Who Wins The STUD Test? BMW 135i Or Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution MR

Who Wins The STUD Test? BMW 135i Or Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution MR

"There we found the perfect 135i competitor: a 300-horsepower, two-door, four-passenger, rear-drive sports car that comes in at $28,000, but can hit the mid-30s fully loaded.

Then we sobered up and realized that nobody cross-shops a BMW against a Mustang. So we rolled up our sleeves and dug past some of the usual disqualifiers to focus on concepts like pure performance and fun factor.

 
 

Which is how we arrived at the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution MR-two extra doors, two fewer cylinders, and one fewer turbocharger, yes, but two more driven wheels, similar engine output, and class-leading performance. Most important, the Evo is the kind of vehicle a true driving enthusiast can honestly consider against the 135i."

Looks like AutoSpies.com was ahead of the curve giving the 135i the 2008 AutoSpies.com car of the year...


Read Article

EL34EL34 - 4/12/2008 10:09:46 PM
-13 Boost
The BMW wins the best looking car contest by a mile.


CLK63BlackSeriesCLK63BlackSeries - 4/13/2008 2:02:06 AM
+5 Boost
The evo is gorgeous.


Designer1Designer1 - 4/13/2008 2:44:40 AM
+2 Boost
When I see the 135's head lamps, my eyes hurt for some reason. It has the looks of an ugly insect, so what looks are you talking about? I would take the Evo over it any day.


EL34EL34 - 4/13/2008 11:42:39 AM
-3 Boost
The Mitsubishi EVO/Zero looks like a Dodge Charger, but with way too many lines and trendy lines at that.

The tail lights look like the typical crap from this company and look at that crummy interior.

Don't get me going woth the Mitsu.


AudiphileAudiphile - 4/13/2008 1:42:13 PM
0 Boost
EL34 is right about the looks. The Evo does remind me a lot of my brother's Dodge Charger. And I've never been a fan of "boy racer" looks. The 135i is definitely the better-looking of the two.

But alas, I am too tall to fit in either car, so the point is moot for me.


gsh23gsh23 - 4/12/2008 10:17:48 PM
-6 Boost
cant say who the winner is, but the biggest loser sure is audi. guess winning le mans doesnt mean better cars.


Matthew1Matthew1 - 4/13/2008 12:05:10 AM
+8 Boost
Thanks for the ignorance lesson.


AudiphileAudiphile - 4/13/2008 1:39:24 PM
+5 Boost
Huh? An Audi wasn't even in this comparison. What are you talking about?


ilmorilmor - 4/12/2008 10:18:10 PM
+6 Boost
Ummm..I did cross shop a BMW (325i) and a Mustang...actually, a Shelby GT. I bought the Shelby GT. I love the car and have an extra $8K in my pocket.


henbmwhenbmw - 4/13/2008 7:32:27 AM
+8 Boost
Which will soon dissipate in repair costs


dimitri_010dimitri_010 - 4/14/2008 10:03:40 AM
+2 Boost
lmao


OblivObliv - 4/14/2008 1:27:25 PM
+3 Boost
lol Hen, you must not own a BMW if you think it has better reliability than a Mustang.


zorbeezezorbeeze - 4/14/2008 1:51:10 PM
+1 Boost
"Which will soon dissipate in repair costs"
Actually the new Mustangs have been very reliable none of my customers have had any complaints. Whereas BMW, i won't even go down that road. Especially the 7 series. Most of my customers regret the purchase.


stash84stash84 - 4/14/2008 8:44:30 PM
+2 Boost
thats why most are leased


dragvorldragvorl - 4/12/2008 10:18:38 PM
+10 Boost
Or may I say least bad looking of these 2. I like BMW, but the 1 is ugly.


investor27investor27 - 4/12/2008 10:20:23 PM
+8 Boost
And the 135i doesn't start at $28K but rather $35K.


Agent001Agent001 - 4/12/2008 10:24:29 PM
+7 Boost
He's talking about the Mustang starting at 28k...not the 135i.

Then he states that noboby compares the Mustang to any BMW and then explains that's how they picked the EVO.

Read the beginning of his article:

What's left? We put together a matrix to compare (see it on page 4).

There we found the perfect 135i competitor: a 300-horsepower, two-door, four-passenger, rear-drive sports car that comes in at $28,000, but can hit the mid-30s fully loaded.

Then we sobered up and realized that nobody cross-shops a BMW against a Mustang. So we rolled up our sleeves and dug past some of the usual disqualifiers to focus on concepts like pure performance and fun factor.



001



OblivObliv - 4/14/2008 1:30:28 PM
-1 Boost
Id take the Mustang over either of these. So I guess your right!


bmwfan1513bmwfan1513 - 4/12/2008 10:48:32 PM
-7 Boost
BMW is better. They have been doing everything right.


farabira1farabira1 - 4/12/2008 10:48:37 PM
+7 Boost
The mitsubishi looks tons better than the 135i, but the BMW is more practical one, while also containing as much performance credibility as the EVO X. But if you are going for pure performance, then the BMW can not match the road going missile that we call EVO GR.


OblivObliv - 4/14/2008 1:28:56 PM
+4 Boost
Yeah, because Toyota does such a good job engineering they have practically no problems with recal...


...er...wait..


SixxFiveSixxFive - 4/12/2008 11:38:52 PM
-4 Boost
BMW wins again....


Matthew1Matthew1 - 4/13/2008 12:06:11 AM
+8 Boost
Appeals to wildly different demographics....


stash84stash84 - 4/14/2008 8:47:07 PM
+2 Boost
you shouldnt care so much about what people think about you..be yourself..


useridinuseuseridinuse - 4/13/2008 12:28:30 AM
+2 Boost
This car is obviously best bang for the buck as long as you don't want any options. I think BMW shouldn't offer any options for the 135i. The msrp can be misleading as this car offers very little at 35k with exception of the engine / handling.


zorbeezezorbeeze - 4/14/2008 1:55:36 PM
+2 Boost
I can get all those safety equipment you refer to in a 20 000$ Kia. Most safety equipment are standard in all cars nowadays. Everybody uses these stupid terms regarding safety equipment. It's all an advertising gimmick and you don`t realise you`re being fooled.


Htay7500Htay7500 - 4/14/2008 2:37:34 PM
+1 Boost
"If you want more luxury and convenience and don't mind adding a few pounds there are options."

the more options you add, the more sacrifice in performance and a gain in weight. the MR doesn't have a nice interior, but its a sports car, not a luxury car so you'll be more focused with its performance than luxury.


stash84stash84 - 4/14/2008 8:48:50 PM
+1 Boost
the 135 isnt a luxury car either..its also a sports car


BMWRUBMWRU - 4/13/2008 2:27:06 AM
-2 Boost
Much as I like the radical new look of the EVo, I hate to say it's Harry's cousin Dudley compared to the One.


aeyjayaeyjay - 4/13/2008 3:56:24 AM
+6 Boost
Both are great cars so it just comes down to a matter of personal taste. Try this on for size (for those that can think outside the box):

Mentally remove the badges and brand association of each vehicle.

Compare and evaluate the underpinnings, drive train, dynamics, technology, etc.

Examine the design elements and think about each cars intention based on looks alone.

I personally think that both are studs. The BMW gives the impression of a "nice guy that can be mischievous at times, and may have one tattoo that isn't visible" feel. On the other hand, the Mitsubishi has more of a "tough guy with a chip on his shoulders, major tattoos, and a few piercings" presence.

So it comes down to what you want (if one even cross shopped those two cars): BMW's "feel" or Mitsubishi's "presence AND feel".

Verdict: EVO - Alpha stud, BMW - jock LOL



MunichRobMunichRob - 4/13/2008 5:56:17 AM
+2 Boost
Good analogy...I agree it really boils down to the consumers taste as both cars are great. I'd even give the thumbs-up to the Evo over the 135i in the looks department if it weren't for its tacky wing; which isn't an option.


aeyjayaeyjay - 4/13/2008 6:17:17 AM
+1 Boost
Thanks ;-)


atomicbriatomicbri - 4/13/2008 7:04:25 AM
0 Boost
I can honestly say I have no clue which would be best. And everyone one here making comments all think this is a beauty pageant. Come on people... there are more to both of these cars than looks. BMW handles and goes very well. I have driven the 135i last weekend and can say it was hell on wheels. TOO MUCH FUN. I like to see BMW offering something that is smaller and still great to drive. Took all the twisty bits with ease and with sporting fun. I have not been able to drive a Evo yet since the dealership where I live acts as if it is a golden god sitting on the lot and do not give out too many test drives in it. They ask crap like if you would like to put a deposit down and try to sell you the car before you ever get into it. So as fr as dealers goes, BMW is better by far. Mitsubishi is still ran (dealership level that is) like a Ford dealership... vulturing over you thinking you are here to buy a car and take it home today! No I wanna drive the thing first thanks! Maybe I will try another dealer a city over and see. I am sure they have a lot of hoodlums wanting to drive the Evo... I say to the hoodlums, dress nice, lose the face jewelry for the hour and go drive the s&*% out of it! LOL! Seriously though, the BMW was a blast to drive, but I am sure the experience is quite different between the two vehicles. Evo is AWD, BMW rear wheel, Evo based off a lesser compact, 135i is BMW's compact.
So people, go and drive them first before you launch comments... its always just a beauty contest in thes blogs... BMW looks ugly, Lexus L Finesse is Jap Crap... lets talk about the cars deeper than just at skin level. Test Drives are free, go make the best out of them!


abcdabcd - 4/13/2008 9:57:42 AM
0 Boost
even with less weight and more power bmw 135i and other cars have small chances with evo on the track thanks to it AWD system . it has not ordinary AWD like in other AWD cars but it has torque vectoring and that`s the reason why evos are so fast in corners .


AUTO_UNIONAUTO_UNION - 4/13/2008 4:02:08 PM
+8 Boost
Am I blind? Is this the first time in your life that you haven't mentioned word " Audi" in one of your posts?


ubercoolubercool - 4/13/2008 11:26:50 AM
+2 Boost
BMW 1 series = DUD, looks like a pig, very ugly front end.


EL34EL34 - 4/13/2008 11:44:40 AM
0 Boost
Look at the how beautiful and unique the front bumper is when compared to the bumper on the Lancer.

Get back to me with your report.

In fact, compare each line and tell me which car has the most clutter?


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 4/13/2008 12:40:08 PM
+6 Boost
They both look fantastic in that picture--as boy-racer-ish as it is, I would definitely take either.


SSP350SSP350 - 4/13/2008 1:00:08 PM
0 Boost
Based on pricepoint alone. I'd take a base 335i. End of story.


lexusis350lexusis350 - 4/13/2008 1:01:05 PM
-1 Boost
You don't compare Mitsu-piece-of-crap with BMW. It's like asking which is more luxurious between a Kia and a Rolls-Royce.


razzy23razzy23 - 4/13/2008 1:03:16 PM
-3 Boost
The BMW 1-Series is FANTASTIC! In every way. I see it as an E46 M3 that costs 20,000 less!


vman1013vman1013 - 4/15/2008 7:18:53 AM
+1 Boost
preach!


NItePhireNItePhire - 4/13/2008 1:19:29 PM
+2 Boost
Unfortunately for me I am stuck in BMW's styling past. I like the current crop ok sans Idiveyounuts controller. I was driving my buddys 01 7series and I just reminded my self how much I miss that styling, that and the last gen 5 series seems timeless. I am sure like all BMW's the 1 drives like it a slot car on those tracks when I was a a kid. They seem to always have driven close to these way and their engines are a thing of beauty. That being said although the EVO is much more refined than its predecessor and cant hope to compare to the interior of a car that was probably not build to a price point like the EVO is. The styling of the 1 does nothing for me but like all BMW's I am sure driving one is something to behold. I have had the pleasure of driving a current EVO and it really a great performance car but if you are looking for refinement this aint it.


EL34EL34 - 4/13/2008 1:31:04 PM
+1 Boost
To me the Lancer looks like an outdated Dodge Shadow.

:-|


AgentOrangeAgentOrange - 4/13/2008 7:00:36 PM
+4 Boost
Yah, pretty much...


vman1013vman1013 - 4/15/2008 8:30:05 AM
+5 Boost
The 135 will take sales away from every performance car in the 30k range. The thing is that I rarely see adults (35+) driving EVO's. But those adults who also happen to be enthusiasts respect the performance of the EVO. The 135 will appeal to those adults who want the performance to compete with (and even beat) an EVO but aren't into the tuner life style.

The BMW can be considered a "turnkey" performance vehicle. You buy it loaded from the factory with all the goodies. And you go fast. You bring it in for service when the car tells you its time.

The EVO on the other hand will undergo modification after modification. That is just the culture. And if you are not going to tune your EVO then you're just a poser!


xlr8xlr8 - 4/13/2008 3:14:21 PM
+4 Boost
as an enthusiast I would choose the evo. The looks arent great but the performance is amazing and as far reliability, doesnt mitsu still have the 10 yr 100k mile waranty? If so that beats the hell out of a bmw. AWD = fun in the dirt and snow!!! Plus a well known rally history and numerous tsukaba and goup series track records its the winner. If I wanted a performance luxury car I would buy the 335i its beautiful and has equal performance to the 135i. The 135i is just too small and ugly imho.


xlr8xlr8 - 4/14/2008 2:52:30 AM
+9 Boost
No im in the military and im 27yrs old, Im currently in the middle east. I own a 2006 530i and a acura rsx type s. I also like your stereotypical view of asian people...which is what I happen to be. Are you a bigot or something? or a pizza delivery boy with a beater 80's 3 series?


stash84stash84 - 4/14/2008 8:59:30 PM
+1 Boost
xlr8..hope u come back soon from the middle east !!!! thanks for serving our country !! Obama 08


PolePositionPolePosition - 4/14/2008 12:42:15 AM
+2 Boost
This is all such a big fast waste of type. Design is so subjective. Why do people feel like they need t


993Turbo993Turbo - 4/14/2008 6:30:38 AM
-2 Boost
How do you have a stud test between two girls?


zorbeezezorbeeze - 4/14/2008 1:01:01 PM
+1 Boost
I'll take the Evo any given day over the 1series but to be honest they both look horrible.


SX123SX123 - 4/14/2008 10:21:37 PM
+1 Boost
How much are both?


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 4/15/2008 5:37:46 PM
+3 Boost
LOL


JaybrnJaybrn - 4/15/2008 6:20:04 PM
0 Boost
Id take a GTR then!


StarStar - 4/15/2008 8:14:07 PM
+1 Boost
The BMW 135i looks better, is considerably faster, has free maintenance and it actually comes with a real warranty. The new EVO is a joke.


JTRacerJTRacer - 4/18/2008 12:36:41 AM
+1 Boost
Between the 2..
If you buy it to go fast.. buy the Evo..
If you buy it for the nice interior.. buy the 135i

Funny.. I've never seen a "Who's got the better interior shoot out" from the magazines!!!!

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/coupes/112_0806_bmw_135_mitsubishi_evo_mr_comparison/photo_12.html

Evo X is faster than the 135i at the track by nearly 4 seconds!!!! What do you expect from a 3400lb cars with
tiny 215 front tires?


evoisevois - 4/18/2008 10:29:38 AM
0 Boost
I thought the article was a STUD test? the BMW 135i is a girlie car, right there it loses the STUD test.


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC