So Why Did Both Buick And Jaguar Beat Lexus In Latest Vehicle Dependability Rankings?

So Why Did Both Buick And Jaguar Beat Lexus In Latest Vehicle Dependability Rankings?
Buick and Jaguar each rank highest in vehicle dependability in a tie, according to the J.D. Power and Associates 2009 Vehicle Dependability StudySM (VDS) released today.  Buick improves from a sixth-place ranking in 2008, while Jaguar improves from 10th place. Following in the top five rankings this year are Lexus, Toyota and Mercury.

Toyota garners five segment awards—more than any other nameplate in 2009—for the Highlander, Prius, Sequoia, Solara and Tundra. Lexus follows with four segment awards for the ES 330 (in a tie with the Acura RL), GX 470, LS 430 and SC 430. Lincoln captures two awards for the Mark LT and Zephyr. Models by Acura, Buick, Dodge, Ford, Honda, Mazda, Mercury, Nissan and Scion each rank highest in one segment.

“Buick has ranked among the top 10 nameplates each year since the study was last redesigned in 2003, while Jaguar has moved rapidly up the rankings,” said David Sargent, vice president of automotive research at J.D. Power and Associates. “Lexus remains a very strong competitor in long-term quality.  In particular, the Lexus LS 430 sets the industry standard for dependability, with fewer problems reported than any other model in the study.”

The study, which measures problems experienced by original owners of three-year-old (2006 model year) vehicles, has been redesigned to include 202 different problem symptoms across all areas of the vehicle.  Overall dependability is determined by the level of problems experienced per 100 vehicles (PP100), with a lower score reflecting higher quality. The study is used extensively by vehicle manufacturers worldwide to help design and build better vehicles—which typically retain higher resale values—and by consumers to help them make more-informed choices for both new and used vehicles.

“In the current economic climate, consumers are delaying new-vehicle purchases and keeping their vehicles longer—the average age of a vehicle at trade-in has increased to 73 months in 2009 from 65 months in 2006,” said Sargent. “This makes vehicle dependability even more critical. Automakers have improved long-term dependability by an average of 10 percent each year since the inception of the study, which is a testament to the industry’s commitment to continuously improve and sustain quality, especially long-term quality. Making improvements in long-term quality not only satisfies customers who are holding onto their vehicles longer, but it will also influence their decisions when they return to the new-vehicle market or are seeking to purchase a pre-owned vehicle.”

The study finds that the frequency and severity of component replacement has a particularly strong impact on customer loyalty intentions. Component areas for which the impact is greatest include engine and transmission. When engine components are replaced or rebuilt, just 11 percent of customers state that they definitely intend to purchase or lease another vehicle of the same make, compared with nearly 40 percent among owners who report replacing no components.

The study also finds that Buick, Lincoln, Mercury and Jaguar owners are less likely to replace components than owners of other vehicle brands. While component replacement rates are similar for premium and non-premium makes, there are notable differences between vehicle segments. Owners of models in the premium sporty vehicle segment are least likely to replace components, while owners of models in the van segment are most likely to replace components.

The 2009 Vehicle Dependability Study is based on responses from more than 46,000 original owners of 2006 model-year vehicles. The study was fielded in October 2008.

Don't forget the ability to upload your photos on the go, simply e-mail Mobile@AutoSpies.com

Also, don't miss out on our exciting galleries including the 2009 Geneva Auto Show as well as the Audi A5/A5 Cabriolet Gallery - NO ONE covers the shows like AutoSpies.com!



holmstarholmstar - 3/19/2009 9:47:17 AM
+7 Boost
These studies don't differentiate between very minor "fixed in five minutes" type problems and "left you stranded at the side of the highway" type problems, so you really have to take it all with a grain of salt.


Agent009Agent009 - 3/19/2009 9:52:24 AM
+10 Boost
True, but I have to admit I would never have thought I would see Jaguar above Lexus any day on any study..


inspirion7inspirion7 - 3/19/2009 10:01:55 AM
+7 Boost
Doesn't matter. For most a win is a win.


WorldofLuxuryWorldofLuxury - 3/19/2009 10:05:35 AM
-3 Boost
Glad that something like this has occurred. This motivates Lexus to do better. x]

But I have to admit, I, as a Lexus owner, might be a little more picky than some owners of other brand's vehicles. I tend to complain a bit more about certain stuffs because I expect more out of my vehicles, and sometimes, I'm just too lazy to fix the minor problems themselves - Sears would've been my choice if the dealer was ridiculously expensive. :P


david999david999 - 3/19/2009 10:07:19 AM
+4 Boost

Holmstar makes a a great point. Surprising to see such a wide disparity between Audi and VW.


AlexTxAlexTx - 3/19/2009 10:45:12 AM
-3 Boost
This proves that Audi and VW are quite different.
if they were the same like some people would like us to believe, they would have the same score.
They use different suppliers for many things!!


hyundaifansdotcomhyundaifansdotcom - 3/19/2009 12:00:38 PM
-1 Boost
Yep. I wish JD takes into account the severity of the problem. We all know Jaguar's recent track record. Its hard to imagine them on top of any survey.


DocMartenDocMarten - 3/19/2009 12:34:39 PM
+2 Boost
So, BMW is competing with Hyundai and they can't even beat them. I mean Chrysler is doing better than BMW, that is very sad. BMW and the word average sounds about right.


dbsvolantedbsvolante - 3/20/2009 10:54:27 AM
+1 Boost
Well done Jaguar, they are designing some of the most desireable cars these days, and there well built aswell, the competition will have there work cut out trying to beat them!


enthusiastx11enthusiastx11 - 3/21/2009 8:37:31 PM
+2 Boost
more like 100 pounds of salt.

the difference between the top and bottom rated brands in this survey is essentially meaningless. new cars today are remarkably reliable.

so top rated buick had 1.22 problems per 100 cars over 3 years. and bottom rated suzuki had 2.63 problems per 100 cars over 3 years. wow...what a difference. call out the national guard!


enthusiastx11enthusiastx11 - 3/21/2009 8:39:12 PM
+1 Boost
meant 1.22 problems PER CAR...etc.


Agent009Agent009 - 3/19/2009 9:55:13 AM
+6 Boost
VW has always been in the basement on these studies.. but still 2.6 problems over 3 years? Not really horrible considering the top guns had 1.22 problems.

So 2 visits to the dealer for the best ranked and 3 for the worst ranked over 3 years. Not sure if I would base any decision on a car solely on these rankings.


inspirion7inspirion7 - 3/19/2009 10:10:29 AM
0 Boost
Audi has gone up and the good thing is that it is reflected in their sales. BMW just squeaked by "average" that is a shocker being how the brand is worshipped here. If quality was a measure of sales success completely, MINI would file chapter 11. How could Toyota's Scion be so s&$tty and the other cars so good? Mercury beats out Lincoln because the product line is older.


Agent009Agent009 - 3/19/2009 10:20:34 AM
+1 Boost
I don't think times in the shop for recalls are measured in this study.


0to600to60 - 3/19/2009 11:09:30 AM
+2 Boost
Might be the number of vehicles sold compared to the number of problems. Toyota sells a lot of cars. If I sold 10 cars and 1 had a problem, then that would be bad. If I sold 1000 and 25 had a problem, thats not as bad. That may be a likely culprit.


Agent009Agent009 - 3/19/2009 10:09:45 AM
+1 Boost
There are better alternatives than this.. True Delta is one, ranking severity of issues over instances.


mkareshmkaresh - 3/19/2009 10:21:43 AM
+6 Boost
Thanks, Agent009. But TrueDelta doesn't weight by severity, either. At least not yet.

Thinking that one brands problems are all minor while anothers are all major is misguided. Nearly all problems in the third year of ownership are minor, with any brand. If you want to assume something, assume that they're all minor.

One clarification: this study covers the third year of ownership, not the first three years. Years one and two are not covered.


Threepoint1415926Threepoint1415926 - 3/19/2009 11:02:59 AM
+1 Boost
"One clarification: this study covers the third year of ownership, not the first three years. Years one and two are not covered."

Where do you see that? All I see is that the survey was conducted of people owning 3 year old cars.


Agent009Agent009 - 3/19/2009 12:43:39 PM
-2 Boost
I guess I stand corrected, because mkaresh is the man over at True Delta. Thx for the correction.


mkareshmkaresh - 3/19/2009 10:22:47 AM
+1 Boost
One variable accounts for Buick and Jaguar placing ahead of Lexus: the number of models in their first year in 2006. Zero for Buick and Jaguar, two for Lexus (GS and IS).

Buick might take a hit in two years, when this study includes the Enclave.

Jaguar might take a hit next year, when the 2007 XK is included, and will definitely take a hit in three years, when the 2009 XF is included.

With prompt quarterly updates, TrueDelta provides results well ahead of anyone else. Current results are based on data through the end of 2008. In mid-May they'll be updated to include data through the end of March.

http://www.truedelta.com/reliability.php


david999david999 - 3/19/2009 10:35:43 AM
+1 Boost

Thanks for pointing this out.


mkareshmkaresh - 3/19/2009 10:24:23 AM
+4 Boost
Correction: the Lucerne was in its first year in 2006. So GM likely had a clean launch for once.


EL34EL34 - 3/19/2009 10:57:25 AM
-1 Boost
Proper props to Buick and Jaguar.

Give those execs a bonus ;->


inspirion7inspirion7 - 3/19/2009 11:11:46 AM
+3 Boost
If you were to look at the models that represent the findings, they have been in production for a good period of time. The Buick La Crosse has been out for some years with minor upgrades, Lexus LS 430 isn't new but Lexus keeps models around for a long period of time and continues to improve on the successful formula (wow isn't that novel), Mercury Grand Marquis was the most dependable large car and the Dodge Caravan was the top-ranked van, whileToyota won five segment awards -- tops among all brands -- for the Highlander, Prius, Sequoia, Solara and Tundra.

It is the first year Buick has finished ahead of Lexus, a result that shows GM and Detroit's Big Three are closing the quality gap with Japanese automakers.

Now Buick could really pull ahead if the design were to reflect the innovation in quality. I think the new La Crosse looks promising. Not my cup of java, but a move in the right direction.
I take my Audi black with no sugar please.


1dott81dott8 - 3/19/2009 11:12:18 AM
+6 Boost
this does not look great for the german car lovers such as myself.


_43LE_43LE - 3/19/2009 11:18:07 AM
+4 Boost
Congrats to the top performers.


sjsj067sjsj067 - 3/19/2009 11:25:39 AM
-1 Boost
Lexus owners will still never buy a Jaguar, let alone a Buick.


inspirion7inspirion7 - 3/19/2009 11:44:11 AM
+9 Boost
Not true. In my past life, I would take Lexus models in on trade for Jags. I really don't know why this thought still lingers out there.


SmokeEmSmokeEm - 3/19/2009 12:14:07 PM
+4 Boost
Good job to everyone at the top. BMW and Benz not looking too good unfortunately.


RedwoodRedwood - 3/19/2009 12:17:09 PM
+1 Boost
I've read/heard before that the Scions are just not up to Toyota standards. I've also read about squeaks and rattles in long-term tests. Scion is the Saturn of Toyota.


DocMartenDocMarten - 3/19/2009 12:33:44 PM
+1 Boost
Wow, look at BMW, really sad. They can't even beat Chrysler or Hyundai.

BMW is in competition with Hyundai and they can't even beat them.


quizzquizz - 3/19/2009 12:41:39 PM
+6 Boost
Benz has been going down hill for decades now - whether it's the suppliers or their own design, the Benz "quality" has deteriorated due to electronic bugs. As a whole, their cars drive well, but the inconvenience of constantly having to take the car into the shop for minor snaggles (bad radio, buzzing sunroof, malfunctioning sunshades, mysterious engine status lights, detached rubber moldings, etc.). So no, none of these things leave you stranded on the freeway, but you are stuck having to negotiate through dealer service hell every 3 weeks, and that's absolutely ridiculous for a 'luxury' car.


CarCrazedinCaliCarCrazedinCali - 3/19/2009 1:18:13 PM
0 Boost
Cuz no one drives them


2001W2102001W210 - 3/19/2009 1:36:39 PM
0 Boost
Prop to Buick, Big 3 please make us proud to drive American again!

I hate seeing Mercedes Benz on below average pools. I guess putting all those crazy engine in their car is paying big toll on the reliability but people have to admit, while Italians builds most exciting supercars in the world, Germans build most of exciting cars on the road. As a auto enthusiasts you got to love what they put under the hood.

There are two really surprising on the top of the list. I don't know how in the world the Jag ever made it up there. It was most unreliable car that I have ever witnessed in my life, it spent more time in the dealer then on road. Another brand that surprising me was Lexus. I wouldn't have believed all the Lexus haters bashing in recent years, but they have really fallen. I thought my brother's RX350 was isolated issue but it is very disappointing thus far. It had 4 incidents of electrical problem and 1 mechanical failure from 8 months of owning it. Toyota truly isn't what it used to be.


800over800over - 3/19/2009 2:39:20 PM
+6 Boost
When Buick is in the top:Yay this study is reliable!

When Lexus is right behind: no way! They make crap!


Yonder7Yonder7 - 3/19/2009 1:37:36 PM
-1 Boost
— quizz: MB is my favorite and I have one, But I have to admite that everytime that I have a problem is an stupid gadget. Same happens with all american or german cars. Now , I have a Question....before, I belive that MB have a lot of enemies, but every time that some budy have the opportunity to atack BMW or bimmer fans, the do. Why?. Now for sure I didn´t see any other brand with more haters.


2001W2102001W210 - 3/19/2009 2:04:11 PM
-1 Boost
Since I watched a Good fellas again last night, here's my view.

Readers think.
Mercedes Benz: Made man = Untouchable.
BMW: Wiseguy = Not quite there yet.

Some times it's comical to read all the fan boys think they belong side by side with BMW, but most of times it's annoying.


PorschinatorPorschinator - 3/19/2009 2:18:16 PM
+2 Boost
Dont worry...Consumer Reports will have a completely different ranking with all Japanese makes in top 10 and will further confuse the whole process.


WhelanWhelan - 3/19/2009 2:27:51 PM
0 Boost
Simple, Buick has been making some decent cars, the Enclave is a nice SUV, and the Jaguar XF just owns.


RaulTRaulT - 3/19/2009 3:09:42 PM
+1 Boost
Germans rank low because a percentage if the people who buy them don;t know how the car works......they get confused, so they go to the dealership for something that takes 2 minutes to correct...

example:
I sold a Passat to some lady and she pulled the trunk release from the inside just to see what it doesn. she couldn't put it back so she had roadside tow it to the dealership.....I immediately ran to the truck and fixed it myself before the service department charged her. But if JD Power or whoever would call her, she'd say the car had a problem even though it was she who caused it



AnthonyAnthony - 3/19/2009 4:34:45 PM
+5 Boost
I do not see why anyone would complain about one brand stepping up their quality over another. We know that Buick, for one is now where it is from a very transparent goal of leapfrogging Lexus's quality. GM made no bones about that, and look at where they are as a result.


VISOVISO - 3/19/2009 4:59:28 PM
0 Boost
Better not tell Whatthe and bmwdrv that their precious little piece of crap is really crap.


andrazandraz - 3/19/2009 5:10:17 PM
-8 Boost
this is a joke.


LaCrosse06LaCrosse06 - 3/19/2009 5:15:46 PM
+1 Boost
Great job Buick I own a 2006 Buick LaCrosse and its the best buick I have owned. Cannot wait for the new 2010 LaCrosse to be out. I would not have a Lexus or even a Cadillac, the buick is so queit and rides wonderful better than Lexus& Cadillac.

Great Job Buick!!!!!!!!!


Agent250Agent250 - 3/19/2009 6:16:58 PM
+6 Boost
No wonder Hyundai is targeting Lexus. Cause beating BMW or MB would just still be mediocre.


DocMartenDocMarten - 3/19/2009 9:24:54 PM
+5 Boost
Hahahaha...good one.


investor27investor27 - 3/19/2009 6:50:28 PM
+1 Boost
I'm glad to see Audi right up there with Porsche. But I am surprised to see VW being next to the bottom. I thought the VW Jetta diesel had a lot of potential.


dbsvolantedbsvolante - 3/20/2009 10:55:39 AM
-1 Boost
This is proof that Jaguar are back on top form, and long may it continue.


1evlaudi1evlaudi - 3/20/2009 3:59:34 PM
-1 Boost
I will go on a limb here and say that Lexus is still the number one, here is why; take a look at the annual sales figures for each brand, Lexus outsells those brands by a wide margin. There is no doubt that the more cars you sell the more you might encounter problems but also the more issues will be reported. It is pure math. As far as the 3 germans, i am afraid it is about the same, BMW sales more than M-B which sells more units than Audi and no coincidence they are in the exact reverse order on the survey.

That's why I never pay too much attention to all those surveys by JD Powers, there are too many components that are just unknown factors.


JordanskiJordanski - 3/21/2009 7:12:34 PM
+1 Boost
Maybe its because both Buick and Jaguar only offer three different models. I swear the only Jaguar model anybody even buys is the XF.

At least Toyota and Lexus both offer a full range of vehicles. Don't even try to tell me that a Buick Enclave is more reliable than a 2010 Lexus RX.

When it comes to reliability (short-term or long-term), there's no match for Toyota/Lexus. Even Audi, BMW, and Mercedes-Benz have their fair share of electrical problems (hence the recent short circuiting of Mercedes-Benz GLK climate controls and tailgate motors).


enthusiastx11enthusiastx11 - 3/21/2009 8:36:13 PM
+2 Boost
answer: because the difference between the top and bottom rated brands in this survey is essentially meaningless. new cars today are remarkably reliable.

so top rated buick had 1.22 problems per 100 cars over 3 years. and bottom rated suzuki had 2.63 problems per 100 cars over 3 years. wow...what a difference. call out the national guard!


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC