Truckers Ask For Fuel Price Relief And Possible Lower Speed Limits

Truckers Ask For Fuel Price Relief And Possible Lower Speed Limits

The American Trucking Associations is urging the Bush Administration to act quickly to ensure that strategies are in place to ensure an affordable supply of oil for the nation’s 3.5 million truck drivers and American consumers.

The trucking industry is experiencing the highest prolonged fuel prices in history. Historically, fuel represented the second-highest operating expense for motor carriers. For some motor carriers, however, fuel is beginning to surpass labor as their largest expense. This ultimately will increase the cost of everything delivered by truck.

ATA is urging the federal government to help bring down the price of diesel fuel and to alleviate trucking companies’ hardships by doing the following:

Ø       Stop fiddling and instead release oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve;

Ø       Establish a national diesel fuel standard;

Ø       Allow environmentally responsible exploration of oil-rich areas in the United States that are now off-limits;

Ø       Allow environmentally responsible development of crude resources in oil shale and tar sands in Colorado, Utah and Wyoming;

Ø       Work with the 50 state Attorneys General to combat any fuel price gouging that might occur;

Ø       Continue to fund EPA’s SmartWay Transport Partnership Program, which encourages fuel-saving strategies;

Ø       Streamline EPA’s regulatory framework for reviewing and processing applications for additional refinery operations;

Ø       Require speed limiters set for 68 mph or lower on all new trucks;

Ø       Set a national maximum speed limit of 65 mph;

Ø       Suspend the collection of the 12 percent federal excise tax on motor carriers’ purchase of auxiliary power units (APUs), which cut the consumption of fuels in idling truck engines;

Ø       Require states to grant a weight exemption for APUs; and

Ø       Eliminate "splash and dash" - a tax benefit for imported biodiesel that is subsequently exported.

"The signs are troubling. We are concerned about fuel’s direct impact on our industry and also its effects on the nation’s economy," said ATA President and CEO Bill Graves. "The industry is doing its part to conserve fuel, but we need help."

ATA recently issued letters to President Bush, the Department of Energy, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration and the Treasury requesting that immediate steps be taken to address this crisis situation.

The trucking industry is making every effort to limit fuel consumption, including lowering speed limits and utilizing equipment to reduce idling. But rising fuel prices have been a significant burden on the trucking industry. The industry is on pace to spend an unprecedented $135 billion on diesel fuel this year, $22 billion more than a year earlier.



chewychewy - 4/1/2008 12:08:59 AM
+3 Boost
Agree, American trucks can benefit greatly from better aerodynamics.


cdokecdoke - 4/1/2008 12:40:31 AM
0 Boost
"Exxon called it quits at the Green River shale site a few years back"

I'm afraid I don't know exactly what you are talking about. I would hope you are not talking about the Colony Project. About 2 years ago the BLM rejected Exxon's oil-shale lease proposal.

I do happen to know that Exxon continues research in this area- I attended the Exxon presentation at the Colorado Oil Shale Symposium hosted by the Colorado School of Mines and CERI in late 2006. They continue similar research today, although I am not sure they have retained the Electrofrac process as viable.


cdokecdoke - 3/31/2008 11:29:38 AM
+4 Boost
Unfortunately, the proposed Federal Reserve bailout will make things worse with regard to this because it will be achieved by printing more money. By printing more money, they devalue the dollar and by devaluing the dollar they cause oil prices to go up- because oil is priced in U.S. dollars.


WhelanWhelan - 3/31/2008 2:40:19 PM
+3 Boost
I couldnt agree with you more on the speed limit xdrive. I can't tell you how many times doing 75-80 in the passing lane on 95 in CT and been literally blown by a semi doing almost 90 in some cases. They are dangerous, wreckless with their lane changes, and I really wish the state would get more fierce with ticketing them for riding to close, speeding and the other offenses.


longhaulerlonghauler - 3/31/2008 4:33:22 PM
+1 Boost
heres something to remember in ct the speed ranges from45 to 65 and many times it changes and most car drivers dont look at the sighns on the roads. truck drivers are restricted to only 2 lanes in the state. if a truck is behind you why dont you just simply move out of his way instead of sitting there. and if your doing 75-80 your just as much at fault for being wreckless. i drive in ct all the time and have only seen few trucks going as fast as you say. there are more car accidents than truck accidents. so wake up and JUST drive.


chewychewy - 4/1/2008 12:04:07 AM
+2 Boost
trucks can go slower themselves, the limit for tractor trailers in CA is 55. they can save fuel and make it safer for all if they go 55 themselves. No need for government here.


chewychewy - 4/1/2008 12:11:47 AM
+1 Boost
some of the other parts make sense, like the APU


Hatemachine777Hatemachine777 - 4/1/2008 4:30:38 AM
+3 Boost
Why not also cut taxes on fuel? The government collects about .50 cents off every gallon.


toolatetoracetoolatetorace - 4/1/2008 9:59:35 AM
0 Boost
Just my 2 cents worth , the last price increase came because the stock market had another slip . The very next day the gas stations had their ladders out to change the prices . How absurb , the crooks ( oil companies ) american owned companies, that is , take advantage of it's own people when things get bad on the economic scene . This would rank right up there with someone stealing from their grandmother .


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC