Study Shows Jaguar Treats Luxury Car Buyers The Best And Audi The Worst

Study Shows Jaguar Treats Luxury Car Buyers The Best And Audi The Worst
Overall satisfaction with the new-vehicle purchase experience has improved from 2008, but automakers are losing 12 percent of new-vehicle sales to other brands, on average, as a result of poor customer treatment at dealerships, according to the J.D. Power and Associates 2009 Sales Satisfaction Index (SSI) Study(SM) released today.

The study is a comprehensive analysis of the new-vehicle purchase experience. Overall customer satisfaction is measured for five factors: dealership facility; salesperson; paperwork/finance process; delivery process; and vehicle price.

Overall satisfaction averages 836 points on a 1,000-point scale in 2009, up by 11 points from 2008(1). Satisfaction with each of the five factors improves from 2008, with the greatest improvements in the two areas that are most within the dealer's control--the salesperson and delivery process factors.

In particular, salespeople have improved most notably from 2008 in helping buyers stay within their budgets and in negotiating prices quickly. Within the delivery process, dealerships have improved considerably in providing complete explanations of the owner's manual and explaining vehicle features.

"In this difficult economy, dealerships are working particularly hard to close sales, but need to be attentive to customers without exerting unwanted sales pressure," said Jon Osborn, director of automotive research at
J.D. Power and Associates. "Nearly one in four buyers in 2009 reports experiencing sales pressure from their selling dealer."

The study finds that more than one in five shoppers who leave a dealership without purchasing a vehicle do so because they experienced poor treatment or dealer performance issues such as pricing games, sales pressure tactics or discourteous treatment. While 43 percent of these buyers ultimately purchased from a different dealer of the same brand, 57 percent decided to purchase from a different brand altogether. For the industry as a whole, this equals a 12 percent loss of retail sales to other brands.

"With the billions of dollars that automakers spend designing, producing and marketing new vehicles, as well as in driving customers to showrooms, it is critical that potential buyers are not pushed out the dealer's door because of a poor customer experience," said Osborn. "Manufacturers and dealers should be concerned with the experiences of all shoppers, whether they purchase or not. From a buyer's perspective, recollections of their shopping experience include not only the selling dealer, but also all of the other dealers they visited."

Sales Satisfaction Index Segment Rankings

Of the 38 brands included in the study, 29 have improved from 2008. Jaguar receives an award for a second consecutive year and ranks highest in 2009 among luxury brands in satisfying buyers with the new-vehicle sales process. Jaguar performs particularly well in the salesperson and paperwork/finance process factors. Following Jaguar in the luxury brand rankings are Cadillac, Lexus and Mercedes-Benz (in a tie) and Land Rover, respectively.

Among mass market brands, Mercury ranks highest and performs particularly well in all five factors. Following in the mass market segment rankings are smart, Buick, Pontiac and Chevrolet, respectively. All seven Ford and GM mass market brands rank above the segment average.

MINI improves by 16 rank positions from 2008 to rank sixth in 2009, and is the most-improved brand this year.

The study findings also include the following key trends:

  • On average, new-vehicle buyers shop at fewer than three dealerships, including the dealership from which they ultimately purchased. Nearly one-half (49%) of all new-vehicle buyers visit only their selling dealer during the purchase process. Therefore, dealers should view all shoppers as serious prospects and treat them accordingly.
  • Satisfaction scores among buyers who visited only the selling dealer (848, on average) are considerably higher than those of customers who visited more than one dealer (826, on average). Customers who have a particularly satisfying experience at the first dealer they visit are less likely to shop other dealers.

The 2009 Sales Satisfaction Index (SSI) Study is based on responses from approximately 48,000 new-vehicle buyers who purchased or leased their new vehicles in May or June 2009. The study was fielded between August and October 2009. To view ratings on customer satisfaction with the new-vehicle sales process or an article on study results, visit JDPower.com.

Sales Satisfaction Index Ranking                  J.D. Power.com Power
 Luxury Brands                                      Circle Ratings
(Based on a 1,000-point scale)                       For Consumers
Jaguar                           898                       5
Cadillac                         893                       5

Lexus                            877                       4
Mercedes-Benz                    877                       4
Land Rover                       872                       4

Luxury Segment Average           864                       3
Lincoln                          863                       3
BMW                              861                       3
Porsche                          861                       3
SAAB                             857                       3
Acura                            856                       3

Infiniti                         845                       2
Volvo                            842                       2
Audi                             828                       2



                                                  J.D. Power.com Power
Mass Market Brands                                  Circle Ratings
(Based on a 1,000-point scale)                       For Consumers
Mercury                          867                       5
smart                            865                       5
Buick                            864                       5
Pontiac                          864                       5
Chevrolet                        863                       5
MINI                             862                       5

Saturn                           858                       4
HUMMER                           856                       4
GMC                              853                       4
Ford                             847                       4

Subaru                           834                       3
Suzuki                           832                       3
Mass Market Segment Average      832                       3
Honda                            830                       3
Volkswagen                       828                       3
Scion                            826                       3
Kia                              823                       3
Toyota                           823                       3
Chrysler                         822                       3
Hyundai                          819                       3
Nissan                           815                       3

Mazda                            809                       2
Dodge                            805                       2
Jeep                             805                       2
Mitsubishi                       778                       2



2009 LA Auto Show Photo Gallery

2011 BMW 5-Series Photo Gallery

2010 Lexus GX460 and 470 Photo Gallery

2010 BMW 7-Series M-Sport Photo Gallery

2009 SEMA AUTO SHOW Photo Gallery Now LIVE!

AutoSpies.com Photo Galleries

If you want to see your photos running on our homepage photo ticker, be sure to upload your photos on the go by sending them to Mobile@AutoSpies.com

Share on Facebook
 


Lexus is the official sponsor of the 2009 AutoSpies.com LA Auto Show Photo Gallery

There are photos and then there are AutoSpies.com photos!

AutoSpies.com is ranked number one on Google search for auto shows


MeanVulcanMeanVulcan - 12/8/2009 11:31:51 AM
+2 Boost
I do not consider JD Power a very reliable source due mainly to their methodology and assumptions. But, I am not surprised to see Audi at the bottom even though I am a big Audi fan and just leased a new car this year. For years the dealerships I've dealt with in Burlington MA (it went through a change in ownership) really sucked. I did not trust bringing my car in for service because I felt I got overquoted compared to other service stations. Even at the new dealership, I felt pressured during my leasing process. It was not horrible but it certainly could have been better. However since then, I've brought my car in for its first free maintenance service and the service there has been exceptional in the way I was attended to, the quickness of their service and the quality of their work.

I really hope that this is a trend for the positive and probably not yet picked up by JD Power.

Lastly, Audi's service would have to be much worse for me to consider another brand. I can always go to another dealer.


100tnega100tnega - 12/8/2009 11:32:15 AM
+2 Boost
The dealer experience sets expectations towards the overall ownership experience, hence playing a crucial role in the purchase decision. To that affect, Infiniti lost both my business and brand affinity due to piss poor customer service.


GodgoreGodgore - 12/11/2009 9:06:22 PM
+1 Boost
I wish there were a reverse study that would allow dealerships to measure the amount of jerks coming through there doors.


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC