Compact exec group test ! Audi vs BMW vs Jaguar vs Mercedes.

Compact exec group test !   Audi vs BMW vs Jaguar vs Mercedes.
BMW has facelifted the 3-Series in a bid to reclaim its compact executive crown. So, how does it shape up against Audi, Jaguar and Mercedes rivals?

It’s the premium car with mass appeal. BMW’s 3-Series wears an upmarket badge, but its popularity and sales success mean it has featured in the UK top 10 best-sellers list for the past three years. Described by bosses as “the heartbeat of the brand”, it accounts for a huge 45 per cent of BMW’s British sales.

So to keep the classy favourite at the top of its game, the saloon and Touring estate have had a mid-life update. The styling has been refreshed, interiors spruced up and engines tweaked, while as before there’s a choice of ES, SE and M Sport models. Nearly half the cars sold in the UK come in the latter trim, so we picked the revamped 330d M Sport for the model’s first UK test.

The six-cylinder 3.0-litre diesel has been revised to give more power and torque, while emissions and economy are also improved. But the competition is tough. Audi’s new A4 is better to drive than ever, and in racy S line trim the 3.0-litre TDI quattro is a real sports saloon to challenge the best BMW has to offer.

Don’t forget Mercedes, either: the C-Class has unique styling in Sport guise, and here our long-term C320 CDI faces up to the reworked BMW. Jaguar’s X-Type has recently benefited from a facelift, too, so this test gives us a chance to find out if it can still compete with the German class leader

Verdict:

Combining excellent driver appeal and immense performance, the 330d M Sport is a fantastic sports saloon – and a superb compact executive model, too.

Its styling updates are subtle, but they have done just enough to make the 3-Series irresistible. And despite its low emissions, the BMW engine has more power than its rivals. What’s more, the firm has addressed the cabin’s only real flaw, by reworking the iDrive system. The 330d wins – albeit only by the tiniest of margins.

It narrowly relegates the Audi to second place. The 3.0-litre TDI is fast and refined, and with the benefit of four-wheel drive the handling is sharp and secure.

With decent performance and sporty styling the C320 is a strong contender, too. Yet the CDI engine can’t match the BMW’s torque or the Audi’s refinement. The C-Class has a slightly uninspiring cabin as well, so despite boasting the best residuals it finishes third here. The Jaguar is the only car to be comprehensively outclassed in every area. Even the low price can’t hide the fact that the X-Type is now too old to compete in the toughest of new car sectors.

1st BMW 330d

2nd Audi A4 TDI S Line

3rd Mercedes C320 CDI Sport

4th Jaguar X-Type 2.2D Auto
Read Article

HSCenterconsoleHSCenterconsole - 10/16/2008 11:08:11 AM
+8 Boost
Always fun reading about the diesel versions living here in the States where we are diesel deprived (I'm really looking forward to driving the 335d when it comes over). This would be my personal preference ranking and obviously I have not driven these diesel versions:

1) BMW 330d: You just can't beat the driving dynamics of the 3-Series. After owning my first 3 for almost two years now, I'm still impressed by its poise and balance. Simply said, it is a GREAT car.

2) Merc C320 CDI: I really like the styling of the new "sport" C-Classes. My previous car was an '03 C320 4MATIC and it was a great car. You can't beat the Mercedes for highway stability and cruising. Diesel fuel mileage on the interstate would be great I can imagine. I just hope the new C's have better reliability than my '03 did.

3) Audi A4 TDI: I love how aggressive the front LED's look. However, I'm less impressed with this A4's styling. One was parked behind me last week and it is far bigger than the 3-Series and I feel the design, while handsome, is very non-descript like the A6. Plus, I still don't like Audi's heavy front nose (even though it has been improved in this model).

4) Jag X-Type 2.2D: I can't believe this model is still around. Talk about a failure of a car that really hurt the brand's image here in the U.S.


steve27tsteve27t - 10/16/2008 10:55:36 PM
-2 Boost
Amazinretard.

It narrowly relegates the Audi to second place. The 3.0-litre TDI is fast and refined, and with the benefit of four-wheel drive the handling is sharp and secure.

For many the Quattro will swing it back the other way.


zygotezygote - 10/18/2008 8:43:51 AM
-1 Boost
Totally predictable. These mags are so obviously sponsored by BMW, Audi and Ford!

3-Series? Big slab of teutonic boredom, and don't get me started on rip-off audi. Glorified VW piece of sh1t driven by morons with no imagination.



jpighettijpighetti - 10/18/2008 4:17:23 PM
+1 Boost
Dear Retard,

From the article that would have only taken a moment - actually in you case, probably an hour and a half - to read:

"The 330d wins – albeit only by the tiniest of margins."

From Merraim-Webster online. Please see definition 2 for additional proof that you're an epic failure(as if that was necesary):

Handily

Pronunciation:
\'han-d?-le\
Function:
adverb
Date:
1665

1 : in a dexterous manner
2 : easily <defeated the other candidate handily>
3 : conveniently nearby

There's no doubt that the 3 series in M sport guise outhandles the A4. What about the massive portion of the population that would rather have competent AWD or even FWD, since raw handling is ONLY IMPORTANT TO A TINY FRACTION OF THE BUYING PUBLIC!!!

I'd still take the BMW....


JRobUSCJRobUSC - 10/16/2008 12:02:40 PM
+2 Boost
damn, why doesn't BMW offer that bodykit from the factory here? It makes the car sooooo much less boring looking (and I have an E90).


Htay7500Htay7500 - 10/16/2008 5:56:35 PM
+3 Boost
Thats one of the reasons why the intro of the E90 didn't really excite me as much. That bodykit looks pretty cool. I can't see why they won't offer it here.


SpeedoholicSpeedoholic - 10/16/2008 1:53:36 PM
+4 Boost
BMW on top ... as always!
This 330d looks so hot with that front bumper!


SHOWTIMESHOWTIME - 10/16/2008 3:46:48 PM
-4 Boost
LOL


nikejknikejk - 10/16/2008 6:59:03 PM
0 Boost
I never thought Jaguar was in these comparisons. And Mercedes hasn't done good in any comparisons. Shouldn't they put like the CTS or G37 sedan in here?


VISOVISO - 10/16/2008 9:43:33 PM
+1 Boost
...the world according to Garth.


steve27tsteve27t - 10/16/2008 10:58:41 PM
0 Boost
Amazin retard, yeah thats why Audi outsells BMW in the UK.

You need to go forth and multiply.


1dott81dott8 - 10/17/2008 1:02:20 AM
+3 Boost
was that english?


QuantumMatrixQuantumMatrix - 10/17/2008 6:05:16 PM
+2 Boost
Damn StarSearch,

You can smell it?? You are on the internet, so you must have sH_t your own pants..


BMWSLSMNBMWSLSMN - 10/17/2008 1:08:17 AM
+4 Boost
For the guys asking about the body kit. That's not a body kit. That is the front fascia for the 2009 (E90) 3 series, which have already landed on N. American soil. In fact drove mine home a couple of weeks ago.

Your right it looks amazing!!!


GermanNutGermanNut - 10/17/2008 1:37:18 AM
-3 Boost
You should accept the fact that BMW produces mass amounts of FWD shit aka as the Mini.

Cheaper, does not mean the car is necessarily bought by less affluent buyers. Get that through your stupid head. Audi buyers are wealthier than their BMW counterparts and spend less on their cars. BMW buyers are poorer and spend more on their cars (this would be you). That is precisely why BMW owners must lease their cars to afford them. BMW owners do not have the cash to buy the car on the spot (which would also be you)

Face it amazinRetard Audi outsells your shitty BMW brand in both the UK and China. They might be FWD but if you discount Audi's FWD models we will discount BMW group's MINI Sales.

MORON!


HSCenterconsoleHSCenterconsole - 10/17/2008 10:30:43 AM
-1 Boost
Germannut, I think your reasoning here is severely flawed: "They might be FWD but if you discount Audi's FWD models we will discount BMW group's MINI Sales."

Mini's are FWD and are owned by BMW. However, Mini is a seperate brand. A FWD Audi A4 is still an Audi and doesn't have its own set of dealerships or advertising.



GermanNutGermanNut - 10/17/2008 1:12:21 PM
0 Boost
Cheaper, does not mean the car is necessarily bought by less affluent buyers. Get that through your stupid head. Audi buyers are wealthier than their BMW counterparts and spend less on their cars. BMW buyers are poorer and spend more on their cars (this would be you). That is precisely why BMW owners must lease their cars to afford them. BMW owners do not have the cash to buy the car on the spot (which would also be you)

Fortunately, I'm not a poot BMW owner like AmazinBimmer. I actually own my car because I had enough money to buy it the day I walked into the dealership unlike BMW owners who must lease their cars.


zygotezygote - 10/18/2008 8:51:32 AM
+1 Boost
However nobody really *buys* 3-series' or A4's do they? Companies lease them for their sales rep's. They are mass market rep-mobiles designed for that specific purpose. You'd be mad to actually buy one.


jpighettijpighetti - 10/18/2008 4:24:57 PM
+1 Boost
Are you serious? Yeah, all of the 3-series and A4's sold are leased in massive numbers by huge companies for their reps.

How do you design a car solely to be leased for company reps, since you claim that's their "specific purpose".

And you'd definitely have to be mad to buy one of the two most competitive, finest choices in the class. Let me guess, Lexus fan?

Clearly you possess the brain power of your namesake. Actually, that might be a stretch...


GermanNutGermanNut - 10/17/2008 3:52:07 PM
0 Boost
Hey Moron tell us WHY did you not BUY your 750Li.

You simply didn't have enough cash on hand. Exactly my point. You are the typical BMW fanboy who is poor and can't aford to spend $90K at once for their car when they go into the dealership to buy it.

How does it feel to make monthly LEASE payments to afford your car. Oh wait I forgot that is what all the stupid dumb blonde BMW-driving secretaries do also!


hahahaha take that AmazinMoron. Come talk to me when you actually have the $90K to drop at once for your 750Li.



M53RM53R - 10/17/2008 4:35:44 PM
+3 Boost
Wow... Im begining to wonder how old the members on this site are...


QuantumMatrixQuantumMatrix - 10/17/2008 6:10:25 PM
+3 Boost
I'm guessing StarSearch and GermanNut are 11 and amazinBimmer might be 13.




BMWSLSMNBMWSLSMN - 10/19/2008 5:14:33 PM
+1 Boost
I think GermanNut is a NUT!!! Your trying to justify a company's prodcut by stating that its customers are more affluent. I got to hand it to you, you've convinced me(sarcasm in case it flew over your head). Facts are facts, Audi makes a great car and benchmarked all wheel drive systems, however the BMW is a better driving vehicle. It handles better, brakes better, and is RWD (expensive production costs), because BMW doesn't compromise for the sake of making its vehicle a lower priced vehicle than its competitors.

People lease BMW's because they are making better financial decisions with their money. You own a vehicle, you own the depreciation. When leasing the manufacturer owns the depreciation. This also leads to BMW's being worth a hell of a lot more after 3 years than an Audi does.

As for your comment about not being a poor BMW owner. Use your brain, how do vehicles that are generally more expensive than their competitors end up being driven by poor people. Play that thought out in your head for a few moments, and then come back and type a proper comment under your name.

I am going to assume that you are 11 as Matrix said because your arguments have no rationale, and are clearly uneducated!!!!


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC