Review: BMW 3-series vs. Lexus IS

Fans of the long-lived BMW 3-Series did not look kindly on Japan's first attempt at building a head-to-head competitor to the legendary German sport sedan. The 2002 Lexus IS arrived on the scene amid much scorn and derision, from Internet chat rooms to mainstream motoring journalists.

It took Toyota's premium division just four years to field a replacement model, and in typical Toyota fashion, the redesigned 2006 IS improves on many of the flaws in the original.

In short, it's a terrific little sport sedan, especially the new IS 350, with its potent 3.5-liter V-6.

Unfortunately for Toyota and Lexus, BMW did not let the 3-Series molder in the meantime.

A fully redesigned Three surfaced several months ago, drawing nearly universal accolades. It too is pretty sensational, easily the best 3-Series ever.

But is it still the benchmark in the compact sport sedan class? We tested the two 2006 models in nearly identical trim, including a Lexus IS 350 priced at $44,929 and a BMW 330i priced at $42,390 (base prices on each start at just over $36,000).

A clear winner emerged, but the margin in most categories was whisker-thin. The only exception was the powertrain department, where the Lexus was the victor by a comfortable spread.

In the end, we gave the nod to the car that displayed an intangible appeal that is difficult to quantify. And that indefinable edge is what really separates these two outstanding vehicles.

Full review here



TauronLBTauronLB - 11/18/2005 8:40:06 PM
+1 Boost
Having driven both cars allow me to say that they are idiots. The BMW interior is far from perfect and to me felt cheap. The mesh headliner really caught my eye. The 3's dash is horrific especially without the much maligned IDrive. Whereas the Lexus interior is beautiful (IMO) and feels much richer to me. I thought that the last generation 3 series interior was beautiful. Everything was perfectly placed and the materials felt much richer than they do now.
Styling wise I must admit that the 3 series has grown on me and looks much better in person than it does in pictures, but its still ugly especially the back end and tail lights. The Lexus has a fresh look. Its has racy and quick styling. I look at it and I want to drive it. And when you do you are rewarded with a great engine smooth power and very competent and sharp handling. Neither myself or anyone else can ever criticize the drive of the BMW but the steering on the other hand is just plain spooky wthe adjustable steering rack. I'd be scared to wreck the car.
I am almost sorry to say that I thoroughly enjoyed the Lexus much more than the 330i that I drove. I have been a BMW fan as long as I can remember and even with the grotesque 7 series I still loved the brand. But the Lexus just does it for me. I also think the ownership costs would be cheaper. So for me a cheaper, ore attractive, faster & argualbly more reliable car works for me anytime.
T


Matthew1Matthew1 - 11/18/2005 9:46:33 PM
+1 Boost
Seriously though, I think the article hit the nail on the head.

Yes, the BMW is a better drivers tool. No arguement here, it is the benchmark.

On an interior note, I have always maintained that while the Lexus interior is well-built and appointed, the design is bland and uninspiring. It looks cheaper than the BMW because of that nasty centre console, cheap gold-tinge plastic and fiddly buttons detract from the build quality.

And THAT clock. This just shows the attention to detail on the new IS isn't as great as you make it out to be.

I agree that the non i-drive interior of the new 3 is a bit dull and flat, but with the benefit of the i-drive screen and warmer colours, it out muscles the Lexus for pure style. The function creates the form. Beautiful.

Engine wise, the Lexus has the advantage, with bigger displacement and more power. The BMW unit is still a characterful and potent engine, with a silky soundtrack that no Japanese 6 can recreate. But without a sparkling chassis, the extra power of the Lexus is useless.

And the distinctive but never flashy BMW exterior looks not only more elegant, but has sense of occasion.

"But it lacks one critical attribute, that intangible something: Call it history or charisma that is summed up in the familiar blue-and-white BMW badge."

Oh, how true.

"



Matthew1Matthew1 - 11/18/2005 9:48:14 PM
+1 Boost
That last quote was directed at the Lexus IS.


hdoganhdogan - 11/18/2005 9:51:26 PM
+1 Boost
3 series interior feels extremly cheap, my 5 year old TV has higher quality buttons and leatherette as standard in a premium segment car? come on bmw.

It's way underpowered engine should've been a 3.5 I6 with 300+ hp now.

lexus engine makes even porsche flat 6es look bad.

I wonder how can a benchmark have less power and eat dust of the competion?





Matthew1Matthew1 - 11/18/2005 10:13:35 PM
+1 Boost
ok?


ThundercloudThundercloud - 11/19/2005 12:38:08 PM
+1 Boost
If you read the article, it says they are equipped nearly the same. Talk about slanting the information towards your biased article about BMW! The 330 with nav & Harmon Kardon comparably equipped comes in about 46-47k not 42k. Also, they talk about the warm wood and metal trim in the BMW. The Luxury package with the warm wood and metal trim in the IS 350 will be available in January. The BMW 330 has the most outdated, stuffiest, plain jane interior in the segment!!


janos2769janos2769 - 11/19/2005 12:49:08 PM
+1 Boost
Typical... BMW fans are blindly stubborn (and stupid)... Lexus fans can't see past their Reliability blindness (although this time they are right ...the new IS marks a clear lead over the bangled 3)... All of the above are ONLY OPINIONS. Buying a car is an emotional deal for most people here... sure value and other things play in the decision, but let's face it if getting from point A to point B is the need than buy a Honda Civic and get it over with!

Now you can keep arguing senseless (forever)!!!


ChipChip - 11/19/2005 7:20:51 PM
+1 Boost
I'm getting really tired of this 3-series vs IS war going on.

Everyone participating in this blog should go out and drive both cars back to back.

The new IS obviously has sparked the interest of many BMW fans (myself included) and the only way to know "for yourself" which one is better is to go out and drive them both.

I walked away thinking the 330i was a much, much better car.

I'm not going to rattle off specs and areas where each car excels.

What matters is how the car performs to "your" expectations.

MY choice..... The BMW 330i is the winner hands down.


ChipChip - 11/19/2005 9:14:48 PM
+1 Boost
"This blog started from a horrible review which was misleading information to the consumer. The reason to rattle off specs and areas where the car excels is for those consumers who want more information about the two vehicles and how they compare."

You contradict yourself.

You state the review was horrible.

Did you think the review was horrible because of the critics personal choices for each category or because you didnt like the outcome of the review?

The critics rattled off specs and areas where the car excels and you just didnt agree with them..

Every person on this site KNOWS ALL THE BITS & PIECES of the new IS and 3.

Some people think the BMW has better driving dynamics.

Just as some people think the LEXUS drives better.

All I'm saying is drive both and decide for yourself.

Compare them yourself.

Dont let some critic sway your decision.

Would you drive one of the cars, like certain aspects of that car, then change your mind because someone says different?

Sounds like you cant decide for yourself, so you want someone else to do it for you.

BTW- I personally enjoy blog wars but think this story is getting old.


wac77wac77 - 11/20/2005 12:57:56 AM
+1 Boost
and I bought the BMW. And I love it!

Lexus would have been a better contender if they offer a manual and/or AWD with the more powerful engine. The fact that they relegated the MT to the base model only tells me they are not really targeting the enthusiasts.


mkk21mkk21 - 11/21/2005 11:50:53 PM
+1 Boost
I think the reason why this article is so biased is because domestic manufacturer's from Detroit are running scared. Especially with all the announcments of layoff's form GM and Ford, they have to find some way to bash those asian counterparts who are kicking their @sses. I mean look at the name of the publication, "The Detroit News." How much more domestic of a publication can you get. Should have just called it the "GM, Ford, & Chrysler (not daimler) News". I'm sure they didn't really care for both vehicles but they don't really have a domestic rival to these vehicles, so they figure they should praise the lesser of two evils.


phantom330phantom330 - 11/28/2005 12:37:35 PM
+1 Boost
this might be the most immature stream of responses I have read in a long time. Grow up people, we're talking cars here, not political policy.


And by the way most of the 3 series you see on the road in the US are made in the Munich plant, not the South Africa production facility.


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC