BMW Group Revenues of Euro 53 Billion in 2008

BMW Group Revenues of Euro 53 Billion in 2008
BMW Press Release Revenues of the BMW Group declined only moderately in 2008 despite the worldwide financial and economic crisis. Group revenues decreased by 5.0% to euro 53,197 million (2007: euro 56,018 million). Revenues of the Automobiles segment dropped to euro 48,782 million (2007: euro 53,818 million /-9.4%) reflecting lower sales volumes. The Motorcycles segment reported sales of euro 1,230 million (2007: euro 1,228 million / +0.2%), whilst the Financial Services segment increased its revenues by 12.8% to euro 15,725 million (2007: euro 13,940 million).

Unsurprisingly in the face of difficult business conditions in 2008, the BMW Group was not able to match the previous year’s record sales volume figure. Set against the previous year’s high level, however, the 4.3% sales volume decrease was also moderate. In total, the BMW Group sold 1,435,876 BMW, MINI and Rolls-Royce brand vehicles in 2008 (2007: 1,500,678 units). The group therefore recorded its second-best annual sales volume figure in its history (behind 2007).

Market climate deteriorated further in fourth quarter 2008

Worldwide business conditions for the automobile sector deteriorated sharply again in the fourth quarter 2008 adversely affecting business performance. Apart from the great reticence to purchase new vehicles, there were also no signs of stabilisation on the used car markets and consequently of residual values for vehicles coming out of leases. Despite the worsening financial and economic crisis, the BMW Group will be reporting clearly positive group earnings for the financial year 2008. The Annual Report for the full year 2008 will be presented at the Annual Accounts Press Conference on 18 March.

Capital expenditure at previous year’s level

Capital expenditure, at euro 4,204 million (2007: euro 4,267 million/-1.5%), was lower than in the previous year. The main focus of capital expenditure was on product and infrastructure investments in conjunction with production start-ups for new models such as the BMW 7 Series, the Z4, the X1 and the MINI Convertible. Capital expenditure for property, plant and equipment and other intangible assets increased by 1.1% to euro 2,966 million (2007: euro 2,934 million). In addition, at euro 1,224 million (2007: euro 1,333 million), development expenditure recognised as assets in accordance with IFRS was 8.2% lower than in the previous year.

Workforce reduced

The number of employees was reduced over the past year as a result of the previously reported personnel-related measures, the sale of business units, natural staff turnover and the expiry of temporary contracts. At the end of 2008, the worldwide workforce comprised 100,041 employees (31 December 2007: 107,539 employees), 7.0% fewer than one year earlier. Approximately 4,000 voluntary employment contract termination agreements had been signed by the end of December. In addition, almost 1,800 posts were reduced in conjunction with the sale of the Cirquent Group to NTT Data. The number of trainees at the year-end (4,102) remained at a high level (31 December 2007: 4,281).

MINI and Rolls-Royce achieve new sale volume records in 2008

The year 2008 presented the whole of the automobile industry with enormous challenges. The BMW Group was nevertheless able to achieve new sales volume records for its MINI and Rolls-Royce brands. One of the main contributing factors enabling the sales volume decrease to be kept to a moderate 4.3% was the BMW Group’s “Efficient Dynamics” technology which is helping to reduce fuel consumption and CO2 emissions. All new BMW and MINI models are now equipped with this technology as a standard feature. In Europe alone, the BMW Group delivered some 830,000 vehicles in 2008 equipped with Efficient Dynamics.

In 2008, 1,202,239 BMW brand vehicles (2007: 1,276,793 units/-5.8%) were sold worldwide, well ahead of the volumes achieved by relevant competitors in the premium segment. MINI was again able to increase the number of units sold, thus setting a new sales volume record. In total, 232,425 units were sold, 4.3% more than in the previous year.

With 1,212 units sold (2007: 1,010 units), Rolls-Royce Motor Cars recorded a sales volume growth of 20.0%. This was the fifth annual increase in succession, ensuring that Rolls-Royce remains the undisputed market leader in the ultra-luxury segment.

BMW again the leading European car brand in USA in 2008

The USA remained the largest single market for BMW, MINI and Rolls-Royce brand cars in 2008. In total, the BMW Group sold 303,639 units (2007: 336,225 units / -9.7%) on this market. Despite a sales volume drop of 15.2% as a consequence of the financial crisis, the BMW brand was again the leading European car brand in the USA in 2008 with 249,113 units sold (2007: 293,795 units). MINI can also look back on a successful performance in the USA in 2008 with sales up by 28.6% to 54,077 units (2007: 42,045 units). This was the best year for the brand in the premium small-vehicle sector in the USA since its market launch in 2002.

Germany remains the BMW Group’s second largest market with 284,353 units sold in total (2007: 284.690 units sold /-0.1%). With sales almost at the previous year’s level, the BMW Group performed significantly better than the German market as a whole which saw a contraction of 1.8% in 2008.

BMW Motorrad almost matches previous year’s record sales volume figure

BMW Motorrad was almost able to match its previous year’s record sales volume figure despite unfavourable business conditions on the world’s motorcycle markets. In total, 101,685 BMW motorcycles (2007: 102,467 units) were sold in 2008 (-0.8%).

Further growth for financial services business

Financial services business continued to grow in 2008. The volume of new retail customer contracts rose by 3.1% to euro 29,341 million. The proportion of new BMW and MINI brand cars financed by the Financial Services segment amounted to 48.5%, up by 3.8 percentage points compared to the previous year. This increase was largely attributable to the higher proportion of credit financing, while lease financing remained fairly constant.
Read Article

downtoearthdowntoearth - 2/11/2009 12:01:43 PM
-1 Boost
What's the point of quoting revenue? People do business for revenue or for profit?

I'm not interested in digging into numbers but in 2007 the situation was as follows (don't expect significant changes in 2008):

2007 BMW revenue: EUR 56 billion
2007 BMW profit: EUR 3,135 billion
No. of employees: 100.000

2007 Audi revenue: EUR 33,6 billion
2007 Audi profit: EUR 2,915 billion
No. of employees: 53.000

2007 BMW net profit margin: 5,6%
2007 Audi net profit margin: 8,7% (+55% more)

2007 BMW profit per employee: 31k USD
2007 Audi profit per employee: 55k USD (+77% more)

Questions anybody?


P.S. I know some rabid BMW fanboys (copyright Teknik) will want to kick me in the ass for posting this but that's only because they feel pain in their own ones.


merce63amgmerce63amg - 2/11/2009 12:21:41 PM
+6 Boost
Where was Audi mentioned in the article? BMW has a lower profit % b/c they have more invested in new programs(project i), and assets...planning for the future.

Capital expenditure for property, plant and equipment and other intangible assets increased by 1.1% to euro 2,966 million (2007: euro 2,934 million). In addition, at euro 1,224 million (2007: euro 1,333 million), development expenditure recognised as assets in accordance with IFRS was 8.2% lower than in the previous year.


BMWAGBMWAG - 2/11/2009 12:29:45 PM
+9 Boost
When your as innovative as BMW, I would guess a large amount of the revenue goes into R&D, BMW has to develop all the vehicles from scratch. Where Audi has a parent company that it shares a great deal of its components with.


downtoearthdowntoearth - 2/11/2009 12:40:10 PM
-1 Boost
Bingo, BMWAG, that's BMW's key problem - return on investment. That's also why they're pairing with FIAT (small cars, engines) and with GM, MB and Chrysler [1] to build hybrids. Aren't these numbers the best proof "Audi way" is far more superior?

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Hybrid_Cooperation


VISOVISO - 2/11/2009 2:06:04 PM
-12 Boost
Actually, all of you seem to not understand the relationship between Audi and VW. Each exists as it own separate company within a conglomerate entity. Although, they have great economies of scale and so forth, Audi must finance its OWN R&D budget which is quite large, not to mention its own racing program, etc. Many of you seem to fail to understand the significant business differentiation. It is not like Toyota and Lexus. Lexus is buried within Toyota (hence Toyota losses) and does not break out its revenue. Audi must report separate revenue to its shareholders for example. Porsche, although owning majority in VW-Audi Group, must have a separate legal relationship to enter into various agreements.


VISOVISO - 2/11/2009 4:16:39 PM
-8 Boost
Deboosting doesn't change the fact! Just makes you look ignorant. You BMW beenie boys live in denial all day long.


bmwm5v10bmwm5v10 - 2/11/2009 4:41:31 PM
+7 Boost
"Although, they have great economies of scale and so forth, Audi must finance its OWN R&D budget which is quite large, not to mention its own racing program, etc. Many of you seem to fail to understand the significant business differentiation. It is not like Toyota and Lexus. Lexus is buried within Toyota (hence Toyota losses) and does not break out its revenue."

I don't know why im replying to you b/c your the most biased fanboy on this site besides maybe germanut.
Anyway, even if Audi and VW are "separate" there is still a GREAT deal of parts sharing, you cannot deny this. While im sure Audi does have an R&D department, its not nearly as large as BMW's, b/c BMW develops EVERY CHASSIS and ENGINE from scratch. This cannot be said about Audi(all of there diesels are VW produced, along with the 2.0t, or have VW origins be it sharing or development like the 3.2). And Audi's racing program is not that large, there lemans cars only race in two races, sebring, lemans, and they have DTM. BMW's involvement in F1 alone costs around 400 million a year.

your irrational, what would be your reasoning for Audi having a higher profit percentage....magic?


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 2/11/2009 9:20:05 PM
-2 Boost
bmwhatever,

"or have VW origins be it sharing or development like the 3.2"

I agree that VW shoulders most of the R&D costs for Audi but something often overlooked is that there are two 3.2 engines that are not related--3.2VR6 (seen in VWs and the A3/TT) and 3.2FSI (which is really a 3.1, as seen in the A4 and '09 A6 FWD). Audi developed that engine themselves, not to mention the 4.2 (which has obviously returned its investment many times over lol), and as far as I know the Lambo V10s. Other than that, yeah.


TheGeniusTheGenius - 2/12/2009 7:20:52 PM
-5 Boost
If only the spies had some sort of basic Auto literacy tests before signing people up we wouldn't have the sort of comments I just read in support of BMW low profit margins

"Maybe Audi has such high profit because they are part of VAG (sorry - VW AG) which means that their R&D costs are seriously reduced B/C they don't need to spend money on large parts of their development."
- the sailor

Audi spends money, but it spends relatively less, and that's the whole point of building an Auto conglomerate like VW. That's one of the many reasons auto companies buy each other to gain some sort of competitive advantage. VW shares platforms and some parts with Audi and the rest of the group to save money. Expenditures/larger unit volumes = lower unit costs for all. That's why BMW bought mini because it helps, and that's why other volume Luxury Auto companies that go alone will have a hard time competing down the line unless they're ridiculously innovative. Because the likes of Audi and Lexus can spread their costs over more units (luxury and economy) to save money.

"I'm sorry, but that just isn't true! All engine development costs for instance are payed by VW." thesailor

Why would VW shoulder all of Audi's R&D costs and then give it engines, platforms or whatever for free? Does that make any sense?

I'm almost worried for thesailor!! Like every other auto company, Audi pays for R & D. You should have at least looked through their financials before making such a completely baseless statement. As mentioned above, the advantage they have is that they don't have to shoulder the costs alone. This is what I pointed out as a disadvantage for BMW has in my big luxury 3 car sales post. See link below. Over time, volume Luxury brands will find it more difficult to compete if they don't enjoy some of the advantages Audi and Lexus cash in from their parent companies.

http://autospies.com/news/The-BIG-Luxury-Three-Audi-BMW-Mercedes-Who-will-be-no-1-in-sales-in-2020-and-who-s-in-trouble-40094/




TheGeniusTheGenius - 2/13/2009 7:20:31 AM
-2 Boost
You still don't get it...that's the point. The name in itself is of no value.. its the units of mini they can sell that will help them..The mini gives them more volume to spread their costs over..


TheGeniusTheGenius - 2/13/2009 11:17:10 PM
-1 Boost
Ha ha. mr sailor..you must be spending too much time out on the sea.. Can't you read? First read, think, then post. I'll make it easy for you. Here are the steps
1) Read my comments "carefully"
2) Go through the financial statements for both companies
3) Then read 'your own' comments again, think (may be hard but try) and then respond. If you still feel the same way..no sweat....I rest my case..


bmwcsbmwcs - 2/14/2009 3:03:15 PM
+2 Boost
Actually for 2008 BMW's gross profit was 12,203 billion, and its net income was 3,126 billion. Audi's was gross profit was 5,566 billion and its net income was 1,654 billion.


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC