As of 2009 all new cars in California will have to wear ‘green’ car labels

As of the first of January 2009, all new cars sold in California will be required to wear a label which will inform customers about their environmental impact. The Secretary of State passed this law earlier this week.
Read Article

thetruth01thetruth01 - 6/26/2008 12:17:16 PM
+2 Boost
I didnt know the Secretary of State had the ability to pass laws.....

Still, the more information available the better.


randy33randy33 - 6/27/2008 1:57:45 AM
+2 Boost
"Global warming score"? IT's A HOAX. Cars do not change the temperature of the Earth. This is a hoax.


SHOWTIMESHOWTIME - 6/26/2008 12:23:09 PM
+1 Boost
I'm sure this sounds sexist but only a female leader would come out with such a rediculous law. She should wear one on her forhead to inform what impact her berps and farts have.


LexusKindaGuy12LexusKindaGuy12 - 6/26/2008 12:31:00 PM
-1 Boost
well im glad you know it sounds sexist. lol


as for the stickers...i guess its an "okay" idea, i dont see it impacting anyone. unless, those real environmentalist will hit you car as they cross the intersection seeing that low emmisions rating of your diesel.


BoredBored - 6/26/2008 12:42:12 PM
-1 Boost
A nice idea that comes off as an election ploy, somewhat.

@LKG12,

Trolling over '09 diesels with urea tech? Please. Let's see how Cali ranks them in respect to gas-electric hybrids first.


LexusKindaGuy12LexusKindaGuy12 - 6/26/2008 6:34:23 PM
+1 Boost
please take a look at fueleconomy.gov

the 2008 E320 bluetec has an airpollution score of 3 out of 10. just because it has urea doesnt mean that it wont have smog forming compounds


LexusKindaGuy12LexusKindaGuy12 - 6/26/2008 6:35:47 PM
+1 Boost
oh and the prius/ ls600h/ rx400h/ GS450h has an airpollution score of an 8.


chewychewy - 6/27/2008 12:30:35 AM
+1 Boost
all the data is already available at fueleconomy.gov, so not that much new here except a sticker

diesels get an air poluttion score of 6

and the greenhouse gas figure is wrong for diesels as you actually get 18%+ more mpgs than what the EPA quotes, which means you actually put out less c02 than advertized


jeffgalljeffgall - 6/26/2008 12:35:04 PM
+6 Boost
Sounds like more energy will be used to create the stickers than the amount of engergy saved by people who actually read it. Can't this info just get added to the dealer sticker. MPG is already communicated.


sold2earlysold2early - 6/26/2008 12:50:37 PM
+5 Boost
It's the automotive equivalent of the Scarlet Letter!


M35MTM35MT - 6/26/2008 3:08:36 PM
+1 Boost
No different than a Nutrition Facts label.


DodgeyaussieDodgeyaussie - 6/26/2008 3:10:46 PM
+2 Boost
Except you don't eat your car. Probably.


M35MTM35MT - 6/26/2008 3:45:14 PM
+1 Boost
BTW, just because a car gets low MPG, doesnt mean its not "green". Emissions are the key here.

I could get 10 MPG and drive 100 miles /week
You get 20 MPG and drive 200 miles /week

10 gallons of fuel either way.


M35MTM35MT - 6/26/2008 3:45:49 PM
+1 Boost
You're right, I dont eat my car.


fuelfoolfuelfool - 6/27/2008 2:00:37 AM
+5 Boost
How about a law requiring carbon profiteers and hypocrites like Al Gore, Leonardo DiCaprio, Nancy Pelosi, etc. to wear a label showing how many more tons of carbon they emit into the atmosphere every year than the average American, whose behavior they're so determined regulate.


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC