First Test: 2009 Nissan Murano

First Test: 2009 Nissan Murano
Nissan's in a funny place with the Murano-sales have increased every year since it went on sale, but the model was getting a little stale. Plus, new, fresh entries are overwhelming the segment: There were only a handful of crossovers five years ago-now there are easily 20-25.

The second-gen Murano looks much like the original, with some notable exceptions. There's the new front end, for example, which uses a more angular grille, narrow, sportier headlights, and a much brighter finish. It is more aggressive, yet more refined than the old front fascia. Nissan also upgraded the wheel and tire package, with the same result, and 18-inch alloys are standard, with a 20-inch option. Some differences take a little longer to notice, such as the character line along the sides and the new taillight design. Those are much more obvious when looking at photos of a 2007 (there's no 2008) next to a 2009.

With the next generation comes a new front-drive based platform -- called "D" by Nissan -- which the Murano shares with the current Altima. Also shared are the Altima's 3.5-liter V-6 and continuously variable transmission, which are similar to the first-gen Murano's. The updated VQ now puts out 265 horsepower and 248 pound-feet of torque (up from 240 and 244, respectively), and the new Xtronic CVT (also on the Altima) is also greatly improved. Yes, it still sounds like a CVT, but it reacts more quickly than it used to and feels closer to an automatic, thanks in large part to its adaptive shift control (ASC) system that helps to optimize and quicken the CVT's operation. Nissan believes ASC works so well that it decided against using a paddle shift setup found on lower line CVT-equipped vehicles like the Rogue and Sentra. Despite the obvious improvement, we still miss the manual mode the old CVT had.
Read Article

rok_altimarok_altima - 12/7/2007 2:12:01 PM
+5 Boost
Wow, big step up in the interior. Looks pretty much on par with the interior of the Lexus RX..Good job Nissan.


lexusis350lexusis350 - 12/7/2007 4:15:09 PM
0 Boost
The grille/headlights look like they came off a Ford Edge. It's not too bad or a car, though.


0to600to60 - 12/7/2007 4:35:08 PM
0 Boost
I hate the grill!


mini22mini22 - 12/7/2007 5:16:34 PM
+4 Boost
It's definately an improvement over it predecessor,especially in the interior.


DaHarderDaHarder - 12/7/2007 5:17:48 PM
0 Boost
The 1st Gen Murano was rather stunning, but the front and rear end styling of this 2nd version lacks the aesthetic 'synergy' of the original, though the interior is a vast improvement.


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 12/8/2007 12:57:25 AM
+1 Boost
Somehow I always thought the first-gen Murano was trying too hard. I never liked it, and always thought it was extremely dull. Not offensive, not attractive... just BORING.

I like the new one a lot more, especially on the inside.


EL34EL34 - 12/7/2007 8:18:37 PM
-8 Boost
Not the best looking Nissan on the block, but it's nicer looking than the GT-R ;)


maximafan1maximafan1 - 12/7/2007 8:47:39 PM
+2 Boost
shut up 1st guy that commented its not ugly just different
think out the box


lexusis350lexusis350 - 12/8/2007 1:19:28 AM
+1 Boost
You do know that you can just push "reply to this comment" don't you? That way we all know what you're talking about. Just for future reference.


Designer1Designer1 - 12/8/2007 1:16:23 AM
+2 Boost
The interior is much better than the older design, but the exterior is still ugly.


dumpstydumpsty - 12/8/2007 10:42:00 AM
+1 Boost
No, it doesn't look as polarizing as the 1st gen model. But, with its exceptional ability of losing little value over the years, it'll be a good seller.

I had been looking at Murano's (SL-AWD) and they have kept quite a bit of their original value after 3-4 years. And with transmission improvements and other other upgrades, the exterior can really be overlooked.


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC