Are You Driving The Safest Or Most Dangerous Car In America?

Are You Driving The Safest Or Most Dangerous Car In America?
What is the safest car in America? Do you look at crash worthiness, agility, or maybe some other factor.

Our friends over at MSN uncovered a treasure trove of statistical information relating to the frequency of crash broken down by the rate of fatalities per million registered vehicles.   By taking this data and crunching it, they determined  the not only safest cars to be in a crash but also the worst. 

So what is the safest car in America based on fatalites?

Lowest Rates of Driver Death
VehicleRate*
Chevrolet Astro07
Infiniti G3511
BMW 7 Series11
Toyota 4Runner13
Audi A4 Quattro14
Audi S4 Quattro14
Mercedes E Class14
Toyota Highlander14
Mercedes M Class14
Toyota Sienna17
Honda Odyssey17
Lexus ES 33018
Toyota Highlander18
Toyota Sequoia19
BMW X519

You might be quick to note that a number of the safer vehicles are larger SUVs.

But now take a look at the worst.

Highest Rates of Driver Death
VehicleRate*
Chevrolet Blazer (two-door)232
Acura RSX202
Nissan 350Z193
Kia Spectra (hatchback)191
Pontiac Sunfire179
Kia Rio175
Chevrolet Cavalier (two-door)171
Mitsubishi Eclipse169
Dodge Neon161
Pontiac Grand Am160
Chevrolet Cavalier (four-door)150
Ford Mustang150
Ford Ranger150
Mazda B Series147
Mitsubishi Eclipse (convertible)146
Mitsubishi Montero Sport146


Not really that much different, however there now is a smattering of smaller cars in the mix.

So does size make a difference, or is it a combination of factors that contribute overall?  But more importantly is your vehicle at the top or the bottom of the list.


Remember the EASIEST way to send and add photos at AutoSpies.com is by emailing them to mobile@AutoSpies.com

2009 Chicago Auto Show Photo Gallery


Read Article

jonmartinjonmartin - 2/9/2009 2:19:29 PM
+3 Boost
Why does the Toyota Highlander show up twice in the "Lowest rates" list?


GambitGambit - 2/9/2009 5:09:14 PM
+3 Boost
Maybe the Highlander's I-4 and V6 are considered separate?


BMWGinoBMWGino - 2/9/2009 5:07:01 PM
-5 Boost
Did someone ring for me?


johannasjohannas - 2/9/2009 2:44:28 PM
+5 Boost
Lots of foreign makes in the safer list, more domestics in the not-so-safe list. Should I read into this?


veyron1001veyron1001 - 2/9/2009 5:26:11 PM
-3 Boost
UAW every car on the safest list except the G35 can hold 5 people or more so your argument is weak. It seems like safety is last on Ford, GM and Chrysler to do list thus making the car cheaper. How many people own the astro these days?


downtoearthdowntoearth - 2/9/2009 2:55:35 PM
+6 Boost
This list hasn't changed since years. And it still proves ChuckG37 was the smartest user on this site.


downtoearthdowntoearth - 2/9/2009 8:26:07 PM
+1 Boost
Butt, I'm with you!! I didn't respond simply because the comment wasn't ridiculous, hilarious and annoying enough :-) BTW, I was also wondering whether this motive with corn in the shit (the most valuable and balanced comment so far on AutoSpies) was made by your alter ego and it appears it was :) To be honest, I also practiced annoying people heavily, not here but on YouTube though :) As the result I had about 25 hateful comments back on my profile and about zillion responses from angry idiots, either mocked or provoked in my mailbox :) That's really a lot of fun, so simply manipulate their minds and trigger swearing :) Somehow however I've got bored and moved here where I occasionally engage in technical arguments so a more credible nickname was necessary (the one on YouTube was closely related to a dog shit :) If you provide me with some way to PM you, I'll link you my purpose-built YT account to show off how effective Internet hooking can be :) PS. My next nickname anywhere else will certainly be BigAssMackerel :)


WhelanWhelan - 2/9/2009 3:50:34 PM
+5 Boost
I have to say this is a very skewed result. I have to ask if they factored age into this at all as well. Kia spectra, Ford Mustangs, etc. are all cars that a lot of younger newer drivers get behind the wheel of. Not to mention they are typically more aggressive drivers than those you see in X5's and RX350s. I can't remember the last time I saw an X5 or RX go flyin down the highway at 80+. Not to mention most of the time they are probably full of the family where driving safely and safer are key with passengers.

I am not bashing results by any means, but to see the way they got their numbers would be very interesting and seeing if sorting by age would create a difference.


WillisWillis - 2/9/2009 4:14:16 PM
+7 Boost
Let's see... an old guy driving a Corolla will make the Corolla a safe car. A speedfreak driving the same Corolla will make that same car a potentially unsafe car due to his driving style. He can put himself and others at risk. This list means nothing.


HSCenterconsoleHSCenterconsole - 2/9/2009 5:24:54 PM
+6 Boost
The joke wasn't funny the first time. Nor the second time. Nor funny here on the third try.


Agent63Agent63 - 2/9/2009 6:01:07 PM
+2 Boost
You know what? Stats like this doesn't mean squat. You know why? Because I can say "100% of all drivers die" and that would be legit.


WillisWillis - 2/9/2009 6:32:22 PM
+3 Boost
Consumer Reports also perceives Toyota to be a "sporty brand". Right...


NItePhireNItePhire - 2/9/2009 8:02:52 PM
+5 Boost
Are you Michael Taylor is drag?


BMWGinoBMWGino - 2/10/2009 12:03:58 PM
-5 Boost
LexusBeautyQueen, You're wrong, zero people have died in the BMW 750i, and they have looked much more fabulous while in them. BMWs are the ultimate safety machine, like didn't you know? The LS is just a tin can, everyone knows...LOL!


thstonethstone - 2/9/2009 7:51:26 PM
+2 Boost
This list definitely means something. Isn't anyone interested in WHY a person in a Chevy Blazer is almost 17 times more likely to die than in a Toyota Highlander? That is huge! And if you have an Acura RSX, I'd trade it in for an Audi A4 tomorrow. No one ever wants to think that these statistics are real, but they are. Those are real people dying on the roads and the vehicle they chose seems to have some correlation to whether they live or die. The frustration is that with the data presented, its impossible to figure out why.


chris357chris357 - 2/9/2009 8:35:52 PM
+2 Boost
the people in th ecars on the bad list died from shame not from actually being in accidents


downtoearthdowntoearth - 2/10/2009 8:54:49 AM
+2 Boost
ROTFL :), +1, actually females account for proportionally less accidents than males but this reference to BUTTmonkey earned you the boost anyway :)


t_bonet_bone - 2/10/2009 9:19:47 AM
+3 Boost
This study is really garbage because it relates the driver and the car. Case in point--I was actually looking at getting a Chevy Astro van for utility stuff a couple years ago (it is a great size!). But I did not because it is pretty much the WORST car on the road for safety...not the best! Now maybe Astro drivers are aware of this, so they drive accordingly...

"Chevy Astro, GMC Safari get worst ratings in government crash tests of minivans" - http://www.detnews.com/2005/autosinsider/0503/21/01-121653.htm


holmstarholmstar - 2/10/2009 3:21:20 PM
+1 Boost
As others have said, this list must be taken with a massive grain of salt. Each vehicle attracts a different demographic, each with different driving habits. This list doesn't separate the data by demographic, thus statistically you cannot draw any real conclusions.

For example, a lot of teens may drive kia spectras because they are dirt cheap. And we all know that teen drivers are more likely to get into accidents than adult drivers thus there are more deaths per million cars.

Am I saying that a kia spectra is as safe as a BMW 7 series?
No, of course not. But I AM saying that you cannot draw that conclusion from this data alone.


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC