the front. It would have at least looked better with the spoilers grafted on. The XF cannot come out soon enough!


d1sinfod1sinfo - 2/28/2007 12:05:26 PM
0 Boost
Maybe it will grow on me. Like fungus :)


OccarnutOccarnut - 3/1/2007 8:27:09 AM
0 Boost
AND, why is Jag scrwewing with names too...what was wrong with XJ8 or XK8?


MBKingMBKing - 2/28/2007 1:48:56 PM
0 Boost
can anyone update on the interior is it any better than the previous version?


tecnopolistecnopolis - 2/28/2007 4:50:01 PM
-1 Boost
I agree, this "update" is horrible. A complete waste of precious budget and man-power which could have been better used elsewhere.



S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 2/28/2007 5:14:47 PM
0 Boost
Horrible! No, no, no, no, no!!!

This was a classic, beautiful design. The bumpers look utterly horrendous, the double-badge is a cheap attempt to copy Mercedes, they ruined the rear end, and the intakes don't go with the car at all.

And yet, the interior looks exactly the same. This is the part that SHOULD'VE been changed- not the exterior!

After the brilliant XK's integration of modern and classic styling cues in one sexy convertible, I expected so much more from Jaguar, even in a minor refresh.


LexusLexus - 2/28/2007 5:34:23 PM
0 Boost
Wow! after seeing the Jaguar C-XF, this XJ is very dispointing. Can this XJ get any uglier? come on what are they thinking.


OccarnutOccarnut - 3/1/2007 8:28:45 AM
0 Boost
But, the question is...can Jag dealers hang in there until it arrives? People do not buy cars now based on what is coming in several years..ususally.


LexusLexus - 2/28/2007 6:56:03 PM
+1 Boost
The Jaguar C-XF is present is just stunning if you ask me. The reason why the C-XF look so good is that the designer that design it, use to work for Aston Martin.


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 2/28/2007 11:41:59 PM
+1 Boost
The same person who designed the XK, C-XF and Aston Martin DB9 (Ian Callum) also penned the refresh for this car. I guess he's not so good with refreshes!


cdokecdoke - 3/1/2007 12:34:17 AM
0 Boost
...Either that or he is not so good with production sedans…

Looking at this picture I can’t help but ask how many people have seen the movie “Cars”?

I am not sure that I can maintain my hope that the new XJ won't disappoint me. The interior sounds very interesting, but I am worried about the exterior. I don’t want it to loose its uniqueness. Jaguars as of now have very distinct and different styling relative to most cars which have a short front and high reared wedge shape to them. Jags are very different.

Truthfully, I was not impressed with the C-XF as a Jaguar. I would be fine for other companies but rubbed me the wrong way as a Jag. If the XJ is like that then it will loose a lot of its uniqueness.

If this hideous thing was ever allowed to have a Jaguar leaper put on it and the same people are in control of the next vehicle’s design, then I am worried.



no1listensanywayno1listensanyway - 2/28/2007 7:37:25 PM
+3 Boost
I have to disagree with the majority, it looks great.


d1sinfod1sinfo - 2/28/2007 8:23:53 PM
0 Boost
Wait I call chop. Look at the lower grill.


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 2/28/2007 11:42:44 PM
0 Boost
Nope. Edmunds released pictures of the same car. Sadly, it's not a photoshop.


Agent63Agent63 - 2/28/2007 9:16:20 PM
+2 Boost
Regardless of that bumper and grill I still think it's a classy looking car for the ultra wealthy. It has British inspiration funded by American paper but it still looks prestige. The ride is still comfortable with up to date luxury ammenities but it has lost a lot of street credit to Audi/BMW/Mercedes and even the LS. It's a shame.... I would still consider something like this if I didn't care about performance as much. Luxury wise it still got it.


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 2/28/2007 11:43:59 PM
+3 Boost
You'd be surprised. All though it can't quite keep up with the competiton in terms of 0-60 (XJ8), the handling is superb. The car is vastly underrated.

By the way, I believe the XJR is just above $80,000. It's a bargain, and it can EASILY keep up with the competition.


Agent63Agent63 - 3/1/2007 1:00:34 AM
+2 Boost
Oh I don't doubt it can't perform or handle well, i've seen it. It's definitely a bargain and I agree with you on it being underrated. It looks the part too of a high end BRITISH luxury saloon. It has all the pedigree to hold it's own image.



cdokecdoke - 3/3/2007 11:13:09 PM
+1 Boost
I happen to drive an XJ, thank you very much. It is true redesign in 2004 is not as pretty as the previous model: that is simply by virtue of the modified proportions. The real things that I don't like is the interaction of the exterior headlight with the body: there is something about it which seems less substantial.

I find this, to be frank about it, hideous. There is almost no other word for it.


farabira1farabira1 - 3/10/2007 6:56:44 AM
+1 Boost
terrible. I just have to wait for the 2010 replacement.


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC