The Price Of A Bailout? Every GM Car Sold Will Cost Taxpayers $12,000 Through 2011

The Price Of A Bailout? Every GM Car Sold Will Cost Taxpayers $12,000 Through 2011
The American taxpayer has put up $12,200 for every General Motors vehicle sold through the beginning of 2011, and $7,600 for every Chrysler vehicle sold as well, according to a new report issued by the 362,000-member National Taxpayers Union (NTU).

The report, The Auto Bailout - A Taxpayer Quagmire, authored by NTU Adjunct Scholar Thomas D. Hopkins, Professor of Economics at the University of Rochester, does the math on what the government bailout of the auto industry - including General Motors, Chrysler, and GMAC - actually means to American taxpayers, including how much each taxpayer has contributed to the auto industry since December 2008 and how much each vehicle is costing us.

"Every time someone in your neighborhood drives home in a shiny new Chevy Silverado, remember that it cost American taxpayers more than $12,000," said Pete Sepp, NTU Vice President for Policy and Communications. "Between this and GM's plan to payback their bailout debt with other taxpayer funds, I wonder if all those Americans without work right now could think of any better ways to spend that money. This is a play out of the Bernie Madoff ponzi scheme playbook, and would be the equivalent of paying your Master Card bill with your Visa."

The study found that the average American taxpaying family has invested roughly $800 in the auto bailouts so far. Moreover, the study found, the government support poured into General Motors, Chrysler, and GMAC - the financing subsidiary that supports sales at both - now stands at a towering $78.9 billion. Given that figure, and an estimate of how many vehicles GM and Chrysler will sell through the end of 2010, the study finds that each vehicle one of the bailed-out companies sells costs taxpayers $10,700.

Finally, breaking down the costs by company, the study reports that every Chrysler vehicle sold costs taxpayers $7,600, and every GM vehicle sold costs taxpayers $12,200.

The research is based upon a November study released by the Government Accountability Office (GAO), entitled "Continued Stewardship Needed as Treasury Develops Strategies for Monitoring and Divesting Financial Interests in Chrysler and GM," a follow-up report on the "Troubled Asset Relief Program," as well as statements and reports released from the U.S. Treasury.

Additional Findings Include:

  • GMAC receives government guarantees not available to most private firms. Coincidentally, these are the same private firms that are forced to compete with GMAC's taxpayer-assisted bank, Ally Bank. These guarantees save GMAC about $500 million annually in interest costs.
  • During the first ten months of 2009, GM and Chrysler sales fell further than other major auto producers, down 33.4 percent and 38.9 percent, respectively.
  • While the prospect of repayment of GM and Chrysler loans might be expected, after bankruptcy the vast majority of the bailout funds are no longer legal obligations of the newly-structured GM and Chrysler.
  • If Americans are to believe public officials' claims that the government will eventually reprivatize the auto industry, the necessity of a thoughtful exit plan is essential. However, at this time no such plan exists, making it likely that the Treasury will not recover its investment.

"[T]he bailout has created moral hazard problems, inadvertently handicapping the progress of stronger, non-subsidized producers," Professor Hopkins concluded. "The problems extend beyond just the auto industry, as favored status for one financial company and its bank necessarily complicates prospects for non-subsidized rivals. The time has come to stop such bailouts, and in an orderly way, to seek at least some recovery for taxpayers."



2010 BMW 7-Series M-Sport Photo Gallery

Rolls-Royce Ghost Photo Gallery

2010 BMW X6 Active Hybrid Photo Gallery

2010 BMW 5-Series GT First Drive Photo Gallery

2009 SEMA AUTO SHOW Photo Gallery Now LIVE!

AutoSpies.com Photo Galleries

If you want to see your photos running on our homepage photo ticker, be sure to upload your photos on the go by sending them to Mobile@AutoSpies.com

Share on Facebook


Read Article

HSCenterconsoleHSCenterconsole - 11/18/2009 5:08:30 PM
+5 Boost
Another reason why the bailout of the auto industry was a horrible idea.


monstermonster - 11/18/2009 6:21:25 PM
-2 Boost
just wait another month and the bailout cost will drop to 6k. the last report said that the bail out would cost 24k now it is 12k. Again, how does a max of $4500 turn out to be 12k is beyond me. Is that how the rich get richer?


KZ258KZ258 - 11/19/2009 7:01:33 PM
+3 Boost
tax fraud is highly encouraged


Yonder7Yonder7 - 11/18/2009 5:14:37 PM
+4 Boost
I an industry needs a bailout, that means that the industry is dead, bailout will pospone the funeral. Hopefuly...I'm wrong.


theoptimisticpessimisttheoptimisticpessimist - 11/18/2009 5:31:59 PM
+6 Boost
If the automtive industry needs a bail out what does say about the banks, who received quantum levels more money.


theoptimisticpessimisttheoptimisticpessimist - 11/18/2009 5:31:59 PM
0 Boost
If the automtive industry needs a bail out what does say about the banks, who received quantum levels more money.


thstonethstone - 11/18/2009 7:03:18 PM
+4 Boost
The banks did not need a bailout to improve their operations, but only to take the bad loans off their books. Once the bad loans were off the books, they went right back to making very nice operating profits.

The car companies, on the other hand, need bailout money in order to try and buy time to restructure their operations to make them profitable.

Same need (bailout money), but two completely different business problems.


theoptimisticpessimisttheoptimisticpessimist - 11/18/2009 7:44:46 PM
+4 Boost
"The banks did not need a bailout to improve their operations"

You're kidding right. The bad loans were there because of poor managment buying into derivitive they did not understand. Loose regualtion left a free for all for greed. What did we do? Award the form bad behavior. To big to fail has become a adage meaning "I keep the profits but the taxpayer pay my loses. The reason most bank a succeding now is due to higher fee and interest rates and be able to write of billions. If you think were done with the banks guess again.

One of the major and over looked reason for the failure of the the big three was the inablity to get credit to their customers during the credit crunch. The Trillon the goverment spent on the banks was supose to loosen the credit markets, instead you found banks buying other bank, paying bonus money, and dividends to shareholders. That bad operations and crime to the tax-payers.

Bring back Glass - Steagall.


theoptimisticpessimisttheoptimisticpessimist - 11/18/2009 8:59:13 PM
+3 Boost
LOL


Agent009Agent009 - 11/19/2009 9:47:09 AM
0 Boost
The only problem with that is the GM will only pay back a small portion of the "loan" The rest was issued as stock back to the taxpayers. Also he factors in the billions given to GMAC - General Motors captive finance arm. With out them GM would have had few places to allow the customer to finance other than the already tight banking sector.


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC