When Mercedes Launches The E-Class Coupe Will It Be The Best In Class?

When Mercedes Launches The E-Class Coupe Will It Be The Best In Class?
Mercedes-Benz is well aware of the fact that their CLK has never really made an impact when compared to other sporting coupes on the market.  That is not to say that the CLK was a bad car, it isn't.  In fact some of the specialty models like the first generation CLK55 and subsequent CLK63 have made a positive impression on enthusiasts, and the CLK63 Black Series is bona fide race car that you can buy off the showroom floor.

But pricing on the specialty models is steep, and as such those models truly were niche models delegating back to the lesser models to compete with the likes of BMW, Infiniti and recently Audi.

And since the current CLK has grown long in the tooth, a new model was inevitable and Mercedes isn't going to disappoint with the next generation, this time based off the new for 2010 E-Class platform.  Moving up in platform along with Mercedes naming, the CLK will soon transform into the E-Class coupe, a car that clearly has set its sights on the BMW 3-Series coupe, the Infiniti G37 coupe as well as the new Audi A5.

We often get criticized for the way we wax poetic over the 3-Series, but the fact is that unless you have driven the 3-Series you really aren't in a position to criticize those of us who have - especially when we do point out how good the 3-Series cars are.  And no matter how you feel about BMW, the fact remains the 3-Series is the benchmark that ALL the others are chasing, a benchmark that BMW refuses to leave idle.


Infiniti has done a great job of chasing down the 3-Series, with the addition of the convertible G37 offering a full lineup that goes head to head with 3.  Sized closer to a E-Class, the G37 has made many friends and stolen quite a few sales from their German rival.


Audi has been in and out of the coupe market for years.  Recently they reentered the market with the A5/S5 coupes.  Stunning styling coupled with powerful engines, these coupes lean more to a grand touring coupe versus a hard edge sports car, however with the 3-Series clearly in the cross hairs, the A5 certainly has won more than its fair share of new customers on looks alone.


NONE of us have driven the new E-Class coupe yet, however photographs show this to be a stunning looking car.  Strong shoulders flank the rear quarter panels while aggressive fender flares up front combine with steeply raked front and rear glass creating a truly unique silhouette that is fresh and new, but at once instantly recognizable as Mercedes-Benz.

But is a pretty face enough to win customers?  You could certainly make the case that Audi has worked that formula with pretty good success, and since we haven't driven the new car yet, that pretty face is a major factor in deciding.

So do you think Mercedes-Benz has a winner on their hands that will impact the sales of the competitors?  And in answering that question, which car would you choose to drive if you were spending your hard earned dollars?

Check in and let us know what you think, and lets let Mercedes know what you think of their newest coupe.

Detroit Auto Show Gallery

Also, don't forget you can now upload your photos direct from your mobile devices simply by sending them to mobile@autospies.com


TauronB2GTauronB2G - 1/17/2009 1:05:10 AM
+5 Boost
Good article poor premise. Over the last year or two on this site people have told me that the CLK was a 3 Series competitor because it was based on the C Class. Even though it was marketed to a much difference customer base and never had the sporting intentions of a 3 series. Now MB is moving the car upmarket in platform and size and will shortly be introducing a C Class coupe to better compete with the 3 Series coupes just as the C Class competes with 3 series sedans. The CLK never was amied at the 3 series or G37. Those are sporting cars. The CLK was always a luxury coupe just as the E Class Coupe will be.
The E Class coupe closest competition will be the 6 series BMW especially in V8 and AMG 63 forms. People like to try to compare the 6 to the CL/S Class coupe but the MB's are bigger, more powerful and more luxurious.
Before you ask I have driven every 3 series they currently make including the new M3 so I do understand that car. I chose to purchase a CLK 550 for my daily driver though. If the new E Class convertible looks as good as I think it will that will be my next car. If not I plan to break down and buy a 911.
T


Agent00JAgent00J - 1/17/2009 10:46:15 AM
-1 Boost
For the record, the point I was trying to make is that the CLK didn't compete with, however MB certainly wants a piece of that market, and with current exchange rates making loaded 3-Series coupes $50k, MB certainly has a dog in the hunt.

With that being said, I too have driven all the current 3-Series offerings including my daily driver M3, in addition I have spent time behind the wheel of a CLK350, CLK500 as well as the previous generation CLK55. I must say the CLK55 was a fun car, my brother in law and myself got it airborne (all 4 wheels) in one of our driving expeditions in it. In addition, we spent some time racing his CLK55 and my 330ci that I had in a subdivision that had all the streets in, but no houses started. Both cars got a workout that day.

-00J


AShul007AShul007 - 1/17/2009 2:39:41 AM
+1 Boost
I must say, I love that you are using my spy shot for this article :)


Agent00JAgent00J - 1/17/2009 10:46:49 AM
+1 Boost
We appreciate you getting the pics and sharing them with us.

-00J


ubercoolubercool - 1/17/2009 5:54:33 AM
-3 Boost
Jaguar's XF is the best mid sized luxury motor by along way still, Jags new 5.0L V8, diesel engines and technology have raised the bar...


knightwing23knightwing23 - 1/17/2009 6:13:51 AM
+1 Boost
I agree with TauronB2G. The New E-Class Coupe will be class leader on the premise, theres no other car company which offers a coupe model in that class. What we will see in the next 3 years is a 5-series Coupe and A6 Coupe. Hey maybe even a Lex GS coupe. One will have to be mindful of what the car is aiming to do, or the market its being pitched at. Merc's have alway been concentrating on Luxury first, then sporting asspriations, whereas their bavarian counterparts have concentrated on sports first, then luxury. But till the other companies comeout with a coupe of that size, the MB E-Class will rule. PS I can't wait to see the Black series version of it.


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 1/17/2009 4:39:03 PM
+1 Boost
There will never be an A6 coupe. The A7 is the closest we will get.


bmwdrvrbmwdrvr - 1/17/2009 11:38:56 AM
+3 Boost
The G37 really looks out of place in the above pic, and alot the altima coupe, the other cars just look upscale and expensive, the G37 doesnt, it kinda looks like someone jsut put that pic their and it doesnt fit in the group at all.


JTWJJTWJ - 1/17/2009 9:50:39 AM
+2 Boost
Never driven the BMW, the Infiniti, or the Audi. Like TauronB2G, my daily driver is also a M-B CLK. I was leaning towards the Audi until I saw the E-Class Coupe. Still plan to check out the Audi. The BMWs just seem tight to me on the inside, so i have never seriously considered them. I have thoroughly enjoyed my CLK, and look forward to the arrival of the new E-Coupe. I strongly think that will be my next car.


PerformanceGuyPerformanceGuy - 1/17/2009 10:54:51 AM
+3 Boost
I think it will be a nice car, but I feel that the class leader here will always be a tie between the G37 and 3-series.


JRobUSCJRobUSC - 1/17/2009 11:14:53 AM
+1 Boost
Sorry but these have never been competitors, as the CLK has always been priced significantly higher than the 3-Series coupe. In fact it wasn't until BMW came out with the new 3-Series coupes in 2007 that it was even remotely close, and even now there's a $7000 difference between a 335i and CLK350, and almost a $12k difference between the CLK and a 328i Coupe. Before that the difference was even more enormous. With a C-class coupe coming (an actual 3-Series coupe competitor), the new E-class coupe is likely going to be even more expensive than the current CLK, probably right at what the 6-Series and Jaguar XK are. Mercedes will not be marketing the E-class coupe as a 3-Series competitor whatsoever.


bmwdrvrbmwdrvr - 1/17/2009 11:30:54 AM
+2 Boost
This article is very wrong, for starters, an "e class coupe wouldnt compete with these cars.", second the so called e class coupe isnt based on the e class platform it is based on the c class despite itsname. Third the 2010 e class is based on a modified version of the current e class, not "all new." My thing with this new c class is they will charge above e class dollars for what essentially the same concept as before a c class coupe with a new name. Which no offense you would have to be a moran to feed into that cash cow paying well over 15,000as an assumption more dollars for the 2 door version of an entry level car, just like the CLK it will be so expensive it wont technically compete with the 3, and A5, and based on driving dynamics alone it wasnt desighned to be, but much more a GThttp://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/hot_lists/car_shopping/the_coupe_coop/2011_mercedes_benz_e_class_coupe_spied......best spy pics of it, and confirmation that it is based on the c class platform not the current e class.


TauronB2GTauronB2G - 1/17/2009 12:29:54 PM
0 Boost
I read the same Car & Driver article about tne new E Coupe. There seems to be some confusion about which platform the new car will be on. Some sites say that it will continue to be on a modified C platform while others say it will move to the E platform. Either was both platforms are very good. You also have to remember that until very recently the 3 series was BMWs entry level car and the fanboys have drooled over it for years.
T


bmwdrvrbmwdrvr - 1/17/2009 12:57:12 PM
+1 Boost
ignorrant comment, Im not surprised. 1. The 1 series came out back in 2004 so is 5 years ago "very recent" no. Thanks for that tidbit of nonsense. Secondly BMW isnt charging 10-15,000 more for a 3 series coupe, which is my point no matter how little sense yours makes. Neither is Audi or Infiniti. The CLK for years has been nothing more than a c class coupe same interior, engines, everything just with 2 extra less doors and slightly different styling and the V8 option. So if you in good sense, would pay 10-15,000 more for a 3 series coupe over a 3 series sedan you go right ahead, I think you would be the only one. Mercedes charging even more than the old cars 10-15,000 for what is again essentially a c class coupe with different styling and a V8 option is good business certainly, but you would again be a moran to fall for that trick literally. lmao @ what in the hell did your comment have to do with anything.


KthornKthorn - 1/17/2009 3:44:13 PM
0 Boost
You're right about it not being a graduated boy racer, everytime I see one there's a chick behind the wheel. And a class by itself, do you live in Europe by any chance? Because the car hasn't been hot here in the states for quite a while.


KthornKthorn - 1/17/2009 3:34:27 PM
+2 Boost
If money is no object I would still go for the Audi. And the G37? What's that doing here? These are luxury cars, not near luxury cars.


bmwdrvrbmwdrvr - 1/17/2009 4:36:29 PM
+1 Boost
actually the 3 series an c class, are about the same price, with the 3 series actually ending up being more expensive depending on how its optioned, but it tops out much higher than than the C class. The CLK on the other hand its thousands more than the C class, or 3 series and ALWAYS has been despite simply being a c class coupe makes no sense. NO wonder they arent really popular here. Like the AMG version of the CLK was what almost 90 grand, versus some 20,000-25,000 less for a C amg. It always been a car that was in the same class as the 3 series that tried to hide that fact with a price(about the same as an e class) that didnt match what you were getting


MBKingMBKing - 1/17/2009 4:55:32 PM
+3 Boost
People who say that the CLK was a 3-series competitor haven't driven both cars. The CLK is soft, smooth, and it's a pure luxury coupe. Sitting behind even a 330ci is a completely different experience. The 3-series coupe is rough, quick, and can take a turn at 45mph without feeling like you're going to lose control. The E-class coupe might be a little big, to compete with the 3. I think Mercedes is bringing all there models more in line. With the S, E, C they're going to also have a complementary coupe i.e. CL, E-Coupe, C-Coupe. And subsequently they'll have and AMG version for every car...which I think is a great idea. I really wish BMW would offer an M for everyone one of their models. Nothing is going to take the 3-series off it's thrown. But the E-class coupe could be the best alternative, and also a great choice for those who don't want to have a car that everyone on their street owns.


formula666formula666 - 1/17/2009 5:09:58 PM
+1 Boost
I drive a 2009 CLK350 coupe and love the balance of luxury and performance. It is not overkill on either, and has unique looks that don't call too much attention to it. If I wanted to go sportier (slightly stiffer, more machismo) I'd no doubt go for the 3-Series, which will always own the performance side of the equation, I think. The G37 is one hell of an alternative, though. I think it is getting dangerously close to the ride of the 3-Series, however, I find the suspension to be almost too stiff for its' own good. I don't feel the same control that I do in the 3-Series. That said, the best looking of the bunch is the A5 / S5. That is one sexy car!! But here is why I chose the CLK and why I will probably love the new E-Class Coupe... No B-Pillar!!! What are these other cars that are billing themselves as luxo sport coupes doing with rear windows that don't even roll down?? Pillar-less hard-top design. Traditional Mercedes-Benz and TRUE COUPE, IMO.


audihateraudihater - 1/17/2009 9:43:50 PM
+1 Boost
what everyone seems to be forgetting is that mercedes benz invented this segment in the late '80s with the 300 E coupe and convertible. then, in 1994 and 1995, they made minor styling changes and called it the E320 cabriolet. All along, this coupe/convertible was based off of the E class sedan (the C hadn't even come out yet!). mercedes returning to the concept that they originally pioneered should not come as a shocker to anyone!


TauronB2GTauronB2G - 1/18/2009 12:21:23 PM
+1 Boost
BMWdrvr must be in high school because he doesn't know what he's talking about. The CLK and C Class do not have the same interiors, they only share 1 engine and the do not compete with the 3 series. The reason the CLK costs more is because after the platform its a different car you dingbat. As far as the 1 series goes they only started selling that car here in america a year or two ago.
T


bmwdrvrbmwdrvr - 1/19/2009 9:29:45 PM
+1 Boost
oh wow personal insults, yeah you are pretty ignorrant. In fact the dash of the c coupe, clk, and c class are all identical, and i dont mean identical in a look like sense they are identical,the same materials and everything. Lol I love when people that know of nothing of cars my ignorrant comments. Second the regular CLK has only 2 engines, and like i said teh only one different from the c is the "v8 option". The clk's rest of the interioronly offers a slight stlying difference in the form of air vents, and of course different door panels since its the 2 door version....lol....when you learn a little more about cars than respond....In fact the CLK costs less to build than the C class, yet Mercedes charges some 15grand more, lol sounds like the perfect car for you. but hey great busines plan though.


Hachee2001Hachee2001 - 1/21/2009 10:47:39 AM
+1 Boost
Audihater, you need to go back further in history. While I'm not sure who invented this segment (midsize pillarless coupes/convertibles), but it's been around a long time, and it was mostly American companies that made cars like this. Mercedes have been making midsize pillarless coupes a long time, and there were at least two versions of it prior to the W124 (300E/E320) from the late 80's/early 90's.


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC