Is This Fair? Fed Slashes Salaries Of Executives That Took Federal Funds

Is This Fair? Fed Slashes Salaries Of Executives That Took Federal Funds
The U.S. Treasury this afternoon unveiled sweeping pay cuts for the top 25 executives at seven companies that received government bailouts, including General Motors Co., Chrysler Group LLC, GMAC Inc. and Chrysler Financial LLC.

In nearly all cases, salaries for the executives will be no more than $500,000 annually. No one at Chrysler will earn more than $500,000 in salary, and the company's CEO Sergio Marchionne will receive no salary from Chrysler, but be paid by Fiat SpA.

GM's president and CEO Fritz Henderson will see his $1.26 million salary cut to no more than $950,000. Just one other employee will receive more than $500,000 at GM in salary.


2010 Porsche 911 Turbo

Photo Gallery


There are photos and then there are AutoSpies.com photos!

AutoSpies.com is ranked number one on Google search for auto shows

The 2009 Frankfurt Motor Show gallery is sponsored by Lexus.

 

AutoSpies.com Photo Galleries

If you want to see your photos running on our homepage photo ticker, be sure to upload your photos on the go by sending them to Mobile@AutoSpies.com

Share on Facebook

 


Read Article

PerformanceGuyPerformanceGuy - 10/22/2009 3:59:51 PM
+12 Boost
Yes!


B7FANB7FAN - 10/23/2009 2:42:48 PM
+1 Boost
wow $42,000 a month probably $35-$37,000 after taxes A MONTH......it must be nice


Agent009Agent009 - 10/22/2009 4:10:20 PM
+9 Boost
Well if you have to go on to life support because of your leadership then I tend to agree you have to pay the price.

I think they call that accountability.


DinamoRDinamoR - 10/22/2009 4:10:36 PM
+10 Boost
are you kidding?? HELL TO THE YEAH it is fair!! how much do those douchebags get paid? FOR WHAT??? bankrupting the industry so we had to bail them out?

cut their pay and make them live in tents for all I care.


SteedPubSteedPub - 10/22/2009 4:34:39 PM
+2 Boost
It does suck that our American Government is stepping all over businesses and telling them what they can and cant do. It is the antithesis of everything America, freedom, capitalism, and our constitution stands for.

However..........

Sucky as that may be, these companies made a deal with the Devil. You get in bed with snakes, you are going to get bitten. They took money from the government to get bailed out, all bets are off.

Now these companies are on display for everyone to see what happens to you, and what the very meaning of selling your soul to the Devil really means.

My own opinion is that they would have been just as well off to NOT take the bail outs last year and just filed for bankruptcy to begin with. It still happened anyway even after we tax payers tossed billions into the rabbit hole.

At least had they done that a year ago instead of the bailouts, they would have come out of BK just the same but we tax payers would not have been on the hook, the government would have nothing to say about who does what, which cars get approved for production, and what people get paid.

This is what happens when you make a deal with the Devil. It sucks, but that is how it is.


Joe_LimonJoe_Limon - 10/22/2009 4:59:10 PM
+3 Boost
it appears that you believe the money handed to GM and Chrysler disappeared with the bankruptcy... this isn't true, they are still spending it...


Joe_LimonJoe_Limon - 10/22/2009 5:31:34 PM
+1 Boost
They had something like $160billion in debt before bankruptcy the loans wouldn't have covered it. The creditors got screwed when bankruptcy set it. All on hand assets were transferred to the new GM upon bankruptcy, this includes land buildings and cash.


Joe_LimonJoe_Limon - 10/22/2009 5:32:31 PM
+2 Boost
but don't feel bad for the creditors... they pay insurance for that...


LauderdaleDriverLauderdaleDriver - 10/22/2009 10:59:12 PM
+1 Boost
You should check Bill Ford's comments in the NYT today. Although Ford didn't take bailouts, he thinks that had GM and Chrysler gone bankrupt in December, it would have been a catastrophe.


thstonethstone - 10/22/2009 4:43:16 PM
+2 Boost
GM has agreed to follow the same compensation guidelines. Guess they saw the writing on the wall.


Joe_LimonJoe_Limon - 10/22/2009 5:50:47 PM
+3 Boost
What if that is the same person that started organized and executed a $5billion program? What would be his incentive to do that over owning a small machine shop where one can easily make $500k.


Joe_LimonJoe_Limon - 10/22/2009 9:30:27 PM
+3 Boost
this is true about money meaning less. Ones happiness is not based on how much money you have, it's how much money you have in comparison to your colleagues. If you're the richest person you know with $100 you're probably as happy as the millionaire that doesn't venture out into the high end social clubs.


stonestone - 10/22/2009 8:20:12 PM
+2 Boost
It's absolutely fair, if these were solvent companies that were making a profit on their own, they could pay their execs billion dollar bonuses for all I care. Reward them for their good work. These people did a horrible job essentially running their respective companies into the ground for a quick buck. They are lucky they have jobs at all. If YOU did a completely horrible job for your company would YOU still be working there?


1234xyz1234xyz - 10/22/2009 8:41:48 PM
+1 Boost
none of these businesses even matter anymore. go after goldman sachs!


monstermonster - 10/23/2009 9:14:20 AM
+2 Boost
I don't know why you are all excited about. They are still getting bonuses so whatever they are not getting as part of their salaries they will be getting them as bonuses. Put a cap on the bonus then we are getting somewhere.


CaraficionadoCaraficionado - 10/28/2009 1:19:59 PM
+1 Boost
your comments?? haven't they been racist and homophobic in the past?


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC