IIHS' "Top Safety Picks" Stirs BMW And 'Shut Out' Toyota

IIHS'
Anyone keeping an eye out on automotive news today would have seen the big story of the day. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety issued a press release last night announcing 2010's Top Safety Picks.

But the news was not who actually made the list, it was who didn't.

Hurting the most was Toyota, with 11 vehicles dropping from the top pick list. Also absent from the list was BMW. But, this was with good reason as they did not send cars to be tested yet, according to a BMW representative.

Why all this hub-bub?  The IIHS introduced a new roof-crush test, which in some cases was the deciding factor. More on the test from the IIHS' website below:

"In the Institute's roof strength test, a metal plate is pushed against 1 side of a roof at a constant speed. To earn a good rating, the roof must withstand a force of 4 times the vehicle's weight before reaching 5 inches of crush. This is called a strength-to-weight ratio. For an acceptable rating, the minimum required strength-to-weight ratio is 3.25. A marginal rating value is 2.5. Anything lower than that is poor.

The Institute's test method is the same one that has been used for testing under the federal roof strength regulation since 1973, but with much higher requirements. Vehicles only need a strength-to-weight ratio of 1.5 to meet the federal regulation. While the actual roof strengths of vehicles may surpass this minimum level by a large amount, this information has not been available to consumers. Institute research has found that a vehicle with a roof strength-to-weight ratio of 4.0 has an estimated 50 percent reduction in the risk of serious and fatal injury in single-vehicle rollover crashes compared with the minimum level of 1.5."

BMW North America's official statement on this controversial subject said "Because no 2010 BMW models were tested for the Insurance Institute for Highways Safety's (IIHS) new rollover rating, no BMW vehicles could qualify for the 2010 round of "Top Safety Picks."

In addition to this, the Bavarians continued to stand behind their vehicles and state that during normal testing protocol, BMW puts the vehicle through three real-world tests that simulate striking a road divider, a car leaving the motorway sideways and a car going down an embankment.

In contrast, Toyota's Irv Miller issued a statement saying that the IIHS' statement about Toyota being "shut out for 2010 is extreme and misleading."

Miller says this was because only three Toyota models were tested for roof strength and the IIHS' proprietary test exceeds federal standards.

At the end of the day, the question remains: what roof-crush test really matters? You pick, a static test where a metal plate is applied to a roof OR a real-world type of test that simulates a rollover.

What say you, SPIES?

Check out the video below to see BMW's in-house testing.

ALSO, check out the picture below to see IIHS' grading chart...



2010 BMW 7-Series M-Sport Photo Gallery

Rolls-Royce Ghost Photo Gallery

2010 BMW X6 Active Hybrid Photo Gallery

2010 BMW 5-Series GT First Drive Photo Gallery

2009 SEMA AUTO SHOW Photo Gallery Now LIVE!

AutoSpies.com Photo Galleries

If you want to see your photos running on our homepage photo ticker, be sure to upload your photos on the go by sending them to Mobile@AutoSpies.com

Share on Facebook





camrydrivercamrydriver - 11/18/2009 6:38:49 PM
+1 Boost
The BMW Crash Testing video is AMAZING! Wow!







IamEvilHomerIamEvilHomer - 11/18/2009 7:56:24 PM
0 Boost
Toyota and BMW do the same thing in racing. If they know they will look bad they take the ball and go home. What other reason would they not send cars to the IIHS? Every company has 100's of cars available test like this.


IamEvilHomerIamEvilHomer - 11/18/2009 8:02:01 PM
0 Boost
btw - I love how Auto Spies sees everything from the BMW marketing arm's point of view


Yonder7Yonder7 - 11/18/2009 8:00:10 PM
+2 Boost
I do not like the X6, but one for my wife seems to me as a very secure car...and I don't tink it will be marginal in side crash test as the 5 o 3 series, which I am sure will be better in the incomming models.


Yonder7Yonder7 - 11/18/2009 8:20:44 PM
0 Boost
IamEvilHomer: Good quetion....


Agent009Agent009 - 11/19/2009 8:57:03 AM
+5 Boost
BMW's official statement on the matter is: Passive safety has always been a design priority for BMW, and BMW products have consistently performed well in both laboratory and real-world crashes. Because no 2010 BMW models were tested for the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety’s (IIHS) new rollover rating, no BMW vehicles could qualify for the 2010 round of “Top Safety Picks.” Although no BMW models were tested for the IIHS’s new rollover rating, BMW’s normal testing protocol includes three separate types of rollover tests during product development. These tests simulate real-life circumstances, such as a vehicle striking a road divider, a vehicle leaving the road sideways, and a vehicle sliding down an embankment. As such, BMW is very confident in the passive rollover protection provided by its vehicles.


truckmantruckman - 11/19/2009 5:59:01 AM
+1 Boost
Toyota has been slipping for a while.


I95SPEEDINGTICKETSI95SPEEDINGTICKETS - 11/19/2009 10:00:45 AM
+3 Boost
I think i will take BMW's Test over the IIHS Tests.

One is Done by a World Renowned QUALITY VEHICLE MANUFATURER, other by a bunch of Overrated Bureaucrats that are easily bribed.


pennfootballpennfootball - 11/19/2009 10:09:59 AM
-2 Boost
THEY WON'T LET THEM TEST THEIR CARS BECAUSE THEY KNOW THEY WILL FAIL!! JESUS THEY ARE ANAL RETENTIVE GERMANS


I95SPEEDINGTICKETSI95SPEEDINGTICKETS - 11/19/2009 10:29:31 AM
+4 Boost
Really

So you think this IIHS test is more Rigorous than the tests done by the German or UK or Other European Vehicle Testing Facilities ?

When you show me one German SUV that was as Structurally Unsound as the Cherokees and Explorers and Broncos then i will conceed that BMW had worries about the IIHS test.




ShredmoShredmo - 11/19/2009 11:48:18 AM
0 Boost
I95,
1. If the IIHS test is not rigorous, then what does BMW have to lose.

2. The VW Thing. Cherokees, Explorers and Broncos you speak of were engineered in the 80's or earlier. My example is perfectly acceptable since we are talking about far outdated automobiles.

Conceed away...


ShredmoShredmo - 11/19/2009 11:41:12 AM
+1 Boost
It is nice to have a standard to test all cars by. That is how you compare items. No one questions whether BMWs are safe, the question is how do they stack up against the rest.


AnthonyAnthony - 11/19/2009 1:06:57 PM
+1 Boost
Companies aren't obligated to send their cars to the IIHS. Most do in good faith that their products will get good ratings so that they can use the results in advertising and marketing.


dhkss2002dhkss2002 - 11/19/2009 1:10:07 PM
0 Boost
concede?


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC