2009 BMW 335d Full Test

2009 BMW 335d Full Test
What Works:
Effortless, quiet acceleration; long cruising range; BMW-quality handling.

What Needs Work:
Beyond the considerable price, not much.

Bottom Line:
A superb execution of clean diesel power wrapped in the proven skin of the 3 Series.

A careful cost/benefit analysis of the diesel-powered 2009 BMW 335d sedan vs. the gasoline-powered BMW 335i is certain to yield...exactly nothing. There are many reasons for this:

1. The 335d burns less fuel than the 335i, no question. Yet diesel fuel also costs more than gasoline.
2. The 335d costs more than the 335i. Yet it also emits less CO2.
3. The 335d can easily exceed 500 miles on one tank of fuel. Yet the 335i is quicker, lighter and handles better.

Shall we continue? As with most alternative-fuel vehicles, the decision to buy the diesel-powered 2009 BMW 335d will be made by the heart more often than the pocketbook. Even so, the resolutions to the dilemmas above aren't easy to find, but here's how we see it:

1. Fuel cost is a wash. In this case, less fuel consumption cancels the price premium of diesel fuel. Most buyers shopping for a $50,000 sedan won't be splitting these hairs anyway.
2. The 335d costs $2,475 more than an identically equipped 335i, yet uses less fuel and emits fewer greenhouse gases. This seems like a small premium for anyone who prioritizes the planet and can afford a car this costly.
3. Who doesn't want to fill up less frequently? We'd bet it's the same folks who care more about CO2 emissions than they do about 0-60-mph times.

Numbers Big and Small
The 2009 BMW 335d is one of two vehicles introducing BMW's clean diesel technology to the U.S. this year (the other is the BMW X5 xDrive35d) and it generates some staggering numbers. Most striking is the output from its twin-turbo 3.0-liter inline-6: 265 horsepower at 4,200 rpm and 425 pound-feet of torque at 1,750 rpm.

All this snort goes to the ground through just one transmission option, a six-speed automatic with a manual shift mode. This is the same gearbox offered in the 335i, and it has the same sport mode that hangs onto gears longer. Our test car was fitted with the optional shift paddles on the steering wheel.

Look critically at the engine's output numbers and you'll see a relatively high power peak for a diesel engine that still retains plenty of low-end, rubber-torturing torque. This is a rare combination. This 3.0-liter inline-6 is capable of burying you in the seat with grunt, yet it still enjoys the drivability at high rpm (the redline is 5,000 rpm) needed for sporting character. It's a unique and entertaining combination.

This kind of flexibility comes courtesy of the two turbochargers — a small one optimized for quick throttle response and a larger one that takes over quickly to produce the bellowing torque. BMW utilizes urea (which it calls AdBlue) injection in the exhaust to reduce nitrous-oxide emissions.

This technology working in conjunction with a diesel particulate filter means the 335d's emissions are clean enough that it can be sold in all 50 states. The 6.1-gallon urea tank is simply refilled at the same intervals as a standard change of engine oil, so no special service is required. Urea refills are included in BMW's service program for four years or 50,000 miles. It's also impressive that BMW managed to jam this much storage volume into the 3 Series with no significant packaging compromises.

Taking Its Measure
As long as we're talking about striking numbers, here's another one: $50,895. That's what this 2009 BMW 335d test car costs with its leather upholstery and trim, the Sport package, keyless ignition and several other options. Its base price including destination is $44,725. Since it's a clean diesel, it qualifies for a $900 federal tax credit, which relieves a tiny bit of the sting. It also narrows the gap to an identically equipped 335i from the aforementioned $2,475 to only $1,575.

Now we're talking, and here's why. Using the EPA's fuel-economy figures for both cars (27 mpg combined for the 335d and 20 mpg combined for the 335i) and a rate of 15,000 miles driven annually, we find that the 335d will burn 195 gallons of fuel fewer than a 335i. In our own testing, we achieved 29.6 mpg with the 335d while covering 1,517 miles, about 70 percent of which were highway miles. Using the current average U.S. fuel prices for diesel and gasoline, the annual fuel cost at this rate is virtually the same — $1,273/year for the 335d and $1,263/year for the 335i.

At this rate, it will take prohibitively long to make up the price premium you pay for the diesel-powered 3 Series in the savings in fuel cost. By virtue of burning less fuel, however, the 335i also emits considerably less CO2 every year — 7.79 tons/year vs. 9.76 tons/year. So the answer for those whose hearts are green is simple: Buy the 335d.

Still, there are other benefits to consider.

Goes Like Stink, but Doesn't
The 335d's acceleration is impressive. At the track it hits 60 mph in 5.9 seconds (5.6 seconds with 1 foot of rollout like on a drag strip). It busts through the quarter-mile traps in 14.1 seconds at 99.1 mph. This is 0.6 second slower to 60 mph than the 335i, a gap that is maintained to the quarter-mile mark, and the trap speed is about 4 mph down on the gasoline-powered car.

The story the numbers don't tell is how effortlessly the diesel gets the job done. This power plant is amply engaging below 3,000 rpm. We found ourselves outrunning everyone while grunting it around town without ever approaching the upper reaches of the tachometer.

Venture beyond 3,000 rpm and you'll find enough life left in the top third of the tachometer to make hard driving enjoyable. And you'll do it without feeling like you're overworking the engine. When we start driving quickly, we inevitably end up spending lots of time around redline, and we've found this diesel will play in that arena with a willingness to rev all the way to redline.

Even though the 2009 BMW 335d features an aluminum-block engine, there's still a weight penalty associated with the diesel sedan compared to the 335i. Nevertheless, the 335d offers the typical feel and response through the controls of a BMW 3 Series. Intuitive and well weighted, the 335d's steering feels rewarding, despite the fact that this car weighs 3,804 pounds, 191 pounds more than the 335i. Turn-in is good and the overall sense of control doesn't suffer from the added weight.

With a 67.3-mph performance through the slalom, the 335d is a few ticks slower than the 335i, yet it punches through the cones with similar confidence. It retains a weight distribution of 51 percent front/49 percent rear despite a heavier engine and accompanying components. On the skid pad, the diesel proved as good or better than any 335i we've tested, with a performance of 0.91g thanks to 225/40R18 front and 255/35R18 rear Bridgestone Potenza RE050A run-flat tires.

According to BMW, this car's Sport package gives it the ability to reach 149 mph, just 1 mph short of the 335i's terminal velocity. Go ahead, tell us there isn't some novelty in a 150-mph diesel that pulls 0.91g on the skid pad.

Diesel? Really?
Even if there isn't novelty and you just happen to like the perfume of diesel fuel in the morning, then you've got a perfectly good 3 Series sedan that makes almost no compromises as a diesel.

Like most modern non-commercial diesel engines, this one is virtually silent. You'd never know this twin-turbo inline-6 is a diesel. When you get into the throttle of most diesel engines, it's as if someone turned up the volume control to 11. But when you rev this BMW diesel, your sound perception gauge barely goes up to 2.

One potential drawback is the fact that you'll occasionally have to search for a fuel station that sells diesel. And, sometimes, when you do, it will be a truck stop complete with the greasy mess of diesel spilled at every pump and slathered on every handle. We only had to deal with this once in five fills.

Still a 3 Series
Inside the diesel's cabin are the familiar instruments, seats, steering wheel and sense of quality that you associate with a 3 Series. You really do get what you pay for here.

And there's no indication that this is a diesel either, just the same materials and design as the other cars in the line of 3 Series cars. Diesel-powered 3s are even available now with the same options as the 335i, except active steering — a feature we doubt many will miss.

So what we have here is a class-leading sedan with plenty of grunt, lots of range and a large price tag. Thing is, if you're shopping in this price range and have an ounce of social responsibility in your soul, then the 2009 BMW 335d is undeniably appealing. There isn't another car that can match its strengths. And it doesn't have many weaknesses.

You don't even need a cost/benefit analysis to tell you that.
Read Article

_43LE_43LE - 1/20/2009 1:27:17 PM
-5 Boost
What you mean "bland"? The 3 series (sedan) is over-styled ugly. However, the coupe is absolutely beautiful.


HSCenterconsoleHSCenterconsole - 1/20/2009 1:28:42 PM
+11 Boost
Too bad the diesel only comes with the automatic. It is really cool though that diesels are reappearing in the U.S., albeit slowly.


neutralneutral - 1/20/2009 8:31:24 PM
+1 Boost
There's too stringent of emissions regulations. Keeping diesels very clean isn't enough, California is forcing the country to have ultra-super-amazing-clean emissions, costing buyers thousands up front and loss of fuel economy, along with the associated problems with the new technologies. Once more renewable sources of diesel come on-line, the prices should be more in line with gasoline and hopefully more people will buy. I've loved diesel since I was a kid, can't wait to see the ultra hi-tech diesel technology of today become everyday technology within a few years---- then merge it with something like GM/MB/BMW's 2-mode hybrid with LiIon (or Litium titanate). All in good time (i hope)......


neutralneutral - 1/21/2009 5:57:34 PM
+1 Boost
They act like they can tell the rest of the country what to do and get pissed and throw fits when the feds tell them they cant. F**k CARB, how can they seriously expect companies to taylor-make cars for every state? Europe has ONE standard amongst dozens of countries and typical of America, we do things ass backwards.


sectorsector - 1/20/2009 1:37:56 PM
-7 Boost
"Diesel emissions from trucks, machinery and other sources elevate the risk of premature death, cancer, asthma and other chronic diseases for more than 3 million people living in West Oakland and the surrounding region, according to the most detailed study yet on the issue."

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/03/20/BA1PVMN0O.DTL


neutralneutral - 1/20/2009 3:45:42 PM
+1 Boost
Diesel emissions from years ago were. Even without particulate filters, diesels from 2005 or 2006 put out only a miniscule fraction of what a diesel engine put out... oh say in 1990. (don't even bother to compare to years previous...). With particulate filters and new emissions technology, diesels are essentially as clean as gasolines. IMO, we should never have mandated the 2007 & 2010 emissions regs for diesel. Typical liberal, reads a report and becomes an expert. Automakers worldwide are going bankrupt trying to satisfy these people and what do these environmentalist-treehuggers do---they bitch and whine!!


AnthonyAnthony - 1/20/2009 4:31:55 PM
-3 Boost
Europe has a smog problem because of NOx and particulates from diesels. Those "liberals" are looking out for your health. Nobody is fooling anyone comparing emissions of diesel engines to gasoline engines.If automakers really want to make it out of this recession alive and have sustainability after it passes, they are going to have to find alternative fueling methods away from gas and diesel.


neutralneutral - 1/20/2009 8:11:29 PM
+2 Boost
"If automakers really want to make it out of this recession alive and have sustainability after it passes, they are going to have to find alternative fueling methods away from gas and diesel."

Your naivety makes me laugh. You really think that jumping onto hydrogen or EV's all at once is going to help things out?!?!? Talk about bankruptcy just b/c "smart" people have "good" ideas...

As for Europe, I recall going there about 20yrs ago (southern Europe) as a kid and washing half of my face at night to see the smog & soot that built up during the day. You could see a big cloud of pollution every night. Now, with catalytic converters and DPF's, theres virtually no PM or NOx problems to speak of. Just go look at the Ancient Marbles of Italy & Greece which were being destroyed in the 60's-90's. Now, that's largely a distant bad memory. When I go back to visit family, I do the same smog check at night and I get nothing. I look in the air a sundown and see clear skies.



AnthonyAnthony - 1/20/2009 11:39:56 PM
0 Boost
Gas and diesel are not sustainable. The last 150 years of automotive history leading up to now have proved that. And your own self-tests aside, Europe still has somewhere near 300,000 premature deaths related to air pollution a year.


neutralneutral - 1/21/2009 6:01:00 PM
0 Boost
BimmerMike46,

The levels of pollution generated by a new gasoline powered car compared to a new "clean" diesel are so miniscule (for both types) that its hard to measure with equipment. The diesel emissions regulations set to come into effect in 2010 (as if the 2007 reg wasnt bad enough) has emissions targets that weren't even measurable in a laboratory just a few years ago. Problem with diesel is that the emissions controls systems (DPF, etc) add so much damn cost & Complexity to an already clean engine (assuming a 2006 diesel engine) and it robs fuel economy.


neutralneutral - 1/21/2009 6:02:35 PM
0 Boost
Also BimmermMIke46, it depends what you are burning. If it's vegetable based biodiesel, you might get a goofy smell. Different blends of diesel can give you different smells, but generally speaking, you don't smell a damn thing!!


david999david999 - 1/20/2009 2:47:36 PM
-3 Boost

What's the point of this car if it doesn't have any real benefits over the 335i? It's slower, costs more, doesn't save on gas, doesn't look any better, more difficult to find a gas station, etc.


Htay7500Htay7500 - 1/20/2009 3:05:16 PM
+2 Boost
Theres a lot more torque on tap, and you get a $900 fed tax credit as it is a clean diesel, and gets more MPG as it handles well.


david999david999 - 1/20/2009 4:51:32 PM
-2 Boost

Did you guys read the Edmunds article? That's what I thought. Ghosthunter below basically responds to you Htay7500. As for the other dope, he is a lost cause.


AnthonyAnthony - 1/20/2009 3:42:35 PM
-1 Boost
"Thing is, if you're shopping in this price range and have an ounce of social responsibility in your soul, then the 2009 BMW 335d is undeniably appealing." So basically the same environmentalist snob mentality that everyone despises from hybrid owners is now acceptable with diesels?


neutralneutral - 1/20/2009 8:37:31 PM
+1 Boost
It's because diesel owners love their diesels b/c they are diesels... its like a nerd club. Diesel owners typically are technically oriented, logical people. All too often, hybrid owners are smug, elitest, technically-ignorant people who think they're better than everyone else b/c they think they're saving the environment. It's too bad b/c hybrid technology IS the bridge to the future, but logical decisions made by some companies (cough**GM**cough) are belittled by those same hybrid owners of the toyota prius. Specifically, it makes the most sense to put a hybrid system on the vehicles that have the worst mileage (and the ones that already generate healthy profit margins). GM did this (what logical engineers WOULD do) and they got shot down in the media left & right while smug Prius owners pointed their fingers down at everyone.


AnthonyAnthony - 1/21/2009 12:09:02 AM
0 Boost
That is a stereotype, and one that I have never experienced I might add. It is very much the same thing to say that all BMW owners are snooty yuppies. In truth, most of the hybrid owners I know are also super-geeks excited about such technology in their automobiles. The rest just feel good about not having to fill up as often as Escalade owners, which our very own government supported (not relying on foreign oil, the shame is that people rely only on foreign cars to accomplish that). Also,spreading hybrid technology across product line-ups is something I also have no problems with.


neutralneutral - 1/21/2009 6:05:11 PM
0 Boost
Well then you and I must live opposite lifestyles or something b/c I've heard/seen/experience more overt, pompus, arrogant Prius owners than anything else. Yea, the guy driving the S63 is often times an ass, but who wouldnt be---- and how many S-classes do you see compared to Pruises?


ghosthunterghosthunter - 1/20/2009 4:06:43 PM
+1 Boost
I just don't understand why most of autospies readers are fascinated by low end torque? If you know anything about cars, you know it is the wheel torque and wheel speed that determines the acceleration of a car and its speed. And the wheel torque and its speed is decided by the engine’s power output, which is a function of torque and rev. a low end torque engine is good for cursing or towing, but it is not good for a sports car. A Prius has a combined total of 350 pound-feet of torque (assuming they peak at the same time), 270 of which is available at 0 rmp, I don’t see any of you guys call prius a sporty car.

Now the result is here, 5.9 second from 0-60 for 335d is hardly impressive when you consider a 335i is 1 second quicker ( a lot quicker), lighter and cheaper. another drawback of diesel is they are pretty much powerless at high speed, where you really need the horsepower to maintain the speed and accelerate more. For those who argue 335d emits less CO2 thus more environments friendly, you better know all diesels (without trapping device) emits NOx, which is actually HARMFUL to the environment.

At any rate, diesels are only popular at European because their government tax gas a shit load higher than diesel. Without government support, diesel will never see the light of day in small cars. Also, as a general rule, a good engine for a sports car should have the peak torque at as high rev as possible.


Flame suit on.



abcdabcd - 1/20/2009 6:08:14 PM
0 Boost
+1


neutralneutral - 1/20/2009 8:18:09 PM
+1 Boost
Agreed with some points, disagree with most. The levels of PM & NOx put out by modern diesels are 100's of times less than the engines of 1 or 2 decades ago (engine out emissions too!!). Now, for all the angry-econazis who blame detroit for not bringing diesel passenger cars to the USA, they have to realize that b/c the want next to NO PM & NOx, the costs outweigh the benefits. BMW/VW/MB sell only a few diesels to a niche market. In the USA, the only place diesel makes sense is on heavier duty applications where the fuel economy gains can be in the 50-70% range over gasoline. As for low-end torque, I love it. I fully understand sports cars' need for high-end power, but I'd personally have a torque monster with a transmission geared so that at 110kph, the engine is under 2000rpm with craploads of torque to spare up until 4000rpm. Lets be honest here, how many of us take our high-revving sports cars up to 8000rpm just to go visit friends or get groceries?


tom43tom43 - 1/20/2009 5:29:11 PM
0 Boost
I think that most if not all writers here have any experience with new diesels like the 335d. I have checked the 335d, 330d and 320d in direct comparison to the petrol counterparts here in Germany. It is not true, that the success of diesel in germany depends on tax privilege. The price of diesel today is nearly as high as the price of petrol ("Super; 95 octane). The "general car tax" you have to pay once a year is even higher for diesel cars compared to petrol driven models.

The difference in acceleration between Euro-335d, which is slightly more powerfull than the US-version (286 hp), compared to the 335i is marginal. We have tested this in many runs on the autobahn at high speeds up to 150 mph. It is true, that the 335i is more a sportscar, because of its sound and high revs. On the other hand the 335d is more quiet especially at high speed, due to the transmission ratio and lower revs. One success of diesel over hybrid in europe depends on the higher travel speeds. Electric mode is not used at autobahn speeds and the diesel is dramatically more efficient at high speeds compared to petrol engines (at 120 mph average a 335d can save up to 50% compared to a 335i!). I don´t think that NOx emited by cars has that dramatic impact mentioned above. Even with a 50% diesel fraction on european roads most cities have much less smog problems compared to US cities...

Both cars have a totally different character. So you find most 335i in the E92 coupe and E93 convertible and most 335d in the E90 sedan and E91 touring.

Second generation Euro-335d will arrive at the IAA in Frankfurt at Sept. 09. The power will exceed 300hp. We will also see a triple-turbo 3.0-inline six in the F01 7-series and the next gen 5-series reaching 350-370 hp.

Give it a try. You will not be dissapointed.


abcdabcd - 1/20/2009 6:07:09 PM
+1 Boost
Fuel tax rates in Germany are 0.65 euro per litre of petrol and 0.47 euro per litre of diesel.


abcdabcd - 1/20/2009 6:11:11 PM
+1 Boost
If not the tax privilege diesel would be quite a lot more expensive than petrol in Germany, like in US.


I95SPEEDINGTICKETSI95SPEEDINGTICKETS - 1/20/2009 7:58:41 PM
+1 Boost
Tom is absolutely correct.

On very long journeys where travelling at high speeds is required the Fuel efficiency from Diesels is almost 50% better than similarly powered Petrol Counterparts.

Trip from Frankfurt to London and Back Once in a 2008 Cayenne S and Once in an Audi Q7 4.2 TDI (2008) both times spent most of the Euro leg of the trip at around 200 - 220 Km/h (Alone in the Cayenne, Had a Passenger in the Q7) Q7 had to Fill up 2 times, Cayenne 3.5 times.


investor27investor27 - 1/20/2009 5:35:31 PM
+3 Boost
It's too bad BMW did not offer the 335d xi. With all the torque that the 335d has, the all-wheel-drive xi system would have benefited.


StarStar - 1/20/2009 6:48:45 PM
-1 Boost
Best in class in either diesel or gasoline version. End of story.


TexLandRoverTexLandRover - 1/20/2009 7:49:01 PM
+1 Boost
$51K seems like a high price for a relatively "small" car. BMW builds quality vehicles, but not too sure about the "value" equation over the last few years. You got to really LIKE BMW to drop $51K on a 3 series, and more importantly, hope you never need utility of any sort. Just seems like a whole bunch of better buys out there right now...


quizzquizz - 1/20/2009 10:09:44 PM
+2 Boost
It was less than 5 years ago when $50K got you a 5 series... damn exchange rate


tom43tom43 - 1/21/2009 3:13:47 AM
-1 Boost
One other comment: I don´t understand why BMW is not transferring the newest diesel-technology to the US. In Germany the 335d is at the end of its life-cycle. The strongest competitor here is the new 330d (single-turbo), available since Sep. 08. It is cheaper, it is nearly as fast as the Euro-335d (0.1 sec difference, 0-62 mph, it is available also with manual transmission and it shows a fairly high improvement in fuel consumption (about 40 miles/gallone). The sales figures say it clearly: The 330d is the much better choice until the 2nd-gen 335 reaches the markets!

Some words again to german taxes: yes, it is true, that the diesel taxes are lower compared to petrol taxes. BUT: you have also to pay an annual tax. This tax is higher for diesel cars (335i 196€/year; 335d 448€/year).


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC