Comparison Test: 2008 Pontiac G8 GT vs. 2008 Dodge Charger R/T

Comparison Test: 2008 Pontiac G8 GT vs. 2008 Dodge Charger R/T
You'll recall the G8 isn't the first rear-drive Aussie import to wear a Pontiac badge. For 2004, the wide-track division launched the Holden Monaro-based GTO coupe stateside. Though fortified with a 350-horse Corvette V-8 (later upgraded to the 400-horse LS2), an available six-speed manual transmission, and a smooth, deft chassis, the GTO ultimately proved too restrained for musclecar purists. Sales never came close to targets; GM pulled the plug in 2006.

Judging by its L.A. reception, the G8 has the "too restrained" issues licked. The base car-powered by a DOHC, 256-horse, 3.6-liter V-6 mated to a five-speed automatic-wears the same rippling bodywork as its more potent GT sibling; 18-inch aluminum wheels are standard. Outside, the GT adds quad stainless-steel exhaust tips fed by its standard 6.0-liter, 361-horsepower V-8 (with cylinder deactivation). An optional Sport package tacks on 19-inch alloy wheels with summer performance tires (plus metallic pedals and a leather-wrapped wheel). It's a winning blend of Euro elegance and American flash. The G8 has some Audi, even some M3 in its lines, but it's a refreshingly distinctive design. "Sweet car!" is how most onlookers put it. Their enthusiasm soared when we revealed the price: The well-equipped base G8 starts at $27,595, while the mighty GT lists at just $29,995-making it, Pontiac execs point out, the most powerful automobile available in the U.S. for under 30 grand. More impressive, the G8 GT even undercuts the GTO, which arrived four years ago bearing a $33,000 window sticker.

Dodge's worthy rival, the Hemi-powered, 340-horse Charger R/T, gets minor freshening for 2008. A neater instrument panel houses a newly optional MyGIG infotainment system with hard drive for storing MP3s and photos. Also new is available Sirius Backseat TV offering three live channels (Nickelodeon, Disney, and Cartoon Network). Our test car wore the available Road/Track performance package: additional side airbags, spoilers front and rear, an upgraded suspension with self-leveling shocks, 20-inch performance tires on chrome rims, and -- our favorite -- spectacular heated front buckets with suede inserts. The performance package is highly recommended, transforming the Charger into the sedan it's meant to be -- studlier, more intimidating -- but it adds nearly $4000 to the bottom line. Our test car checked in at a stiff $36,900.

We're spoiled. These days, a V-6 Camry can dust the sprint to 60 mph in just over six seconds. So brawny sport sedans sporting high-output V-8s ought to knock your Nikes off, right? Yes and no. Slam down on the Charger's right pedal and, its Hemi and five-speed automatic teaming in full fury, it'll hit 60 in 5.5 seconds. Feels impressive for such a big car. The G8 GT is quicker, reaching 60 mph in just 5.3 seconds, but somehow the Pontiac left us wanting more; it's almost too subdued. Seems Pontiac could've easily wrung more than 361 ponies from a 6.0-liter mill, and the addition of a sixth cog in the gearbox should've contributed to a wider performance gap. Also, we still remember the 400-horse 2005 GTO, which easily sprinted to 60 in under five seconds. Undoubtedly, the new G8 suffers from the constraints of CAFE creep. Stay tuned, though: Pontiac execs hint that, when a six-speed manual becomes optional later this year, a specially tuned V-8 may come with it.
Read Article

DaHarderDaHarder - 2/25/2008 3:53:13 PM
+5 Boost
Both very good sedans, but I much prefer the 'tidier' European inspired dimensions of the Pontiac G8 over the Dick Tracy-Esque Brawniness/Bulk of The Dodge...


xlr8xlr8 - 2/25/2008 4:04:26 PM
+7 Boost
A U.S. HOLDEN for under 30k...yes please!!!


PlanBPlanB - 2/25/2008 4:33:24 PM
+4 Boost
As soon as he said the G8's stability control can be turned completely off and not the Dodge, I knew which car was gonna win this battle.


2ndbimmer2ndbimmer - 2/25/2008 5:25:11 PM
+6 Boost
I would definately take the G8 over the bloated charger. I like the line of site you get on the G8 vs. the charger (you have to look over the hood, not down it)


bmwdrvrbmwdrvr - 2/25/2008 8:17:12 PM
+2 Boost
im confused edmunds just tested these to cars, and the way that review went it was no contest at all. The G8 wiped the floor with the charger, it was more refined, faster, more powerful, handled better everything about it was better and at about the same size as say an a6 or 5 series with interior room to compare with the charger at over 200inches thats not bad....this was an off reviews


bmwfan1513bmwfan1513 - 2/25/2008 8:51:21 PM
+2 Boost
I like both of them but if I had to choose, I would pick the G8.


farabira1farabira1 - 2/25/2008 10:26:18 PM
+3 Boost
The G8 is a rebadged Holden VE SS Commodore, the first car that Holden had designed and engineered completely in Australia without GM intrusion. Holden has been a part of GM since 1931. Ironically, it is the Australian subsidiary of GM that has made the best bang for buck car in the whole of GM line up. The G8 is an awesome car, but to call it American will be a mistake, because none of the engineering was done or borrowed from GM's usual Opel platform. The older generation Holden cars' chasis were based on Opels, but this new commodore and thus the G8 was designed completely in Australia. And the Engine is an Alloytec V6 also made in Australia, not sourced from any GM engine. Americans really can't make cars. Only exception so far is the CTS and the 1967 Mustang, and offcourse the Corvette. Other than that not much.


Matthew1Matthew1 - 2/25/2008 10:46:00 PM
+2 Boost
Not entirely true.

The VE Commodore range was designed from the outset to be a 'world' car, so its engineering and styling could be easily modified for different markets. From the outset this was going to be sold in the US, and thus some of its development work was done stateside, utilising GM's engineering and testing facilities.

The Alloytec V6 was a JOINT co-operation between GM America, Holden Australia and FIAT. (SAAB was also involved in the development of the turbo-charged version, a 2.5 litre found in both the 9-3 and Opel Vectra OPC.)

While the majority of the car was designed in Australia, GM utilised its world-wide engineering pool to develop the car.





ILikeLamboILikeLambo - 2/26/2008 1:23:01 AM
+2 Boost
and you are a wanker who has never heard of bang for buck


StickShiftCamryStickShiftCamry - 2/27/2008 1:21:09 AM
-1 Boost
Charger will always have a timeless "mean and aggressive" look, but less than $30,000. and manual for the plasticky looking G8=sold.


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC