Hyundai Genesis Strips Lexus ES350 Of Top Rated Upscale Sedan Ranking By Consumer Reports

Hyundai Genesis Strips Lexus ES350 Of Top Rated Upscale Sedan Ranking By Consumer Reports
The Hyundai Genesis outscored four competitors to become Consumer Reports top-rated vehicle in the competitive "Upscale Sedan" category. The Genesis, which achieved an "Excellent" overall road test score, now outranks 12 vehicles from Lexus, Acura, Lincoln and others including the Lexus ES 350.

The Genesis' performance in CR's battery of tests solidifies the automaker's reputation as a builder of high-quality vehicles in several diverse automotive segments. Previously, Consumer Reports named two Hyundais, the Elantra and Santa Fe, as "Top Pick" vehicles in the small sedan and midsize SUV categories respectively.

"The Hyundai Genesis rivals high-end luxury sedans but costs considerably less," said David Champion, senior director of Consumer Reports' Auto Test Center in East Haddam, Connecticut. "Its luxurious and spacious interior and quietness far transcend its relatively modest price."

The Genesis was tested against four other new or redesigned upscale sedans—the Acura TL, Nissan Maxima, Pontiac G8 and Lincoln MKS-for the February issue of Consumer Reports. Prices ranged from $33,660 for the Pontiac to $40,880 for the Lincoln.

Two other vehicles in the test group also earned Excellent overall road test scores, the TL and Maxima. The G8 and MKS achieved Very Good overall scores.

The eight other vehicles in the Upscale Sedans category including the ES 350, Toyota Avalon, Buick Lucerne and Saab 9-5, were all tested previously.

In addition to the five upscale sedans tested, CR also purchased and tested the Jaguar XF luxury sedan. Though it obtained a Very Good overall score, it still ranked near the bottom of the group of 12 luxury sedans that Consumer Reports has rated.

But the redesigned Honda Pilot has slipped from being one of Consumer Reports' top-rated three-row SUVs to midpack. The Pilot now ranks eleventh out of seventeen midsized, three-row SUVs that have been tested by CR.

Full tests and ratings of all six sedans appear in the February issue of Consumer Reports, which goes on sale January 6. The reports are also available to subscribers of www.ConsumerReports.org. (Road test vehicles of recently tested vehicles are also available free at CR's web site.)

The issue also contains a report on the conversion of a hybrid Toyota Prius to a plug-in hybrid. Consumer Reports chose a Hymotion L5 conversion kit sold by A123 Systems, which the company claims can yield more than 100 mpg. Fuel economy in CR's converted Prius jumped from 42 to 67 mpg overall for the first 35 miles of driving. At almost $11,000, the plug-in conversion clearly won't save consumers money overall. However, the technology itself proved viable.

The TL is the only vehicle in this month's test group that is Recommended by Consumer Reports.

CR only Recommends vehicles that have performed well in its tests, have at least average predicted reliability based on CR's annual Car Reliability Survey of its more than seven million print and web subscribers, and performed at least adequately if crash-tested or included in a government rollover test.

CR doesn't have reliability data yet on the Genesis, MKS, Maxima, G8 and XF.

Spacious and well appointed, the rear-wheel-drive Genesis offers good value and is a compelling alternative to luxury vehicles costing thousands more. This car's forte is swaddling passengers in silence. The engine sounds polished and road noise is strikingly absent. The interior rivals those of the very best luxury cars, with its optional stitched-leather dashboard facing and consistently high-quality materials. The only real drawback is its ride, which can be unsettled at times and doesn't live up to the standards set by other luxury cars. The Genesis 3.8 ($36,000 Manufacturer's Suggested Retail Price as tested) is powered by a 290-hp, 3.8-liter V6 that feels quick and smooth and delivers a decent 21 mpg in CR's own fuel-economy tests. The six-speed automatic transmission provides smooth, quick shifts. Braking is excellent.

The redesigned Acura TL is a nice car, with responsive handling, a slick powertrain and commendable fuel economy. But when compared with the previous TL, which was CR's Top Pick in this segment for years, the latest generation is not as impressive. Vague steering saps the fun out of its handling, the trunk opening is small, and other competitors have roomier rear seats. The base-model TL ($35,715 MSRP as tested) is powered by a 280-hp, 3.5-liter V6 that delivers excellent acceleration and a respectable 23 mpg overall on premium fuel. The five-speed automatic transmission is both quick and smooth. Brakes are excellent overall.

The Maxima is a quick car, but it doesn't add much over the less costly Nissan Altima overall. While it's pleasant, it falls short in some ways. Handling is responsive, but at low speeds the steering is overly light. The car is quiet and the ride is decent. But the new coupe-like silhouette compromises visibility, trunk room, and rear-seat comfort. The Maxima 3.5 SV ($33,700 MSRP as tested) is powered by a 290-hp, 3.5-liter V6 that gives the car quicker acceleration than some V8s. Expect 22 mpg overall on premium fuel. The continuously variable transmission works very well overall; it's also the only one available. The Maxima's brakes are very good overall.

As a bargain sports sedan that can challenge the performance of models from BMW and Mercedes, Pontiac's G8 is a success. It handles and rides as well as the best cards in its class. The G8 GT's acceleration is very impressive, with a zero-to-sixty time of 5.7-seconds. But the downside of that is poor fuel economy-at just 17 mpg overall on regular fuel. The G8 GT ($33,660 MSRP as tested) is powered by a huge 361-hp, 6.0-liter V8 engine that makes it blisteringly quick. The smooth six speed automatic transmission with a tall sixth gear makes highway cruising relaxed. The brakes are very good overall. (A 256-hp, 3.6-liter V6 with a five-speed automatic is also available in the base G8, but CR didn't test it because a more powerful V6 with a six-speed automatic will arrive in 2010.)

In the tradition of large domestic luxury cars, Lincoln's MKS is built for pampering, not for spirited driving. Handling lacks agility, and the engine is too noisy for a car in this class. The interior amenities and finishes are pleasant, but the MKS feels too much like the Ford Taurus, on which it is based, to justify its luxury price tag. The MKS ($40,880 MSRP as tested) is equipped with a 273-hp, 3.7-liter V6 engine that performs well, but is not as quick or smooth as its competition in this class. CR measured its fuel economy at just 20 mpg overall on regular, which is not impressive. The six-speed automatic transmission is not as slick as most in this class. Brakes are very good overall.

San Diego Auto Show Photo Gallery

Detroit Auto Show Photo Gallery



WillisWillis - 1/6/2009 9:28:22 AM
+10 Boost
I recently checked one out at a nearby dealer and I was very impressed with the car. Overall a solid effort by Hyundai and much better than the Azera or previous XG.


hyundaifansdotcomhyundaifansdotcom - 1/6/2009 9:36:45 AM
+4 Boost
Get ready for the flood of Hyundai haters.....


KthornKthorn - 1/6/2009 12:23:01 PM
+2 Boost
Chuck, you noticed it trounced the G37/Maxima too right? Most if not all of your hate is baseless.


blackbrblackbr - 1/6/2009 9:43:27 AM
+3 Boost
I agree with ChuckG37. I'm a little over 6' and don't fit in the GS (or the ES, for that matter).


pushrod27pushrod27 - 1/6/2009 2:38:16 PM
+1 Boost
You are either lying, stupid, or you've never been inside of a Lexus. The Lexus GS is in fact one of the best cars available for tall drivers - it has more front legroom than just about any other car on the market and it has done so since it's introduction in 1993. The current model has about 46 inches of front legroom - class leading.
I know for a fact, I am 6'7" and have driven several different Lexus models. I haven't driven an ES, but I have an SC430 right now, and even it is accommodating for tall drivers. Get your facts straight.


golfer38golfer38 - 1/6/2009 9:46:34 AM
+9 Boost
The best way to describe this car is that it is alot of car for the price. A formula proven to work by Acura in 1986, then by Lexus in 1989.


Agent009Agent009 - 1/6/2009 10:00:02 AM
+3 Boost
You are right on target, in this case they may have out done Lexus themselves


PlanBPlanB - 1/6/2009 10:05:01 AM
+4 Boost
I went to a Hyundai test drive event they had for the Genesis and I was impressed by it, you really do get a lot of car for the money. They also had a Benz E-Class and Caddy CTS on hand to drive and make your own conclusions. IMO, the performance was easily on par with the other two, even the V6 model. Fit and finish wasn't quite at the E-Class level but came very, very close... so close I think it is deserving of all this attention. My only gripe (if I could even call it that) is that they didn't create a new nameplate to put it under. The Genesis and Equus (I'll even throw in the Veracruz), need to be under another name to help get rid of the old Hyundai stigma.


bmwdrvrbmwdrvr - 1/6/2009 10:31:45 AM
+3 Boost
I'm confused about how Consumerreports rates these cars, their reviews often just dont make sense, the XF towards the bottom ofthe pack? the Tl is easily the largest car in its class and it has a small backseat, what are they comparing it to? Either way its always hard to take these consumer reports tests seriously they just dont make sense. At least the results of the Genesis was consistant with other mags, but some of the others are just non sense.


david999david999 - 1/6/2009 10:44:38 AM
-6 Boost

You also notice that they do not "recommend" the Genesis.
It's glowing review is based on car-for-the-money, not a straight comparison. The Genesis is more a sedan in the 5-Series or E-class area, not for example the Lexus ES350 wich is their entry-level model along with the IS.


NItePhireNItePhire - 1/6/2009 11:40:29 AM
+1 Boost
I think that they are saying compared to others in its segment that it may be the largest outside but one of the smallest back seat wise. For the TL that is.


NItePhireNItePhire - 1/6/2009 11:42:03 AM
+3 Boost
David they didnt recommend it because they dont have enough reliability data on it yet. They do the same for all newer cars with no history.


david999david999 - 1/6/2009 12:48:01 PM
-2 Boost

I know that is why they don't recommend it. That is why I find it strange it would be ahead of cars that are proven. It's like rating a Walmart suite ahead of a real Armani one because of price, but not knowing it will last and wear properly over time.


0to600to60 - 1/6/2009 1:54:46 PM
+1 Boost
They compare everything to a Toyota Camry or Accord. They dont consider the class the vehicle is in. So a large suv will always be a gas guzzler even if it achieves a best in class fuel economy rating. Likewise, a convertible will be dinged for not having enough trunk space. They dont consider it is a convertible and should not have much trunk space. Again, they campare it to midsize sedans


NItePhireNItePhire - 1/6/2009 3:07:55 PM
+1 Boost
David they are strictly basing it on their performance criteria not reliability. The Passat used to be the best performing mid sizer according to CR but they never recommended it due to reliability.


inspirion7inspirion7 - 1/6/2009 11:52:55 AM
-1 Boost
So why do most individuals over the past zillion years consider the publication?


inspirion7inspirion7 - 1/6/2009 11:56:00 AM
+3 Boost
Oh, excellent work that has paid off for Hyundai. Hard work and the obvious drive to better one's position in life proves that anyone can pull out of a crap hole and rise like cream to the top.


answeranswer - 1/6/2009 11:58:01 AM
+4 Boost
Once again I gotta say Hyundai did a great job on this.

Far better car than the Azera, and that really wasn't a POS either.

And kudos to Hyundai for offering that brown/dark tan interior color too.


KthornKthorn - 1/6/2009 12:31:56 PM
+1 Boost
SF, I love your passion for this brand. You stand in here day after day defending the brand while doing so intelligently. I have a feeling once Hyundai addresses the secondary market value of their new line-up, Hyundai will be getting the respect they have deservedly earned. The industry and consumers deserve what this kind of healthy competition brings... a better product for all.

And this coming from a guy that sells Lexus automobiles.


pushrod27pushrod27 - 1/6/2009 2:44:48 PM
-1 Boost
What SLK ever had 600-750 horsepower??? The SLK is a 4 or 6 cylinder compact chick coupe. Your shallow knowledge of automobiles explains your affinity for Hyundai.
More power to you. I would never be caught dead in a Hyundai. I don't care what they build, I would avoid driving around with that stupid, no-class 'H' on my car at all costs. But that's just me. I don't eat McDonald's at all, but I hear it's rather popular.


HSCenterconsoleHSCenterconsole - 1/6/2009 3:11:43 PM
+3 Boost
"The SLK is a 4 or 6 cylinder compact chick coupe."
Pushroad27, you shouldn't throw stones if you live in a glass house. The SC430 that you said you own is also a chick coupe as well.


FillorKillFillorKill - 1/6/2009 3:35:24 PM
+3 Boost
What a snob. Pushrod would not be caught dead driving a car with a "no class H" on it, yet he drives a ritzy Toyota with an apparently far higher class L on it. Get over yourself pushrod. You aren't impressing anyone.


KthornKthorn - 1/6/2009 5:21:53 PM
-1 Boost
You know SF beauty is in the eye of the beholder. In my opinion the new Jag has the best looking interior of any new sedan. I have never been a fan of the 7 series or S class interiors. For being the supposed benchmarks they both fall short of the Jag in my opinion. But then again, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. As far as lexus using higher quality materials, I have yet to the the wood in a LS cloud over like the wood in a 7 series. Because it is so subjective, it's hard to argue.


DenaliDenali - 1/6/2009 3:01:57 PM
+3 Boost
Wow the ES???? isnt the ES in a league by itself, i know this comparo is crap, last time i check, the Genesis out perform the E, 5 and GS....FACT
them other cars should be its match but standards.


pjpellicopjpellico - 1/6/2009 5:32:38 PM
0 Boost
Forget about all these ConsumerReprts list.
They are biased and against anything diesel, ect.
I test drove all these cars at least 4 times over a 2 month period trying to decide.
The new TL, the new Genesis, the new A$, the ES350...on and on.

At least 4 Times!!!!

But its easy to do RWD and get performance IF you don't need to worry about snow and bad weather!!!!
But here in Chicago and WI, forgetaboutit!

I ended up with the newMKS and its wonderful,except for that damned trunk opening!

AWD.
Best leather going.
Gigantic in the rea seats....

Try it, you'll like it.


KthornKthorn - 1/7/2009 12:02:36 AM
+3 Boost
You know SF, I don't think anybody is making a bad car these days. It would be nice to see Lexus distance themselves from Toyota a little more, and the LF-A would be a step in the right direction. But given the fact that Lexus is rebadging the Prius, it doesn't look like they have plans for that anytime soon. Unfortunatley.


KthornKthorn - 1/7/2009 1:23:39 PM
+1 Boost
Smoke, You might be on to something here. A reality show about pimping hybrids, I'd watch that show. "Pimp my Brid".

I agree, the luxury market would benefit greatly from the addition of a premium hybrid, however I'm no fan of badge engineering. I would prefer to see Lexus put out a lightweight IS hybrid derivitive as opposeds to rebadging a Toyota.

By the way I enjoy your contributions, the facts and logic you provide to support your arguements are much appreciated.



r_driver04r_driver04 - 1/7/2009 4:29:27 PM
+2 Boost
Genesis is a sweet car that will put luxury brands on notice for sure. I drove a V6 several months ago and came away very impressed. Hyundai's doing the same thing Lexus,Infiniti and Acura did to the Germans in the early 90s.


ISqqkkISqqkk - 1/7/2009 8:14:22 PM
-2 Boost
Korean car == cheap


EpikEpik - 1/7/2009 10:38:19 PM
0 Boost
Best value out there for the money. Easily comparable to cars twice the cost.

The Genesis Coupe is a really good looking car too. This is a pretty serious one-two combination.


drdonrsdrdonrs - 1/8/2009 10:52:46 PM
+1 Boost
Still some doubters around. Give it up. This car puts Hyundai in the next level. My Azera and Sonata have been impeccable after several Acura TL's. W hat's wrong with saving several thousands unless you like to pay for a label.


lexworldlexworld - 1/9/2009 12:10:09 AM
+1 Boost
Hyundai makes some nice cars for the money. Comparing a Hyundai to a Lexus is like comparing a Chevrolet to a Ferrari. People that drive Hyundai cars buy them because that's what they can afford to drive. Who in their right mind,if they had the money,would choose a Hyundai over a brand new Lexus. You guys really make yourself look and sound bad. Real bad. Seriously out of touch with reality.


lexworldlexworld - 1/9/2009 12:12:56 AM
+1 Boost
Besides...If you find something or hear of something like this in JDPOWERS or Forbes then come talk to us.


autoenthusiast88autoenthusiast88 - 1/9/2009 4:18:41 PM
+1 Boost
Pushrod27, that's actually not accurate. I worked for Lexus for 7 years, and have owned many vehicles, including several Lexus's. I can tell you from experience, the new generation GS is not as comfortable for tall drivers as the old model. This is especially true of the AWD model, because the transmission intrudes into the drivers foot well area, and is uncomfortable. From a measurable stand point you are correct, but in practice its not as comfortable. I used to love my 2003 GS430 because it provided me great leg room, as I am 6'2. The SC430 shares many components with the previous generation GS, which explains why you are comfortable.


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC