2009 Porsche 911 Carrera PDK vs. 2009 BMW M3 DCT

2009 Porsche 911 Carrera PDK vs. 2009 BMW M3 DCT
Is the squeaky-clean, push-button, microchip-managed future of motoring grim? It’s hard to say. Ignition keys are disappearing. So are clutch pedals. And toxic gases. And the risk of violent death.

Your outlook may depend on whether you’d rather pilot a real 427 Cobra or an X-Wing fighter, the prices of which are about the same. Luke Skywalker can’t drive a stick, but his switch-throwing skills are legendary. Then again, Carroll Shelby could probably kick Luke’s bony butt. The debate rages.

We put our bony butts in two examples of the future of push-button, high-performance driving. Summoning the Force to safely pick a champion, we headed for the coiled back roads of California and the corkscrewing ribbon of Mazda Raceway Laguna Seca.

The new BMW M3 is well-known to us and to you, now that you’re digesting our fourth—fourth! When will your letters pleading for more ever end?—comparison test of the M3 in 15 months. Like a solid Hollywood franchise, BMW’s ranking joy toy and its 414-hp V-8 fusillade have us churning out endless popcorn sequels. The M3’s lineup includes a sedan and a convertible, plus a coupe. Our coupe, base price $59,625, has silver-blue paint over rust-colored leather, with $13,895 in options. Almost all the boxes were checked, including the Premium, Technology, and Cold-Weather packs, plus the new $2900 “M double-clutch transmission with Drivelogic,” a $10 way of saying paddle-shifted seven-speed with programmable shift maps.

We’ve seen the M3 dispatch a Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG and an Audi RS 4, a Lexus IS F, and the stupendous Nissan GT-R. So much for the prelims. This time, the M3 is pitted again a Porsche sneering, “I must blake you!” ?The revamped, direct-injected Porsche 911 Carrera makes 345 horsepower from its six-cylinder engine and has an optional transmission called PDK, or Porsche Doppelkupplungsgetriebe. It’s a 10-euro way of saying a “double-clutch” seven-speed, and it costs $4080 on top of the Carrera’s $76,395 base price. To make the 911 and M3 prices better match up, we begged Porsche for a stripper Carrera (the Carrera S has 40 more horses and starts $10,600 higher). Porsche complied—perhaps for the last time—lending us one with a $750 XM radio and $140 floor mats and painted, fittingly, in New York–taxi yellow. You talkin’ to me?

The dilemma: how to sit in judgment. Should we pick the car that best re-creates the analog, gear-jamming, life-in-your-hands rush of the old days in the digital, fingertip-operated, safety-netted world of today—or the one we just like better? Here’s our answer.


Read Article

mscottc1mscottc1 - 1/6/2009 12:02:24 PM
0 Boost
repost?


AmericaAmerica - 1/6/2009 9:18:52 PM
+2 Boost
This is a well written article and worth a second read through. They give the nod to the M3 based on composure, feel, NVH, and ultimately on the lower lap times of the M3 on Laguna Seca and in the lane change maneuver.

"...no matter how you set it, the M3 astounds. There’s more front-end grip than most people have the guts to exploit, the steering wheel able to carve perfectly elliptical arcs up a winding road at foolish speeds. Where the 911 battles each corner, sometimes in a nerve-jangling sine wave of alternating grip and push, the M3 is dead calm. It shows hardly any body roll or bobble, the chassis balanced with the poise of a Bolshoi star. Call it insulation, or call it stupendous competence, but the M3 chewed 1.1 seconds off the 911’s best Laguna lap time and was quicker through the lane-change maneuver."

They did mention that the heavier M3's brakes softened which is par for the course with the M3. Track junkie M3 drivers almost universally have had a dedicated set of track pads with the last three generations of M3.




downtoearthdowntoearth - 1/6/2009 1:32:00 PM
-1 Boost
"We’ve seen the M3 dispatch a Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG and an Audi RS 4, a Lexus IS F, and the stupendous Nissan GT-R."

Ridiculous. I have never ever seen any M3 dispatching any GT-R. And don't even mention about some tests made somewhere by somebody. Car comparison results vary depending on country and testers' preference.

Let's face it, the GT-R beats the M3 to death around any possible race track and down any possible straight line. And, most importantly, in the wet or slippery conditions of everyday driving the rear wheel drive M3s simply cease to exists while any all wheel drive GT-R, R8/S4/RS4 or 911 Turbo keep rocking. Nissan even has a big boot and some space in the back for chicks with thin legs (which we all want). That's what you call an "all rounder".

What's more, occasionally M3 and GT-R drivers will want to have some fun skiing in a snowy mountain resort and the bimmer owner always has to carry his equipment and the girlfriend on his back up the mountain icy road. In a rucksack, maybe :P Not his friends though since, according to Jeremy Clarkson, M3 drivers don't have any :-)

Obviously, fanboys will never get it. But they don't get many things :-)


HSCenterconsoleHSCenterconsole - 1/6/2009 2:17:57 PM
+2 Boost
downtoearth, you should read the article before going off on a long winded and unintelligible rant. C&D was referring to their past comparison tests where the M3 won. That's all...there is not some vast global conspiracy going on.


downtoearthdowntoearth - 1/6/2009 4:39:14 PM
-2 Boost
HSCenterconsole, why are you casting some "vast global conspiracy" bandwagon on my comment? Are you running out of arguments? And the test by C'n'D was as useless as it could be. They scored M3 and GT-R equally in terms of performance while they measured a Nissan's huge advantage in this area. They scored the M3 equally in handling while you can follow this link http://www.fastestlaps.com/index.php?page_id=compare&car1=46f388b437911&car2=4717b80e35715 to see the GT-R crushing the M3 on any race track in the world. And the "professional" testers didn't even bother to check the cars in the wet, why should they, eh? :-) But the others did: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NWcv7Zp0H78 and GT-R and 911 Turbo still worked brilliantly. Meanwhile, when Chris Harris tested the M3 around the wet N-ring http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5JSrm83uPKo he was driving very slooooooowly not to kill himself :-) Ever wondered why?


M53RM53R - 1/7/2009 3:42:53 AM
+3 Boost
Maybe you should learn to READ 1st before getting all defensive. In the C&D comparison the M3 won overall ( not in performance ) and that's what the article is talking about. No one ever said the M3 was faster than the GTR around a race track because it OBVIOUSLY isn't!!!


HSCenterconsoleHSCenterconsole - 1/7/2009 8:03:55 AM
+2 Boost
M53R summed it up perfectly.
Chill out downtoearth.


quizzquizz - 1/6/2009 9:10:46 PM
-2 Boost
The 911 is easily as reliable if not more so than the M3, so that makes it a potential "everyday driver" for people who can ingress/egress easily.

As far as maintenance costs, it's not significantly more expensive than an M3, trust me.


AmericaAmerica - 1/6/2009 9:23:16 PM
+2 Boost
The 911 is close to being free to maintain?! That is awesome. Dr Porsche said that the 911 was a sports car that could be driven every day and I think they have stayed true that, but I thought that maintenance was the owner's responsibility with Porsche, is that not the case?


mini22mini22 - 1/7/2009 10:14:23 AM
+1 Boost
Of course the Porsche did have the standard suspension,wheels and tires.Wonder how it would have done if it was usually equiped.


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC