New Infiniti FX Slaps BMW X6 Upside The Head In New Review!

Infiniti shook the entire SUV perception when it rolled out the original FX in 2004.  Love it or hate it, the styling and design is something that has become part of the automotive landscape.  Magazines commented on the 20" rims that came from the factory, and the swept roof line which decreased the "utility" component of the Sport Utility concept.  For Infiniti it was a hit however, and without changing the formula too much they are about to unleash round 2 of the FX to the car buying public.

In the meantime, BMW obviously took notice and has offered us their take on the sporting SUV with the X6.  Yeah, you can argue the X5 has visions of grandeur in terms of its sport component, but at the end of the day unless equipped with the right option groups it really became an alternative to the minivan for soccer moms everywhere.  With the new X5, BMW stepped it up a notch, but it is still a SUV at heart offering additional options including  a third row.

Not so with the X6.  Talk about a statement.  Park one of these next to almost anything else that claims to be an SUV of sporty intention and the picture that develops speaks for itself.  Of course had this been done with the original FX at the time it was rolled out, a similar picture would have developed.

So is BMW copying the FX concept with the X6 and if the answer is YES, which is better???

As you know Agent 001 spent some time in an X6 this year, and he was shocked as to the reaction it received as he drove around Southern California.  Give that some time to sink in, HE WAS SHOCKED AS TO THE REACTION IT RECEIVED AS HE DROVE AROUND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA.  Why the caps, Southern California is a car mecca.  Trends started there trickle out to the rest of the country and the world.  The manufacturers know this and have set up numerous design studios there to capitalize on this fact.

And the X6 captured the attention of people there, and feat that is hard to accomplish.

But is it good enough to go up against the FX.

Well both Motor Trend and Automobile magazines asked that very question in their July 2008 issues, and the results are interesting, BUT ARE THEY CORRECT?

MT compared a X6 xDRIVE 35i to a FX35 while Automobile used the X6 xDRIVE 50i against the FX50.

Both magazines rank the Infiniti ahead of the BMW.  For the Infiniti fan boys, you can stop reading now, the rest of you read on as the Agents here at AutoSpies.com aren't sure the magazines got it correct.

Allow me to make the case...

MT - "...Infiniti FX35 - Less sexy, with more utility and a surprisingly smooth ride.  Add in a far thriftier price tag, and the FX is clearly the more rational buy."

Automobile - "...the FX50 makes more sense to us - with nearly identical performance, five passenger seating, and a lower price it clearly will appeal to more buyers."

The testing done by both magazines confirm that the BMW's outperform the Infiniti in almost all of the tests run, and in general both magazines really have nothing bad to say about the X6 with either engine.

People don't choose an Infiniti over a BMW simply based on price.  BMW's are more expensive for a reason, and people are willing to pay a premium to state they drive a BMW.

Is it just me or did both magazines MISS THE POINT???

KZ258 - 6/4/2008 3:50:01 PM

+22 Boost

its simple math, ooj: FX > X6

VISO - 6/4/2008 6:29:29 PM

-3 Boost

Desparate times call for desparate measures.

ricer - 6/4/2008 9:37:36 PM

+6 Boost

00J is a twat, JRobUSC below makes the best point here.

dlin - 6/4/2008 10:20:48 PM

+7 Boost

Allow me to quote MT:

"Shame she doesn't drive as good as she looks."

"The FX35 has many of the X6's strengths, none of its weaknesses, and a few great advantages of its own-for a lot less money."

That, my friend, is the point of MT's review, which is why I consider it the most trustworthy US car mag.

dlin - 6/4/2008 10:34:52 PM

+5 Boost

I also think 00J is missing the point here: it's questionable to compare 2 SUV based only on engines or performance test numbers. You just won't buy a SUV solely for its performance, especially when it cost more than a pretty practical 335.

BMW4me4ever - 6/4/2008 3:52:18 PM

-13 Boost

they totally missed the point. The X6 was not designed to compete with the Infiniti. The X6 is targeting the Porsche Cayenne & Range Rover Sport Buyers. Both of which are more expensive than the Infiniti. As you can clearly see the X6 5.0L is the better performer in acceleration, handling & stopping. Price again is the Fx's only solice in order to best the BMW.

NItePhire - 6/4/2008 10:55:30 PM

+3 Boost

Take that garbage talk to another site dude.

BMW4me4ever - 6/5/2008 1:48:37 PM

+5 Boost

what sh*t ... you people on here amaze me at times. S4 hit it right on the head. Believe me, BMW didnt create the X6 to compete with the FX. Is it a competitor, yes. So is the Range Rover Sport and the Porsche Cayenne.

Status with any luxury car plays an important role. How the car makes one feel whether driving or sitting in your driveway. The last time I checked, when I valet parked my car, the restaurant parked it out front due to being a nice luxury car, 2008 535i. When is the last time you saw a restaurant park a honda civic right out in front? never. not saying anything negative about the civic, but there is no status with having a car like that. People that cant afford these cars have no concept on why one car is more than another. It is like some of these Car Magazines in the sole reason for their Opinion and base their entire logic around it. that kills me.

No one needs a $50k car or truck. It is a want. I dont like the Infiniti FX. It is a nice performer? yes. Is it attractive? my opinion a resounding NO. I would never spend $50k, $60k , $70k on a vehicle that I find unattractive no matter how fast it is. Performance is very important for myself in how it handles, accelerates, and brakes, but exterior is also important. The X6 for me is the best of both worlds. It is what I am getting to replace my 2008 535i when it comes off of lease next year.

222max - 6/4/2008 3:56:56 PM

+13 Boost

Man, is this whole article flame bait or what?

bigmotov - 6/4/2008 4:04:39 PM

+6 Boost

LOL!!!

answer - 6/4/2008 5:57:11 PM

+7 Boost

Aren't they all?

ThierryHenry14 - 6/5/2008 1:21:24 PM

+3 Boost

are you surprised?

GTR35 - 6/4/2008 4:00:51 PM

+18 Boost

00J, you come out very strong to be considered as a respectable journalist.
First off, you are a reporter so avoid saying "For the Infiniti fan boys, you can stop reading now, the rest of you read on as the Agents here at AutoSpies.com aren't sure the magazines got it correct."
Second, "BMW's are more expensive for a reason, and people are willing to pay a premium to state they drive a BMW." ...What was the reason?
AutoSpies has earned my respect throughout the years, please don't ruin this site. But I know 001 is a pretty smart man so I'm sure he'll have a talk with you soon.

We all know you're a BMW fan Boy, but leave the fan boy stuff to the readers.

ugofil - 6/4/2008 4:22:14 PM

+5 Boost

Amen & well said. And to note that the reviews noted nearly identical performance (I think 0-60 was 0.3 better in the X6?).

Also, I did take a look at an X6 at a dealer and it looks great... from the front. And the interior is great... when you are in the front seat. The back seat would have to be a no mans land for us >6footers.

But hell, who cares about the back seat when you're going to buy one of these anyway. ;)

Agent00J - 6/4/2008 4:53:15 PM

-25 Boost

I state that the Infiniti fan boys can stop reading as their car won. Isn't that all they care about anyways is winning?

For the rest of us, lets look at why Infiniti won, and I would argue a good portion of that has to do with price.

Last week when C&D came out with the M3 on top of the GT-R and 911 Turbo, price was a factor, but not THE factor in that determination. Was the same true here, or was price THE factor and as such the FX won the vote.

In fairness to Automobile magazine, they really didn't choose a winner. Why not?

Although you call me a BMW fan boy, I feel as though I have kept personal preferences pretty toned down here instead focusing on a being fair in what is written.

-00J

Agent001 - 6/4/2008 5:31:44 PM

-25 Boost

I think Automobile mag withheld judgment because they need all the ad dollars they can get to stay afloat.

It's expensive running a magazine...

001

0to60 - 6/4/2008 5:40:19 PM

+12 Boost

00J, you are officially an idiot!

VISO - 6/4/2008 6:30:15 PM

+13 Boost

There is such a thing as Infiniti fanboys?

S30GTR - 6/4/2008 8:23:01 PM

+7 Boost

everybody is a fanboy whether they admit it or not. even a car magazine has favoritism. thanks for all the crap that you guys argue about. it's hilarious.

M35MT - 6/5/2008 7:33:17 AM

+7 Boost

"There is such a thing as Infiniti fanboys?"

Nope! They like the car what is truly is, not the badge it wears.

Agent001 - 6/4/2008 4:35:32 PM

-18 Boost

Yes, they paid us to say it lost in the review,

LOL!

You're a freak alright!

001

MunichRob - 6/4/2008 9:14:07 PM

+4 Boost

You know I never thought I'd stoop to the undignified level of saying SHUT THE F UP! It's just that I'm tired of everyone screaming out "Conspiracy! They're being paid off by BMW!"

I just laugh at this like the guys in Munich are sitting in the boardroom eager to get AutoSpies on their payroll...yeah right!

I've seen more than a couple negative BMW articles on this site over the past month, don't you think BMW would have paid AutoSpies to keep quiet on the article stating a brand new M3 tranny failed?

Furthermore I can remember this website being anti-bangle after the first few designs released under his direction were far from his better work.

Understand the large number of BMW articles on this site has a lot to do with you the users, we click on them making them the most popular articles on this site & therefore making the autospies agents feel like they need to meet this demand.

JRobUSC - 6/4/2008 4:34:22 PM

+14 Boost

What a BS thread. FYI, the Automobile Magazine article wasn't a "ranking", they merely said the FX was more practical and less expensive and was likely to sell more. It was the "rational" choice. Well guess what genius? That's the idea. A RAV4 is a more rational buy than any of these, but who cares? Where was the RAV4 in the comparison?

Someone with $80k to blow on a loaded X6 is buying the statement the vehicle makes. Same thing with a $100k ML63, a $90k Range Rover, a $100k Cayenne Turbo, etc. Hell, even the FX is a statement. It was designed to get attention and it values performance over utility, same as the X6, just for less money. No one "needs" an FX, or an X6, or any of those vehicles. They buy them because they WANT them.

Look, there'll always be cheaper vehicles that do similar things. Always. That doesn't make them better or more desirable, it just makes them cheaper. A Timex keeps time better than a Rolex. Does anyone need a $50k watch when a $50 watch works just fine? Hell no. But which one would most people rather have?

STATUS. That's what you're buying. You're not buying ANY of these cars, FX included, because it was "the best buy", or "the most practical", and screw "the rational choice". Throw those out the window. They're useless when talking about cars this expensive. If that's all people cared about everyone would drive Hyundai's and Kia's. But they don't. When you buy a vehicle in this segment, what you're deciding is "how much status do you want, and how much are you willing to pay to get it"? That's it. Period. End of story. Now everyone can get on with their lives instead of arguing about the validity of vehicles 99.99% of the people on here can't afford anyway. It's getting ridiculous.

Agent00J - 6/4/2008 5:00:22 PM

-9 Boost

JRobUSC, I think you are correct in what you write. Neither car is bought due to price, however the other side of that is since neither is bought due to price, why keep making price an issue and simply name the better of the 2 cars. Of course if that was done price would work its way back into the discussion.

I pose the question to you then, what criteria should be used in making the decision as to which is better. Is it performance, versatility, comfort, pricing etc. and within that vein, how is each category weighted to insure a fair and consistent test each and every time no matter who the competitors are.

-00J

0to60 - 6/4/2008 5:42:50 PM

+11 Boost

00J, get over it!

bmwdrvr - 6/4/2008 7:33:00 PM

-9 Boost

exactly why are people comparing an unpratical very expensive suv to a relatively cheap 350z based SUV and say its cheaper and more pratical.....not trashing the SUV but they could have came to that conclusion without a test. Why no post the CAR magazine review of the X6, FX, and Range Rover Sport, I'm really gettin sick of reading mags that let cars win based on price and practicality this whole FX beating the X6 even though its much better in every area because of price and practicality is just as bad as the M3 beating the GTR......i mean seriously.....what next a Genesis and CLS comparison where the Genesis wins because its alot cheaper and more pratical

ym73 - 6/4/2008 8:05:57 PM

+1 Boost

That's simple. If performance is similiar ( a fraction of a second doesn't make a car better unless you race and these cars are definitely not intended for a race track)and the interior is fairly similiar then you look at price. Then based on the price difference each person has to decide if the extra prestige a badge gives is worth the money. Will people envy you more for having a BMW over an infinity? Will you feel better about yourself? For me, I would go with the infinity because I don't believe BMW has the same status as before. Because of the cheap subsidized leases, its too easy to own a BMW. Except for the top end models, people just aren't that impressed anymore (at least in Los Angeles).

07G35J - 6/5/2008 11:56:39 AM

+2 Boost

JRobUSC,
You could not have said it better. Well said. You and I have had our differences before, but I must admit that you postings have always been very insightful (unlike others who just post anything just to say the wrote something on the internet).
I kinda even missed you. I haven't seen you for a while.

tattedtwice - 6/4/2008 4:41:45 PM

-12 Boost

Its not enough for you nissan zealots that he noted the fx won both comparos, is it? Since he didnt bow down to it and suck nissan >>>>>> like you all do, he's 'biased'.

Get over yourselves. Your better looking than the original but still ugly fx won both because it's cheaper and seats more. As usual, the competing BMW kicked its ass on the road, proving the more things change, the more they stay the same.

222max - 6/4/2008 5:06:20 PM

+3 Boost

It's just that the tone and content of this article is highly editorial and sounds more like hurt feelings than subjective writing.

NISSANINFINITI - 6/5/2008 3:26:37 AM

+2 Boost

BMW knows that Infiniti has made it a personal thing to beat them at the game that they have been in the number 1 position for so many years (Sporty Performance). Now since Nissan and Toyota have come out with their highline/luxury lines (Infiniti & Lexus)BMW has competion now...REAL competion...all BMW fans can say (and I'm so tired of hearing it) "oh thats just a dressed up Nissan or Toyota". Thats not a bad thing...it just means that Nissan & Toyota are good cars. Now im starting to see where BMW is starting to copy Infiniti with the 3 series coupe(my personal opinion) for years the 3 series coupe has looked like a 2 door car, now since the g35 coupe has meet and even exceeded the BMW's performance in some arenas now they are starting to slope and pull the back end of the car out so it looks more like a sports car (like the G35 always has been). BMW has a long (and great) history before Infiniti & Lexus came but they need to stop the hate and give them their props that they are due. Infiniti & Lexus are about 20 years old where BMW is at least 2x that ( i dont know when the started).

NISSANINFINITI - 6/5/2008 3:30:19 AM

+1 Boost

compention=competition

Agent001 - 6/4/2008 5:35:28 PM

-12 Boost

The FX is a nice ride but in my opinion the new X6's twin turbo 8 is amazing, it drives better, feels more expensive (because it is) and has more exclusivity.

But I wouldn't be disappointed if all I could afford is the FX (ooh, I'll get heat 4 that!).

It's sweet too!

Much better than the last one and a lot of value for the bucks...

001

Agent001 - 6/4/2008 5:51:15 PM

+6 Boost

Agent001 - 6/4/2008 5:51:59 PM

-5 Boost

droptop - 6/5/2008 8:45:04 AM

-1 Boost

I'm not a big fan of the front of the new FX, but looking at those two photos, the X6 looks very akward compared to the photo of the FX.

I think it's probably more so the angle of the photo. It's a bad angle to try and show off the lines of the X6. Looks like an Aztec's rear.

0to60 - 6/4/2008 5:45:52 PM

+6 Boost

I love the X6 and am not to keen on the styling of the FX yet but you guys just make me sick for feeling this way (001 and 00J). How about when you post something, say nothing! Your opinion for that matter is usually useless. You guys are sickening! Just post and not comment.

Agent00J - 6/4/2008 6:02:32 PM

-9 Boost

"00J, you are officially an idiot!"

Aside from you calling me an idiot, what point did I miss. I asked a relevant question and left it up to you to decide, and that makes me an idiot?

Had I come out and voiced an opinion one way or the other, the losing side would have been all over me. Throw the discussion to the readers, and I get called an idiot. Seems as though you can't win here.

You state our opinion is "useless" and yet you go on to voice your own opinion, which I happen to agree with regarding the styling of the X6 over the FX. Why do you get to share your opinion, and I can't share mine?

-00J

M35MT - 6/5/2008 7:37:16 AM

+5 Boost

Because you're a tool. Shutup.

The X6 lost. The FX is better.

chinojk - 6/5/2008 3:30:18 PM

+1 Boost

lmao my first post on here and i can definitely see where agent 00J is a tool

Whelan - 6/4/2008 5:55:31 PM

+5 Boost

Personally I like the new FX styling better than the X6. Both will sell really well I am sure. But you are also comparing a segment creator to a new guy.

It is the same as the M3 and IS-F comparo. The IS-F is the new guy and the M3 has been around the block. So most likely the new guy is not going to get the honors, it's a pretty status quo thing. So when BMW created an X6 and the FX was redesigned and updated, it already had a bias as being a segment leader for a few years, now a new guy comes around and it has to match up. Sure it was a little faster, but I don't personally go flying around to be .3 seconds faster to 60.

Porsche Cayenne? Who said that!?! The Porsche Cayenne is a X5 competitor all day, just as the Range Rover is. For this segment you have the FX, X6, Range Rover Sport. Besides, a Porsche SUV is just a funny idea to me anyways.

Yes people don't buy these cars for practicality, they buy them because they want them as so many stated. But I also know that the FX has a reputation in this segment, I know I know it's a BMW they say, but it is a brand new BMW line so it has to muscle into the sector. Plus who doesn't turn their heads when you hear an Infiniti exhaust roll buy, that tone is awesome!

ym73 - 6/4/2008 8:16:18 PM

-5 Boost

I curious why people like this cars. When I saw te FX I thought it was an ugly car. The the Porsche Cayennes and Audi came and they were even uglier. Is there really a need for suv that's to small to be truely useful yet still guzzles alot of gas. There isn't enough sporty sedans that can sit 5 people?

VISO - 6/4/2008 6:31:55 PM

+3 Boost

Stop already! The Headache your posts ensue.

85bmw745i - 6/4/2008 10:30:39 PM

+3 Boost

How did their engineering beat the BMW when the BMW beat it in performance. Sure the FX is less expensive and that alone makes it appealing, but Jrobusc said it best. I wouldn't say the FX out-engineered the BMW, I think if they would change the front end and at least change the side grill, it since it is actually functional, It would be more appealing. To me the BMW is very unique, and from some angles it does look kinda wierd, at least in the photos, likewise the FX looks wierd from certain views. Personally I don't think you could lose with either, but I kinda like the BMW especially if price wasn't an option.

NISSANINFINITI - 6/5/2008 3:36:32 AM

0 Boost

I'm with you on this one FX is better looking inside and out. BMW looks almost unchanged on the interior for over 20+ years, and the exterior is very boring (considering the risque' styling of the 5 and 7 series)

Star - 6/4/2008 6:26:58 PM

-4 Boost

" The testing done by both magazines confirm that the BMW's outperform the Infiniti in almost all of the tests run"

Same c**p again. The BMW is of course the better car but the Infiniti is cheaper... so it wins.
BMW for the enthusiast who cannot accept anything less than the best has to offer.
Infiniti...for the cheap sheep.

ym73 - 6/4/2008 8:23:27 PM

+2 Boost

I guess there is always a market for people who are willing to spend a lot of money on marginally better performance/quality. I doubt this car is designed for an enthusiast. It's more for the soccer dad who wants a more masculine car, but still need the room and wants to show off a little.

BJS470 - 6/5/2008 11:50:38 AM

-1 Boost

Always has an excuse when BMW Looses...never can accept it

PerformanceGuy - 6/4/2008 6:59:51 PM

+9 Boost

Good job Infiniti, keep up the good work.

07mcs - 6/4/2008 7:08:39 PM

+9 Boost

The FX50 is a very good crossover for the performance and price it is offered at.

bclemans - 6/4/2008 8:14:58 PM

+7 Boost

It is okay to be biased. Like Road & Track's editor said he likes the Porsche 911 Turbo over the Nissan GTR because it has an "it" factor. I interpret that as the "prestiage" factor, or whatever that means. I can draw parallel to the X6 here, which is also a capable contender. Its okay to express an opinion, just admit it is biased, is that so hard in this forum?

MunichRob - 6/4/2008 8:56:02 PM

+5 Boost

Agent 00J don't let most of this sites useless users get under your skin, they see a positive comment made about another brand in which they're not loyal too & end up with their panties all in a knot.

Agent00J - 6/4/2008 10:41:32 PM

-2 Boost

MunichRob - They don't get under my skin, I just find it funny how much is read into what is written. I can assure everyone that we are not on BMW's payroll. Heck, if all BMW did was take care of my monthly payment I would be happy, but we both know that isn't happening.

I stated early on the fact that people are able to come here and defend their brand is what makes us an auto enthusiast. If we didn't care, we would all drive cars that look the same.

-00J

222max - 6/4/2008 11:31:13 PM

+2 Boost

This article is in no way congratulatory of the FX. It is clearly making a case against the results of the magazines in question. Fine.

But you don't have to read much into it to see that the article has little to stand on except some quiet outrage that a favorite car did not come out the clear winner.

222max - 6/4/2008 11:35:09 PM

0 Boost

By the way... just to even things out the X6 did come out on top by a small margin in the latest issue of EVO against The FX and Range Rover Sport. Maybe that will help.

Agent004 - 6/4/2008 10:04:50 PM

+10 Boost

I own an FX35 - and I love the way the X6 looks and the potential it has (I have yet to drive it). But at $70,000, there's no way I'd even consider buying it, it is overpriced.

At $70,000, I'm buying an M5 and worrying about the snow when winter rolls around.

Agent001 - 6/5/2008 12:05:55 AM

-1 Boost

You mean a used M5.

A new one is close to 90k these days...better keep coding ;)

001

S4cabriofoxone - 6/5/2008 1:52:03 AM

+5 Boost

For $70K you can get a loaded 535xi wagon.

Bmw8ter - 6/5/2008 7:48:24 AM

-2 Boost

"For $70K you can get a loaded 535xi wagon."

That's a high price for "tacky".

M35MT - 6/5/2008 8:24:37 AM

+2 Boost

I think S4 was pointing out how ridiculously overpriced they are.

Agent004 - 6/5/2008 8:41:28 AM

+2 Boost

Obviously a used one.

S4cabriofoxone - 6/5/2008 10:16:20 PM

+1 Boost

I actually really like the 535xiT and am considering it as my next purchase... Of course, it would be all-black with an M kit, but that's not the point.

Agent63 - 6/4/2008 11:37:49 PM

+6 Boost

As much as I love BMW's I have to say I find the FX more attractive, despite the over-sized front end that will take some time to grow on me.

In my opinion,

BMW didn't need this X6 model in their lineup. They already have a good looking X5 SUV and a smaller X3 so the X6 fills in no niche market. As for crossovers cars like the FX has already established itself and it doesn't look half bad.

So sorry BMW but you deserve the slap upside the head!

Agent63 - 6/4/2008 11:38:09 PM

+2 Boost

Oh I forgot. That BMW engine sounds awesome though!

mwrmmg - 6/5/2008 12:08:57 AM

-2 Boost

X6 is better. But the FX was there first with the concept.

Matthew1 - 6/5/2008 12:51:09 AM

-1 Boost

The FX is simply grotesque, nothing works on the design, and comes across decidedly like a caricature of a real car, almost cartoon-like. Especially with its exaggerated features and tacky chrome elements.

Lexus - 6/5/2008 1:17:47 AM

+1 Boost

I saw the new BMW X6 in red at work, man she was definitely a beauty for sure. I don't know which one handle better, but on look, I have to go with BMW X6.

S4cabriofoxone - 6/5/2008 1:53:34 AM

+1 Boost

Most people here know I like Infiniti, but I don't find the new FX attractive at all. It's too contradictory--the air vent is really the thing that completely ruins the entire design. It looks tacky. I much prefer the current model, and the X6, which I saw on the road the other day.

Dr550 - 6/5/2008 2:57:32 AM

-1 Boost

Was behind a black FX450. The view resembled a Darth Vader helmet.

JUGNU - 6/5/2008 6:05:00 AM

+4 Boost

I'll take FX every time over the X6. I just don't like X6's shape. FX's inteior is also better looking to me. Similar performance and costs less, that's a bounus.

JUGNU

S4cabriofoxone - 6/5/2008 10:17:38 PM

-1 Boost

I understand it when people say they like the car overall better... but interior? Who are you kidding? It's almost identical to the new Nissan Murano's interior and can't hold a candle to the X5/X6 interior, especially when outfitted with glove-soft Nappa leather.

EL44 - 6/5/2008 7:05:10 AM

-1 Boost

Here we go for a new battle. Step by step the new war will be between BMW fans and INFINITY's.

finishline - 6/5/2008 9:29:45 AM

+1 Boost

Agreed, but it's not just terrorists. It's extremists of any variety. It's only when you look at it as a disinterested observer that you see how absurd it is.

I understand that this site doesn't pretend to follow impartial journalistic standards, but more and more it's become like FOX News, designed to inflame, thereby increasing traffic and revenue. It's a business model that works, so it's hard to argue with it. Hey, at least with cars we're not inciting people to hatred, violence or restricting the civil rights of others (I'm talking to you FOX).

S4cabriofoxone - 6/5/2008 10:18:07 PM

+1 Boost

IS-F

abcd - 6/5/2008 9:58:34 AM

0 Boost

in my opinion bmw X6 and infinty fx aren`t competitors . infinty fx competes rather with bmw X5 . bmw X6 competitor is mercedes cls becouse they are both do for the same customers who prefer "form over function" . bmw wanted only to follow this coupe fashion making coupe SUV instead of sedan coupe like porsche panamera and aston martin .

MeanVulcan - 6/5/2008 10:31:57 AM

-1 Boost

hmm, similar performance but the FX50 is much cheaper than the X6 and much nicer looking IMO. I would have to be stupid to pay extra simply for a name, while the Infiniti brand name is not above BMW it is certainly not too far behind, and for the price you get a sport SUV that can hold its own in performance and beat BMW in styling, quality and practical use. I just ended my lease on an FX35 and this SUV has way more cargo space than the X6. Honestly, without the practical cargo space the X6 is a waste of a design since it has no other purpose - its not a sports car and its not an SUV, there are better alternatives for any use you could possibly need a vehicle for. So I agree with both reviews, the FX50 with added power, performance and improved styling is a clear choice over the X6.

markanthony0419 - 6/5/2008 11:12:58 AM

0 Boost

in all these comparisons its obvious price matters. the fx beats the x6 and people dont like it because they say the performace is slightly better. well isnt that why the 335 beats the s5 because the numbers are the same and the bmw is cheaper so it wins but now the bmw is on the wrong side and most of you are crying about it.

Star - 6/5/2008 11:28:08 AM

-4 Boost

The only difference is that Infiniti looks like an economy car next to the luxurious, tough built BMW.

Star - 6/5/2008 3:14:03 PM

-2 Boost

FX is a POS Nissan? What part you don't understand tool-nik?

Star - 6/5/2008 8:35:55 PM

0 Boost

Sheep, sheep, sheeeeeep....

Star - 6/5/2008 11:25:14 AM

-3 Boost

There is obviously a trend in which a lot of magazines are trying to gain popularity with the poor, dumb masses by slamming rich people's "toys" no matter if they are cars, houses, jewelries, clothing...and so on.
What is more satisfying for the unsuccessful, hateful sheep than to read fairy-tales in which cheap, trashy economy cars like Infiniti "beat"(supposedly) engineering marvels like the BMW. Wanna sell a magazine....say crap about expensive, luxurious things and you got the masses cheering. This is what Clarkson did for years on Top Gear with so much success and it is obvious that plenty of other magazines try to gain popularity using the same "technique".

Star - 6/5/2008 3:11:06 PM

-1 Boost

I can recognise trash if that's you mean. I recognised you Teknik, didn't I? LOL...

Star - 6/5/2008 8:33:16 PM

-2 Boost

Try to act like a man and leave the family out of this. As for myself, I will choose not to insult your family since is not responsible for your failure as an adult.

Randry - 6/19/2008 12:26:31 PM

+1 Boost

Star's description of magazine tactics reminds me of the M3, 911 Turbo, GTR Car&Driver article. That is a better example of a magazine trying hard to sell more magazines.

gsh23 - 6/5/2008 2:16:16 PM

+1 Boost

you know im starting to miss the lexus fanatics...i would love to see someone say the GX is better than both of these. im being serious. it would actually make me feel sane.

Htay7500 - 6/5/2008 3:18:47 PM

+2 Boost

performance suvs = oxymoron

avanti64 - 6/5/2008 10:44:53 PM

-4 Boost

Status is an American manifestation of greed. Some people (Star?) can never get enough because they were dorky little kids with no self esteem but a load of money.
German kraut is the ultimate manifestation to these dorks because they are close-minded and stupid.
Forget about the Nazimobiles, they are on their way out. They have always been overpriced, un reliable pieces of junk - just what our dorky low self esteem Americans need to make them feel superior (somewhat like the Germans - remember the German "super race"? They were the same. They felt better wielding their sick power over anyone who was not blond and blue-eyed.
Congratulations INFINITI!!

Matthew1 - 6/6/2008 2:22:39 AM

+5 Boost

Both of you sound financially-insecure and jealous.

There is nothing wrong with not being wealthy (I'm certainly not) but when you have to stoop so low as to directly insult those peoples' choice of car, and compare them to Nazis, then I have a feeling you suffer from deep-set physiological issues.

For you, rational conversation is nigh on impossible, as witnessed by the hateful drivel in your posts.

Teknik,

I do believe that those who try their hardest to prove that someone is a 'little kid' does so in a transparent attempt to hide the fact that they aren't that old themselves -certainly not old enough to drive, which is why most of your posts aren't about cars at all, but immature personal attacks -the anonymity of the Internet your only protection..

AdHominem - 6/6/2008 6:25:43 PM

+2 Boost

Please ban telnik and avanti64. They offer nothing but racism and mindless insults.

avanti64 - 6/5/2008 10:46:24 PM

-1 Boost

Oh, by the way the X6 is BUTT UGLY!

Randry - 6/6/2008 7:31:53 PM

-1 Boost

Hatchback with a liftkit? Why? Get a sedan and enjoy a lower center of gravity and better aerodynamics... At least the FX has a trunk you could actually stand something up in which is the reason people bought SUVs in the first place right? SUV minus the U is SV or Stupid Vehicle

AdHominem - 6/7/2008 11:33:55 PM

+2 Boost

There are plenty of wagon shaped SUVs for hauling a washing machine, the X6 is for people who want soemthing else. So YOU don't like it...who cares. They are building them for the people who do.

JRobUSC - 6/7/2008 5:36:50 PM

+4 Boost

"It doesnt matter how much engineering is put into an X6 you can't mask 800 lbs in handling..."

well, other than the fact that the X6 actually did outhandle the FX, you're right. Considering it outhandled (and outran) the Infiniti WITH the extra 700lbs, imagine how it would have done without it.

JockDoc8 - 12/23/2010 5:38:06 PM

+1 Boost

Just purchased 2011 x6 50 and the thing is a complete beast!!! So much fun to drive!! Excellent ride comfort with power and superior handling ability! 8 speed tranny is as smooth as silk!!! So before you dis on the x6 take one for a drive...then let me no what you think.