Can We Use JD Power Studies To Become The eHarmony of the Automotive World?

Can We Use JD Power Studies To Become The eHarmony of the Automotive World?
Are the statistical experts at JD Power, and the matchmaking experts over at eHarmony.com more alike than different?

Before you think that 009 has truly flipped out, let me explain. The whole premise of eHarmony is that, through their patented 29 step evaluation process, they promise you will meet the mate most compatible for you. Sounds good on the surface, and if you think about it, buying a car is a bit like picking a potential mate

First you weigh the attractiveness of the candidate, and factor in the known negative values, and then determine if this relationship is worthy of a long term commitment. Basically, it is a statistical analysis weighing emotional factors with real life consequences.

Just like buying a new car.

First the right side of the brain kicks in and the emotional appeal of the vehicle entices your senses. But now the left side of the brain factors in and reliability and quality issues to counterpoint those emotions. Who wins? Sometimes we make a wrong choice the emotions rule, and we buy a car that turns into a nightmare. On the other hand if we allow logical to always prevail, then are we missing out on the thrill of taking it to the next level? After all you can’t always live in a cocoon can we?

Wouldn’t it be nice if someone could give us all of the steps needed to find the perfect automotive match? Maybe JD Power surveys can show us the collective light? The three main reports released by the Power network actually may do just that.

First off is the annual APEAL study which quantifies the same basic emotional tendencies that eHarmony addresses for match making. Then the Initial Quality Study and the Vehicle Dependability Studies if subtracted are available to bring us back to reality.

So let’s take two examples and run them through the paces and see what we get. In this example we will take the overall APEAL scores as a basis of our computations.

First off we will take Lexus, for many the benchmark of excellence in all areas. Lexus scores rather highly in the APEAL rankings with a score of 836 points. Next we will subtract the excellent IQS and VDS scores of 94 and 136 respectively, and we get a grand total of 606 points. Not too bad overall. Now on to example number two, Land Rover.

Land Rover too ranks in the upper end of the APEAL rankings with a score of 815 points but this time when we subtract out the IQS and VDS scores of 170 and 428 we get an over total of only 218 points. A big difference compared to the Lexus. It seems reliability and quality issues can really take their toll in the exercise.

Can these reports be combined in a meaningful manner? No doubt scientifically the results are probably off by quite a margin, but the theory at least is correct. With that in mind I applied the formula across the board to let you see how everyone stacks up against each other The idea here is to see who matches best wit the target consumer

Now looking at these rankings how do you think they stack up. Are you where you think you should be?

 

APEAL–IQS-VDS=Match Compatibility?

 

APEAL

VDS

IQS

Overall

 

836

136

94

606

Lexus

818

163

135

520

Cadillac

841

210

112

519

Jaguar

849

248

91

510

Porsche

847

212

133

502

BMW

815

184

130

501

Acura

844

240

111

493

Mercedes-Benz

823

215

117

491

Infniti

810

220

100

490

Lincoln

743

151

113

479

Mercury

776

194

108

474

Honda

761

179

112

470

Toyota

750

153

127

470

Buick

772

227

125

420

Industry Avg

829

279

136

414

Audi

754

224

120

410

Ford

776

242

132

402

Nissan

768

239

131

398

GMC

762

232

133

397

Pontiac

763

241

129

393

Chevrolet

792

272

129

391

Volvo

766

253

125

388

Hyundai

777

243

163

371

Mazda

724

232

133

359

Subaru

740

232

151

357

Chrysler

770

260

155

355

Mitsubishi

800

299

160

341

Volkswagen

757

289

132

336

Saturn

784

326

133

325

Saab

737

258

156

323

Dodge

742

310

125

307

Kia

773

307

162

304

HUMMER

718

264

161

293

Jeep

738

318

153

267

Suzuki

816

428

170

218

Land Rover

Note Mini, Scion, and Isuzu were not computed due to too small of a sample size.



Agent009Agent009 - 7/11/2007 2:19:00 PM
+2 Boost
I am not a BMW fan by any stretch....

Just challenging to look at another side of the reasons why we like what we do....



Agent009Agent009 - 7/11/2007 2:53:24 PM
+1 Boost
I emailed you about that submission, thanks!



Agent009Agent009 - 7/11/2007 2:52:51 PM
+3 Boost
I nearly fell out of my chair reading a compliment from you! LOL

The reasons I did it the originally way was to allow reason (reliability & quality) to weigh in more in the overall score and give more than a minor impact on the emotional value.

Too many times we discount or exaggerate real values.

For example, is a car with a VDS score of 100 twice as reliable as a car with the score of 200. Technically it is, but in the overall scheme of things most people would never even notice.

I see nothing wrong with your formula, The VDS and IQS are scores based off of 1 per 100 vehicles sampled and the APEAL is not in that format. Without specific details from JD Power we will never know if it could ever correlate, but your math makes about as much sense as mine.

The real person to ask would be cdoke he is "da man" when is comes to statistics. But then again he would probably be laughing at my feeble attempts to make reason of this unrelated data.






Agent009Agent009 - 7/11/2007 4:57:50 PM
+2 Boost
XeroK00L- The reason really don't agree on the 100 vs 200 scenario is that many times when a car goes to the dealer it maybe for two issues. One of the main problem with VDS and IQS is we never see how many time it went to the dealer for issue resolution.

If you had only one problem and it went one, to me it would be the same as having two minor issues that were service at the same interval. Basically the same down time.


rg12345rg12345 - 7/11/2007 3:02:32 PM
-2 Boost
Whatever! So, which car is the One for me??? How do I find that out?? I see numbers, what do I do with them?


Agent009Agent009 - 7/11/2007 3:40:40 PM
+2 Boost
the higher the number the more of a chance you will be eternally happy with a long term relationship.


david989david989 - 7/11/2007 3:17:50 PM
+2 Boost
Good to see Lexus in first place as usual.


chuck717chuck717 - 7/11/2007 3:57:21 PM
+4 Boost
david> I'm not a Lexus owner nor do i care to be one i like my German cars and Infiniti but i must say that when a person in genaral is ask about their car almost all Lexus owners praise the machine and look forward to buying another one. I can't say the same for the German cars. People of course like their status look but all usally qualify it with a " I wish it held up better, at the dealer to many times, very touchy cars etc. So you are right it is not a shocker to see Lexus always do well in survey's, Lexus customers for the most part are their best advertisers.


Will_Will_ - 7/11/2007 4:41:33 PM
0 Boost
Survey number crunching is never appealing in my opinion. What has been proven or disproved here?


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC