BMW Reveals It's Vision Efficient Dynamics Hybrid-Diesel X5 Concept

BMW Reveals It's Vision Efficient Dynamics Hybrid-Diesel X5 Concept

Offering an insight into the future of BMW’s innovative EfficientDynamics technologies

The Geneva Motor Show (4 – 16 March) will mark the world premiere of the BMW Vision EfficientDynamics, a concept car designed to showcase the future direction of BMW’s performance enhancing and emissions lowering innovations. Mild ActiveHybrid technology is combined with a twin-turbocharged four-cylinder diesel engine, a new eight-speed automatic gearbox and even roof-mounted solar panels, and all shrouded in a BMW X5 body.

All of these technologies combine to deliver the best fuel economy and lowest emissions of any large 4×4 currently on sale. The BMW Vision EfficientDynamics delivers 43.5mpg on the combined cycle and just 172g/km of CO2 emissions. However, these frugal figures do not translate into low performance figures. With its twin-turbocharged two-litre diesel engine delivering more than 100hp per litre, the BMW Vision EfficientDynamics concept completes the sprint from zero to 62mph in just 8.9 seconds, a time faster than most current production competitors.

The 2.0-litre four-cylinder diesel engine in the BMW Vision EfficientDynamics uses BMW’s Variable Twin Turbo concept, third-generation common-rail injection and an all aluminium crankcase to deliver 204hp and 400Nm of torque between 2,000 and 2,250rpm. The engine is supplemented by a mild hybrid concept that delivers a further 20hp and 210Nm of torque under acceleration. As a consequence, even though the BMW Vision EfficientDynamics features a relatively small capacity engine, it delivers nearly the same levels of horsepower as the conventional X5, but offers improvements in its already class-leading consumption and emissions figures.

The mild hybrid solution in the BMW Vision EfficientDynamics uses a compact generator that, for the first time, is flange mounted directly onto the gearbox. This motor produces up to 20hp of on-demand power. In addition, BMW’s now familiar Brake Energy Regeneration is used to efficiently capture energy that would previously have been lost when the engine is on overrun. Innovatively, the alternator is also integrated into the crankcase rather than conventionally driven from the front of the engine.

BMW’s concept uses highly efficient lithium-ion batteries in the boot area to store the power generated. These high-storage-capacity batteries enable optimum use of Brake Energy Regeneration. In addition, they create possibilities to power the air conditioning, electric coolant pump and the electric power steering system. For these functions, a 120 volt vehicle power system was designed and runs in parallel with the conventional 12 volt system.

The power harnessed by the batteries is also supplemented by roof mounted photovoltaic solar panels, measuring 1.0 metre square. The energy generated can either be used immediately or stored for later use. Importantly, the power created in this zero- CO2 way can be used to pre-heat the diesel fuel. The less efficient warm-up phase is thus shortened considerably.

This innovative and technologically advanced engine is directly mated to a new eight- speed automatic transmission. Developed jointly between BMW and ZF, the new gearbox delivers fast and efficient gear changes. With such a spread of gears, the car will always be in exactly the right ratio for the prevailing driving conditions. It also improves fuel consumption and minimises emissions.

The chassis and ride-height of the X5 have been adapted for the BMW Vision EfficientDynamics. This includes aerodynamically-efficient 19-inch light alloy wheels with reduced ventilation. The design of the spokes reduces wind resistance to the extent that, at 100mph, the car has to produce one horsepower less than a conventionally-wheeled car. This benefit has not been included in the fuel consumption calculations but, on the road, the impact is noticeable.

 



bmwfan1513bmwfan1513 - 2/21/2008 4:14:54 PM
+7 Boost
Cool.


MZautoMZauto - 2/21/2008 4:15:57 PM
-11 Boost
Cool, but why not gas-hybrid?


mscottc1mscottc1 - 2/21/2008 4:28:16 PM
+8 Boost
ummm, torque......


mscottc1mscottc1 - 2/21/2008 4:31:42 PM
+7 Boost
and, yes more efficiency. All this from a significantly smaller powerplant than would be necessary if gasoline powered.


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 2/21/2008 7:47:51 PM
+4 Boost
Not to mention that a normal hybrid X5 (which will probably be coming anyway) would only get a miniscule fuel economy advantage over a gas-powered six-cylinder X5. This vehicle is WAY more efficient in both an engineering regard and in terms of fuel economy.


ThierryHenry14ThierryHenry14 - 2/21/2008 4:19:16 PM
+8 Boost
great... I love to see innovation. The only thing is BMW has to market its diesel-based products more in the US.


ThierryHenry14ThierryHenry14 - 2/21/2008 4:52:53 PM
+2 Boost
I'm sure they will, but for those that require a 7 seater or needs to carry around things, why not try to save fuel? I'm sure a 43mpg hybrid SUV is a lot more efficient than a 18mpg SUV. If you have to get a SUV, might as well get one that will get you further on one gallon of fuel.


ThierryHenry14ThierryHenry14 - 2/21/2008 5:15:42 PM
+2 Boost
thats understandable, for I am a sport sedan and sports car kinda guy myself, who do not really understand those people who buys SUVs as a fad, instead of actually needing its capabilities...


RupertRupert - 2/21/2008 4:48:18 PM
+3 Boost
Wow.
Plus its using the 2.0 TT diesel from the 123d...including the hybrid stuff do you think they would call it the X5 2.3d TT HybridPowerXdrive SolarVision SAV? Or perhaps something a little easier...


autoproautopro - 2/21/2008 5:24:27 PM
-3 Boost
Hybrid sucks when Lexus makes it but let bmw make one and its cool.What are you guys democrats.


RupertRupert - 2/21/2008 6:18:41 PM
+3 Boost
Petrol-hybrids suck, diesel-hybrids do not.


1970toyotamarc1970toyotamarc - 2/21/2008 6:47:56 PM
+3 Boost
and how many diesel hybrids have you driven???


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 2/21/2008 7:49:34 PM
+1 Boost
1970toyotamarc, are you serious? That was weak. Isn't it obvious?

I thought you were an advocate of new green technology, no matter who it comes from. So why are you trying to defend Toyota here when this technology is superior?


AE86AE86 - 2/22/2008 2:52:47 AM
-1 Boost
Rupert, I am afraid to break it to everyone, even diesel hybrids suck. If this gets 40+ mpg with the weight of the hybrid system, imagine what it could get if they left that dead weight at the curb!


1970toyotamarc1970toyotamarc - 2/22/2008 11:32:59 AM
-1 Boost
Look, the future may include cleaner diesels mated to hybrid engines. Maybe, who knows. I still think that getting over emissions issues will be too great a hurdle, not to mention prohibitive costs. But my problem is not with the technology itself. In fact, I dont even have a huge problem with the cleaner diesel vehicles, (if and when they ever show up, and in the right application.) My problem is with fanboys and hybrid haters bashing every Toyota hybrid, then jumping with glee when a Euro brand says they have a diesel hybrid. We havent seen any of these diesel hybrids in a practical application, do not know their performance capabilities, their true mpg savings or their emissions. But all the Euro boys act like its the next coming when a mfr just brings out a concept. The gasoline hybrids are here, they are good, and they keep getting better. These concepts, pre-production vehciles, or whatever else you want to call them are still not ready for prime time.


tecnopolistecnopolis - 2/21/2008 6:28:24 PM
+2 Boost
This is why I love German cars!


1970toyotamarc1970toyotamarc - 2/21/2008 6:47:25 PM
0 Boost
hybrid....
8 speed auto....

hmmm......


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 2/21/2008 7:50:07 PM
+3 Boost
DIESEL-hybrid with a 2.0L engine.

That's pretty incredible if you ask me. Not only that, but it looks sweet...


enthusiastx11enthusiastx11 - 2/22/2008 2:41:26 AM
0 Boost
the similarities end there.

43.5mpg.
good looking.
fun to drive.
driven by people under 65.
they're not all silver.


RupertRupert - 2/22/2008 12:40:06 PM
+3 Boost
8.9 isn't acceptable? What kind of weird world do you live in??


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 2/21/2008 7:50:18 PM
0 Boost
This could be my wife's next car.


BMW4me4everBMW4me4ever - 2/21/2008 8:28:57 PM
+4 Boost
I am going to get the diesel X5 when my lease expires on my 330xi ... BMW ahead of the curve, wouldnt expect anything less.


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 2/23/2008 5:00:24 PM
+1 Boost
It can almost run with an Audi Q7 3.6...


rspectrspect - 2/21/2008 11:04:37 PM
+3 Boost
dig the wheels.


sholemonsholemon - 2/21/2008 11:08:56 PM
+4 Boost
45mpg is awesome for a vehicle that size.

i'm tired of these hybrids getting 23mpg, sure its better than their non hybrid counterparts, but 45?!...now we're getting somewhere.


hybridfarcehybridfarce - 2/21/2008 11:30:40 PM
+3 Boost
I read about the electric motor mounted inside the transmission (to save weight and space) over a year ago (probably on this site), and it looks like it'll be reality with this car. This is an ingenious solution to make practically any car a hybrid without sacrificing the normal layout of drivetrain components. I wonder how BMW will compensate on their 50-50 balance with Li-Ion batteries in the back.


ThierryHenry14ThierryHenry14 - 2/22/2008 10:32:47 AM
+2 Boost
its mindsets like yours that makes things unacceptable. There are many Americans who are willing to conceed slower 0-100kph for way better kpg.


RupertRupert - 2/22/2008 12:41:20 PM
+2 Boost
And considering the number of people that bought a Prius with a 0-60 of 10.5 I think Americans worry less about acceleration than we think.


RupertRupert - 2/22/2008 4:29:08 PM
+2 Boost
However, as Lexus often state, the hybrid power train does result in faster 0-60. A 2.0d X5 would be quite slow (as in 10 seconds plus), and also the engines are not the same - the X3 uses a single turbo 2.0 diesel, with about 170 hp - this hybrid has a 2.0 twin turbodiesel, with 204 hp.
I realise I have completely contradicted myself, but whatever.
8.9 - not slow
10 - slow in a luxury car.

Your comparison does show up somethign very interesting. Just by downsizing and saving weight, one can get equivalent performance and MPG to a larger hybrid.
This car is starting to make less sense - the 3.0 diesel X5 currently on sale does 0-60 in 8.0 seconds (quicker than this), gets 35 imperial mpg (compared with 43), and emits 214 g/km CO2 (vs 172). For thge expected cost of the X5 hybrid, to me the 3.0d is a much better bet, and if you want better performance, the 3.0sd (twin turbo), gets the 34 MPG, 216 g/km CO2 and does 0-60 in under 7 seconds. Why bother with this hybrid with a 2.0d?


M53RM53R - 2/22/2008 7:06:06 AM
+1 Boost
Still 36 mpg is impressinve. I cant wait until they put the system into something smaller, like a 3 series or even a 1 series. Now thats innovation!


ShahanShahan - 2/22/2008 9:11:28 AM
-1 Boost
BMW has done it again!!!!


1970toyotamarc1970toyotamarc - 2/22/2008 5:03:24 PM
0 Boost
they havent done anything....do I have to say it again...please dont make say it again....Ive been saying it all week.....IT'S A CONCEPT.


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 2/23/2008 5:03:59 PM
+1 Boost
But what would you be saying if it was a Lexus concept?


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC