Nine Organizations Unite In a Knock Down Battle Against Toyota

Nine Organizations Unite In a Knock Down Battle Against Toyota
Nine of the nation's leading environmental and science-based organizations targeted Toyota today for the company's opposition to legislation before Congress to set the first meaningful increase in fuel economy standards in nearly 30 years. As the producer of the hybrid Prius and other fuel-efficient vehicles, Toyota has publicly opposed a bipartisan Senate compromise to increase fuel economy standards to 35 miles per gallon fleet wide by 2020. In response, the organizations have sent a letter to Toyota North America Chairman and CEO, Shigeru Hayakawa, asking him to stop the companies lobby efforts to "weaken, delay, or eliminate" meaningful fuel economy standards.

At the same time, the groups will run a full page ad targeting Toyota in USA Today and launch a Web site, TruthAboutToyota.com, to highlight the disconnect between Toyota's public commitment to better technology and higher fuel economy and its efforts behind the scenes to block this important environmental legislation.

"Just because Toyota is taking over General Motor's market share does not mean that Toyota has to take on GM's anti-environmental lobbying practices," said Brendan Bell, Washington Representative for the Union of Concerned Scientists.

The new Web site gives owners of fuel-efficient Toyota vehicles the opportunity to send a letter to Hayakawa expressing their concern with the company's stance on fuel efficiency. In addition, consumers and Prius owners in 15 states will hold rallies at Toyota dealerships to raise questions about the company's opposition to greater fuel economy standards.

"Toyota needs to start living up to its slogan, 'moving forward' instead of driving us backward," said Philip Clapp, President of the National Environmental Trust.

In June, the Senate passed a bipartisan compromise to increase the fleet wide fuel economy of new vehicles to 35 miles per gallon by 2020. When fully implemented, the Senate bill would reduce U.S. oil consumption by 1.2 million barrels per day -- more than twice as much as is currently imported from Iraq. It would also reduce greenhouse gas emissions by more than 200 million metric tons per year in 2020; the equivalent of taking over 31 million vehicles off the road every year.

"Being seen as a green automaker has been great for Toyota's sales. The company changed the game by putting hybrid technology on the road. If Toyota expects to keep that image, they should stop lobbying against the strongest fuel economy improvement in over 30 years," said Frances Beinecke, President of the Natural Resources Defense Council.


Read Article

Agent009Agent009 - 10/11/2007 3:30:19 PM
+1 Boost
In theory if Toyota can maintain a green image and then delay the new economy standards, the competition would relax.

Then Toyota could release a salvo of ultra efficient hybrids that will effectively allow the to gain the upper hand yet again over the domestics.

Now is this savvy lobbying, or a conspiracy?


EnnNorakEnnNorak - 10/12/2007 10:26:41 AM
+1 Boost
Other car companies agree with Totyota. The left wing greenies with their pierced eyebrown and noses have nothing better to do than to make up a bunch of phoney environmental groups and take out ads to make it look like Toyota is wrong. The only fair thing to do is to raise taxes on fuel so as to curb demamd and control prices at the pump accordingly.

Toyota is not outnumbered by bona fide learned organizations. Toyota is under attack by leftist front organizations of the green movement. The green movement used to fight nuclear power in a big way but seems to have backed off a little tiny bit now. The result is pollution from coal-fired power plants that should have been clean nuclear ones to start with.

Lately, the green movement appears to oppose an international effort to demontrate clean nuclear fusion power.


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 10/11/2007 5:21:14 PM
-1 Boost
I wouldn't have been surprised if the nine corporations turned out to be GM, Ford, Chrysler, Nissan, Honda, Volkswagen, Peugeot, BMW and Daimler.


EnnNorakEnnNorak - 10/12/2007 10:31:15 AM
+1 Boost
The car comanies do not want tighter CAFE. They would rather see higher gas taxes. Politicians are too chicken to implement higher gas taxes so I would not be surprised if the greenies will get some political support for their silly propaganda.


zairnaimzairnaim - 10/11/2007 6:13:16 PM
0 Boost
why are they picking only on toyota why not the others aswell this is very unjust why not also attack the companies are doing worse than toyota like gm or ford other than picking on the greener companies


pushrod27pushrod27 - 10/11/2007 9:33:20 PM
0 Boost
Because the other companies are just regular companies. Toyota and it's press machine have made a very big deal out of their hybrids, and Toyota has been pitching itself as the green car company. If they are going to wear that hat, then they need to be consistent. Everyone knows what GM's stance is on fuel economy standards: Escalades and Suburbans. Toyota, however has been really cashing in with environmentally concious consumers because of their hybrids.


toolatetoracetoolatetorace - 10/11/2007 10:13:09 PM
0 Boost
Toyota is getting picked on for the same reason that Wal- Mart is getting picked on . You can't trust niether one of them and they don't care who the step on to get their way


enthusiastx11enthusiastx11 - 10/11/2007 6:35:39 PM
+1 Boost
this is the down side of being number one.

GM endured it for many years, now toyota has to deal with it.


sracekilisracekili - 10/11/2007 7:01:16 PM
+2 Boost
Car companies make automobiles that market demands. Instead of requiring car companies to improve gas mileage of the cars, why not change the market so that everyone demands better MPG by increasing gas tax progressively over the next 20 years or so, say, $0.50 cents every year (ok, that's a bit harsh, I know). Consumers will start buying and demanding more fuel efficent cars and trucks which forces car manufactures to meet that demand.


Fan1234Fan1234 - 10/11/2007 9:48:18 PM
+1 Boost
That would solve half the problem. The other half is still with manufacturers. Suv sales went down when gas prices went up so yes, it would solve 50% of the problem, but not completely.


sracekilisracekili - 10/12/2007 12:32:37 AM
+1 Boost
Well, my point is to let the market dictate what car manufactures need to produce in order to meet the demand rather than government to force car companies to increase fuel efficiency of the fleet.

If nobody wants a large gas guzzling SUVs, do you think companies will keep making them? If everyone wants cars that gets much better gas milage in the next 10 years than the most fuel efficent cars available today, car companies must produce them to compete in the US market place.


KingerKinger - 10/12/2007 8:39:03 AM
+1 Boost
As a European I take offense to the above statement that the "enviro-heads" are uninformed because you claim they must of been "educated in Europe". I can assure you that the rest of the world doesn't regard Americans as being some sort of inteluctual elite, quite the opposite actually. Don't get me wrong, I've got nothing against Americans, but that kind of attitude shows stupidity of the highest order.


EnnNorakEnnNorak - 10/12/2007 10:38:17 AM
+2 Boost
Kinger, don't let huu76 get you down, he often makes very ignorant statements. It is true that the general level of education in Europe is higher than what we have in North America but the U.S. and Canada do have a highly educated elite.

Our politicians do not allocate as much money to education as they should. This is a big mistake as intellectual capital is what will count in the future.


EnnNorakEnnNorak - 10/19/2007 10:52:31 AM
+1 Boost
How can the masses learn if university tuition costs more than the bread winner's annual income. Nations that fail to make massive investmnets in education will not have sufficient intellectual capital to stay in the lead in the future.


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC