Jagaur unveils 2010 XF Diesel: 35 mpg with a 0 to 60 mph time of 5.9 secs

Jagaur unveils 2010 XF Diesel: 35 mpg with a 0 to 60 mph time of 5.9 secs
Prior to the launch of the Jaguar XF-R which is scheduled for the 2009 Detroit Motor Show next month, Jaguar has dropped the details on the new 2010 Jaguar XF Diesel S.

Powered by the most advanced, powerful and efficient Jaguar diesel engine ever, the 275-hp XF V6 diesel can go from 0 to 60 mph in 5.9 seconds and 50 to 70 mph in 3.2 seconds. Even with that performance level, the XF Diesel S averages an estimated fuel-economy of 35 mpg. Jaguar says that it is 12 percent more efficient than the 2.7L V6 diesel XF and offers 33 percent more power and 61 percent more torque. The engine is mated to Jaguar’s 6-speed ZF 6HP28 automatic transmission.

There is also a 240-hp version of the 3.0L diesel engine available as well. It gets
Read Article

ubercoolubercool - 12/29/2008 12:35:39 PM
+1 Boost
Awesome Jag, seriously fast aswell, will probably be the best diesel motor you can get.


ubercoolubercool - 12/29/2008 12:41:51 PM
0 Boost
Jaguar XF-S 0-60 = 5.9s

BMW 535d M 0-60 = 6.4s

Mercedes 320 CDI sport 0 - 60= 6.8s

Audi A6 3.0 TDI quattro 0 - 60 = 7.5s

The new fastest mid-sized luxury sports sedan in the world, impressive!




neutralneutral - 12/29/2008 12:55:40 PM
+4 Boost
Diesel rocks....

Only thing is... theres SO much hardware under that hood that you feel sorry for the guy that has to replace something...

Either way, go diesel.


Type707Type707 - 12/29/2008 1:06:56 PM
0 Boost
I think Jaguars XF's are a true break through for the company...considering that the other models: XK's, XJ's and the S-types are meant for retirees (seating is scrunched up). XF's are better in comfort.


ubercoolubercool - 12/29/2008 2:13:35 PM
+2 Boost
The XK is certainly not for retirees, it's a beast of a machine!


t_bonet_bone - 12/29/2008 1:22:51 PM
+1 Boost
I'm really digging these new diesels. Even though I'd rather have a hybrid (or diesel hybrid!), it is nice to have a premium car option that doesn't guzzle.


ubercoolubercool - 12/29/2008 3:20:26 PM
+1 Boost
Twin-turbos – maximum efficiency, instant response

A key feature of the new engine is the unique, parallel sequential turbocharger system, the first of its type to be fitted to a V-engine anywhere in the world. Delivering high torque throughout the entire engine rev range, improved throttle response and low CO2 emissions, the twin-turbochargers work sequentially to deliver unrivalled response and best-in-class torque – an impressive 61 percent more than the 2.7-litre diesel from 1500rpm – while packing a huge punch at higher engine speeds.
For most day-to-day driving, including motorway cruising, a responsive, variable-geometry primary turbocharger does all the work, while the smaller, fixed-geometry, secondary turbo is dormant, saving energy and improving efficiency. When the engine revs climb above 2800rpm, the secondary turbo is brought on line within 300 milliseconds, smoothly and seamlessly boosting the engine output with no discernible turbo-lag or power-step.

Jaguar engineers particularly focussed on the issue of turbocharger ‘lag’ at low engine speeds. The new AJ-V6D Gen III 3.0-litre diesels significantly out-perform their rivals by delivering 500Nm of torque in only 500 milliseconds from idle.




veyron1001veyron1001 - 12/29/2008 7:35:19 PM
+1 Boost
Yea it sucks. I was thinking about buying a used TDI but there are about 10-100 on ebay with the most lenient search options in the US that comes in manual. Sucks that 9/10 americans are either too lazy or have a phobia of using a manual transmission.


wooodwoood - 12/30/2008 7:40:57 AM
+1 Boost
Who made the diesel engine for Jaguar? Is the devlopment totally done by Jaguar or Ford Europe?


urbansouljahurbansouljah - 12/30/2008 8:17:09 AM
+2 Boost
Jaguar, Ford and PSA did the development of the original engine together from the very beginning. This new version is done by Jaguar.


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 12/31/2008 2:47:22 AM
+1 Boost
I'm guessing this is imperial MPG, and while that's still good, it's not amazing. It's fast but gets less than 30MPG on the US cycle. I'd rather have a slightly slower car (that still has a ton of passing power, mind you) but with better mileage if I were shopping in this class. Probably a 530d.


DieselRulesDieselRules - 1/1/2009 2:31:35 AM
+2 Boost
Imperial is 42 MPG ... 35 is converted to US.
Very impressive for this performance.
But I'd rather have an R8 with a twin-turbo V6 TDI and DSG.
That would likely get similar performance with much better economy due to lower-weight and better aerodynamics.
Unfortunately, a car with those features would be too practical/popular for Audi to ever offer it for sale.


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 1/1/2009 2:41:52 AM
+1 Boost
Wow, I'm surprised that's US. Very impressive actually.

"But I'd rather have an R8 with a twin-turbo V6 TDI and DSG."

LMAO, wouldn't anyone?


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC