What car embarrased a BMW M3 on the track?



I had the chance to attend the Cadillac drive summit (Thanks to a great heads up by one of our readers, Mohammad) and it was cool!

But the best part was the showdown between the Cadillac CTS-V and the BMW M3.

They took both cars and challenged them to a test.

Who could go from 0-100MPH and back to 0 the fastest?

The drivers were not able to start hitting the brakes UNTIL their car hit 100MPH.

They then further handicapped the CTS-V by making it go through a six cone obstacle test whill the M3 was allowed to go straight ahead as fast as it could.

Guess what happened?

I thought for sure it would be super close because the Caddy had to do the obstacle course.

Boy, was I wrong!

It SMOKED the M3!

It was faster to 100MPH AND faster stopping!

The picture you see here shows how much the M3 lost by...





We then had a chance to drive them and we were extremely impressed with the CTS-V. It was faster, larger inside and handled better than any M3 I've driven....for the same price or less depending on what deal you get!

I even like the interior appointments and ergonomics better.

That's high praise because I'm a real import snob.

If you're in the market for a current generation M-series car, you owe it to yourself to test the CTS-V.



jrsarchyjrsarchy - 7/18/2004 10:30:41 AM
+1 Boost
It's funny how a lot of people here are putting down GM and Cadillac as being dinosaurs using inferior technology but lets talk about how many people have praised BMW's 5 speed transmission as one of the best in the industry when it was made and built by GM.


rjagrjag - 11/12/2004 10:56:04 AM
+1 Boost
If GM dropped the 'Cadillac' name and just called it a CTS-V it would gain more respect. This was a set up that was so obvious. There is no way anyone is going to consider a Cadillac over a BMW, Audi, or Mercedes. If they want performance and a decent resale you stay away from N.A. vehicles. Unless its a vette of course


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC