GM Makes A Commitment To The US Tax Payer, But Will You Ever Trust Them Again?

GM Makes A Commitment To The US Tax Payer, But Will You Ever Trust Them Again?
We deeply appreciate the Congress considering General Motors’ request to borrow up to
$18 billion from the United States. We want to be sure the American people know why
we need it, what we’ll do with it and how it will make GM viable for the long term.
For a century, we have been serving your personal mobility needs, providing American
jobs and serving local communities. We have been the U.S. sales leader for 76
consecutive years. Of the 250 million cars and trucks on U.S. roads today, more than 66
million are GM brands — nearly 44 million more than Toyota brands. Our goal is to
continue to fulfill your aspirations and exceed your expectations.

While we’re still the U.S. sales leader, we acknowledge we have disappointed you. At
times we violated your trust by letting our quality fall below industry standards and our
designs become lackluster. We have proliferated our brands and dealer network to the
point where we lost adequate focus on our core U.S. market. We also biased our product
mix toward pick-up trucks and SUVs. And, we made commitments to compensation
plans that have proven to be unsustainable in today’s globally competitive industry. We
have paid dearly for these decisions, learned from them and are working hard to correct
them by restructuring our U.S. business to be viable for the long term.

Today, we have substantially overcome our quality gap; our newest designs like the
Chevrolet Malibu and Cadillac CTS are widely heralded for their appeal; our new
products are nearly all cars and “crossovers” rather than pick-ups and SUVs; our factories
have greatly improved productivity and our labor agreements are much more competitive.
We are also driven to lead in fuel economy, with more hybrid models for sale and
biofuel-capable vehicles on the road than any other manufacturer, and determined to
reinvent the automobile with products like the Chevrolet Volt extended-range electric
vehicle and breakthrough technology like hydrogen fuel cells.

Until recent events, we felt the actions we’d been taking positioned us for a bright future.
Just a year ago, after we reached transformational agreements with our unions, industry
analysts were forecasting a positive GM turnaround. We had adequate cash on hand to
continue our restructuring even under relatively conservative industry sales volume
assumptions. Unfortunately, along with all Americans, we were hit by a “perfect storm.”
Over the past year we have all faced volatile energy prices, the collapse of the U.S.
housing market, failing financial institutions, a stock market crash and the complete
freezing of credit. We are in the midst of the worst economic crisis since the Great
Depression. Just like you, we have been severely impacted by events outside our control.
U.S. auto industry sales have fallen to their lowest per capita rate in half a century.
Despite moving quickly to reduce our planned spending by over $20 billion, GM finds
itself precariously and frighteningly close to running out of cash.

This is why we need to borrow money from U.S. taxpayers. If we run out of cash, we
will be unable to pay our bills, sustain our operations and invest in advanced technology.
A collapse of GM and the domestic auto industry will accelerate the downward spiral of
an already anemic U.S. economy. This will be devastating to all Americans, not just GM
stakeholders, because it would put millions of jobs at risk and deepen our recession. By
lending GM money, you will provide us with a financial bridge until the U.S. economy
and auto sales return to modestly healthy levels. This will allow us to keep operating and
complete our restructuring.

We submitted a plan to Congress Dec. 2, 2008, detailing our commitments to ensure our
viability, strengthen our competitiveness, and deliver energy-efficient products.

Specifically, we are committed to:
• produce automobiles you want to buy and are excited to own
• lead the reinvention of the automobile based on promising new technology
• focus on our core brands to consistently deliver on their promises
• streamline our dealer network to ensure the best sales and service
• ensure sacrifices are shared by all GM stakeholders
• meet appropriate standards for executive pay and corporate governance
• work with our unions to quickly realize competitive wages and benefits
• reduce U.S. dependence on imported oil
• protect our environment
• pay you back the entire loan with appropriate oversight and returns

These actions, combined with a modest rebound of the U.S. economy, should allow us to
begin repaying you in 2011.

In summary, our plan is designed to provide a secure return on your investment in GM’s
future. We accept the conditions of your loan, the commitments of our plan, and the
results needed to transform our business for long-term success. We will contribute to
strengthening U.S. energy and environmental security. We will contribute to America’s
technical and manufacturing know-how and create high quality jobs for the “new
economy.” And, we will continue to deliver personal mobility freedom to Americans
using the most advanced transportation solutions. We are proud of our century of
contribution to U.S. prosperity and look forward to making an equally meaningful
contribution during our next 100 years.



HSCenterconsoleHSCenterconsole - 12/8/2008 9:59:09 AM
+3 Boost
Better title for this posting would be: How many article variations of the Big Three bailout can 001 and 009 come up with in 24hours and flood Autospies with?

If the U.S. tax payers trusted GM, they would still be buying their products.




91z4me91z4me - 12/8/2008 10:16:50 AM
+4 Boost
To correct this: How many NEGATIVE article variations of the Big Three bailout can 001 and 009 come up with in 24hours and flood Autospies with?


bmwdrvrbmwdrvr - 12/8/2008 11:44:36 AM
-1 Boost
i agree with 91z4me


Agent009Agent009 - 12/8/2008 10:22:10 AM
-2 Boost
As many titles as there are articles worth submitting. In case you haven't noticed this is a critical crossroads for the industry. So a lot of developments dictate continuous coverage.

We are actually less negative than many. But you have to face the fact the Detroit 3 have screwed themselves over in a big way.


american_madeamerican_made - 12/8/2008 2:04:07 PM
+2 Boost
I believe the big three are making fantastic products, some that far exceed anything out of Europe or Asia. More specifically, and until you reject my comments, go drive one and then rebuttal, I have driven a lot of vehicles, and GM specifically has a great product mix however, they do make some products that I do question.

Correct me if I am wrong:

Buick Enclave, hands down the finest crossover on the market. Better then the XC90, MDX, R-Class, GL-Class and the sorry Bimmer lovers, even the ugly X6….. all for less money and a better vehicle.

The CTS, hands down a better all around sedan, better than the 3 series, C-class, A4 and Lexus IS.

ZR1, sorry I added this but it is the best pound for pound Supercar on the planet. HANDS DOWN! Better then the GT-R, 599, anything Lambo... you name it is a proven fact!

GMC/Silverado....if you think a tundra, titan compare, you are smoking some good SH*^, pass it along. Even F150 and Ram can't compare..

Escalade/Denali, Drive one and tell me the Rover, Sequoia, Lexus, is better, again you are smoking crack!

Above, is a vast product mix that GM has beat over the competition, go drive one/all and then tell me you don't agree..



ShredmoShredmo - 12/8/2008 2:53:21 PM
+1 Boost
american_made, Problem is, the CTS is the only relevant vehicle of the ones you mention, but it is not a high volume seller. SUVs & CUVs are a joke. The ZR1 is great, but money wasted when GM is about to fail.


american_madeamerican_made - 12/8/2008 3:56:27 PM
+1 Boost
it's not high volume because no one gives it a chance, like I said go drive one b4 you open your mouth. They were on track for success, however the mortgage meltdown, credit markets have all deteriorated. GM wouldn't need the government had banks had money, but thanks to the Govt for hammering fannie may and freddie mack to loan money to ppl who couldn't afford sh*!, becuse they "deserve" a chance, we are in this mess and GM has no where else to go, imagine if BMW were an American Co, they'd be right there in line....WAKE UP!


ShredmoShredmo - 12/8/2008 5:04:21 PM
+1 Boost
american_made, what is with the hostility?
I read through some of your other comments on autospies, just to see where you are coming from. Hostility everywhere. No one ever said the CTS is not a great car.


american_madeamerican_made - 12/9/2008 1:47:56 AM
+1 Boost
Shredmo, no hostility, I am just a strong believer in the American Auto but mostly GM. I love their products although not all, I do question some of their products, but every time I get behind of the wheel of most of their products, I think to myself how and why people think American vehicles are sub par, I just don’t get it. I love Autopsies because I believe those that are on here are true car enthusiast. I love BMW, Mercedes, Ferrari and so on…. However, it ticks me off when people make ignorant comments about vehicles they don’t drive or know anything about. I own a BMW product and a GM product both of which are on par with each other as far as quality, refinement and driving excitement.



ShredmoShredmo - 12/8/2008 10:48:55 AM
+2 Boost
I trust the quality of their products, I just have no interest in the products they are trying to market.


ShredmoShredmo - 12/8/2008 12:06:03 PM
+1 Boost
I want a family sleeper, a relatively light weight FWD/AWD wagon. I prefer manual transmissions too, but that is getting rare in this niche. Last wagon GM made, IIRC was the Saturn L300. Perhaps a Vectra will be imported and sold as a Saturn. I'd entertain the idea of a Astra redline in either 2 or 4 doors.


91z4me91z4me - 12/8/2008 1:01:45 PM
+2 Boost
The HHR is essentially a Cobalt wagon (FWD, lightweight, and good power). Also the Caddy CTS wagon will be on sale within a year right (although it will be RWD/AWD).


ShredmoShredmo - 12/8/2008 2:00:27 PM
+1 Boost
914z4me, I'd be very interested in a variation of the CTS wagon if there was a non-luxury version to make it to the states (G8 based). I could live w/RWD on a sporty wagon.

Regarding the union, the concessions are mostly limited to new hires. If they would have made the concessions a decade (or more) earlier, I feel GM, Ford & Chrysler would be in much better shape.



cantaffordonecantaffordone - 12/8/2008 11:13:47 AM
+1 Boost
It's not about trust. They are trying to stay in business and make money. I doubt they want to be saddled with huge debts. What they need, is to get out from under the vice grip the UAW has on them. It's one big thing that Ford, Chrysler and GM have in common.


carguy68carguy68 - 12/8/2008 11:23:58 AM
0 Boost
No never did trust general mess.


inspirion7inspirion7 - 12/8/2008 2:35:53 PM
+1 Boost
Lot of blame can go around. But after this mess, would GM be better, I'm sure. Could consumers purchase their products, of course. Audi, Chrysler and the like have overcome bad crisis to return to profit. Some will say not good examples to use, but you get the point. Let's move on.


veyron1001veyron1001 - 12/8/2008 2:41:20 PM
+1 Boost
Not buying it.


bekenbeken - 12/11/2008 6:49:10 PM
+1 Boost
Sorry, American_made and 1UAW. I'm one of those that only post one or two times and I am a real person. After buying American cars the last 35 years, earlier this year, I couldn't get rid of my Buick fast enough. It was costing me $5000 a year on repairs just to keep running the last 3 years in a row. I've bought (and got rid of) my last American car. I lamented that the American based manufacturers (especially GM) had to stoop down low enough to beg for forgiveness as I, at one time, even owned some GM stock to support an American company. Looking back, I also wonder why I kept coming back the last decades inspite of GM dealerships constantly apologizing to me for doing something wrong to my car. I have driven some of GM's current "best" and though I feel a few of their models are competitive, they are not better. Especially considering that most people buy cars based on emotional appeal. If you sit in any of the cars other than the top of the line fully optioned models, you can see where the cost cutting happened. Sorry, my wife can't stand the CTS; I think it's merrily okay. A good effort...for GM. I think for a Cadillac, it should be better. But it's not.

The money loaned to GM will not save many GM worker's jobs. GM has an uphill battle to work through to fix decades of errors. They need to rethink their business and what it would take to change how their future potential customers will view them as a company.

Owning an import car has been an eye-opener.






Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC