Toyota ranks highest in ethical reputation study

Geneva, Switzerland – Toyota has ranked highest among automakers and second among all industries for ethical reputation by Geneva-based Covalence. The ratings, for the first quarter of 2008, are divided by Best EthicalQuote Score, Best EthicalQuote Progress, and Best Reported Progress.

Covalence rates companies by such factors as community affairs, international presence, lobbying practices, product environmental risk, social sponsorship, waste management and human rights, and to a lesser extent, wages, anticorruption policy, environmental impact of production, social impact, United Nations policy and eco-innovative product. Twenty multinational companies are analyzed in ten major sectors.

Best EthicalQuote Score and Best EthicalQuote Progress are calculated by evaluating positive and negative news, while Best Reported Performance is calculated by quantifying positive news only.

Overall, Toyota ranked second to Unilever for Best EthicalQuote Score. In Best EthicalQuote Progress, Toyota ranked second behind Wal-Mart, while General Motors placed fourth. In Best Reported Performance, Wal-Mart was ranked first, followed by Toyota in second and General Motors in third. These were the only two automakers to make the list of leaders across all sectors.

Among Automobiles & Parts, Best EthicalQuote Score rankings were, in order, Toyota, Ford, General Motors, Honda, BMW, Daimler, Renault, Nissan, Peugeot and Denso. Best EthicalQuote Progress rankings, in order, were Toyota, General Motors, Ford, Honda, Nissan, BMW, Mazda, Renault, Denso and Daimler. Under Best Reported Performance, the companies, in order, were Toyota, General Motors, Ford, Honda, Nissan, BMW, Renault, Mazda, Daimler and Volkswagen.
Read Article

stash84 - 4/17/2008 2:08:04 PM

+2 Boost

i dont know much about the subject but it does sound like "provoking"

Rupert - 4/17/2008 3:08:34 PM

-1 Boost

Well Japan had invaded China and killed more people than the holocaust ever did...they were hardly ethical. Read up on the Rape of Nanking.

Rupert - 4/17/2008 3:12:27 PM

0 Boost

Additionally: 'On August 6, 1937, Hirohito personally ratified his army's proposition to remove the constraints of international law on the treatment of Chinese prisoners.'

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_of_nanking#Historical_background

And they didn't kill more than the holocaust in the Rape of Nanking, I was wrong. Still, 250,000 in a few weeks is a lot. All civilians.

_43LE - 4/17/2008 3:28:49 PM

+5 Boost

How many civilians have died as a result the the Vietnam and Iraq War?

0to60 - 4/17/2008 4:03:14 PM

+5 Boost

Thanks 43LE. Its so easy to tell someone else their shit stinks without first smelling your own!

Rupert - 4/17/2008 6:48:30 PM

-2 Boost

I don't know how many have died, and I don't particularly care about Vietnam, my country was never involved in that.
Iraq's a thorny issue, and meaningful stats are hard to come buy. Most records of civilian deaths are made by asking 'do you know someone who has died'. Very unreliable.
However, your question is rather odd. The Japanese government and army deliberately killed civilians, and a lot of them, in a very short period of time. 1000 rapes a night was what one commentator said, just in one city.
The US, for all its failings, does have the side of 'morality'. Very misguided morality, maybe, but at least they're trying. And the US have never (as far as I know) killed 250000 civilians in 6 weeks. Not just young male civilians, but children, babies, women and the elderly. Think about it. We all love US bashing, but what the Japanese did is a largely overlooked atrocity.

And 'as a result of' is a very different thing to 'murdered'.

M35MT - 4/18/2008 8:11:52 AM

+5 Boost

Rupert - the difference is - Hitler attempted to exterminate an entire people based on their religion, for the benefit of the "superior race".

There is nothing more F'd then that.

_43LE - 4/17/2008 1:23:01 PM

+9 Boost

It's funny that when positive news about a Japanese company gets posted people tend to say negative things, borderline xenophobic/racial. However, when positive news about German car companies gets posted most congratulate those companies. Just another example of the double standard here on Autospies.

Thanks Turbo/midengine/sport!

_43LE - 4/17/2008 4:18:54 PM

+4 Boost

"You're right that it's a double standard. Just imagine if it was Volkswagen or Mercedes that forced its employees to work 80 hours of overtime each month and that people died from over work. You wouldn't hear the end of it on these forums. "

You're wrong on that one. If that were the case, people would be praising the Germans for their great work ethic and dedication to high quality, bla bla bla. In this case, all I see is criticism for the Japanese.

_43LE - 4/18/2008 2:37:14 PM

+7 Boost

You're not making sense. The award was not given because they work so hard. It was given for these reasons:

community affairs, international presence, lobbying practices, product environmental risk, social sponsorship, waste management and human rights, and to a lesser extent, wages, anticorruption policy, environmental impact of production, social impact, United Nations policy and eco-innovative product.

I'm just saying that here on autospies, if a German car company won the award, everyone would say how great they are. When it's a Japanese company that gets this award (based on the above criteria) people become negative. It had nothing to do with working overtime. You have your issues mixed up.

oscarseah - 4/17/2008 11:38:51 PM

-2 Boost

fact: toyota cars are very reliable
fact: japanese did invade china and kill a lot of people in the past
fact: german did kill a lot people in the past

whether covalence is ethical in conducting this so-called ethical survey: no one knows.

and i don't think japanese and toyota is ethical

agent507 - 4/18/2008 4:49:22 AM

+7 Boost

and now that the germans are involved in the discussion we can add to the facts list:

fact: china did kill a lot of people in the past
fact: US did kill a lot of people in the past
fact: Great Britain did kill a lot of people in the past
fact: Spain did kill a lot of people in the past
fact: Russia did kill a lot of people in the past
fact: Italy did kill a lot of people in the past
...

WTF? Guys, please, let us learn from history, live today and change things for the future. And discussion like the above won´t do anything close to that.

Htay7500 - 4/18/2008 8:55:52 AM

+4 Boost

when Adolf Hitler was in power, he commited genocide of more than 6 million jews. more than double of what japan did to china and the US during WWII.

Htay7500 - 4/18/2008 9:05:58 AM

+5 Boost

and he joined forces with facist Italy and the Empire of Japan which became the axis powers, conquering all of continental europe, going against GB and the US. but you sound really uneducated, so none of this means anything to you.

_43LE - 4/18/2008 2:40:50 PM

+5 Boost

I don't believe in people that don't believe the holocaust. What rock have you been living under? Or, are you just being a troll here?

Rupert - 4/18/2008 2:51:23 PM

+5 Boost

Then you're a f***tard.

Rupert - 4/18/2008 2:51:52 PM

+5 Boost

By the way you can be sent to prison for saying that in Austria.

Htay7500 - 4/18/2008 6:58:05 PM

+6 Boost

somebody ban this uneducated, antisemitic redneck.

lexusrox123 - 4/18/2008 8:48:14 PM

+5 Boost

i cant believe evilm! at first i thought he was a stupid german fanboy. "i dont believe in the holocaust," LOL! now i know that evilm is REALLY stupid!
btw, in addition to 6 mil murdered jews, nazis killed 5 mil non-jews (homos, gypsies, anyone in hitlers way)

Htay7500 - 4/18/2008 8:59:56 PM

+4 Boost

"btw, in addition to 6 mil murdered jews, nazis killed 5 mil non-jews (homos, gypsies, anyone in hitlers way)"

and the mentally disabled.

Rupert - 4/19/2008 8:58:21 AM

+2 Boost

And the physically disabled - blind, deaf, crippled etc.