2010 Audi S4 Comes with Greatly Improved Fuel Economy

2010 Audi S4 Comes with Greatly Improved Fuel Economy
According to fueleconomy.gov the 2010 Audi S4 with its 3 liter 333 horsepower supercharged V6 will have EPA fuel economy ratings of 18 city and 28 highway with the 7 speed S-Tronic gearbox. The S4 with the 6 speed manual gearbox has fuel economy of 18 city and 27 mpg on the highway. The 3.0T S4 not only greatly improves upon the previous V8 powered S4's fuel economy, but it also bests rear wheel drive competitors.. BMW's twin turbo 335 is rated @ 17/26, Infiniti's G37 is rated @ 18/26 with the automatic and 17/25 with the manual. The Lexus IS350 is rated @ 18 city and 25 highway.
Read Article

BMW4me4everBMW4me4ever - 7/16/2009 6:40:23 PM
+1 Boost
then there is the 335 diesel. 26 and 33 with 265 hp and 426 lbs of torque.


chewychewy - 7/16/2009 6:51:20 PM
+6 Boost
Apples and oranges are both delicious.


Joe_LimonJoe_Limon - 7/16/2009 7:31:53 PM
+3 Boost
The pos 3.2L in the a4 had 17/26mpg with only 265hp. I think the real story is not in the couple mpg gain they managed to squeak out, but the fact that they got out an extra 68hp at the same time. Forced induction win :)


Joe_LimonJoe_Limon - 7/16/2009 7:34:12 PM
+1 Boost
as to the diesel... torque doesn't mean much, if you have a 200hp/300ft-lb car and a 200hp/100ft-lb car and gear them both to redline at the same speed they'll get the same torque at the wheels. That being said it's not surprising that a car with 68 less hp was able to get better mileage...


sectorsector - 7/16/2009 9:15:19 PM
-2 Boost
"then there is the 335 diesel. 26 and 33 with 265 hp and 426 lbs of torque"

Then there is the premium $3000 more than petrol 335i, or $8000 more than petrol 328i to an already inflated BMW prices. Your point is MOOT.


sstainbasstainba - 7/17/2009 11:41:23 AM
0 Boost
i have to disagree with the "inflated prices" comment. bmws are more expensive, but not inflated. bmw offers many more options as far as customization goes that audi can't touch. there are many interior color options and trims available for bmw but audi offers only the basics which is disappointing. the equipment options in audi are also either all-or-nothing which is reather annoying. i like being able to pick what i do and do not want - which bmw allows. bmws do drive better as well. the steering is much more communicative and the braking is more precise.

all that being said, i currently have a 135i and an X6... but we are trading the X6 in to save some extra money for a project next year. still, my X6 drives way better than the audi i'm getting.


JRobUSCJRobUSC - 7/16/2009 7:43:08 PM
0 Boost
and I'll guarantee you it's not going to achieve those figures. Look no further than Audi's own 2.0L turbo I4. It's rated at 21/27, and C&D got 23mpg with one. Meanwhile they got 25mpg with a 328i rated at 18/28. In Europe the 335xi is rated exactly the same as the S4.

Frankly there's no way the supercharged V6 is going to get better numbers in the real world than the turbo I4, and the EPA numbers are inflated anyway. Regardless of what the EPA numbers are, expect low 20's.


Joe_LimonJoe_Limon - 7/16/2009 8:00:48 PM
+1 Boost
Did you just say epa numbers are inflated? haha, european cycle numbers are inflated, anyone can get higher then epa. It annoys the shit out of me when I hear local Toyota dealerships claiming the prius gets 71mpg and the Camry hybrid gets 51mpg, where there respective epa numbers (which everyone in North America generally uses) is 50mpg combined for the prius and 34mpg combined for the camry...


chewychewy - 7/16/2009 8:50:17 PM
+3 Boost
Not sure about the A4, but other 2.0T can easily beat their EPA ratings on the highway based on many accounts.

With the extra low end torque and overdrive gearing it wouldn't be unreasonable if the S4 got around 28 on a highway cruise. Of course if you aren't paying for gas (like car mags) or if you are stuck in traffic your mpg won't be impressive.


sdcarguysdcarguy - 7/17/2009 5:35:02 AM
+1 Boost
Imperial Gallon used in UK is 1.2 US Gallons contributing to making mileage figures 20% higher "there".


bmwdrvrbmwdrvr - 7/16/2009 7:47:56 PM
+5 Boost
impressive numbers if they can deliver on them.


rxh8me9000rxh8me9000 - 7/16/2009 8:11:41 PM
+5 Boost
The S4 name use to be up there with the ///M3...now it seems like its just not as sporty as it once was. Give me a 2001 Bi-turbo S4 any day of the week.


IamEvilHomerIamEvilHomer - 7/16/2009 9:50:29 PM
+1 Boost
the S4 was with the M3 but BMW came out with a 335 and moved the M3 up to the RS4 range. The S4 is a 335 competitor and it will do a great job.

With a base MSRP of $45,900 it is about $1,1000 less then a 335 with the same options and if you compair it to the 335 ix it is about $3,000 better and a much nicer car.


budfrogS4budfrogS4 - 7/20/2009 10:14:57 AM
+1 Boost
No, I'm pretty sure Homer had it mostly right. From 1995 - 2007 BMW and Audi had their products staggered with the 3, S4, M3 and RS4. Then in 2007, BMW matched the S4's performance with the 335 and in '08 the M3 matched the RS4. When I use the word "match", you know what I mean...I'm not trying to start a pissing contest. Now, it seems like they're just going to stagger their release dates so that one automaker "one-ups" the other one every release.


JaybrnJaybrn - 7/16/2009 9:40:14 PM
+3 Boost
MTM is reporting an extra 100hp just tweaking the ECU, it will be exciting to see what this car can do with a bit more work.


BondMI6BondMI6 - 7/16/2009 9:53:13 PM
0 Boost
No more V8???? Pass I say. Nothing compares to the V8 rumble in such a car. Every 2010 tester has commented on how quiet the new car is. Sad. If I wanted fuel econ I'd buy a damn Prius..... Even more sad, the S5 is going to the V6 as well. Way too big and heavy of a car to go down this road......


chewychewy - 7/16/2009 11:52:25 PM
+4 Boost
the supercharged V6 combo will be quicker than the previous V8. And if you want it to be louder, you can get an aftermarket exhaust. Though it won't have the V8 sound. The fuel economy is way better and there is quite a bit more performance, and the new S4 should be cheaper than before.


aarononymousaarononymous - 7/17/2009 9:07:14 AM
+2 Boost
and also handle a bit better than the V8


Agent00RAgent00R - 7/17/2009 1:42:52 PM
+1 Boost
The V8 was a poor choice for Audi's B6/7 S4.

The bi-turbo B5 S4 was a much better car IMHO.


1234xyz1234xyz - 7/16/2009 11:30:35 PM
+5 Boost
jeez get the damn car here all ready!!!


sdcarguysdcarguy - 7/17/2009 5:28:51 AM
+4 Boost
amen


budfrogS4budfrogS4 - 7/20/2009 10:26:13 AM
+1 Boost
+1


sdcarguysdcarguy - 7/17/2009 5:38:38 AM
+3 Boost
Nice "article" chewy. Google Audi S4 news..


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC