2008 Porsche Cayenne GTS - First Drive

2008 Porsche Cayenne GTS - First Drive
Porsche has fashioned a new sports machine that comfortably seats four adults and hauls lots of luggage, but we're not referring, yet, to the Panamera Gran Turismo sedan. It won't reach showrooms until 2009, but, to the chagrin of purists who still mourn the day Porsche began building trucks, the Panamera's promised combination of performance and luxurious utility is available, right now, with the 2008 Cayenne GTS, our seat-of-the-pants choice as the best-handling SUV on the planet.

Powered by a freer-breathing, 405-horsepower version of the 385-horsepower, 4.8-liter V-8 offered in the Cayenne S, the $69,300 GTS slots neatly between the S and the 500-horsepower Cayenne Turbo in engine output and price, but its dynamic prowess makes the GTS more than just a marketing exercise. The GTS also gets down the road, paved or otherwise, with genuine Porsche spiritedness. The factory claims (conservatively, we think) 0-to-62-mph dashes of 6.5 seconds with the six-speed Tiptronic S gearbox and 6.1 seconds when equipped with the new six-speed manual (and its shorter final drive), and both models will reach 100 mph in around 15 seconds, but this more than sufficient acceleration isn't even the GTS's core strength.

The GTS instead stands out from the crowd of five Cayenne models by its handling, as we discovered on the narrow, winding roads along Portugal's rugged western coastline. It's the first Cayenne to echo Porsche sports-car practice by matching its amazing Active Suspension Management system with steel springs instead of with air suspension - but not on GTS models sold in America because of federal ride-height regulations concerning the Cayenne's classification as a light truck. U.S. models instead will get, as with the other Cayennes in the lineup, PASM combined with air suspension.
Read Article

DaHarderDaHarder - 1/2/2008 3:22:29 PM
+2 Boost
A suitable 'gap filler' for the line-up...

Now Bring On The Smaller/Sportier/better Looking Model!


pushrod27pushrod27 - 1/2/2008 4:34:29 PM
+6 Boost
You sound like worse than a fanboy. How exactly is the LX570 green? It is very heavy and has abysmal fuel mileage. Also, in what way is the LX570 sporty??? Lexus' cars don't even have properly sporting handling, so how could their 3-ton SUV propose to do so?

The fanboy exit was 2 miles back. You, my friend have clearly ventured into outright idiocy.

If it weren't for the huge profits that Cayennes brought in, Porsche wouldn't have been able to keep building 911s and Boxters.


ThierryHenry14ThierryHenry14 - 1/2/2008 5:00:00 PM
+2 Boost
well, I think the Cayanne is just as capable as any SUV out there, including the Hummer. I've seen demonstrations of it in desert sand, and the Cayanne Turbo left the X5 4.8 and Jeep Cherokee SRT behind. Its multi-purpose built, I think, giving great off road capability, while not sacraficing luxury and on-road performance.




MonkMonk - 1/2/2008 5:06:17 PM
+3 Boost
is this david989 reincarnated for the third time?


RupertRupert - 1/2/2008 5:53:45 PM
+3 Boost
Green?

GREEN??????
It has a 5.7 V8 you moron!!!!
It's on the list of the 20 cars with the worst fuel economy in Britain! It's 17th!


Htay7500Htay7500 - 1/2/2008 6:28:34 PM
+3 Boost
take your comment (MichaelTaylor) and shove it up your ass.


RupertRupert - 1/2/2008 6:39:12 PM
+2 Boost
I have found the word which sums up my feelings on this moron's comment (MT)

I am incredulous!!!


bmwdrvrbmwdrvr - 1/2/2008 7:04:20 PM
+2 Boost
there is nothing sporty about an LX, and unless you mean sporty in a Dodge Caravan Sport kinda way....nor green for that matter


BillBill - 1/3/2008 5:07:46 AM
+1 Boost
Lexus LX570 and "green"? What in the world are you smoking? I don't care what the Lexus advertisements brag about (most of it is overhyped marketing anyway), the LX570 is not green. It's only luxurious and possibly good offroad, but green and sporty? Not a chance.


DROOPYSAKKDROOPYSAKK - 1/2/2008 3:57:19 PM
0 Boost
i agree, its like Porsche sold its sole with this. but they sell so many of them that i cant blame them. but its not my style.


DaHarderDaHarder - 1/2/2008 5:03:15 PM
+4 Boost
Well...

At least selling the bottom of one's shoe/foot is far less costly (in the long run) than the selling one's Mortal SOUL.


SHOWTIMESHOWTIME - 1/2/2008 4:03:56 PM
-1 Boost
how about a Caymen GTS?


mini22mini22 - 1/2/2008 5:09:00 PM
-3 Boost
Well Porsche sold it's sole so they could keep making the 911,Boxster and now Cayman.Selling it's sole allowed it to not only remain independent but now buy majority ownership of VW.It went from a tiny little company to soon to be a major player on the automotive landscape. In fact isn't it's VW's goal to overtake Toyota by 2015.Granted this may not happen. But.... think about it for a moment. If it does overtake Toyota wouldn't that make Porsche the largest car company in the world....By the way how is the "sole" market these days?


DaHarderDaHarder - 1/2/2008 5:34:28 PM
+2 Boost
Not to be a jerk, but... It's Selling One's SOUL not SOLE -

SOUL /so?l/ - noun

1. the principle of life, feeling, thought, and action in humans, regarded as a distinct entity separate from the body, and commonly held to be separable in existence from the body; the spiritual part of humans as distinct from the physical part.

2. the spiritual part of humans regarded in its moral aspect, or as believed to survive death and be subject to happiness or misery in a life to come: arguing the immortality of the soul.

3. the disembodied spirit of a deceased person: He feared the soul of the deceased would haunt him.

4. the emotional part of human nature; the seat of the feelings or sentiments.

5. a human being; person.

6. high-mindedness; noble warmth of feeling, spirit or courage, etc.

7. the animating principle; the essential element or part of something.

8. the inspirer or moving spirit of some action, movement, etc.

9. the embodiment of some quality: He was the very soul of tact.

10. (initial capital letter) Christian Science. God; the divine source of all identity and individuality.

11. shared ethnic awareness and pride among black people, esp. black Americans.

12. deeply felt emotion, as conveyed or expressed by a performer or artist.

13. soul music.


mini22mini22 - 1/2/2008 5:59:52 PM
0 Boost
Thank you for the spelling correction.But you didn't answer what the market is for selling one's soul.


DaHarderDaHarder - 1/2/2008 7:53:06 PM
+3 Boost
I think Porsche is quite pleased with being one of the single most profitable nameplates in all of vehicle manufacturing...

What More Could A Company Want/Need?

If 'model diversification' is the key to survival, then So Be It!


AnthonyAnthony - 1/2/2008 6:39:08 PM
+1 Boost
When is that Cayenne Hybrid going to be available?


DaHarderDaHarder - 1/2/2008 7:18:08 PM
+2 Boost
It's been placed on the 'Back Burner' for now...

"Porsche has postponed plans for future hybrid models as top managers express doubts about sales. With Porsche forecasts showing no more the 5 percent market share, the Cayenne Hybrid introduction has been pushed back until 2010. As a result, Porsche sales expectations for the US market are now incorrect. Despite the Cayenne Hybrid Concept being introduced at the Frankfurt Motor Show 2007, Porsche has not given a market debut date for hybrid models.

The hybrid technology is jointly developed with Volkswagen and will be on Audi Q7 hybrid in 2008. The Cayenne, Q7 and VW Touareg are built on the same platform.

Depending on analysis, Porsche will also delay the Panamera Hybrid until 2011 at the earliest and possibly as late as 2013. The base model is coming in 2009."

http://www.worldcarfans.com/9071221.006/porsche-is-delaying-hybrid-models-until-2010


t_bonet_bone - 1/2/2008 10:53:57 PM
-1 Boost
Porsche in no way "needed" the Cayenne to stay alive. That's a PR spin created by Porsche executives. It was a greedy choice that has worked like gangbusters so they are now powerful enough to take over VW.

But...from an enthusiast POV, what the heck does a bigger, more powerful Porsche in closer ties with VW than ever have ANYTHING to do with better sportscars? Not much, I'm afraid. It's all about the money.

FWIW, Ferrari as a non-independent company owned by Fiat, has NOT sold its soul. Hmmm.


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 1/4/2008 2:11:45 AM
+1 Boost
"But...from an enthusiast POV, what the heck does a bigger, more powerful Porsche in closer ties with VW than ever have ANYTHING to do with better sportscars? Not much, I'm afraid. It's all about the money."

Yes, but without all that MONEY, they wouldn't be able to make so many amazing sports cars like they are today! Yes, Porsche would still exist without the Cayenne, but it would be in a very different state. You wouldn't be able to customize your sports car like you can now. The 911 wouldn't be available in so many different variants. The Cayman may not even be here. Think about that: a world without the Porsche Cayman... errgh.


WerksRacerWerksRacer - 1/4/2008 7:48:00 PM
+1 Boost
I think Porsche would Disagree, while they might not have "needed" the Cayenne, it IS the best-selling model they make right now, and when has that EVER been a bad thing? Porsche is a Business, Businesses need Money to make More Money.

As the Cayenne being a 'greedy choice' so that they can takeover VW. Porsche & VW have worked for years on
'common projects', think of the 914 WAY back in the late 60's. Porsche is/has increased their shares of VW, but the main reason was to keep other companies away from VW.

Re: better sportscars: I'm not sure IF you've rec'd the memo yet, but Technology costs ALOT of MONEY. $$$$
More Technology = Better Sportscars.

Maybe Ferrari hasn't sold its soul. Or maybe they did when they became part of Fiat, your opinions may vary.
BUT, until Ferrari or anyone else can say this:
"Porsche is the smallest independent car company in the world, yet we produce MORE racecars than ANY other car manufacturer in the world". I'd say Porsche's soul is just fine.


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 1/4/2008 2:08:37 AM
+1 Boost
An EX with a GT-R engine? Are you joking?


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 1/4/2008 10:46:40 PM
+1 Boost
What's your problem?

Isn't it obvious? Do I really have to explain it?

That's like putting the M3's 4.0L V8 in the X3. It just doesn't happen. I'll overlook the fact that it's absolutely unnecessary... but aside from that, it's a waste of engine. Why was the EX the first car you thought to put the GT-R's engine in? Why not the G coupe? Even the M??? Nobody wants a raised wagon (EX) with a 480hp twin-turbo six. It would be much better suited to a sedan or coupe.


henbmwhenbmw - 1/3/2008 11:25:25 AM
+3 Boost
They're going to keep lowering these SUV's until they are cars once again.


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 1/4/2008 2:07:30 AM
+1 Boost
Speaking of which, I saw a Mazda CX-7 in front of a Camry today, and they were practically the same height! The CX-7 was less than half a foot taller!


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 1/4/2008 2:06:32 AM
+1 Boost
(Sigh)

C-A-Y-E-N-N-E

B-O-X-S-T-E-R

C-A-Y-M-A-N

9-1-1 (LOL)

The Cayenne GTS is definitely interesting. I think it looks great, but I don't see much point to a truck like it, because at that price and with that performance, I would just get a sedan instead.


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC