2008 Mercedes CLS Facelift Official Released

2008 Mercedes CLS Facelift Official Released
The new-generation CLS: Fine-tuning for the design trendsetter
Mercedes-Benz is making the CLS even more irresistible. This one-of-a-kind four-door coupé – the pioneer of a whole new automotive segment – has now been fine-tuned to give it added appeal. The new entry-level model version, the CLS 280 with its sophisticated V6 power unit, develops 170 kW/231 hp. Meanwhile, the flagship model in the range – the CLS 63 AMG with its 378 kW/514 hp AMG 6.3-litre V8 engine – now comes with 19-inch AMG light-alloy wheels plus a new AMG sports exhaust system.

Understated but masterly neatly sums up the result of the restyling programme for the CLS. At the front, it is the modified radiator grille that stands out, with two louvres now instead of the previous four. The diamond-shaped, three-dimensional grilles painted in atlas grey that cover the air intakes project an even greater air of self-assurance as well as adding further emphasis to the vehicle’s width. The exterior mirrors have also been given a new look. The LED side indicator lamps that are built into them are arranged in the form of an arrow to produce a most eye-catching effect, especially in the dark. The mirror surface has furthermore been enlarged by 32 per cent to afford a clearer view of the traffic behind and thereby boost active safety.

The side view is dominated by new, attractively styled light-alloy wheels, measuring either 17 inches (CLS 280, CLS 320 CDI and CLS 350 CGI) or 18 inches (CLS 500) in diameter. When viewed from the rear, the new-generation CLS makes its mark with a new rear apron, new tail lights, as well as modified tailpipes. The centre section of the rear bumper now drops down further, while the additional light-catching contour running along it adds to the impression of breadth. This is further emphasised by the exhaust tailpipes, which are trapezoidal in shape, and not oval as before. LED technology is now deployed for the tail lights: the brake lamps, tail lamps and indicator lamps all make use of the extra-fast-reacting light-emitting diodes. Just like the side indicators in the exterior mirrors, the rear indicators look like arrows when they light up, which is particularly striking in the dark. The same is true of the optical fibres at the side, which are always activated whenever the low-beam headlamps are switched on.
A new deactivation function for the low-beam headlamps when the ignition is switched off helps to optimise energy management.

The new bodywork details harmonise perfectly with the multi-award-winning design of the CLS and make the four-door Coupé always look as if it is about to dash off. Almost four years on from its world premiere, the electrifying, muscular lines of the trendsetter are as unique and as unmistakable as ever.

New inside: three-spoke steering wheel and new telematics generation
Great attention to detail was paid while updating the interior too: modifications include a restyled leather steering wheel in a three-spoke design with multifunction buttons, as well as a new-look instrument cluster, whose white dials now contrast distinctly with the chased surface of the backplate. The previous matt laurel colour scheme has been replaced with new chestnut wood trim elements.


Read Article

HyundaiHyundai - 1/18/2008 10:39:20 AM
+4 Boost
I still don't find this car good looking. The belt line is too droopy.


0to600to60 - 1/18/2008 10:59:06 AM
+2 Boost
Yea its ugly yet sexy at the same time... I would drive it because its different.


w209w114w209w114 - 1/18/2008 12:24:46 PM
-1 Boost
Are any of the lower priced variants coming to the US?


lyonboylyonboy - 1/18/2008 1:50:42 PM
-1 Boost
I do not understand this car. Ugly, impractical and so copied. BMW, Jaguar, Audi are all coming out with 4 door coupes, but why?


LexusKindaGuy12LexusKindaGuy12 - 1/18/2008 2:14:21 PM
+3 Boost
lol seems like im the only one here that thinks this car is "da bomb".

only i cant spot any real changes from the "facelift"


merc07merc07 - 1/18/2008 3:25:43 PM
-1 Boost
no lexus ur not the only one who thinks this car is "da bomb". this car in the right color with the sports package looks amazing like sex on wheels. thats why is so copied. and thats why every other major competative luxury car comp has been working on their own cls.


tattedtwicetattedtwice - 1/22/2008 12:05:42 AM
+1 Boost
People say because something is copied doesnt mean its good looking. In this case, thats most definitely true, since this thing is disgusting. Its not that theyre copying the cls (since no company would be that stupid), its that theyre 'copying' the 4 door coupe idea. Every 4 door coupe that's been shown has blown this thing back to germany, where it should have stayed.


lyonboylyonboy - 1/18/2008 4:46:20 PM
+2 Boost
This car sells in very small numbers, less than the S class, way less than the E class. Mercedes does not need this "image" car. This is the car Mercedes said they would never build, even the CL has a better back seat than this elongated turd.


CarboyCarboy - 1/18/2008 5:34:44 PM
0 Boost
I don't like the wheel. I prefer the one before this.


cdokecdoke - 1/18/2008 9:56:56 PM
+1 Boost
"I do not understand this car. Ugly, impractical"

Well, this car is not really designed with a German aesthetic. It is quite obviously a German interpreation of an English aesthetic. This is particularly evident in the dash of the car. I harp on about this but Mercedes intended this car as a "Jag-fighter" and has made no secret of it. It is low, long and lithe- like a Jaguar. A bit impractical- a Jaguar trait as well as they are not the most roomy of cars.

I do think that they completely missed something with this car though. With a Jaguar if you have the need you can get the extended wheelbase model while no such option exists for the CLS. As a Jaguar driver, I would even consider it as a replacement based upon that alone. My family is just too tall to fit in that tiny backseat.


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 1/19/2008 3:05:25 PM
+1 Boost
Ironically, the XF was designed to compete with this car, not the other way around.

And in my opinion... the CLS actually looks more like a Jaguar than the XF does... but I'll have to see it in person. I love it, and I want to drive it, but it's not exactly what I was expecting.


cdokecdoke - 1/19/2008 7:01:03 PM
0 Boost
"I love it, and I want to drive it, but it's not exactly what I was expecting."

You don't have to tell me twice. I am expecting something spectacular with the next XJ- I hope I won't be disappointed.


AGLAAGLA - 1/18/2008 11:18:23 PM
-3 Boost
The CLS is in my opinion the most beautiful "4-door coupe" on the road! It may not be practical but that was never the intention, if you want a practical Benz you buy a E-class or if you can afford a S-class. This car is for that small segment of the population like myself, who wants a sporty 4-door even though I never have 4 passengers. This is the sportiest, sexiest 4-door on the road and that's why every car company is scrambling to release their own "4-door coupe", and so far none of them look better!

It's not for everyone but if you think out of the box you understand it!


tattedtwicetattedtwice - 1/21/2008 11:59:46 PM
+1 Boost
This thing is about as sexy as Rosie O'donnell in a thong. Not only is it outrageously hideous, it's just senseless. What are they moving, like a couple hundred a month? Either way, each one that moves mystifies me. Like lexus, I guess it's good to have silly followers who'll shell out money for anything with your badge on it.


lyonboylyonboy - 1/19/2008 1:19:22 AM
+1 Boost
Good point, there are alot of Jaguar clues with this car. Mercedes should leave poor pathetic Jaguar alone, in the US this car sells more than all the Jaguar models combined. But even with that the CLS has not met expectations and sales are alreadt declining. CLS sales make me wonder why other manufacturers are bothering, I know, if enough of these ghastly things are built the consumer will get used to the look and a new segment is born. I have been proven wrong before with cars like this over years but this style baffles me.


lyonboylyonboy - 1/19/2008 2:22:21 PM
-1 Boost
The XF will have no impact on the CLS. Has anyone noticed how heavy the XF is? I thought Jaguar was the leader in lightweight technology. The XJ is much roomier and weighs almost 400 lbs less than than the XF. The XF weighs more than the CLS550. The CLS is so far superior mechanically compared to the XF I doubt any manufacturer is too concerned about the portly XF. Why Jaguar chose to go into this small struggling segment with this must sell car baffles me. Mercedes will dominate with the CLS.


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 1/19/2008 3:10:51 PM
0 Boost
I have three points.

1. The XF is made of steel, the XJ is aluminum. Aluminum was deemed to costly to produce on an upcoming high-volume vehicle like the XF. Obviously, it drives quite well (read the reviews). Weight isn't going to be much of an issue, especially if they bring the diesel model to the US.

2. The XF is a crossover vehicle. It is not only in the CLS's class, but it competes with the E-Class also. It has much more interior space than the CLS and much more style than the E. That's a winning combination.

3. Less sophisticated? Maybe, but the XF SV8 will be about $10K less than the CLS550 with 40 more horsepower and a brilliant ZF transmission. I think it's worth it.


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 1/19/2008 3:11:10 PM
0 Boost
*TOO COSTLY... damn!


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 1/19/2008 3:12:04 PM
0 Boost
Also--as for #2, I didn't mean it was a crossover in the figurative sense (a car-based SUV). It is literally a cross-over. It is in two classes.


RupertRupert - 1/19/2008 4:51:52 PM
0 Boost
Thank god they have got rid of the awful matt wood - I hate that stuff.


AGLAAGLA - 1/19/2008 5:11:54 PM
+1 Boost
The Jaguar XF is no competition for the CLS, I've seen it in person, it looks too american (the front lights remind me of the old Chrysler 300C). There is nothing lasting about the design, Jaguar just can't seem to get it right. The only Jaguar that looks good in my opinion is the XK, everything else needs to be redesigned, that is why the company is barely afloat!


AnthonyAnthony - 1/19/2008 6:08:11 PM
+1 Boost
You really have to see this car in person to appreciate it. It is one of the most unique designs on the road today, AND its low volume/sales numbers only add to the exclusivity of it.


lyonboylyonboy - 1/19/2008 8:35:31 PM
-3 Boost
There is no excuse for the XF to be so FAT. The XF is made of steel, WHOA! The A6, 5 Series and E-Class must be made of plastic. These other cars are roomier and weigh alot less. I have seen the XF in the flesh 3 times. At both the San Francisco and San Jose Auto Shows the XF drew very little attention. In London in September it had a good crowd but then again it was at the London Eye. I think the XF will be declared a dud in 12 months. The CLS and the new BMW and Mercedes will not even know the XF is there.


Jagexpert2Jagexpert2 - 1/20/2008 9:50:23 PM
+1 Boost
I beg to differ on the other cars being much roomier. See the competative comparison at my web site. You haven't done your homework as usual.


http://www.jaguarnewswire.com/2008/01/jaguar-newswire-exclusive-xf.html



mercuryguymercuryguy - 1/20/2008 4:03:46 PM
0 Boost
Beware of chopped roofs. The Chrysler 300 is riddled with blind spots and terrible rear view visibility.


Jagexpert2Jagexpert2 - 1/20/2008 9:52:17 PM
+2 Boost
Oh and by the way the weight is offset by better torque numbers




lyonboylyonboy - 1/21/2008 2:05:42 PM
0 Boost
Go sit in the competition, numbers do not tell the story. The XF back seat is too low to the floor, visibility for backseat passengers is a problem. The XF has a nice trunk. Exit and entry from the rear of the XF is clumsy. The rear seat in the XF is worst in class in an overweight car. I predict poor sales.


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC