3 cars that could save the Big 3

3 cars that could save the Big 3
Ford is struggling to recover from a $12.7 billion loss in 2006, GM just lost its number one spot after 76 years to Toyota, and Chrysler has been getting sold for God knows how long. So why are the Big Three just sitting back and watching the deck of cards crumble right in front of their eyes? Why aren’t they speeding up development on cars that American people want instead of resurrecting cars like the Ford Taurus which no one cares for?

Well, we decided to take a look at three concepts the Big Three have shown at the Detroit Auto Show and how they can save Detroit.

Ford Interceptor: This Mustang-based concept has a “Built Ford Tough” attitude which is powered by a 5.0 liter V8 Cammer engine that produces 400 horsepower and runs on E85 ethanol. Just look at the sharp, yet round cuts that give it an aggressive “get the hell out of my way” look when it appears in the rear-view mirror of any car. If thrown into production with a little more than 400 horsepower and other technical tweaks, the Ford Interceptor could compete strongly against any German or Japanese high-performance sedan (hint: the BMW M5 or the upcoming Lexus IS-F). Not only that, with just a few design changes the Ford Interceptor could even explore the terrain of the four-door-coupe craze that’s been going on these days with luxury cars (hint: Mesh it up with the Lincoln MKR concept as a four-door-coupe that will give the Mercedes CLS and the upcoming Audi A7 a run for their buck). Whatever you do with the Ford Interceptor Concept just don’t shelve it.

Chevrolet Volt: Probably one of the hardest to mass produce out of the three concepts, the Chevrolet Volt is surprisingly the only one that has shown some progression. After being a victim of much criticism that this was just publicity stunt and wouldn’t ever be put into production, GM awarded two development contracts for the batteries with they will evalute later this fall. The Chevrolet Volt is expected to have a charge time of 6.5 hours offering 40 miles on battery alone with a 640 mile range with a full tank of gasoline. The car is expected to make its production debut in 2010.

Dodge Demon Roadster: Now, we don’t know how much the Dodge Demon Roadster can actually do for Chrysler, but out of the three concepts mentioned here, this one is probably the closest to its production version. While the Mazda Miata MX-5 isn’t Mazda’s best-selling model it’s created the “Zoom Zoom” motto you hear today, so now you feel a little “Zoom Zoom” behind every Mazda vehicle you sit in. Maybe the Dodge Demon Roadster can do the same for Chrysler, maybe not. But the rear-wheel-drive and the 2.4 liter engine that produces 172 horsepower, places the Dodge Demon Roadster perfectly between Mazda Miata MX-5’s 2.0 liter 166 horsepower engine and Honda S2000’s 2.2 liter 237 horsepower roadster. Chrysler and Dodge, just remember to make it a hardtop convertible, and try to extract a little more horsepower from that 2.4 liter engine. Take some pointers from Mazda and Honda.

So come on Detroit, get up off this lazy and unmotivated lag you guys are on and get moving with these three wonderful cars as soon as possible.
Read Article

atomicbriatomicbri - 5/5/2007 3:26:39 PM
+2 Boost
No doubt Ford needs a rear wheel drive sedan in order to be taken seriously. And a rebadged and facelifted Ford 500 into a Taurus is NOT the answer. The Interceptor looks good, but as for resurrecting the company, I am not too sure. Ford desperately needs some small cars that are good in its American portfolio. A hybrid type car they also need! And the FOcus, poor poor Focus...guess it is definate we will never see an MK2 Focus on these shores. And they got rid of the HATCH!!! Backwards step in my opinion...

GM is probably the best one of the Big 3 at the moment since they have many new vehicles in the pipeline. The Volt is a MUST!! GM are you listening? If they had a Prius competitor and made it well, built it worth a damn, and holds on to the sexy sheetmetal of the concept then they will have a winner hands down. The problem with the Prius is its dowdy looks. Like it was styled by a blind person or a typical Toyota designer which ever way you wanna look at it. The Volt is ELECTRIC! LOL! I saw it at the NYC Auto Show and my friend there who knows jack squat about cars saw it and was like "WOW That is a neat looking car!" And trust me he drives to just drive and is rarely excited about cars. He was in the market for a new one so I forced him to go to the show. He approched the model girl and asked when it would be available, she of course said it was a design exercise.... COME ON GM!! Don't drop this ball, for once!!

As for Chrysler....Hmmmm.... The Demon is not their answer. Not by a long shot. Chrysler just needs to get a handle on their cheapo interiors. They drive ok and their motors for the most part are not bad. I guess their answer is to be more edgy and take a risk like with the 300. The Sebring was a disappointment I must say. I thought it would be more in the blood of the 300, only to see it looking like a bloated and trunked Caliber. Not so good.... I am not sure about them or what they could do....


LexusNumberOne4everLexusNumberOne4ever - 5/6/2007 2:54:58 AM
-1 Boost
The Demon and Interceptor WIIL not save Ford or Chrysler.
Improved quality and reliability in mainstream cars WILL.

And oh, GM finally seems to be on the way up.


izfuneyizfuney - 5/5/2007 3:43:35 PM
+3 Boost
There is so much promise that the big 3 have in terms of products...
However for the consumer ..stories like the one below that define their experience and opinion of the Big 3 .

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/06/automobiles/06USED.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
(you might have to register for NYT .. but i think its worth your time)




SilverAeroSilverAero - 5/5/2007 4:03:15 PM
+3 Boost
Even if it sells as many as the MX-5 or Solstice (which it won't), the Demon could not save dodge. The interceptor and volt are important though


LexusNumberOne4everLexusNumberOne4ever - 5/6/2007 2:56:45 AM
0 Boost
I'm not so sure about the interceptor. Sales wise, trucks sell more than their cars.


Matthew1Matthew1 - 5/5/2007 9:37:28 PM
0 Boost
Why the hell would you want one of those pre-historic pieces of junk?

Oh right, because you are huu76.

My bad!


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 5/6/2007 5:39:10 PM
+1 Boost
The Grand Marquis is a Ford product.


EnnNorakEnnNorak - 5/5/2007 7:30:50 PM
+2 Boost
Agree with first comment above that rebadging the 500 as a Taurus is not the answer. I know former Taurus owners who still swear that the Taurus brand promises crap. I fear that Ford's reputation may not recover in time to save the company as Ford needs to spend too much money to right previous wrongs -- it's money Ford can't afford in its current circumstances. I gave up driving Ford products because of things like rust, bad paint and bad warranty policies. Ford has totally abandoned the large RWD sedan by failing to offer the Crown Vic, Grand Marquis and Town Car with a proper 300 hp plus DOHC engine and 6-speed automatic. I had 3 Grand Marquis in succession, each with its own problems. I switched to the smaller yet higher quality Audi A6 and my wife now prefers cars of smaller size. Ford's big mistake re the 500 was to launch it with insufficient engine power and a cheap CVT transmission. Ford did have a 300 hp DOHC Grand Marquis called the Mercury Marauder for a year or two but abandoned it without retaining this engine in the Grand Marquis line. Whatever happened to the system Ford talked about that would allow retail customers to trace their car order through the production process? I had to work real hard to get a telephone number for that purpose only to be admonished by some uncaring superclerk for using "restricted" telephone number. Even though I got the information I was looking for, I feel I should have been able to pinpoint the production status of my vehicle by simply logging into an appropriate website with a password provided by Ford right after my order was received by the dealer.


LexusLexus - 5/5/2007 7:36:15 PM
+3 Boost
Most if not all BMW, Audi, MB, Lexus, Acura, and Infiniti are "NOT" going to downgrade what they own. It would be a downgrade if they trade in their Bimmer, MB, Audi or even a Lexus. People in this category want an "upgrade".

I have a Lexus IS350, I want an Aston Martin V8 Vantage for my next ride. See what I mean? I want an upgrade.

The Demon Roadster look like the Honda S2000 from the front and side view. And the Volt look look similar to the Mazda Kabura concept. Nevertheless, all of this concept look pretty good.


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 5/7/2007 10:09:19 PM
+1 Boost
LOL, as an IS350 owner, is an Aston Martin really attainable? That would be awesome, and you should write an article on it if you get it, but...


jt716jt716 - 5/5/2007 8:59:27 PM
+2 Boost
Ford is coming out I think in 2009 with the hybrid fusion. The Crown/Marquis/Town car need total overhauls and be efficient with decent interiors. They should be powerful too with options that attract buyers.For Dodge I think its too late


txshldm07txshldm07 - 5/5/2007 9:48:11 PM
+4 Boost
What the big three need is some new products. The current product suck. They should fire their designers for not having any guts. All they do is retro, retro, and more retro. The people who designed the Taurus they were great, for their time. The people who designed the 1998 Intrepid they were great. Today no guts just regurgitate old designs.

Having said all that do we good designers here in the US I think so. Management has been fat, dumb and happy.

And the last thing is the american cars' quality sucks. How can it be that Honda Accords build in Merrisville have great quality?

So unless management changes no hope for US cars.
My $.02


LexusNumberOne4everLexusNumberOne4ever - 5/6/2007 10:00:41 AM
+1 Boost
"Today no guts just regurgitate old designs."

The recent GM cars have been a marked effort to look futuristic.
While the SSR was just a bad day, Chevy and Cadillac cars do look good.
Even the new Camaro looks futuristic.


arcyarcy - 5/6/2007 1:47:19 AM
+2 Boost
i agree the volt will most likely help GM but they shouldnt keep their hopes up. i think they should just lessen the production of their SUVs and V-8 engines to cut down cost then start making small engines to make small cars start selling them in europe and asia... and well as for USA... the big 3 may have to change their origin...lol


LexusNumberOne4everLexusNumberOne4ever - 5/6/2007 3:04:35 AM
+1 Boost
The V8 engines are important to the big3. They need it to have higher profit-margin cars.
Also, American market is very power hungry.
To be really honest, only GM can pull themselves out of this tricky situation. They have Saab, Opel, Daewoo, Vauxhall so they can rely on the European sales.


arcyarcy - 5/6/2007 11:49:22 PM
+2 Boost
hmm maybe so i guess they are just not making the right cars to sell then


LexusNumberOne4everLexusNumberOne4ever - 5/7/2007 12:17:38 AM
+1 Boost
I think it's about the build quality.


mp2dtwmp2dtw - 5/6/2007 2:03:24 AM
+2 Boost
Thankfully these three could flop and the Big Three would still be fine, as long as they're headed in the right direction.
If Chrysler were pinning its hopes on a roadster, any roadster, it would be in great trouble. However this roadster looks great and should be a plus.
The Ford and Chevrolet are far less promising. If Ford hopes to regain market share it needs to build cars that compete and inspire, not rehashed gimmicks of the past. The Volt is fine--just don't hold your breath for the technology to surface and become steadily reliable.


mini22mini22 - 5/6/2007 12:18:15 PM
+1 Boost
Obviously the right products are a step in the right direction. However until the big three figure out how to reduce their health care costs their ability to turn and maintain a profit will ultimately fail. Foreign car makers at this point simply have a built in advantage right now. Unless the US government does somthing like adding a built in health care tariff on all foreign car makers that sell vehicles in the US or the unions capitulate to the big three this situation is not going to change. What I'm saying is there are 2 parts to the equation-Good Products and Greatly reduced Healthcare Costs.


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 5/6/2007 5:40:48 PM
+4 Boost
Why would the Nitro save Chrysler? It's a low-volume product. They need a good mainstream car, not an impractical sports car that no normal family could have.

The Interceptor, which I really like, could help Ford, though. So could the Volt with GM.


RupertRupert - 5/6/2007 6:38:17 PM
+1 Boost
One of those small Chevys they showed at a motor show recently could save GM.
Not a Volt, a made up car.


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 5/7/2007 10:11:03 PM
+1 Boost
Not the Nitro- don't know why I said that. Meant Demon.

Rupert, I didn't particularly like any of the GM small cars. They looked like cartoon characters to me.


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC