GM Says Success Of The Volt Will Depend On Federal And State Investments

GM Says Success Of The Volt Will Depend On Federal And State Investments
General Motors today outlined a comprehensive plan of action to help communities get ready for plug-in electric vehicles such as the upcoming Chevrolet Volt. GM announced details of the plan at the Washington Auto Show.

"Collaborating with communities such as San Francisco and metropolitan areas such as Washington, D.C. - where there's already an interest in plug-in vehicles - is another important step toward raising customer awareness of the environmental and economic benefits of vehicles such as the Volt," said Ed Peper, GM North America vice president, Chevrolet.

General Motors is working with key stakeholders in cities such as San Francisco to develop policies and enablers to accelerate the transition to plug-in electric vehicles. GM will undertake similar efforts around the country in communities such as Washington, D.C. These actions will help ensure the early success of the Chevrolet Volt - which hits the market next year - and other plug-in vehicles. Stakeholders that are key to establishing plug-in-ready metropolitan areas and regions include:

  • State, city and county governments
  • Electric utilities
  • Regulators/public utility commissions
  • Permitting and code officials
  • Clean Cities coalitions
  • Local employers
  • Universities
  • Early electric vehicle adopters

"Cities have an indispensable role in making plug-in vehicles successful," said San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom. "Here in San Francisco, we are acting now to make sure the charging infrastructure will be available to support these vehicles as soon as they are ready for sale, and we are working with other cities in the region to make the Bay Area a thriving market for electric transportation."

Challenges that need to be addressed include consumer incentives to make this early technology more affordable; public and workplace charging infrastructure; consumer-friendly electricity rates and renewable electricity options; government and corporate vehicle purchases; supportive permitting and codes for vehicle charging; and other incentives such as high-occupancy-vehicle (HOV) lane access.

GM is making great strides toward bringing the Volt from concept to the showroom. More than 30 prototype vehicles powered by lithium-ion battery packs are undergoing rigorous testing at GM's Proving Ground in Milford, Mich. In addition, last month at the North American International Auto Show in Detroit, GM announced it will manufacture the Volt battery packs in the United States.

"The Chevy Volt is truly coming to life, but preparing the market for electric vehicles also requires capable partners from outside the auto industry," said Peper. "Momentum is building as governments, technology companies, communities and universities are increasingly working together to prepare the market for electric vehicles."

Several recent positive developments in this regard include:

  • Last October, the federal government approved a $7,500 tax incentive for consumers of plug-in electric vehicles such as the Chevy Volt.
  • In November, the California cities of San Francisco, San Jose and Oakland announced a plan for plug-in vehicle infrastructure, incentives and enablers.
  • A new Michigan law expedites the development of advanced battery manufacturing and research capabilities in the state.

GM is also helping to pave the way to plug-in commercialization on several other fronts, including:

  • Working with the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) and a coalition of more than 40 utilities to solve challenges and accelerate the commercialization of plug-in electric vehicles.
  • Playing a lead role in helping to create Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) standards for the vehicle charging interface.

"We know plenty of work still remains, both within and outside of GM," said Peper. "But today's and other recent announcements underscore the comprehensive work being done to bring the Chevrolet Volt and other electrically driven vehicles to market - and they also highlight why we are so optimistic about the ultimate success of the Volt."



BremboBrembo - 2/3/2009 5:41:17 PM
+4 Boost
NO! Success depend on whether GM made a good product.


cocococococo - 2/3/2009 7:03:27 PM
+5 Boost
Ah, yes. The old we-hosed-the-project-so-now-we'll-drag-the-government-into-it-so-we-have-a-scapegoat routine. America knows it well.


ThierryHenry14ThierryHenry14 - 2/3/2009 7:23:44 PM
+4 Boost
What a stupid logic, from GM. Why does the product's success depend on others? It should depend on what GM does right...


E36erE36er - 2/3/2009 7:35:24 PM
+5 Boost
Seriously, F*#$! them. This is the same old GM line. Excuses, excuses.




neutralneutral - 2/4/2009 3:32:52 PM
+1 Boost
You obviously didnt read the article. What excuses are you talking about? Quit polluting the internet with stupidity.


veyron1001veyron1001 - 2/3/2009 7:35:33 PM
+2 Boost
So what they are saying the success of the Volt is with more bailout funding? I thought consumers decide if its successful or not by purchasing the vehicle?


downtoearthdowntoearth - 2/3/2009 8:33:38 PM
-1 Boost
The more news I read about the Volt, the more I think the hope will simply turn into just a huge American fart. Chinese have already overtaken us and overtaken us badly. They have started selling a car of similar size, twice the range, half the price which performs well in crash testes and requires no bailout: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BYD_F3DM ||| We are doomed. I've already trained myself on how to eat rice only and survive. I even started to like Condoleezza Rice.


neutralneutral - 2/4/2009 12:17:35 PM
0 Boost
I don't even know where to start with you, please stop with your nonsense babbling. Quit whining about "bailouts", you government spent $850 billion on the first bailout (pork included) and is about to spend another $850 billion. By my count, that makes the Big3 LOAN just over 1% of the whole thing. 1% going to America's last true vestage of industry, an industry that went through MASSIVE turnarounds only to fall victim to bad-attitude Americans, govt under-regulation of Wall st., and overall wall st greed leading to a collapse of the worlds economy. Quit your whining.


neutralneutral - 2/4/2009 2:55:38 PM
0 Boost
Mike, Yes, we CURRENTLY have tons of computer/software industry, but without being smart about it, we will probably loose that too b/c some jackass economist/michael moore are going to say its not worth having. The Big3 are more important than ANY of the jackasses on wall st or politicians. In the end, if the proverbial shi* hits the fan and the country collapses, we need our engineers, designers, factories & everything that goes along with it. In the end, if Citigroup or any of those guys go away, they are just replaced by another group of bankers. They don't actually do anything (per se), they just shuffle money around. What will keep america's economy functional is our ability to OWN, develope and manufacture stuff, ESPECIALLY CARS! For those idiots in the country who are so short sighted to think "we can build factories for tanks anywhere", I ask, who is going to design the tank? Who is going to integrate the electronics? Who is going to design the actuators and sensors? Mike, once again, your comment is appreciated. On another note, didnt you say you have a CI BMW? Do you have the one with the big yellow LED turn signals? I dont know why (probably b/c im an electronics nerd) but i absolutely love the tail lights on that model.


neutralneutral - 2/4/2009 3:48:09 PM
+1 Boost
Mike, a few thousand cars isn't going to cause any real disturbances. The power companies will sense this extra demand (although it might be offset by other efficiency improvements) and will compensate. This is supply & demand, what the eco-nazis don't understand.


neutralneutral - 2/4/2009 12:07:46 PM
0 Boost
I Can't believe you people. Here everyone has been whining how bad GM
is for the environment and all they do is force people to buy
big, bad SUVs, blah blah blah. Then GM builds an EREV, the car all
the public has "said" they wanted, and everyone complains. Shut up
and give them a chance. The EV is a complete change of gears from
conventional systems and is going to require certain infrastructure
changes. The GOVERNMENT wants these cars (lets face it, the eco-whackos
control the govt now) and since there's essentially no infrastructure in
place, there has to be some sort of organized, govt effort to get these
new technologies in place. If there isn't an official push, then
this stuff won't take off. Get off GM's ass, everything they do, people
are going to complain. Unfortunately, cars are going to be designed according to what a minority of people want (since they control the gov now), not what people actually want.


neutralneutral - 2/4/2009 2:49:16 PM
0 Boost
OH hell, if Toyota was doing this then all of california and all the jackasses who CALL themselves environmentalists (they're just militant wackos) would be on their hands and knees paying homage to their japanese gods. GM does it and everyone gets upset. Bull... just plain Bull.


pnsb24apnsb24a - 2/6/2009 4:40:23 PM
+2 Boost
Once again GM comes up smelling like a turd. Who is going to buy a 40k car when they can get a honda or prius for half the price. Also they might as well cancel the camaro, it is now way to late


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC