Spy Shots: 600hp BMW M5 twin-turbo spotted again

Spy Shots: 600hp BMW M5 twin-turbo spotted again
You’re probably thinking, “Wow that’s one crazy looking front bumper.” And there is a really good reason why this M5 has what seems like four intakes. Of course more intakes mean more air to cool a powerful engine under the hood. This BMW M5 is said to be fitted with a V10 twin-turbo engine producing close to 600 horsepower.

While nothing has been confirmed, previous photographers who’ve caught this beast undergoing high-speed testing said that the engine sounded more powerful than the regular M5.

If produced this would be BMW’s stab at the Audi RS6 Avant which produces 580 horsepower (understating the true figure of 600hp...
Read Article

SpectatorSpectator - 10/12/2007 3:51:18 PM
+1 Boost
Probably a cost saving measure I imagine. The M6 and M5 share the same engine and the M3's engine basically is an 8 cyl offset of the V10.

It's easier to add turbos and external plumbing rather than upping the displacment of an already high revving tight tolarance engine like the ones in the M's.

Cant wait to see it though. I hope they fix the front facade...I agree it looks strange.


dlindlin - 10/12/2007 9:41:45 PM
+1 Boost
mm 5? :)


adamblackadamblack - 10/15/2007 10:22:30 PM
+1 Boost
yes i agree its looks weird but it functional..... is this go into the market lot of people will buy it


M35MTM35MT - 10/12/2007 3:49:28 PM
+1 Boost
Badass.


r_driver04r_driver04 - 10/12/2007 3:50:05 PM
+1 Boost
Bring the noise. Can wait for a twin turbo M3.


lenkunlenkun - 10/12/2007 3:53:05 PM
-5 Boost
Now BMW finally have a car that almost could competes with the AMG SL65/CL65/S65.

Hopefully it can keep up with the other 600hp vehicles such as C7 ZR-1, Viper, Ford GT, Carrera Gt, and SLR 722.


DaHarderDaHarder - 10/12/2007 4:14:43 PM
+6 Boost
"Hopefully it can keep up with the other 600hp vehicles such as C7 ZR-1, Viper, Ford GT, Carrera Gt, and SLR 722."

Ok now...

Let's get back to reality, this is a sports sedan, a wonderfully performing one, but a sports sedan non-the-less.


ThierryHenry14ThierryHenry14 - 10/12/2007 9:40:59 PM
+3 Boost
the 500 hp already goes 205 mph. catch up to what? I think it can hold its own...


DaHarderDaHarder - 10/12/2007 4:04:25 PM
+6 Boost
Still quite unfortunate in the looks department...

Question: Honestly, when will these idiotic horsepower wars end?

I, for one, drive in the real-world, where I appreciate performance for what it does to keep my vehicles in control/out of harms way.

This nonsense is nothing more than a case of 'Mine’s Bigger Than Yours' at this point… Sillyness!


85bmw745i85bmw745i - 10/12/2007 10:16:22 PM
+4 Boost
I agree, Just think if these cars had the power of their predecessors 10 years back, combined with todays technology in the engines, fuel economy ratings would be great. Hell ir a 270 hp nissan altima can hit 30 mpg on the highway, think of what an older maxima with 200hp would do with this technology on top of being much lighter. My little 85 325e is only about 121, althought I have a chip intake and exhaust so I give it about 135hp, as it is a low reving engine, and the chip bumps the rev limiter to 5,300 rpm. any way the car is quite quick, much more so than the numbers would suggest, and it will smoke all of those smaller more powerful cars its size. Why, because all cars now days are fat overweight pigs. they need to go on a diet, then they wouldn't need 270 hp to do what a 200hp car did some years back. Take for example the Ford f150. 300hp and slow. about 9 seconds 0-60 while the older 245hp lightning would do it in 7 seconds.


Htay7500Htay7500 - 10/12/2007 4:31:07 PM
+1 Boost
where in b-more?


Bmw8terBmw8ter - 10/12/2007 5:19:17 PM
+4 Boost
I-10 between San Antonio and El Paso. I don't even see what the point is in having speed limits out there....there's nothing but desert all around you for most of that stretch; you're lucky to find a gas station. They supposedly increased the speed limit out there to 80mph.


SevorbeupstryIsBackSevorbeupstryIsBack - 10/12/2007 4:41:38 PM
+2 Boost
Is BMW for real? a turbocharged M-car?


DaHarderDaHarder - 10/12/2007 5:34:11 PM
-2 Boost
Funny, I recall many stating that the Japanese resorted to turbo-charging because they didn't know how to properly design larger displacement engines, and now that BMW is doing it all's well...

Whatever!


bmwdrvrbmwdrvr - 10/12/2007 10:06:16 PM
+1 Boost
what are you talking about, and why....that doesnt even make sense the v6 in the g37 is very much the size of a small v8, and produces the power of one, why would anyone say something like that about japanese engines, wow how illogical


supermotosupermoto - 10/12/2007 4:55:31 PM
+4 Boost
Waiting for the lexus fans to say that the IS-Fugly will blow this away.


Matthew1Matthew1 - 10/13/2007 12:19:04 AM
+1 Boost
You must go to a pretty poor country club.

The one I belong to scoffs at BMW owners and calls them 'Big W's' (Big W**kers).

You only see Porsche, Bentley and Maserati in the heated car parks.


Matthew1Matthew1 - 10/13/2007 12:23:36 AM
+1 Boost
This one time a white M5 owner pulled up and we asked him why he didn't buy a Maserati instead.

He looked embarrased and said 'Yeah, that would be nice, but I couldn't quite stretch to one"

I replied: "Looks like it, every new-money douche has a M5"

Needless to say we never saw him again.



Matthew1Matthew1 - 10/13/2007 12:28:41 AM
+2 Boost
Come to think of it, it's quite sad how we at the club are so petty that we openly judge and discriminate against seemingly nice people just because their cars are lower on the prestige scale.

It does show what useless existences we really do live...

oh well, who cares? The golf's good.


Matthew1Matthew1 - 10/13/2007 12:30:00 AM
+1 Boost
Actually, the golf isn't actually THAT good....

I guess our membership fees go toward the upkeep of the heated car park elements.

Most important.


qballqball - 10/13/2007 8:35:04 AM
+2 Boost
Ha-ha......BMW chasing just little old VW's 580HP RS6.......playing catch up.


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 10/13/2007 12:39:44 PM
+1 Boost
The RS6 is apparently underrated (it has more than 600hp--that's what I've heard), so BMW will have a hard time playing catch-up if they're really doing this to copy the RS6.

amazinBimmer, of course, when the RS6 comes out with a 600hp RS6, it's a piece of crap that can't do anything. But when BMW--the God of Gods--copies them shortly after with a twin-turbo M5, it's the best sedan ever to come into existence. And we don't even know if it exists yet! How do we know it's not the next-gen M5 (on the real next-gen platform) undergoing testing?


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 10/13/2007 12:40:22 PM
+1 Boost
Aargh... when *AUDI* comes out with a 600hp RS6...


stonestone - 10/12/2007 7:31:50 PM
+2 Boost
While I am not completely convinced that there will be a turbo-charged M car, I can see the reason, the new M3 V8 and M5/6 V10 are both high strung, high revving engines but you need to be in the upper RPM range for the engines to shine. I don't think anyone would argue the fact that both engines could use a little more low end torque to satisfy the American market where you will rarely get to explore the 8K plus redline in the upper gears. Turbo charging is a quick fix for this as there will/should be gobs of torque with a couple of blowers, just look at the N54 in the 335. Many disagree with me, but the E39 M5 was just about perfect IMO, gobs of low end torque, great handling and a beautiful body.


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 10/13/2007 12:41:41 PM
+2 Boost
The E39 was an amazing car. The E60... seems a bit much. I would still buy one, though. It just doesn't make sense for me; I'd want my sedan (winter car) to be AWD, so that gives me the S6 and RS4. I would want my convertible to be RWD.


85bmw745i85bmw745i - 10/12/2007 11:38:01 PM
+1 Boost
Those two vents left and right of the license plate are fake, obviously a photoshop job. Notice the drivers side so-called scoop actually cuts into the crease while the one on the left does not cros the crease. Looks like a fabricated story to me, although I wouldn't be surprised to see the M3/5/6 gain some power to keep up eith the competition and have an edge.


Matthew1Matthew1 - 10/13/2007 12:25:38 AM
0 Boost
Great detective work there....

*rolls eyes*


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 10/13/2007 12:43:44 PM
+1 Boost
I hope the new M5 isn't turbocharged. Audi has been turbocharging their cars for years- and it's a signature. I love the new RS6. But I don't want BMW to do the same to the M5, simply because it doesn't need it. The "M" philosophy is not power, power, power, but weight, weight, weight. Or at least it should be! Why don't they just lower the weight of the current model and keep the same engine?!


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 10/13/2007 12:45:51 PM
+1 Boost
Let me add: that is true engineering. It's what Audi did with the new A4 and TT, and they don't really need new engines. It's the little things like this that just make me think BMW is losing it. This car will be a rocket... but it won't be much fun. That's how I see it. I'd rather have an RS6, because it is unabashedly turbocharged and makes the most of it. This car seems like an afterthought... because it is!


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 10/14/2007 12:25:45 AM
0 Boost
I have a passing interest in your comments, for entertainment purposes.


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 10/14/2007 12:26:17 AM
0 Boost
BTW, who do you think the M5 is driven by? Hot young chicks? LOL. No, middle-aged @ssholes like you.


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 10/14/2007 12:27:30 AM
0 Boost
One more thing- how long do you think it takes BMW to bolt on a pair of turbochargers? People have known that the RS6 would be twin-turbocharged for at least a year now, so of course BMW is responding to it.


Matthew1Matthew1 - 10/14/2007 1:13:29 AM
+1 Boost
Nope, don't drive a 911. I have a McLaren F1 as a weekend car and a Aston Martin DB9 as my daily.

250K? Chump change.

And I don't have any fat bald people at my club...


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 10/14/2007 1:24:00 PM
0 Boost
Matthew, I'm on the list for the Veyron next year. Black/white two-tone. It will be beautiful. There are already ten in my area. Are you on there?


Matthew1Matthew1 - 10/14/2007 3:50:30 PM
+1 Boost
Nice, but I'm waiting on my Pur Sang.

There's already a space reserved for it at the club.


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 10/14/2007 11:04:36 PM
+1 Boost
Oh, puh-lease, the A380 and 787 are sitting in my hangar...


Jag_xfrJag_xfr - 10/14/2007 10:40:40 AM
+1 Boost
hideous looking car...


2ndbimmer2ndbimmer - 10/15/2007 2:03:25 PM
+1 Boost
I would NOT take any maserati over the M5. The maseratis are way overated. I would take a Jaguar XK type R over any maserati. The M5 is so much more of a street legal race car than a maserati. No BMW's at the country club, that is right! My grandpas country club is full of cadillacs! Lots of old people taking it slow. No porsches either!


Matthew1Matthew1 - 10/16/2007 12:35:47 AM
+1 Boost
The new breed of Maserati's are NOT over-rated.

I'd have one just for the styling and the engine note.


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC