DETROIT AUTO SHOW: 2010 Cadillac SRX Re-styled. Meet the 'Baby' Escalade Or Should We Call It The 'Escaladia'?

DETROIT AUTO SHOW: 2010 Cadillac SRX Re-styled. Meet the 'Baby' Escalade Or Should We Call It The 'Escaladia'?
2010 CADILLAC SRX: A DISTINCTIVE ALTERNATIVE FOR TODAY’S LUXURY CROSSOVER CONSUMER

DETROITCadillac unveiled the next-generation 2010 SRX Crossover today, featuring a completely new design and more-efficient, high-technology engine choices. The new SRX is a mid-size luxury crossover coming to the North American International Auto Show next week.

San Diego Auto Show Photo Gallery

Detroit Auto Show Photo Gallery

“The all-new SRX is a fresh and compelling crossover aimed squarely at the priorities of luxury buyers,” said Mark McNabb, North America vice president, Cadillac/Premium Channel. “With new technologies for increased efficiency and safety, the redesigned 2010 SRX Crossover focuses on both the emotional and pragmatic sides of the luxury consumer.”

The 2010 SRX is designed for efficient performance, including the choice of two high-tech six-cylinder engines that are new to Cadillac – the smallest-displacement engines it offers in North America. A new, 3.0L direct injected V-6 engine is standard and a new, 2.8L turbocharged V-6 is optional. Both engines employ technology that helps produce strong performance that is typical of larger-displacement engines. Direct injection enables a 25-percent reduction in hydrocarbon emissions. Fuel economy in the mid-20s on the highway is expected, but testing isn’t complete.

Performance and safety are enhanced by an available all-wheel-drive (AWD) system that is designed to optimize vehicle handling and stability in all driving conditions. The AWD system includes an advanced electronic limited-slip differential (eLSD) that distributes torque as needed from side to side along the rear axle, as well as from the front to rear axle. The pre-emptive, active-on-demand system provides an extra measure of capability in wet or icy conditions.

The 2010 SRX rides on a wide track that was designed to deliver a nimble, responsive driving experience. It seats five, with generous occupant and cargo room, and can tow up to 3,500 pounds (1,587 kg).

Distinctive design and craftsmanship

“Cadillac is known for bold design. The 2010 SRX Crossover builds on that reputation,” said Clay Dean, Cadillac global design director. “As with the 2008 CTS, we advanced our Art and Science design to create a crossover for style-conscious customers. The exterior features a dramatic diving gesture on the body side to impart the feeling of movement, even at rest.”

A multi-piece shield grille and Cadillac’s iconic vertical headlamps – with light pipe technology and available adaptive forward lighting – are the face of the SRX. They blend into a tightly wrapped, sweeping body that tapers downward at the rear, giving the vehicle a sporty profile, Dean said.

The SRX features a wide stance, minimal overhang and wheels pushed to corners. Eighteen-inch wheels are standard and 20-inch wheels are offered. A bold accent line dives across the body side and culminates at a chrome front fender vent that incorporates a side marker lamp. An integrated spoiler on the rearward edge of the roof extends the sleek lines and improves aerodynamics.

“Inside the new SRX, technical precision blends with old-world craftsmanship,” Dean said. “Hand-cut-and-sewn coverings on the instrument panel and ambient lighting details convey a finely tailored cabin.”

An integrated center stack houses controls for climate and audio systems, while the navigation system rises from the center of the instrument panel. A signature example of the SRX’s attention to detail is the Cadillac script logos in the front door sill plates that illuminate when the doors are opened.

Advanced technology and entertainment systems

The 2010 SRX features numerous advanced electronic systems. Highlights include a “pop-up” navigation screen with three-dimensional imaging; adaptive forward lighting that swivels the headlamps in synch with vehicle steering; power liftgate with adjustable height setting; integrated hard disc drive for audio storage and a dual-screen system for rear entertainment.

Bluetooth compatibility is standard, as is OnStar’s turn-by-turn navigation service for buyers who do not select the car’s navigation system option.

 

Efficient performance

The SRX is powered by a new, fuel-efficient direct injected 3.0L V-6 that delivers an estimated 260 horsepower (193 kW) and is paired with a six-speed automatic transmission. Direct injection results in more power, better fuel economy and lower emissions, all will a smaller-displacement package. As a result, the new V-6 engine is expected to raise the SRX’s standard power rating by 5 horsepower, while achieving an estimated 1 0-15-percent fuel economy improvement.

The 3.0L direct injection V-6 is a smaller-displacement version of the 3.6L, direct injection engine featured in the CTS sport sedan and named one of the world’s 10 Best Engines for 2009 by Ward’s Automotive. Along with direct injection technology, the 3.0L engine employs variable valve timing to optimize power and fuel efficiency and reduce emissions.

The Hydra-Matic 6T70 six-speed automatic transmission helps save fuel by lowering the engine’s rpm at constant highway speeds, while manual shift control enables greater driver interaction when desired. The new SRX includes a driver-selectable “eco mode” that alters transmission shift points to maximize fuel economy.

“The 2010 SRX will deliver excellent, balanced driving dynamics in all types of weather,” said Bob Reuter, global vehicle chief engineer. “The all-wheel-drive system with electronic limited slip effectively transfers torque not only from front to rear, but also along the rear axle. This system sets a new benchmark for all all-wheel-drive systems, giving the driver control and confidence on any road surface.”

Traction control is taken a step further on AWD models with the rear eLSD. In icy or wet conditions, the system can transfer up to 100 percent of torque to the wheel that has more grip. The eLSD also gives the driver enhanced control when cornering hard or completing a high-speed maneuver, such as a lane change, by momentarily applying more or less torque to either of the wheels to help the rear of the vehicle more closely follow the direction of the front wheels.

The suspension includes a real-time damping system in conjunction with AWD that adjusts shock damping rates in response to road conditions for a smooth ride quality.

Enhanced safety

SRX’s safety features are designed to protect occupants before, during and after a crash. A strong body structure and chassis that absorbs crash energy is complemented by the use of martensitic steel in the fully enclosed rocker sections. Martensitic steel is one of the strongest available and its use in the rockers helps protect against intrusion during a side-impact crash, while also maintaining the structure during front and rear crashes.

Additional safety features include standard head curtain side air bags, standard front seat-mounted pelvic/thorax side air bags, front safety belts with dual pretensioners and load limiters, rollover mitigation sensors, a pedal release system, trailer stability assist and OnStar.


The SRX was also designed to meet European pedestrian protection standards; and the front bumper is positioned for greater compatibility with car bumpers.

Production begins in the second quarter of 2009, with dealer availability shortly thereafter.

San Diego Auto Show Photo Gallery

Detroit Auto Show Photo Gallery

PRELIMINARY SPECIFICATIONS

Models:

2010 Cadillac SRX

Body style / driveline:

five-door, 5-passenger front engine transaxle; front-wheel-drive/all-wheel-drive mid-luxury crossover vehicle

Construction:

steel body frame integral; galvanized steel front fenders, hood, roof, door panels, one-piece bodyside outer panel, and liftgate

EPA vehicle class:

sport utility vehicle

Manufacturing location:

Ramos Arizpe, Mexico

Key competitors:

Lexus RX; Acura MDX; BWW X3 and X5

Engines

Application:

standard

available

Type:

3.0L DOHC V-6 direct injection, variable valve timing, four valves per cylinder

2.8L DOHC Turbo V-6, four valves per cylinder

Displacement (cu in / cc):

182 cu in / 2986 cc

170 cu in / 2792 cc

Bore x stroke (in / mm):

3.50 x 3.16 in / 89 x 80.3

3.50 x 2.94 in / 89 x 74.8

Block material:

aluminum

aluminum

Cylinder head material:

aluminum

aluminum

Valvetrain:

DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder

DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder

Ignition system:

coil-near-plug

pencil Coil

Fuel Delivery:

high-pressure direct injection

PFI returnless

Compression ratio:

11.7:1

9.5:1

Horsepower (hp / kw @ rpm):

260 / 193 @ 6950 (est)

300 / 224 @ 5500 (est)

Torque (lb-ft / Nm @ rpm):

221 / 300 @ 5600 (est)

295 / 400 @ 1850 (est)

Recommended fuel:

regular unleaded; E85 capable

premium unleaded

Max engine speed (fuel cut-off):

7100

6500

Emissions Controls:

dual close-coupled catalysts and single underfloor catalyst; variable valve timing, evaporative system

dual close-coupled catalysts

Fuel economy (city / hwy)

TBD

TBD

Transmissions

Type:

6T70 Hydra-Matic six-speed transverse, electronically controlled, automatic overdrive transmission

AF40 Aisin Warner six-speed transverse, electronically controlled, automatic overdrive transmission

Application:

3.0L V-6

2.8L V-6

Gear ratios (:1):

 

 

First:

4.48

4.15

Second:

2.87

2.37

Third:

1.84

1.56

Fourth:

1.41

1.16

Fifth:

1.00

0.86

Sixth:

0.74

0.69

Reverse:

2.88

3.39

Final Drive:

3.39

3.75

Additional features:

clutch-to-clutch operation (except 1-2); integrated transmission electro-hydraulic control module with driver shift control

clutch-to-clutch operation (except 1-2); integrated transmission electro-hydraulic control module with driver shift control

Chassis and Suspension

Front suspension:

independent, strut-type, specifically tuned coil springs, direct-acting stabilizer bar (hollow); hydraulic ride bushings

Rear suspension:

linked H-arm, hollow stabilizer bar; real-time damping available

Traction control:

all-speed using engine torque reduction and brake intervention

Steering type:

specifically calibrated hydraulic-power-assisted rack-and-pinion for V-6 models

Steering wheel turns, lock-to-lock

2.84

Turning circle, curb-to-curb (ft / M):

40.3 / 12.2

Steering ratio:

16.5:1

Brakes

Type:

Four-wheel power-asssited disc with ABS (and ESC); vented front and rear rotors; aluminum calipers front and rear (two-piston front calipers, single-piston rear calipers)

Brake rotor diameter – front
(in / mm):

13.6 / 345 x 1.2 / 30

Brake rotor diameter – rear (in / mm):

12.4 / 315 x 0.9 / 23

Total swept area (cu cc):

front: 179.4
rear: 72

Wheels and Tires

Wheel size and type:

18-inch aluminum (std on all models)

20-inch aluminum (opt on all models)

Tires:

P235/65R18 AL3
P235/55R20 AL3 or 235/55R20 HW4

Exterior Dimensions

Overall length (in / mm):

190.2 / 4833

Overall width (in / mm):

75.1 / 1910

Overall height (in / mm):

65.6 / 1668

Wheelbase (in / mm):

110.5 / 2807

Front track (in / mm):

64.0 / 1626

Rear track (in / mm):

63.7 / 1620

Interior Dimensions

Seating Capacity (front / rear):

2 / 3

Headroom (in / mm):

front: 39.7 / 1009

rear: 38.4 / 976

Legroom (in / mm):

front: 41.2 / 1047
rear: 36.3 / 923

Shoulder room (in / mm):

front: 58.3 / 1481
rear: 56.2 / 1430

Hip room (in / mm):

front: 55.4 / 1408
rear: 54.7 / 1391

EPA passenger volume (cu ft / L) :

100.6 / 2848.6

EPA interior volume (cu ft / L):

129.8 / 3675.5

Cargo volume behind first-row seats (cu ft / L):

61.18 / 1732.4

Cargo volume behind second-row seats (cu ft / L):

29.20 / 826.8

 

Capacities

Trailer towing maximum (lb / kg):

3.0L: 2500 / 1136 (without towing package)

3.0L: 3500 / 1590 (with towing package)

2.8L: 3500 / 1590 (with towing package)

Maximum tongue weight (lb / kg):

350 / 158

Fuel tank (gal / L):

21 / 79.5

Cooling system (qt / L):

3.0L: 12.4 /11.7
2.8L: 12.6 /11.9

Note: Information shown is current at time of publication.

San Diego Auto Show Photo Gallery

Detroit Auto Show Photo Gallery

 


theoptimisticpessimisttheoptimisticpessimist - 1/4/2009 12:43:40 AM
-16 Boost
Oooh, ahhhh, another badge engineered crossover from GM. Well I guess the “Arts & Sciences” design language has evolved enough cubists movement to make Picasso proud. Nothing new to see here, move along, move along.

Can you say stubby?


veyron1001veyron1001 - 1/4/2009 12:57:16 AM
-18 Boost
Seems like GM is trying to copy what BMW does with the X series and take some of the spot light away. Its not going to work.


neutralneutral - 1/4/2009 2:18:47 AM
+18 Boost
both of your are morons... i'd continue my argument but it'd be a waste of time


EnnNorakEnnNorak - 1/4/2009 8:09:22 AM
-8 Boost
It seems that Cadillac has forgotten what makes a vehicle a Cadillac. Cadillacs must be bigger than similar cars in the GM stable. This one seems to be about the size of a Saturn VUE


dumpstydumpsty - 1/4/2009 3:33:39 PM
+5 Boost
--------------
EnnNorak:
It seems that Cadillac has forgotten what makes a vehicle a Cadillac. Cadillacs must be bigger than similar cars in the GM stable. This one seems to be about the size of a Saturn VUE
--------------

Huh? EnnNorak, your statement is a key reason why GM was having so many competitive design issues. What "made a Cadillac, a Cadillac" was this huge, land yacht with horrid on-road performance, cheap couch-like seats, and floaty (nausea-inducing) suspension...and an interior that was much less "luxury" than a tarted-up Chevy setup.

Bigger isn't a requirement for being better than any mainstream variants. But I think the Theta-Epsilon platform was intended to be a little bit larger than the Vue. If you haven't noticed, GM is making its SUV smaller and taking advantage of new model designs to introduce smaller vehicles into their lineup.


KthornKthorn - 1/4/2009 11:30:37 PM
-2 Boost
ObesePig is not new, it's kthor and his new online persona. He sure loves his colon though, I wonder how many people he's shared it with?


KthornKthorn - 1/9/2009 10:30:42 PM
-1 Boost
Gee, maybe it was the quote you lifted from one of my posts and put on your profile? Yeah, I think that was it. kthor, you are a smug little prick of a man (sic). You created a profile using this poor dumb stupid bastards photo thinking you had me, but you are wrong. You got the wrong guy on the wrong coast, you're off by a few thousand miles. It's nice to know I got to you though, it's nice to know that I got to you so bad you would go to this extent. Hahahahahahha aaaaaaah. Now do the guy a favor and take it down. Here, so you that you take a shot at the right guy I'll throw you a bone... I live and work in one of the 10 western states, near an alpine lake, with some of the best skiing on earth.


Intensity007Intensity007 - 1/4/2009 1:14:38 AM
-2 Boost
I didn't know the Saturn Vue and Escalade were expecting!

Keeping it in the family I suppose LOL!


Agent63Agent63 - 1/4/2009 1:33:13 AM
-5 Boost
It should be called the Cadillac Enclavade.


EL34EL34 - 1/4/2009 2:03:43 AM
+10 Boost
Looks 100% better than any of those Lexus and Nissans.


neutralneutral - 1/4/2009 2:20:25 AM
+1 Boost
i agree...however infinti's FX & EX are quite the SUVs


EL34EL34 - 1/4/2009 12:15:14 PM
-9 Boost
The Infinti FX is a monstrosity and the EX is a little chicky SUV.

Give me a this Caddy anyday.


0to600to60 - 1/4/2009 1:13:03 PM
+8 Boost
The FX in black in hot. It also looks better than any SUV in BMW's lineup!


LACMANLACMAN - 1/4/2009 1:45:13 PM
+7 Boost
^^^Agreed. The FX is a hot ass ride. I dont know which one is better performance wise but in looks, it MURDERS the X6. (JUST MY OPINION FOLKS!)


bmwdrvrbmwdrvr - 1/5/2009 7:38:57 PM
0 Boost
the funny thing is no one even mention BMW, yet you say the god awful FX looks better than everything fro BMW, your BMW envy is showing..........in fact that is a pretty minority opinion most people agree the X6 is by far the better looking SUV, than the FX proportions are all wrong in addition to its odd details which dont match up with the rest of the vehicle, the ex just looks wierd, it simply looks like an odd wagon version of any random nissan with a ton of chrome, and the infiniti/z/maxima/murano dash layout.....


neutralneutral - 1/4/2009 2:17:39 AM
+1 Boost
gorgeous,

I just wish theyd get rid of the chrome just before the front doors and replace it with the fender side vents like in the CTS & STS


uscgameuscgame - 1/4/2009 2:43:30 AM
-1 Boost
Does look absolutely great.

Agreed I dont like the chrome vents, but I'm not a big fan of the CTS ones either. I think it'd actually be a big improvement on both, if you gotta have the vents, just no chrome. I like some chrome but chrome in the wrong places looks tacky and cheap.


richardposlusznyrichardposluszny - 1/4/2009 3:50:38 AM
+1 Boost
Much better exterior styling than the previous, awkward generation.

Man, when will car companies stop abusing the side vent fad?

Interior looks miles ahead of last generation. Another plus!


STJ88STJ88 - 1/4/2009 9:07:05 AM
+8 Boost
What is this? someone gets deboosted because he says the infiniti EX en FX are also good looking.

But the retard EL34 says something racist and stupid again and he gets boosted up!


veyron1001veyron1001 - 1/4/2009 11:09:25 AM
+6 Boost
Its does not help when EL34 can make 10 accounts.


LexSucksLexSucks - 1/4/2009 5:08:30 PM
-3 Boost
"But the retard EL34 says something racist and stupid again'

- What did EL34 say that was Racist? I must have missed it.


_43LE_43LE - 1/4/2009 6:18:39 PM
+1 Boost
Stick around and you'll see that he automatically hates anything Asian,and everything American or European is absolutely the best, according to him.


Bmw8terBmw8ter - 1/4/2009 9:40:08 AM
+1 Boost
Partial appluase for the use of the Saab 2.8L TT. I wonder why this isn't an option on the Cadillac CTS. Why wait until 2010 for a 2.9L TT when you already have an engine available now.

I'm happy I live in a country that's anti-diesel and anti-forced induction....*sigh*


91z4me91z4me - 1/4/2009 2:43:22 PM
+1 Boost
The 2.8 Turbo HF V6 is used in the European CTS but is not on sale in the US because the 3.6 DI engine is used in its place. Some European countries tax vehicles on engine displacement and the 2.8 T (while making less power and using more fuel than the 3.6 DI) saves money on that end. Also Europeans tend to by and large accept turbo engines while they are still abnormal in the US.


db350zdb350z - 1/4/2009 10:04:40 AM
-2 Boost
This in my opinion looks better than its brother and sister crossovers at GM. But honestly, for far more money you get basically the same thing as a Traverse, Arcadia, Enclave, and Outlook, and not to mention the SAAB variant. Give the Caddy something to stick out. Make one of these in a V variant.


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 1/4/2009 2:20:17 PM
+1 Boost
This is not related to the Acadia/Traverse/Enclave/Outlook. It's based on the Saturn VUE. So is the new SAAB.


91z4me91z4me - 1/4/2009 2:40:53 PM
+1 Boost
Actually S4 the new SRX only shares SOME pieces with the standard Theta 2.0 chassis. It rides on a premium version, also sometimes called TE (theta epsilon), with different suspension pieces, geometry, and design. The only other vehicle currently scheduled to be on this chassis is the SAAB 9-4x.


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 1/4/2009 2:47:18 PM
+1 Boost
What? Dodge is Chrysler. This is GM.


100tnega100tnega - 1/4/2009 11:37:01 AM
+2 Boost
I like it.

And, with all the CUVs being released, i'll wait for the comparos in the spring before acting like a douche.


Intensity007Intensity007 - 1/4/2009 12:20:57 PM
-4 Boost
This car doesn't inspire me at all. Cadillacs usually have a certain "panache" about them.

The relationship to it's siblings is just too obvious to make this a serious competitor to the others on the market.

It looks like a Cadillac BLS and Saturn Vue.

I'm sure it will sell though, but it's a little disappointing to see this redesign especially after such a great job done on the Vue.

The problem with GM is that they are so stretched out with numerous brands that they continue to badge-engineer models in order to have something on the market.

If you're a savvy consumer, actions like that stand out like a sore thumb.

Note to GM: Wake up! The real American people are rooting for you. If you can swallow your pride and eliminate some brands and get back to your core: Chevrolet and Cadillac with the possibility of 1 or 2 other brands, you'll be able to focus on building true conpetitors to the foreign makes and possibly, start shipping Chevrolets and Cadillacs overseas!


Intensity007Intensity007 - 1/4/2009 12:22:43 PM
+1 Boost
"I'm sure it will sell though, but it's a little disappointing to see this redesign especially after such a great job done on the Vue."

I mean't to say:

"...after such a great job on the CTS."




KthornKthorn - 1/4/2009 1:14:30 PM
-3 Boost
I second your motion on the rooting public.

It's really hard to say exactly what market GM is going after with this vahicle? A college car for the kids? In town runabout? Something hideous to tow behind your massive motorhome? It looks better as a Saturn and the addition will only serve to further dilute the segment.


0to600to60 - 1/4/2009 1:16:16 PM
+1 Boost
I like the interior dash much more than the dated boxy Escalade interior dash


3pointstar3pointstar - 1/4/2009 1:41:04 PM
+1 Boost
It may be a Saturn VUE in diguise but, the styling is stunning. The interior looks very modern and is terrific, but I didn't see any wood trim.


randy33randy33 - 1/6/2009 12:13:50 AM
+1 Boost
The styling is stunning. Too bad GM doesn't just let this guy (or girl) design ALL GM VEHICLES.




LACMANLACMAN - 1/4/2009 1:41:38 PM
+1 Boost
Interesting. It looks 100% better in the video then it does in pictures and Im sure even better than the video, in person.

The only let down with this vehicle is the "available" AWD part. Cadillac should NOT have any FWD models in their line-up. They could have camouflaged the fact that this vehicle was FWD based by offering it in "SRX4" form only.


LACMANLACMAN - 1/4/2009 2:03:48 PM
0 Boost
Damn, I believe I have changed my mind. Im going to miss the sporty "ground hugging" wagon-look of the previous SRX. It reminds me of a STS wagon in some pics. :(

I know the Northstar was underpowered for its size but that problem could have easily been solved. Im a fan of V8 power.

Im also going to miss that big ass glass moonroof on the previous SRX. :(

They should have improved the previous SRX drastically and introduced this as the "BRX" like we all thought in the first place...

:( :( :(


Bmw8terBmw8ter - 1/4/2009 2:14:59 PM
0 Boost
The biggest negative the 2010 SRX will have is that it's losing the RWD Sigma Platform, and will instead use a FWD Modified Theta Platform.

Supposedly, the new SRX will have better f/r weight distribution, power/weight will be better than the X6 xdrive Burt Reynolds moustache 35i, as well as handling. This all sounds like an Audi approach with a twist; still being a little cheap.


LACMANLACMAN - 1/4/2009 2:22:07 PM
+1 Boost
I know the 4.4L "SC" Northstar is a beast! Its the 4.6L version that I was calling underpowered. If the DI 3.6L V6 in the CTS puts out 304HP, its kind of embarrassing that the 4.6L Northstar only puts out 320HP. Doesnt the Genesis 4.6 put out 380 or something? Thats all I was saying. The 4.6L Northstar needed an update but overall a great engine. Maybe they should have just dropped the 4.6L and used the 4.4L (minus the supercharger) as the standard Northstar engine.

***Well anyways, I wanted to add that Im also going to miss the MRC suspension offered on the previous SRX.***

:(


M53RM53R - 1/5/2009 11:31:56 AM
+1 Boost
LACMAN

We have an 06 SRX for the family and I totally agree with you.


totokindomtotokindom - 1/4/2009 4:29:08 PM
-3 Boost
No wonder the big 3 are in trouble. Another P.O.S., who in thier right mind would spend that kind of money for a vehicle made in Mexico. What are they thinking?


LauderdaleDriverLauderdaleDriver - 1/5/2009 4:15:36 PM
+1 Boost
I guess you don't like Jettas or most of the other VWs sold in the US, and made in Hermosilla, either?


mercuryguymercuryguy - 1/4/2009 4:30:17 PM
-1 Boost
Nice vehicle. FWD and AWD is a big mistake. RWD is more efficient and less costly to maintain.


veyron1001veyron1001 - 1/4/2009 7:39:54 PM
+4 Boost
FWD is the least costly, most efficient and the easiest to maintain. Has the least moving parts. Although the worst performing.


AgentOrangeAgentOrange - 1/4/2009 5:17:41 PM
+2 Boost
190" long is hardly a "baby" anything..


pushrodv8pushrodv8 - 1/4/2009 5:24:06 PM
-2 Boost
It's one of the reasons GM is in so much trouble- thinking five years behind instead of 5 years in the future. And it's ugly.


EL34EL34 - 1/4/2009 5:44:16 PM
+2 Boost
The reason I would buy this Caddy SUV is because it's built in Mexico.

Maybe if the UAW would die already the Big 3 could bring the car business back home.


answeranswer - 1/4/2009 8:22:05 PM
-5 Boost
GM really has a talent for releasing models 4-5 years after they would have been successful.


tkindredtkindred - 1/4/2009 9:10:40 PM
+2 Boost
Looks good. More stylish than BMW SUV.


veyron1001veyron1001 - 1/4/2009 10:43:40 PM
0 Boost
Now is a good time for you to see an optometrist.


LauderdaleDriverLauderdaleDriver - 1/5/2009 4:17:47 PM
+1 Boost
Hard for anything to look much worse than the X3. A great vehicle, but it's not a joy to behold. My neighbor has one, and I've planted hedges to hide it from my house.

Love the comments about why this isn't bigger. We have new CAFE standards coming, like it or not, and the biggest of the SUVs, including the X5, Sequoia and Armada, are going to be history.


inspirion7inspirion7 - 1/4/2009 11:02:54 PM
0 Boost
There is no satisfying everyone. This is a great car from GM and based on the CTS, it is solid with more style than anything in class. Interior quality is on par with the CTS. Morons will complain that it is small, but the Escalade is too big. What gives. As long as it sales to its base, that is all that counts.

"Looks good. More stylish than BMW SUV". tkindred

GREAT JOB!!!!


KthornKthorn - 1/5/2009 12:56:33 AM
-2 Boost
Hey Kthor (or ObesePig whatever you're going by these days) If your colon is still killing you turn around and see if you have a BMW service writer sticking out of your ass... If you do this is the first indication your full maint program has expired.


truckmantruckman - 1/5/2009 1:46:38 AM
+2 Boost
Looks good.


M53RM53R - 1/5/2009 11:39:06 AM
+1 Boost
It's a nice looking vehicle... but one of the main reason we bought an SRX is because it has 3rd row seating while still being smaller than the Escalade, and it still managed to cost much less than German competitors.. I guess this is gone now, but I have a question... Are they going to make the next generation Escalade smaller?


inspirion7inspirion7 - 1/5/2009 12:37:22 PM
+1 Boost
Will the Escalade be smaller once GM get their mojo back? In a word, yes. It was stated that the same platform the the Enclave (Lamba) rides on will be used for the Escalade.

http://www.leftlanenews.com/confirmed-cadillac-to-get-lambda-cuv-in-2012-potential-escalade-replacement.html

The SRX new and old are very attractive and distinctive in design. I believe if Cadillac continue on course, it could rival at first Audi then who knows. They just need consistency and focus.




M53RM53R - 1/7/2009 3:15:12 AM
+1 Boost
If that's the case, then the next Escalade would be on my shopping list. Thanks for the info, and yes the SRX is a nice vehicle, and we haven't faced any problems with our one.


vman1013vman1013 - 1/5/2009 1:28:41 PM
+2 Boost
It should sell well. Even through all the GM headline risk.


KrazeedddKrazeeddd - 1/7/2009 12:10:54 PM
+1 Boost
I am not sure why if you are an Asian or German based manufacturer badge Engineering isn't bad. (I am looking at you Porche and Lexus) I see no real harm as long as no children or animals were injured in the changing of badges. If it bothers you - don't by it.

I do like this more than the even more badge engineered MKx and it sells pretty well (back when things sold that is). This should do just fine for Cadilac.


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC