And the greenest car of the year is ... a diesel-powered Volvo

Family car trumps futuristic hybrids in What Car? competition

It may not be a streamlined hybrid, a futuristic electric vehicle or a snazzy biofuel car, but a distinctly boxy diesel Volvo has won What Car? magazine's award for the year's greenest car.

A small family car with carbon emissions on a par with Toyota's Prius, the Volvo S40 DRIVe received the award today from London mayor Boris Johnson. Vauxhall's Ampera electric car and US electric car-maker Tesla also received awards.

Johnson said: "There are clear incentives for manufacturers to raise the bar higher and higher to design less gas guzzling cars that take hundreds of pounds off consumers' fuel bills. This is good for the planet, good for the economy and great for the driver."

What Car? editor Steve Fowler said of the winning Volvo: "It's not just about a low CO2 figure. The S40 is great to drive, safe, has enough space for the family and, crucially, is cheap to run, too."

Ford, the US motoring giant which owns Volvo, lost out to Toyota in the battle for trophies between major car manufacturers. Toyota's Avensis 2.0 D-4D (CO2 emissions of 135 grammes per kilometre) won the best family car award, while Toyota subsidary Lexus picked up the prize for the greenest 4x4 with a petrol hybrid SUV, the RX450h SE-L (148g/km).

The winner of the technical award, Vauxhall's electric Ampera, is expected to debut in its US model the GM Volt in 2010 and arrive in the UK by 2012. Vauxhall's parent company General Motors claims the Ampera will change the image of electric cars by combining a 100mph top speed with an electric motor capable of driving 40 miles and a petrol engine which can increase the car's range to several hundred miles. Most of today's production electric cars, such as the G-Wiz, have a range of less than 100 miles.

Two notable omissions from the winners' list were Honda's hybrid Insight — which is the same size as the Volvo S40 DRIVe but has lower emissions — and the next generation Prius, which is set to go on sale later this summer.

Fowler warned the recession had made cars' environmental credentials a low priority for consumers. "Green issues are still a hot topic, but it's fair to say that they are not right at the top of car buyers' priorities at the moment. It's just as well then, that green cars will save you plenty of cash at the fuel pumps and will likely be worth more than other cars when you come to sell."

The winners:
Read Article

ChevyFan100ChevyFan100 - 6/16/2009 4:09:45 PM
+8 Boost
Tons of old batteries in a landfill isn't very green


pagemanpageman - 6/16/2009 6:04:17 PM
-3 Boost
The one who voted the diesel must still have huge shares in an oil company. Virtually impossible to say that burning fossil fuels are better than electric? Duh, what's up doc?


inspirion7inspirion7 - 6/17/2009 8:31:16 AM
+4 Boost
Where are you guys from, Pluto? Everyone knows electric cars are just as polluting as petrol just in a different way. Complete life cycle shows electric cars even more so in some studies. The Prius is more economical, not greener than some cars. I thought someone would pooh-pooh this article. A car is "green" in many ways. Is it made from recycled material or can the car be recycled successfully and not completely scraped? Batteries aren't always recycled cleanly.


SteedPubSteedPub - 6/16/2009 5:55:19 PM
+5 Boost
Oh, the Hybrid ninnies are going to get beeked again! They just cant get past the fact that their God's Green Gifts have a bigger carbon footprint at the end of the day than a Hummer H2.

Diesels are more green because they use less fuel and dont create a tidal wave of pre-loaded pollution and after effects just to exist. They last longer, dont require the tons of toxicity to build and get rid of, and in many cases use about the same amount of fuel.

There is more to being "green" than driving around in a trophy to your ignorance.


pagemanpageman - 6/16/2009 6:08:21 PM
-1 Boost
Governments have to implement the infastructure to producing power by greener means to ensure that electric cars will be "totally" better for the environment. I am a fan of environment saving. Push the gov't to stop burning coal and put up solar,wind and ocean current turbines. Now that is going green along with the electric cars.
These electric cars are our future. I want my grandkids to say, "why were they years ago burning fuel?" "that was dumb!".


SteedPubSteedPub - 6/16/2009 6:18:01 PM
+3 Boost
Government does not burn coal, power companies do.

Solar does not pencil out on the balance sheet or work when it is cloudy, you still have to burn something to get power no matter what.

People just need to grow up and get their hands around that FACT.


Joe_LimonJoe_Limon - 6/16/2009 7:54:36 PM
+3 Boost
This is true, even wind turbines still just barely break even by time they reach the end of their lifespan. That's why the only people who own them are the oil companies, its a break even way to look greener.


MrBratwurstMrBratwurst - 6/17/2009 5:38:45 AM
-3 Boost
— Joe_Limon:

| This is true, even wind turbines still just barely break
| even by time they reach the end of their lifespan.

Why do people have to be dumb and be able to speak at the same time, spreading lies? :(

Energy Returned On Energy Inwested for wind turbines is 20-25. So a unit of energy consumed to build a wind turbine produces 20-25 units of energy that this wind turbine generates over its lifetime.

You invest a dollar. You get 20-25 in return.

Source:
http://www.eoearth.org/article/Energy_return_on_investment_(EROI)_for_wind_energy


Joe_LimonJoe_Limon - 6/17/2009 10:09:33 AM
+2 Boost
lol Mr Bratwurst, you fail, that is the energy required to make a wind turbine, not the cost to make a wind turbine. Everytime I have argued with someone on this subject that is their only point. It still isn't cost effective once you add in actual dollars for labour materials shipping, etc (not the energy required to turn a piece on a lathe here, to truck something x amount of kms etc etc.)


_43LE_43LE - 6/17/2009 10:13:35 AM
+2 Boost
Correct, and this year's world green car winner does not even have an internal combustion engine:

http://www.motorauthority.com/world-green-car-of-the-year-candidates-announced.html


SteedPubSteedPub - 6/17/2009 11:14:42 AM
+3 Boost
The VW Jetta TDI got Green Car of the Year last fall at the Los Angeles International Auto Show.

It is the "Greenies" who keep giving these awards to diesels, not the "oil cabal".




Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC