Consumer Reports Proves Reliability Is Only A Part Of The Car Purchasing Equation

Consumer Reports Proves Reliability Is Only A Part Of The Car Purchasing Equation
A cheaper car can cost consumers more in the long run compared with a more expensive alternative, according to Consumer Reports' new owner-costs comparisons, which appear in the Annual April Auto Issue. In fact, says CR, a car's sticker price doesn't tell the whole story.

At about $17,500, a Mitsubishi Lancer could cost $5,000 less than a Mini Cooper to drive home. But considering the total costs of ownership for each car, the Lancer could cost drivers around $3,000 more over the first five years. A Toyota Highlander can cost $3,000 more to purchase than a V6 Ford Explorer, but owning the Ford after five years can end up costing an
additional $6,500.

Consumer Reports recommends that in addition to looking for a good deal on their next car, car shoppers also consider how much the model will cost them to own. To help consumers; CR is introducing new owner-cost estimates in the April issue which can help consumers compare models and possibly save thousands of dollars. CR's estimates include depreciation, fuel costs, interest, insurance, maintenance and repair, and sales tax. Because depreciation is factored into the estimates, CR assumes that the vehicle will be traded in after five years.

The cost of vehicle ownership for 262 cars is available in the Annual April Auto issue of Consumer Reports, which hits newsstands on Tuesday,  March 4. Online subscribers to http://www.ConsumerReports.org can compare the costs for one, three, five, and eight years of ownership.

"CR's cost of vehicle ownership comparisons are useful to consumers because they provide a benchmark for car shoppers to compare the total costs of their choices over time," said Rik Paul, automotive editor,  Consumer Reports.

CR's calculations in seven common automotive categories show that the most expensive vehicle to run for five years is the Mercedes-Benz S550 at about $101,750. CR's calculated that the least expensive vehicle to run over five years was the Toyota Yaris with a manual transmission, at about $23,250.

Costs vary among similar models

In analyzing ownership costs, CR made some notable discoveries:


-- Most Lexus models have relatively high maintenance and repair costs (primarily due to maintenance), despite excellent reliability. The Lexus ES350 racks up an average of $2,300 in maintenance and repair in the first five years, about twice what a consumer would pay for a Lincoln MKZ.

-- The Toyota Prius hybrid actually costs less to own than similar conventional models. The Prius costs about $7,500 more to buy than a similarly sized Chevrolet Cobalt, but costs almost $2,000 less over five years.

Calculating the Costs

CR's cost-of-ownership ratings comprise six main factors:

Depreciation is the largest cost factor by far. To calculate depreciation, CR starts with the price that a typically equipped model sells for; if a model often sells at a large discount CR factors that into the price. From that figure, CR deducts the wholesale trade-in value of the car at the end of the period, based on data from CR's Used Car Price Service. The average model depreciates about 65 percent over five years. When CR doesn't have depreciation data for a new model, it uses estimates based on comparable vehicles.

Fuel costs can really add up, especially for SUVs. Drivers could pay more than $10,000 to fill up a Dodge Nitro over five years, for example, while a similar-sized but more-efficient RAV4 V6 could save consumers $2,000 during that time. To calculate fuel costs, CR assumes the vehicles are driven 12,000 miles a year, the average reported by survey respondents. To that, CR applies the national average price of regular gas as of December 2007, or the price of premium or diesel fuel if applicable.

Interest is tied directly to vehicle price. It's calculated based on a five-year loan, the typical financing term. CR assumes a 15 percent down payment and uses the average interest rate of 6.86 percent as reported by Bankrate.com in December 2007.

Insurance costs vary depending on many factors, including drivers' age, location, and driving record. And they can dramatically boost ownership costs of models that would otherwise seem affordable. Costs are derived from data from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.

Maintenance and repair makes up about 4 percent of ownership costs on average over the first five years, according to data from 675,000 Consumer Reports and ConsumerReports.org subscribers who responded to the online version of CR's Annual Car Reliability Survey. Respondents supplied estimated costs for the past year, excluding tires, and their responses
provided data for more than 300 models up to eight years old. CR used estimates based on similar models when data was unavailable. CR found that the Range Rover is the most expensive vehicle on average for 5 and 8 years for maintenance and repairs, costing about $2,000 in the fifth year alone. The comparable Toyota Land Cruiser, on the other hand, costs only $600 in that year.

Sales tax costs owners roughly as much as maintenance and repair does. CR uses the national average of 4.83 percent.



commander104commander104 - 2/29/2008 11:42:27 AM
+2 Boost
i know many feedbackers don't have a high opinion of CR but it's good to know what the cost of ownership is beyond that sticker--just add cost to insure into the equation to get a better perspective in choices.



EnnNorakEnnNorak - 2/29/2008 5:04:24 PM
+1 Boost
I attribute a lot of cost to cars that fail me in comfort. Reliability is my next important issue as time is money and an unreliable car wastes the owner's time. Durability is also important because I want my car to last long so as to minimize the number of times I have to put up with sales idiots. If resale value is a problem, one can always just run the car into the ground and beat the system that way.


kpaxxkpaxx - 2/29/2008 12:29:13 PM
+5 Boost


CR holds no credibility with me...every car I have purchased in the recommended list has been a POS. How am I supposed to believe their any of their data


XYZZXYZZ - 3/3/2008 4:50:54 AM
+1 Boost

actually, it is NOT that big a deal for a car to get the CR "recommended" rating. the bar is not set very high AT ALL.

basically the ONLY things that disqualify a car from getting on a CR "Recommended" list, are 1) a poor Safety rating from either the Insurance Institute OR the fed's crash tests; and 2) having Below Average reliability. Neither provides a very high bar.

conversely, a CR "Not Recommended" will not mean a great deal to many people either. not as many people put as high a priority on Safety as CR does (esp. among enthusiast types. and imho, lack of ABS and VSC don't mean shit for any competent driver.)

and many people put up with less than stellar reliability, if a car has compensating features. for example the reliability of Benzes on average are such that NO MB model gets a CR recommendation. but you don't see MB going out of bizness in america.

the one service CR provides that is unique (and earns them brickbats from certain folks) is their comprehensive LONG-TERM reliability studies. for people who just HATE unscheduled visits to the shop, the CR surveys do indeed, provide an industry GOLD STANDARD. (as Business Week called it.)

so one can get any of MANY "CR recommended" cars and still have a mediocre product. or one can use the recommended list as just a STARTING POINT and make the best selection for one's OWN preferences, whatever they may be.








XYZZXYZZ - 3/1/2008 5:09:59 AM
0 Boost
"-- Most Lexus models have relatively high maintenance and repair costs (primarily due to maintenance), despite excellent reliability. The Lexus ES350 racks up an average of $2,300 in maintenance and repair in the first five years..."


this makes me wonder if just maybe, with few or no repairs EVER needed, the SCHEDULED maintenance for Lexi are INFLATED so the service depts can at least pay the mechanics.

this works out to $460/year. of the more than dozen camry owners i know, none have EVER had to pay that much! (granted, they don't pay Lexus shop rates. and few have the v6.)

of all the toyotas i've owned over the years, not counting tires, i have never paid more than $400 either for any FIVE YEAR period. these cars ARE TRULY, "just put in gas and go" near maintenance free.

the low cost of owning a Yaris on the other hand, is entirely believable.




bambamsdbambamsd - 3/1/2008 1:59:20 PM
+1 Boost
I went and looked at the Honda Civic after reading about it on CR. I bought one the same day and have never been happier with my decision! I haven't had one problem with it in the two years that I've owned it.


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC