Motor Week Road Test: Cadillac's CTS-V Beats BMW M5 At Its Own Game At A Third The Price

 Motor Week Road Test: Cadillac's  CTS-V Beats BMW  M5 At Its Own Game At  A Third The Price

BMW M5 enters this fray with the confidence of experience, having defended its title against any number of young street brawlers over the years, including the original CTS-V.

But, the '09 CTS-V is something of a comeback kid, better conditioned now and having learned a few tricks since their last fight.

The M5's physique is muscular but not bulging. Think old school, like Gentleman Jim Corbett in his street clothes. Not an obvious threat, but one you'd better look at twice before picking a fight.

The Cadillac CTS-V, on the other hand, bares its brawn for all to see with chiseled lines, stacked headlights, and power dome hood. The visual statement promises blunt force trauma to all who get in its way. Call it a young Mike Tyson in a torn t-shirt.

Flexing their muscles for the camera, the BMW M5 reveals a high-tech 5.0 liter V10 engine capable of 500 horsepower and 383 pound feet of torque. Designed for sustained high-rpm operation, the M5 engine uses proven racing technology to achieve its 8,250 RPM redline.

For the CTS-V, GM turned to its tried and true V8 family, choosing a de-tuned version of the supercharged 6.2 liter monster found in the Corvette ZR1. Minus the ZR1's dry-sump lubrication and twin-intercoolers, the CTS-V pumps out a still impressive 556 horsepower and 551 pound-feet of torque but at a less lofty 6200 RPM redline.

Once at the race track, the gloves quickly came off, and even on this freezing day, the brash Caddy laid a smoky stripe of rubber while warming up to a 0-60 sprint of 4.2 seconds. The quarter-mile flashed by in 12.5 seconds at 118 miles-per-hour.

The less-torquey M5 managed a 4.5 second 0 to 60 run, and used its strong launch to ring the quarter-mile bell in 12.7 seconds and 116 miles-per-hour.

Now, both cars offer a choice of manual or automatic gearboxes. Our BMW arrived with a proper 6-speed manual, while the Caddy carried a 6-speed automatic with paddle-shifters. So, even with the perceived disadvantage of an automatic, the Caddy crossed the line first.
Read Article

ThierryHenry14ThierryHenry14 - 3/21/2009 2:35:00 PM
-5 Boost
The article says that on numbers, Caddy wins, but BMW is still the ultimate driving machine. So how is that beating the M5 at its own game?



golfer38golfer38 - 3/21/2009 3:07:26 PM
+9 Boost
When you come in second or third with the M5 in a race against the CTS V make sure you talk about how solid it felt, how communicative the chassis is, and I'll talk about how great it is to actually win the race...


dbsvolantedbsvolante - 3/21/2009 4:23:24 PM
-7 Boost
Jaguar's XFR is the the one to own in this class.


09CTSVforMe09CTSVforMe - 3/23/2009 2:12:52 PM
0 Boost
Better performance numbers vs. a marketing slogna. Hmmm...I'll take the numbers, thank you very much.

I put as much value into "Ultimate Driving Machine" for BMW as I do "America's Team" for the Dallas Cowboys...they made up the terms themselves. I proclaim myself the "Best Driver Ever", so there.


TECHGEEKTECHGEEK - 3/21/2009 3:32:41 PM
+3 Boost
Aah, 8250 RPM vs 6200 RPM - All other numbers are worthless and don't mean much in everyday driving.


JRobUSCJRobUSC - 3/21/2009 3:34:44 PM
+5 Boost
"Cadillac's CTS-V Beats BMW M5 At Its Own Game At A Third The Price"

Interesting title. I'm still trying to figure out how $60k is 1/3 of $90k. It's been awhile since I took 2nd grade math but I'm pretty sure that's 1/3 OFF $90k, or 2/3 the price. You could also get an M3 sedan for the same price as the CTS-V, and it performs similarly.


inspirion7inspirion7 - 3/22/2009 4:35:24 AM
-1 Boost
Obviously M3 isn't compared here. Can't change the test. It is what it is.


theoptimisticpessimisttheoptimisticpessimist - 3/21/2009 4:44:29 PM
+1 Boost
Did you read the article?

"The M5 however, plays a different game. More boxer than brawler, it steps into the ring expecting to go all 15 rounds. Relying more on style than flash and technique over punching power, the M5 is still the ultimate driving machine." -MotorWeek




theoptimisticpessimisttheoptimisticpessimist - 3/21/2009 4:42:56 PM
-2 Boost
"I wonder why they didn't mentoin the Caddy has a better interior as well?"


Obviously you have never been inside a M5, let alone driven one.



inspirion7inspirion7 - 3/22/2009 4:37:59 AM
+3 Boost
Interiors in BMW's have been lacking for a while. I've been in them and yes Caddy does have a more inviting arrangement.


JRobUSCJRobUSC - 3/21/2009 6:57:15 PM
+3 Boost
maybe. At least it's better than Lexus, where there IS no excuse.


theoptimisticpessimisttheoptimisticpessimist - 3/21/2009 7:28:03 PM
0 Boost
Yes I did, I was referring to your blind bias against BMW. Comments like “Sounds like loser talk for a car that has to fall back on a little plastic propeller because the Yankees beat them.”, “wonder why they didn't mention the Caddy has a better interior as well?” and, “Just like the IS300's suspension out did the 3 in sportiness but then they complained it was too sporty for a sport sedan.” Are just naïve opinions about BMW.

Look I like the CTS-V and I personally think it’s a better value than the BMW. I have driven a CTS (not the V) and Various 5 and m5 I can tell you that Cadillac interior quality has advanced exponentially, but it is still not up to the level of BMW 5er, the plastic isn’t as dense or refined an BMW leather completely trumps the Caddy. Add the M5 full leather dash and interior and alcanta head liner, and games over.

Both cars are fabulous the Caddy is a better value the BMW the better car. Wake up BMW is not just a hood ornament, it’s the car company everybody chasing.



david999david999 - 3/21/2009 9:33:18 PM
+2 Boost

In terms of the interior, the BMW is far nicer. In fact, the regular CTS interior is better than the CTS-V.
It does not have the cheap looking (sport) add-ons Caddy
placed in the V interior.


enthusiastx11enthusiastx11 - 3/21/2009 8:29:37 PM
+5 Boost
fix the headline.

1/3 the price of an M5 = $30,000. the CTS-V is just a bit more than that.


veyron1001veyron1001 - 3/24/2009 11:38:47 AM
+1 Boost
1UAW you have been hiding in the shadows lately.


EL34EL34 - 3/21/2009 10:33:37 PM
+4 Boost
The Caddy is one hell of a car.

Proper props to Caddy.


darzavdarzav - 3/22/2009 3:32:35 AM
0 Boost
Thats interesting. Hmm don't know when GM is really going to bring Caddy down to Australia, Its gona sell in large numbers if it sticks to the claims. Another thing thats got me worried is the amount thats going to sell. All i can say is bye bye prestige.

Or i can wait a couple more years for the next generation 5-series, and then the M5.


andrazandraz - 3/22/2009 5:59:19 AM
+1 Boost
Since it has beaten m5, now export it to europe and we will see how the market will react to this, actually very well designed car that screams Made in USA and this is not such a bad thing.


inspirion7inspirion7 - 3/22/2009 12:18:21 PM
+2 Boost
Good design is wanted where ever. GM didn't have a lot to offer in the last 2 decades. Ford, its designs would come a go, plus it is established all over Europe. The CTS-V will take time to catch on, but GM need to continue perfecting this design forward!!!!


bmwdrvrbmwdrvr - 3/22/2009 12:33:55 PM
+1 Boost
I saw the CTSV for the first time on the road a black one, it is an amazing car. The one thing I didnt like was the interior the sport add ons are essentially the same in the base CTS without wood, I think aluminum, or wood have been a better choice other wise the two tone interior treatment was very nice. Its ironic when GM takes costs out of the equation, and just tries to build the best car it can to fight the competition not only lands a hit, but beats them as well (just look at the ZR1 as proof also) can only imagine what the next generation of the V and regular CTS will be like.


Htay7500Htay7500 - 3/22/2009 12:38:46 PM
+3 Boost
Go cadillac!!


100octane100octane - 3/22/2009 12:41:19 PM
+1 Boost
ctsv: 0-60=4,2 1/4m=12,5
bmw: 0-60=4,5 1/4=12,7

not that much for 50hp and 168 pound feet advantage. a beating looks different, it's nevertheless some serious competition


tangotango - 3/22/2009 11:23:29 PM
+2 Boost
Cadillac has not given up on the CTS. It continues to build on what it has learnt. I think of Caddy as the Hyundai of luxury manufacturers. Often laughed at, but steadily growing in quality and in personality. I can only imagine what will happen with the next generation of CTS. If you think about it though, the CTS does have a multitude of roles to play. It battles BOTH the M3 and the M5 (depending on who is testing it). Which other car in any other category takes on two classes at once? The STS is the real 5-series competitor and the STS-V should be the M5 challenger. Pitty, though, that the CTS-V outshines it.


inspirion7inspirion7 - 3/23/2009 5:44:47 AM
+1 Boost
Technically, the CTS-V was designed to go up against the M5 but pricing it, comes closer to the M3. This doesn't mean it has duo roles, just that its size and pricing makes it span between the two. The STS-V should be in the league of 7 Series or Lexus LS430.


inspirion7inspirion7 - 3/23/2009 5:47:48 AM
+2 Boost
Cadillac is working on a true 3 Series competitor. When it will arrive, next decade some time? The Coupe and Avante Wagon along with the new SRX will keep Cadillac busy for a good while.


sstainba2sstainba2 - 3/23/2009 11:10:10 AM
+1 Boost
this is all pretty silly... GM may not be around long enough to service the warranty on the CTS.


inspirion7inspirion7 - 3/23/2009 1:43:43 PM
+1 Boost
If this logic of yours was true and we abide by it, then Audi wouldn't be around.


SouthBayM5SouthBayM5 - 3/24/2009 2:54:20 AM
+1 Boost
I think it is embarrassing that my M5 is getting its ass kicked by a pushrod V8 CTS-V, and just about everything else is getting its ass kicked by the the ZR-1, for a fraction of the cost. Props where props is due. Period. The world has been put on notice. Buy these cars while they last, before the balls get pulled off of GM by the green movement, a new management team, bankruptcy court, and/or the federal government. It seems like every time a US car maker does something right, they kill it. Witness the Ford GT.


EyecarehawaiiEyecarehawaii - 3/26/2009 11:41:47 PM
+1 Boost
Only in America does 0-60 and 1/4 mile times define a car's true worth..


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC