GM: " Chevy Volt Price Depending on Price of Gas And Will Be Set In May 2010"

GM:  " Chevy Volt Price Depending on Price of Gas And Will Be Set In May 2010"
The MSRP of the Chevy Volt remains a mystery.

Despite the concept being unveiled more than 2 years ago, and the thousands of articles, comments, and interviews about it, the exact price of the car remains unknown.
GM claims they don’t know how much they will charge yet either. They say it will depend on the price of gas in November 2010 when the car is launched.

“We’re not wishing for higher petroleum costs, but the economic viability of what we’re doing only gets greater with higher fuel prices,” said Bob Kruse, GM’s director of EVs and HEVs, “$1.50 gallon gas is not helping our business case.”
Another apparently unresolved financial aspect of the car is whether the battery packs will be sold or leased to the customer. Kruse noted the possibility of separately leasing the car’s battery still remains an option.

The Volt is profoundly important to GM’s future viability. Speaking to how critical fuel cost is in the Volt equation, GM’s CEO Rick Wagoner recently went on record stating that a mandatory federal gas tax to keep gasoline at $4.00 per gallon minimum is “worthy of consideration.”

GM VP John Lauckner recently announced when we we finally know what the Chevy Volt’s MSRP will be. He said “we won’t set the price of the Volt until 6 months prior to start of production.”
Read Article

BremboBrembo - 3/27/2009 2:45:48 PM
-1 Boost
Same old BS excuses!


DinamoRDinamoR - 3/27/2009 9:55:23 PM
0 Boost
Tesla Model S kicks the Volt in the balls and will probably cost only $10,000 more.


MrBratwurstMrBratwurst - 3/28/2009 10:43:50 AM
+1 Boost
Not necessarily, DinamoR. Despite much shorter all electric range, still some 80-90 percent of Chevy Volt's entire mileage through its lifetime will be all electric. That's the beauty of plugin hybrids matching driving patterns despite much smaller batteries. And the gasoline powered range extender allows longer cruises.

However, it needs to be said in terms of presence, performance and class, Volt stands no chance.


thstonethstone - 3/27/2009 2:54:17 PM
-4 Boost
Screw GM. They are playing car buyers for fools. Let them go bankrupt and then whoever buys the Volt assets can build it and price it without playing games.


neutralneutral - 3/27/2009 3:12:06 PM
+4 Boost
Whoever buys the volt assets eh.. so you mean whoever buys all of GM engineering & design.... which essentially is all of GM.

GM just can't win with some people.


neutralneutral - 3/27/2009 3:15:12 PM
+3 Boost
@ Brembo & thstone,

are you guys serious? EVERY car is priced according to a variety of factors including energy, raw materials, and consumer desire.

You mean to tell me that Toyota's discounts on Priuses aren't based on price of fuel?

You want to talk about BS? Talk about looking for any excuse to point fingers...

What can I say, ignorance is bliss. GM should know better than to say anything though, they should know by now that closed-minded people will use any excuse to complain.


CobrajimCobrajim - 3/27/2009 3:27:38 PM
-1 Boost
If the Volt is not priced competitively with the Prius and Insight they can shove it!


neutralneutral - 3/27/2009 3:29:35 PM
+4 Boost
Or, you can just not buy one.


veyron1001veyron1001 - 3/27/2009 5:53:40 PM
+1 Boost
Well if you put it this way. The only way a Volt will be competitively priced is if the consumer is going to buy 2 Prius or Insights to one Volt.


HSCenterconsoleHSCenterconsole - 3/27/2009 4:33:36 PM
0 Boost
GM will be losing money on every Volt it produces.


inspirion7inspirion7 - 3/27/2009 5:53:18 PM
+2 Boost
True. But most companies does loose money on premier tech. Luxury car rarely make money nor does halo cars because production is limited. After the tech filters through does it pay off.


rallyssrallyss - 3/27/2009 5:09:29 PM
+4 Boost
the volt's tech. is way beyond that of the prius nd insight of coarse it will cost more.


ThierryHenry14ThierryHenry14 - 3/27/2009 5:25:46 PM
0 Boost
I think GM meant to say that they will not price the car just yet, because they will wait to see how much they have to pay the government back for all the bail-out and how much money they need to keep afloat before calculating that into the price.


ThierryHenry14ThierryHenry14 - 3/27/2009 5:26:26 PM
0 Boost
btw, whats with the """?


ThierryHenry14ThierryHenry14 - 3/27/2009 5:27:22 PM
0 Boost
that is suppose to say " & quot "... why not just put quotation marks?


inspirion7inspirion7 - 3/27/2009 5:51:04 PM
+2 Boost
Try it. Doesn't work for some reason. Focus on the blog.


veyron1001veyron1001 - 3/27/2009 5:56:44 PM
-2 Boost
So now GM wants politicians to over price gas while continuously take your money? GM needs to go.


delandelan - 3/27/2009 7:44:39 PM
+2 Boost
I disagree. Remember it was the ridiculous increase of gas prices that triggered the SUV bust...which then spiraled the big three downward.


neutralneutral - 3/27/2009 8:47:17 PM
+3 Boost
Veryon,

Stop it, your anti GM bias is flat out annoying. GM (as well as all automakers) would like to see modest fuel tax increases so that the cars the GOVERNMENT is making industry build will be bought.

When the government steps in and forces the industry to make certain cars & punishes automakers for not obeying their commands, then they need to convince buyers to buy these cars.

If gas is $2 a gallon and the government forces automakers to achieve ridiculous fuel economy, there has to be some incentive for buyers to buy these things.

Ex: Chevy Silverado vs Silverado hybrid. If gas is $2/gallon, no logical person would buy the hybrid, and then GM gets fined for it.

This is another glaring example of the Japanese/German/Korean automakers letting GM take the flak for government absurdity.


rallyssrallyss - 3/29/2009 8:11:29 PM
+1 Boost
I recall GM releasing a fully electric car that revolutionized a lot of the tech. that is used in modderen hybrids.


rallyssrallyss - 3/30/2009 11:06:34 AM
+1 Boost
and why might that be could it be because thats wht every one wanted. no one bought the EV1 the public wanted big gas guzzlers thats not GM's fault. it's like eting wendy's breakfest, lunch and dinner then sueing suing them because they made you fat.


pnsb24apnsb24a - 4/3/2009 4:01:48 PM
0 Boost
As I said two years ago, this car is a flop. Even if they lower the price into the 30k range it cannot compete. Another GM stupid. Not only that but car does not even have any kind of styling.Shit


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC