Consumer Reports Names Most And Least Reliable Used Cars On The Market

Consumer Reports Names Most And Least Reliable Used Cars On The Market
Value-minded consumers know that buying a reliable used car is often the best choice, but that finding one takes research. To help simplify the process, Consumer Reports has identified the most and least reliable used cars for 10 years - from model years 1999 to 2008 - in the magazine's 2009 Annual Auto Issue. Reliability data was compiled from the magazine's Annual Auto Survey, which generated responses about more than 1.4 million new and used vehicles.

Consumer Reports identifies the most reliable used vehicles in its "Best of the Best" list, which highlights the most well-rounded vehicles and lists other contenders in order of the overall reliability scores for model years 1999 to 2008. The list features nine categories - small cars, family cars, upscale cars, luxury cars, sports and sporty cars, minivans, small SUVs, midsized and large SUVs, and pickup trucks. Toyota and Honda dominated the majority of the categories, demonstrating consistent reliability and performance, but some recent domestic models are also worthy choices. Below are Consumer Reports' picks in five categories:

Small Cars: Honda Civic, Toyota Echo, Scion xB, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Matrix, Pontiac Vibe, Mazda 3, Mazda Protege, Subaru Impreza

Family Cars: Honda Accord, Toyota Prius, Ford Fusion, Mercury Milan, Toyota Camry (except '08 V6), Subaru Outback (6-cyl.), Nissan Altima

Minivans: Toyota Sienna, Honda Odyssey

Small SUVs: Toyota RAV4, Honda CR-V, Subaru Forester, Mitsubishi Outlander

Midsized and large SUVs: Honda Pilot, Toyota Highlander, Lexus RX, Toyota Land Cruiser, Toyota 4Runner, Infiniti FX35, Acura MDX, Infiniti QX4, Lexus GX, Hyundai Santa Fe, Subaru Tribeca, Nissan Xterra ('05 - '08), Toyota Sequoia

To help consumers identify cars within their budget, Consumer Reports' Annual Auto Issue also contains a "Models to Look For" list, which is categorized by price. It features a variety of used vehicles which all have above-average reliability and are priced from less than $4,000 to $30,000 and up. CR found 19 cars that can be purchased for $6,000 or less including the 1999 Acura CL and the 2003 Buick Century.

The report also features a list of "Used Cars to Avoid" and the "Worst of the Worst," which names vehicles with multiple years of much-worse-than average reliability, including models from the following manufacturers: Audi, BMW, Buick, Cadillac, Chevrolet, Chrysler, Dodge, GMC, Jeep, Kia, Land Rover, Mazda, Oldsmobile, Pontiac, Porsche, Saturn, Volkswagen, and Volvo.

How Used Cars Are Holding Up

According to Consumer Reports' reliability data based on information from the Annual Auto Survey, the most reliable three-year-old vehicles have fewer problems than many newer vehicles - and many of them tend to be Hondas and Toyotas. These vehicles tend to be a good value because the steepest part of the depreciation curve is past and many newer safety features can often be found on these vehicles.

Used-car quality often depends on how a vehicle has been treated by its previous owner. Vehicles that are well-maintained tend to have a long useful life ahead of them. Still, Consumer Reports found that some models will stand up better over time than others. Overall, the most reliable vehicles come from Asian nameplates. Though domestic cars are getting better, they still trail the Japanese models. European models are also improving, but the older ones tend to be among the most problematic.

Here are more trends that stood out in Consumer Reports' Annual Auto Survey:

 

  • Problem rates for cars have decreased across the board, so newer used cars should hold up better than their predecessors as they age.
  • Among five-year-old and newer cars, Ford, Hyundai, and Nissan are about tied in reliability.
  • European cars, long the least reliable overall, are pulling even with the domestics on newer models.
  • Additionally, cars with high problem rates are not always the oldest.

How Vehicles Age

Across all 10 years in Consumer Reports' survey, problems with the check-engine light, windows, and squeaks and rattles are reported most often. Common troubles among almost-new to three-year-old models include body integrity (squeaks and rattles), body hardware, and power equipment. On average, three-year-old (2006) models had about 43 problems per 100 vehicles.

Brake problems became evident at five years. The average five-year-old (2004) model had about 62 problems per 100 vehicles. Ten-year-old (1999) models averaged 124 problems per 100 vehicles.



sectorsector - 2/27/2009 10:49:32 AM
-1 Boost
I keep hitting ctrl-f on my keyboard and searchin' "BMW" but nothing... somethin' wrong with my computer? or have BMW fanatics been lying about the "improved" reliability again, hmm...


IamEvilHomerIamEvilHomer - 2/28/2009 3:16:25 PM
+3 Boost
Arn't all cars on the Market used cars? I guess they can't do a report on undriven and unowned cars.


mkareshmkaresh - 2/27/2009 11:20:48 AM
+1 Boost
For the only car reliability statistics anywhere based on owner experiences through the end of 2008:

http://www.truedelta.com/car-reliability.php

Not only are recent BMWs doing well in our survey, but recent Audis are as well. Will they continue to do well as they age? With prompt, quarterly updates, we'll have this info first.


sectorsector - 2/27/2009 11:53:43 AM
-3 Boost
I wouldn't be surprised at all if that's a BMW piston, probably from a e46 M3... remember BMW always use the "lowest bidder" to shave costs... many issues with defective rod bearing destroying engines, VANOS inlet cheap metal components breaking off destroying pistons, timing chains, exhaust camshaft drive tabs breaking off etc... my wallet starts crying when it sees a bimmer :)


HoseHose - 2/27/2009 11:58:24 AM
-3 Boost
That thing on the top... not supposed to be there, right?


sectorsector - 2/27/2009 5:24:10 PM
0 Boost
Hey no need to take offense Mike, just stating some facts... you drive a bimmer that's great, I choose not to... I want to sleep well at night :)


dhkss2002dhkss2002 - 2/27/2009 11:44:32 AM
-4 Boost
So where are the Krauts?


holmstarholmstar - 2/27/2009 12:33:22 PM
+4 Boost
where is the worst of the worst list? the title implies that both would be here.


holmstarholmstar - 2/27/2009 12:34:42 PM
+4 Boost
Worst of the worst

These have multiple years of much-worse-than-average reliability among 1999 to 2008 models. Listed alphabetically.
Audi A6 Allroad
Audi A8
BMW X5 (V8)
Buick Rendezvous (AWD)
Cadillac SRX
Chevrolet Blazer
Chevrolet Colorado (4WD)
Chevrolet S-10 (4WD)
Chevrolet Uplander
Chevrolet Venture
Chrysler Pacifica
Chrysler Sebring convertible
Chrysler Town & Country (AWD)
Dodge Grand Caravan (AWD)
GMC Canyon (4WD)
GMC Jimmy
GMC S-15 Sonoma (4WD) Jeep Grand Cherokee
Kia Sedona
Land Rover Discovery, LR3
Mazda RX-8
Oldsmobile Bravada
Oldsmobile Silhouette
Pontiac Aztek
Pontiac G6 (V6)
Pontiac Montana, Montana SV6
Porsche Cayenne
Saturn Relay
Volkswagen Cabrio
Volkswagen Jetta (V6)
Volkswagen New Beetle (turbo)
Volkswagen Passat (V6, FWD)
Volkswagen Touareg
Volvo XC90 (6-cyl.)


cocococococo - 2/27/2009 1:04:04 PM
0 Boost
I wonder why Mercedes isn't on that list. It seems to make every other worst-reliability list CR has.


iLexusiLexus - 2/27/2009 2:50:31 PM
+5 Boost
Best of The Best

Acura Integra, RSX
Acura MDX
Acura RL
Acura TL
Acura TSX
BMW Z3,Z4
Ford Fusion
Honda Accord
Honda CR-V
Honda Civic
Honda Element
Honda Odyssey
Honda Pilot
Honda Ridgeline
Honda S2000
Hyundai Sante Fe
Infiniti FX
Infiniti G20, G35
Infiniti M
Infiniti QX4
“Every Single Lexus Model but the LX due to lack of Data”
Lexus- ES,GS,GX,IS, LS, RX, SC
Lincoln Town Car
Lincoln Zephyr, MKZ
Mazda MX-5 Miata
Mazda Protégé, 3
Mercury Milan
Mitsubishi Outlander
Nissan 350Z
Nissan Altima
Nissan maxima
Nissan Murano
Pontiac Vibe
“Every Single Scion but the xA-xD due to lack of Data”
Scion-tC, xB
Subaru B9 Tribeca
Subaru Baja
Subaru Forester
Subaru Impreza
“Every single Toyota but the FJ Cruiser and MR2 due to lack of Data”
Toyota-4Runner, Avalon, Camry, Camry-Solara, Celica, Corolla, Echo-Yaris, Highlander, Matrix, Prius, Sequoia, Sienna, Tacoma, Tundra
Volvo S60


Agent009Agent009 - 2/27/2009 3:21:33 PM
+7 Boost
That is an awful long spread of 10 years. All things being equal the simpler cars will always being on top of the good list due to the lack of complexity.


holmstarholmstar - 2/27/2009 4:13:25 PM
+2 Boost
WTF! I get deboosted for posting CRs worst list? If you think the list sucks then post a comment saying so. It's not my fault, i'm just the messenger.


sizquiksizquik - 2/27/2009 4:36:35 PM
+2 Boost
This mean it's ok to get a range rover sport?


IamEvilHomerIamEvilHomer - 2/28/2009 3:19:21 PM
+1 Boost
the A6 allroad is the most loved car that Audi ever made (even though they haven't brought one to the USA for 5 years)

The A8 I don't believe. I guess if you compare it to a honda civic it is not reliable but if you compare it to the other high tec cars it does great. (7 Series , S Class)


downtoearthdowntoearth - 2/28/2009 11:22:22 PM
+2 Boost
— holmstar:

> WTF! I get deboosted for posting CRs worst list? If you think the list
> sucks then post a comment saying so. It's not my fault, i'm just the
> messenger.

You got deboosted because the "Worst of the worst" list from a rather credible institution you posted contains some most important cars from Volkswagen AG (Audi A6, A8, VW Jetta, Passat, Touareg) and BWM Gmbh.

You simply made germyphiles patrolling this site and occasionally commenting in a "Lexus sucks" fashion angry.

For future reference, try to write something negative about Lexus, to mock them. You'll be amazed with the boosting results.

Or just shout "Tayoda!" below any news considering Toyota, especially those putting them in good light.


philippekphilippek - 2/27/2009 12:57:04 PM
+5 Boost
Pure driving pleasure = reliability? Um, no. If that was the case I'd still be driving a Honda Civic.


Agent009Agent009 - 2/27/2009 3:22:33 PM
+4 Boost
Kraut_god- I'm not sure if a broken ash tray is a reliability issue.


RaulTRaulT - 2/27/2009 7:26:43 PM
+3 Boost
weird, I wouldn't own any of the "best of the best" cars.......


Type707Type707 - 2/27/2009 9:43:27 PM
+1 Boost
How come I don't see any domestic vehicles listed?...Hmm...I get the Japanese/Koreans are really taking over the Market.


lexworldlexworld - 2/27/2009 10:54:17 PM
-3 Boost
Pure driving pleasure=reliability? UM, YES...and that is almost the case philippek. Of course you'd still be one of many driving a civic because that's your mentality. Toy/Lex fans are in the big leagues. Honda fans are not in the major leagues. After all they did drop out of Formula 1, dropped their NSX supercar program, had to sell their URL racing program, has no vision/confidence/cash resource to produce a competitive model with a V8 engine, Acura division can't keep pace with it's Lexus rivals(not even close,except in reliability) and utterly seems to be following Nissan/Infiniti producing performance oriented ugly cars. Philippek, if you hang around long enough you just might learn something but you gotta run with the big dogs. Do you think Honda could ever compete with Rolls or Bently?...Do you honestly think they have what it takes? So yea drive your civic, I'll drive my Corolla which is made by a big dog. Nothing personal it's just the way we roll.


no1listensanywayno1listensanyway - 2/28/2009 5:57:42 AM
-1 Boost
hyundai is going to take over the automotive world after this recession is over.


StarStar - 2/28/2009 10:44:50 AM
0 Boost
Reliability ratings are the biggest scam ever. To succeed in convincing somebody to buy an inferior product by showing that person how on paper the obviously inferior product is going to be somehow better(more reliable- all that based on other people's opinion)is indeed mind blowing.

To not buy a car you like because a company you don't have any reason to trust(JD Power, Consumer Reports)told you that other people were dissatisfied with it, is absolutely retarded. What if those ratings are completely inaccurate? What if those people care about completely other things than you do?

Buying a car that offers a s**ty driving experience over a car that offers a great driving experience based on an ASSUMPTION that the car offering the s**ty driving experience is going to be more reliable is again...absolutely retarded.




_43LE_43LE - 2/28/2009 10:56:03 AM
-2 Boost
Crappy, don't be bitter, sorry I meant Star.


StarStar - 2/28/2009 1:12:02 PM
+1 Boost
I don't have any reason to be bitter, rice boy. You on the other hand....


downtoearthdowntoearth - 2/28/2009 11:40:42 PM
0 Boost
— TheSailor:

> It's pretty obvious what is going on here... The only premium car
> represented on the best list is the Lexus RX [...]

Is it a problem with reading or accepting reality that you're apparently experiencing?

The article list more premium cars as as clearly as possible. Those are: Toyota Land Cruiser, Infiniti FX35, Acura MDX, Infiniti QX4, Lexus GX.

And the list provided by iLexus (it's credibility can be verified here: [1], took me exactly 5 seconds of googling to find it) is actually full of luxury cars that usually come loaded with advanced technology as standard. Which should break down according to your logic, only it doesn't.


> and that pretty much just proves the notion that if the car is more
> advanced, there is more to go wrong.

Only in some selected cases probably. Which I won't list not to frustrate germyphiles.


> My brothers girlfriend drive an E400CDI (or 420, I can't remember) and
> though that is supposed to be one of those catastrophic cars from MB,
> it has only had minor glitches!

Drawing conclusions from a single test only proves courses in statistics should be made mandatory.


[1] http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/cars/used-cars/cr-recommended/best-and-worst-used-cars/overview/best-and-worst-used-cars.htm#best


BlakuraTLSBlakuraTLS - 2/28/2009 5:38:22 PM
0 Boost
Just because a car is supposed to be upscale doesn't mean it should be given a free pass to break down. An upscale car should also be trouble-free otherwise its a huge waste of money on some levels. Aren't name brand household items more expensive than store-brand knock-offs? If the name brands were made more cheaply wouldn't they end up going out of business? Just the way I see it...


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC