Subaru's Forester Claims Motor Trend SUV Of The Year Award

Subaru's Forester Claims Motor Trend SUV Of The Year Award
Topping 12 other contenders, the Subaru Forester was, according to MOTOR TREND editor-in-chief, Angus MacKenzie, the judges' unanimous decision. "The Subaru Forester is the SUV for our times," said MacKenzie.

    "We are proud and honored to receive this award for the Subaru Forester," said Thomas J. Doll, executive vice president, Subaru of America. "The previous Forester had become a byword for practicality and durability and we knew the 2009 Forester had a tough act to follow. So, we
made the new Forester bigger, more powerful and more economical than ever-while retaining its legendary reliability and safety, only in a more complete package. The improvements to the new Forester are also being reflected in consumer demand, with sales up 32% over the previous year."

    Priced from $19,995 the all-new Subaru Forester represents a $1,200 reduction over the entry price of the previous model. It is available with either a 170-hp 2.5-liter boxer engine or a 224-hp turbocharged engine. Blending utility with performance and comfort, the 2009 Forester is built on an all-new platform featuring a 3.6-inch longer wheelbase (now 103.0 inches) that improves ride and interior space, especially rear seat legroom. The 2009 Forester also features increased hip and shoulder room.

    Living up to Subaru's legendary safety record, the Forester and offers cutting-edge safety technology, including Subaru's ring reinforcement safety system, front, seat-mounted side, and three-row side-curtain airbags and ABS. Subaru Vehicle Dynamics Control (VDC) system, which incorporates stability and traction control systems with a roll-over sensor, is also
standard equipment.

    The Subaru Forester recently received the highest possible ratings in frontal and side impact crash tests by the governments' National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). In addition to a five-star frontal and side impact crash-test rating, the 2009 Forester received a four-star rollover resistance rating.

    To judge contenders for the award, MOTOR TREND's editorial staff conducted exhaustive off-road, street and track testing, and carefully considered essentials such as driving performance, safety and features. MOTOR TREND'S Sport/Utility of the Year is not a comparison test. Each contender was evaluated against three simple criteria: superiority
(engineering, design, utilization of resources); significance (its impact on the market), and value (what buyers get for their money versus the competition).


Be sure to check out our latest Audi Mileage Marathon updates!



HSCenterconsoleHSCenterconsole - 10/16/2008 10:54:13 AM
+6 Boost
The Forester has always gotten great reviews. HOWEVER, I think it really should be considered a tall wagon and not an SUV.


ShredmoShredmo - 10/16/2008 11:45:28 AM
+2 Boost
My wish, offer the 2009 265hp WRX motor and manual transmission. This would rip!


Htay7500Htay7500 - 10/16/2008 3:42:03 PM
+2 Boost
I think the boxer diesel would make the great all-round vehicle. It sucks that it'll come in '10. I hear its towing capacity is a little more than 2400lb!


Htay7500Htay7500 - 10/16/2008 3:42:32 PM
+1 Boost
The WRX motor should belong in legacy!!


Htay7500Htay7500 - 10/16/2008 3:56:37 PM
+2 Boost
Scratch that, 4400 lb on the diesel! (look at the last pg of MTs review)


Htay7500Htay7500 - 10/16/2008 3:56:41 PM
+2 Boost
Scratch that, 4400 lb on the diesel! (look at the last pg of MTs review)


JanizaryJanizary - 10/16/2008 11:55:52 AM
+3 Boost
My wife has been looking at the Rav4 and CR-V. After some propmting, I had her go look at the new Forester and it is now high in probability that it will be the one purchased. 2.5X Limited.


r_driver04r_driver04 - 10/17/2008 10:19:34 AM
+1 Boost
I own a 2007 RAV4 4wd V6 and currently own a 2008 Spec B Legacy(family's owned 5 Subies). Forester is strong and offers excellent performance and safety. But the V6 RAV4 is hard to beat, for the power, drivetrain refinement and price. I avg 23 mpg or better in my RAV4 and Spec B.


no1listensanywayno1listensanyway - 10/16/2008 12:41:16 PM
-1 Boost
lol..ok


M35MTM35MT - 10/16/2008 1:24:21 PM
+1 Boost
Do you have a link? I wanted to see all the contenders.


ShredmoShredmo - 10/16/2008 1:34:33 PM
+2 Boost
It is on motortrend.com
Interesting, the only other vehicle that received any votes out of the ~15 new SUV's tested was the Ford Flex. Hmmm. interesting.


justthetipjustthetip - 10/16/2008 2:37:18 PM
+1 Boost
http://www.motortrend.com/oftheyear/suv/112_0812_2009_subaru_forester_suv_of_the_year/index.html


PlanBPlanB - 10/16/2008 2:20:52 PM
+1 Boost
Funny opening to article about why the Toyota Venza isn't there.


Htay7500Htay7500 - 10/16/2008 3:42:55 PM
+2 Boost
You're really funny.


WhelanWhelan - 10/16/2008 3:36:16 PM
+2 Boost
I would definitely put the new Forester in the small SUV class. Before it was a taller version of the Outback wagon, but it has grown into a great alternative to the other baby utes. I have seen a few on the road and they are impressive looking.

Not to mention they offer more car with better features at a cheaper cost than the previous model. Something today's consumer is really looking for.


ShredmoShredmo - 10/16/2008 10:52:37 PM
+1 Boost
Regardless the difference in quality between a Subaru and a BMW, it is clear that you are not in the echelon of people that BMW targets when they create these vehicles.


truckmantruckman - 10/17/2008 4:31:02 AM
0 Boost
This is more of a station wagon than a suv! There is no way that this could follow my old 1993 4-runner off road! So are suv's progressing off road or regressing? If this is the best I may as well make my own suv and I will buy a car for commuting.


ShredmoShredmo - 10/17/2008 10:01:32 AM
0 Boost
Let me remind you that this product is the overall best "SUV" at covering all categories of SUV useage. Also, the Foz does off-road acceptably, just not up to your elite "4runner" standards...



r_driver04r_driver04 - 10/17/2008 10:35:31 AM
+1 Boost
I bet most new SUVs get better gas mpg than your 93 4Runner. I love 4wheelin, but unless you do it once a week, what's the point. How many Rubicons do you see w/o a hint of mud on them?


truckmantruckman - 10/17/2008 2:34:04 PM
+1 Boost
Shredmo I like the car but I just can't imagine taking it off road other than a gravel road, and Road and Track says it all! It's not called "Four Wheeler" or "Off Road" magazine.I would like to see this try to follow a jeep Rubicon.
and r driver04 my 4 Runner averaged 12.5L/100km with 31 inch tires! That is around 23mpg (Canadian gallon)Unfortunately the 180 lbs of torque didn't work well in deep sand or deep snow, especially hill climbing, I have been in many bad situations because of the lack of power. I like this Subaru, I just think that the word utility in these vehicles have been lost.


ShredmoShredmo - 10/17/2008 4:44:38 PM
+2 Boost
Keep in mind that the older FXTs would do 0-62kph in 5.5 sec and top speed was electronically limited to 210kph. Top Gear put it on their "Cool Wall".

Here is a thread on subarforester.org chocked full of pics of Foresters in action. No, no Rubicon style off-roading, but definitely more than gravel. Look at these pics, think of it's on-road performance and tell me if the word UTILITY has really been lost. Enjoy...

http://www.subaruforester.org/vbulletin/f114/historical-hysterical-off-road-forester-pictures-913/



ShredmoShredmo - 10/18/2008 8:00:01 PM
+2 Boost
I meant 0-100lph in 5.5 seconds....
I sucks


ShredmoShredmo - 10/18/2008 8:08:49 PM
+2 Boost
I suxors even worse. I meant KPH. Gosh!!!!!!!!!1!


truckmantruckman - 10/18/2008 1:41:44 AM
+2 Boost
Impressive photos! I like the Subaru with the gate crashing bumper on page 9, On the same page it shows the vulnerable undercarriage with the headers all banged up, all it needs is a skid plate though. I am not overly surprised but more impressive than I thought!Not comparable to my 4-runner off road but better than I imagined.Thanks for the enlightening link, it was fun.


ShredmoShredmo - 10/18/2008 8:07:02 PM
+2 Boost
Yeah, it is not an off-road machine, but does O.K. off-road. I'm just saying, it nearly defines the word utility. I do have a soft spot for the second gen. 4runner, BTW.


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC