TCC Drives: 2008 Audi Q7

TCC Drives: 2008 Audi Q7
This week’s test drive in the TCC South garage is Audi’s Q7 sport-ute, outfitted with a Premium package.

The Q7 is our clear favorite, compared to the utes that share its running gear, the Porsche Cayenne and the Volkswagen Touareg. The Q7’s the only one with a third-row option, for one, and its suave styling trumps the plain look of the Touareg and the dowdy, ungainly Cayenne. And when we road tested it last year, we favored the Q7 over the BMW X5, saying “Despite its beefy stats and tons of equipment, Audi’s first true SUV is a lighter, nimbler piece than its data sheet spells out. Among its colleagues, only the Range Rover Sport approaches its sense of style and deft blend of on- and off-road personalities.”

It holds true in the 2008 model year, as the Audi’s luxe interior continues to impress us, and the pals we chum around in it. The Q7 has stunning interior materials for a sport-ute. The carpeting in the cargo area is better than most “custom-built” homes we saw while gawking this month, and they’re bordered in high-quality trim, with bits of chrome even apparent behind the second-row seats. I’m not a big user of third-row seats, but with them folded down the Q7’s cargo hold would easily swallow two weeks’ worth of luggage.

This time around, we found a little less to like about the six-speed Tiptronic automatic. It’s a little quick to dodge around the gears, and the throttle tip-in it set to feel quick–but it can feel jumpy in city-street driving.

Another disappointment in any SUV of this size is fuel economy, and in this the Audi’s doesn’t disappoint. City mileage is tagged at 12 mpg — and on the highway it doesn’t get much better, at 17 mpg.

My test vehicle carried a base price of $59,375, with a generous helping of standard gear ladled on, including a navigation system, the third-row seat, Sirius, a rearview camera, and a power tailgate. Options including an air suspension, a panorama sunroof, chrome wheels and voice-activated navigation, pulled the tally to $66,775.

If that tab for the Q7 doesn’t make you blink, the few minor quibbles we have with its transmission should be easy enough to overlook. But Land Rover’s Range Rover Sport is a good alternative in this sky-high price range.
Read Article

buxie1buxie1 - 1/25/2008 10:41:40 AM
+2 Boost
Having driven a 2004 Cayenne Turbo 52k miles and a Q7 4.2 19k miles I can tell you that if Audi could just fix all their glitches (radio, tailgate, door handles etc) with the vehicle then your review would be correct, but my car has been in for service so many times that I have given up on repairing it and am going to purchase another Cayenne.


IamEvilHomerIamEvilHomer - 1/25/2008 10:40:54 PM
+1 Boost
so far the Q7 has been a very good car. Maybe you have a car build during Octoberfest


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 1/25/2008 10:46:40 AM
+2 Boost
I wouldn't say the RR Sport competes with this car... the Land Rover is even worse on gas, slower, isn't available with a third-row seat and has a cheaper interior.


M35MTM35MT - 1/25/2008 12:26:26 PM
+1 Boost
In this class vehicles, I like the RR Sport and Q7 the best. I'd expect electrical glitches from both (especially the LR). I pick the RR Sport based on styling and the fact that I dont need a third row, also, its more capable off road. The Q7 is the more sensible decision, however.

I have heard negatives comments about the RR Interior quality, although I do like the design. Audi interiors are always top notch.

And I agree about the Cayenne, it doesnt appeal to me at all.


LarryLarry - 1/25/2008 11:06:00 AM
+2 Boost
S4, correct me if I am wrong, you did choose a X5 over the Q7? why didn't you buy the Q7?


KZ258KZ258 - 1/25/2008 3:04:13 PM
0 Boost
his wife made him lol whipped!


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 1/26/2008 11:34:26 AM
+1 Boost
No.

We didn't want a 200in boat like the Q7. We only drove the X5, Cayenne S and RR Sport HSE (in the SUV section).


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 1/26/2008 11:35:16 AM
+1 Boost
BTW, it's her car. She chooses what she wants. I was very happy with her decision.

Just like how I choose what I want. If she had a say, I'd be driving another A6 right now.


BFABSBFABS - 1/25/2008 2:47:44 PM
+2 Boost
I bought a Q7 in may last year for my wife and I can tell you we have not had a single problem with the car. Her's is a 3.6 though and it now has 23000 miles on it. The gas mileage is generally around 18.7 mpg but we got 23.1mpg on a 3hr journey to the beach. I did not even consider the RR sports because it had no third row seat and it's so thirsty and slow for a V8 (0-60 8.0 secs compared to 7.9 secs on the V6 Audi. I considered the GL450 and LR3 but i figured that in 5 years time gas guslers may be very unpopular so when it's time to sell, people might shy away from the Big-looking truck (visually the LR3 and GL450 look much bigger than the Q7 but they are actually smaller. The GL450 is 0.1" shorter) Also the Q7, to me, looks beautiful and masculine as the same time. I considered the MDX for a second and then figured that every tom, dick and harry is going to have one because it is so popular. No regrets here, but I may consider buying the diesel version or hybrid version one year after it come out.


speedmasterspeedmaster - 1/25/2008 7:39:27 PM
+1 Boost
Out of the VAG trio, I like the Q7 over the VW & Porsche. Howevever, I'll stick with my Range Rover Sport (despite it being slow).

I can go offroad and I actually tow with it every 3 weeks for my business. When the MILF in the Cayenne Turbo sees me in my Rover towing my rig, I get phone calls and looks all the time.




BFABSBFABS - 1/25/2008 8:58:09 PM
+3 Boost
True, the RR sport can go off road, but I bet you did not know the Q7 v6 can tow 6000 pounds.


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC