2005 Nissan 350Z Roadster vs. 2005 Ford Mustang GT Convertible
Rumble In The Desert: Rival icons from Japan and the United States join the fight for superiority in the valley of death
Read Article
ericisamazing335 -
2/17/2008 2:48:53 AM
+2 Boost
2005?? really....
EL34 -
2/17/2008 3:27:47 AM
0 Boost
One looks like a bitchin' car and the other looks like a bathtub.
Can you tell which is which?
EL34 -
2/17/2008 12:25:55 PM
-1 Boost
A Mustang is a redneck car???
If you go to Liberal Los Angeles, Chicago or New York you will see a lot of Mustangs on the streets.
Please!
Htay7500 -
2/17/2008 1:45:17 PM
+1 Boost
conv mustangs are for girls.
Designer1 -
2/17/2008 7:11:19 AM
0 Boost
The Z is much more of a car than the Mustang, although the interior quality of both is the same crap.
rocker -
2/17/2008 9:00:03 AM
+3 Boost
Oh I get it. Since neither has had a refresh since 2005, why waste time on getting a new test with new cars when you can use the staffers vehicles and cut costs to do an article. Cost cutting at its finest. Go Nissan, Go Ford. Keeping things stale.
KZ258 -
2/17/2008 9:56:59 AM
+4 Boost
this article is really old....why even post it?
jeffgall -
2/17/2008 11:14:27 AM
+5 Boost
This article was in Motor Trend in 2005. I still have the issue. Why is this posted now?
BimmerFan -
2/17/2008 11:52:49 AM
+1 Boost
The editors must be sleeping to let these old archive articles into Autospies.
1BadMan -
2/17/2008 1:46:18 PM
0 Boost
Talking about 2 cars that are three model years old? And the point is? Mustang with it's Playschool interior. And the 350Z aka the Japanese Corvette! Someone must a discussion about their ride?
DROOPYSAKK -
2/17/2008 4:45:41 PM
+2 Boost
this 2008 talk to me about cars that matter
lyonboy -
2/18/2008 7:34:08 PM
+1 Boost
Both of these cars are overweight and too big for there interior room and peformance.
Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC