NEW 2010 Ford Mustang LEAKED-63 PICTURES

NEW 2010 Ford Mustang LEAKED-63 PICTURES
The 2010 Ford Mustang was supposed to be released Tuesday but Ford seemed to semi-release it a bit early. The Mustang’s exterior looks a lot different and it seems to be a blend of the 05-09 Mustang generation as well as the generation before that. Some noticeable differences are the new wheels,LED tail lamps, fog lamps. Inside, the car has a reverse camera and the Ford Sync(which I heard is great). newmustang5.jpgA lot of people always tell me that the mustang is a chick car, well this one looks a lot more aggressive and is clearly a modern day “Muscle Car”. Underneath the skin, Ford’s engineers have retuned the 2009 Mustang’s suspension and reworked the GT’s 4.6-liter V8 engine which benefits from the changes first seen on the Bullitt delivering 315HP and 325 lb-ft of torque. For the 2010 model, the entry-level 4.0-liter V6 engine remains unchanged producing a pathetic -for a 21st century car- 210HP and 240 lb-ft of torque.

“We adjusted the springs, stabilizer bars and shocks to better balance the ride, steering and handling for all models, which results in a more engaging driving experience,” adds Mustang Vehicle Engineering manager Tom Barnes. “The 2010 Mustangs feel more controlled for steering and handling, yet retain a good ride balance.”
Thankfully, the old school antenna has been finally cut. Also, Ford claims that it has newmustang34.jpgreplaced the cheap and hard plastics of the current generation model with upgraded, soft touch materials, which from the pictures seems to be true. The new ‘Stang is expected to go on sale in the U.S. in early 2009 where it will be available in three body styles, coupe, convertible and with a glass roof option. The only question is how will it compete with the all new Chevy Camaro, which has been its competitor since the 60’s?

What are your thoughts on the car?
Read Article

rxh8me1rxh8me1 - 11/18/2008 3:13:38 AM
+1 Boost
The interior still looks cheap.I like the exterior....a lot.


Jeffnfun631Jeffnfun631 - 11/18/2008 11:23:46 PM
+3 Boost
If you dont care why are you on this page to check? Which do you have let me guess Camry or Accord?


synxsynx - 11/18/2008 5:04:29 AM
+1 Boost
the old one looked better


HSCenterconsoleHSCenterconsole - 11/18/2008 7:49:55 AM
-1 Boost
764 teaser pics of door handles, fuel caps, and radio buttons for this? I prefer the current model's styling over this refresh.


CARsFAN19CARsFAN19 - 11/18/2008 9:01:29 AM
0 Boost
I like it , at least it`s had the new shape ...


lakerfan213lakerfan213 - 11/18/2008 9:19:09 AM
+1 Boost
Wow...I actually like it.


lakerfan213lakerfan213 - 11/18/2008 9:19:12 AM
+1 Boost
Wow...I actually like it.


veyron1001veyron1001 - 11/18/2008 9:56:35 AM
0 Boost
Dont they mean the same car we were looking at for the last 2 to 3 years with the shitty and irrelevant teasers.


hk4sitehk4site - 11/18/2008 10:58:18 AM
0 Boost
You have to be kidding me all that hype and hardly any changes!! I do not feel sorry for the little 3 anymore!


hk4sitehk4site - 11/18/2008 10:58:18 AM
+1 Boost
You have to be kidding me all that hype and hardly any changes!! I do not feel sorry for the little 3 anymore!


bmwdrvrbmwdrvr - 11/18/2008 11:02:30 AM
+2 Boost
the camaro almost makes this thing seem irrelevant. It has a much more modern chassis and suspension setup, it offer more power, for not much more money, and its interior looks better, while being a larger car all together.....the base camaro has 300hp, while the one that competes with the Gt's 320hp has 420hp whilenot losing to he mustang in epa ratings unlessyou have to have a mustang, i cant see why anyone would buy one over a camaro and after driving a G8 GT, it has to be alot more sophisticated than the mustang, the G8 had a great performance comfort compromise much like a european car


2ndbimmer2ndbimmer - 11/18/2008 12:49:55 PM
+1 Boost
i hate mustangs, but this actually looks nice. good for them. hopefully they will stop overproducing cars and not kill its resale value, again and again.


komododavekomododave - 11/18/2008 5:29:35 PM
+1 Boost
What did they do to the tail lights???


truckmantruckman - 11/18/2008 5:51:53 PM
+1 Boost
I would actually have to drive one to really say but it doesn't excite me. The v-6 is very dated with low power, is the v-6 an economy engine? If the V-6 were a gas miser that would be acceptable. I would be more impressed if it performed against the likes of the GTR, unlikely but at least something for Ford to strive to.


jt716jt716 - 11/18/2008 7:40:40 PM
+2 Boost
I think the V6 engine is going to be replaced by the ecoboost engine so maybe that is why they did'nt change it:S


Jeffnfun631Jeffnfun631 - 11/18/2008 11:31:23 PM
+1 Boost
The 71-73 fastback styling was still my fave. But im old school..


mini22mini22 - 11/19/2008 12:35:55 PM
+1 Boost
Truckman-Are you serious. A Nissan GTR costs about 80 grand. A Mustang is not trying to appeal to the same audience and is in a totally different price catagory.Ford had a halo car.It was the Ford GT. Unfortunately Ford decided to stop producing it.Thats life.The only thing that holds the Mustang back in my book is the lack of IRS and the Duratec engine for the V6. When the eco boost comes out in a few yrs that should solve the lack of power in the V6.The rest of the car is very good in my opinion. I like the restyle. The interior is more upscale then a Camaro or Challenger. Further the Camaro and Challenger weigh in from 400 to 600LBS more then the Mustang so performance wise it is not a big a gap as one would thing. A GT V8 will probably hit 0-60 in 5 seconds flat. A Camaro SS at 420 HP might be 3/10s of a second quicker and a SRT8 Challenger about the same.A base Mustang GT V8 is probably going to cost similar money to the Camaro V6 RS or about 26 grand. A Camaro SS will probably come in at around 33 grand and SRT8 starts at 40 grand. In fact the Challenger RT loaded up with options is 39 grand where a premium GT is slightly over 30 grand.So you have to say that the Mustang does offer pretty good value for the buck.


truckmantruckman - 11/20/2008 4:37:40 AM
+1 Boost
I can argue with your logic mini22, You are absolutely right. What I was trying to convey is that Ford should add some more teck into this car like you mentioned about the IRS and an eco teck engine with more HP. I didn't hear any talk about a stiffer frame,or better handling! that is the stuff I would like to hear.


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC