Do You Agree? Badge Engineering Is One Of The Major Downfalls For A Cash-Strapped Automaker

Do You Agree? Badge Engineering Is One Of The Major Downfalls For A Cash-Strapped Automaker
I stumbled upon this piece today and after giving it a thorough read, it makes a lot of sense.

There is something inherently wrong about rebadging a car, and most of the time it is insensible. For instance, every brand has its own aura or vibe and it proliferates throughout their products. When I take a seat behind the wheel of an Audi, there is no question that I am driving something other than a car with four rings.

This is what CAR's Gavin Green is getting at AND this is why rebadging simply does not work.

Do you agree with us? Can you name a couple of successful rebadge attempts? I am pretty sure I cannot...

CAR Magazine reports:

"One of the most talked-about cars of the recent Detroit Show was a Chrysler Delta. It sounds like an elite US military unit. In fact it is an idiosyncratic little Italian hatch (a Lancia Delta) with a beaver-like American (Chrysler) grille.

Now there will be those who salute Chrysler’s boldness, by grabbing attention at a motor show in which it had absolutely nothing new (the ‘Chrysler’ Delta is just a concept). They grabbed headlines, certainly. Sergio Marchionne, boss of Fiat, new controller of Chrysler, and one of the boldest and most intelligent leaders in the car industry – Fiat now rocks – reckons that there are some parallels between Lancia and Chrysler (which may be true). Some journalists, whose opinions I normally covet, were nodding sagely, explaining that this is a clever and inexpensive way for cash-strapped Chrysler to launch new cars. (I always worry when car journalists sound more like accountants than enthusiasts.)..."



2011 BMW 335iS Photo Gallery

2011 BMW 5-Series Photo Gallery

2010 Detroit Auto Show Photo Gallery


AutoSpies.com Photo Galleries

If you want to see your photos running on our homepage photo ticker, be sure to upload your photos on the go by sending them to Mobile@AutoSpies.com

Share on Facebook
 



Read Article

theoptimisticpessimisttheoptimisticpessimist - 1/26/2010 4:43:00 PM
+6 Boost
"Cash-Strapped Automaker"

What? non-cash stripped automaker are doing it: Toyota, Ford, VW,etc.... it's an industry issue. If the public keeps buying them as they have been since the 1930 I don't see a problem.


AlleVierAlleVier - 1/26/2010 5:56:46 PM
+3 Boost
If you're talking about real rebadging--a car from another market entering a new market as a different brand with only styling changes--then it partly depends on whether the original vehicle sells in the new market or not. The Matrix-to-Vibe rebadge didn't make sense because you could buy the Matrix just as readily, whereas the Commodore-to-G8 rebadge did.

The Audi-as-Volkswagen or Lexus-as-Toyota type of rebadging to which you're alluding is only troublesome if the distinctions between the products aren't significant enough--and note that your perception itself does not define "significant." If the rebadged cars are selling profitably then somebody thinks there's a difference between the two cars. I will acknowledge that, long-term, it could tarnish a brand's reputation, but really, they have to have one worthy of protecting before it's a problem.


bmwdrvrbmwdrvr - 1/26/2010 7:05:35 PM
+4 Boost
ok for one the Matrix and Vibe isnt an example of a rebadge they dont look the same, they simply share mechanicals. The G8 and commodore are identical cars with different badges thats a rebadge. Or the Audi A4 and Seat Exeo thats nothing more than a rebadge, the list goes on.....


AlleVierAlleVier - 1/27/2010 12:23:47 AM
0 Boost
The Matrix and the Vibe don't look alike? Are you kidding me? The interiors are identical--the grill, lamps, and wheels are the only thing that are different. The Exeo, at least only exists as a rebadge (again, grill, lamps, and wheels different) of a previous generation A4.


LACMANLACMAN - 1/28/2010 9:57:42 AM
+1 Boost
@ AlleVier: Umm... no. You are blind. Take a look @ the vehicles again. Even the first generations of those two vehicles didnt look alike. Interior and mechanicals? Yes. Exterior? No.


downtoearthdowntoearth - 1/26/2010 9:06:20 PM
+9 Boost
What's the bloody problem with selling Lancia Delta as Chrysler???

It's a very good, stylish Italian car which also happens to offer some of the most modern technology. But Americans don't know the word LANCIA. And people don't buy expensive stuff (like cars) they don't know at all.

But they do know the word CHRYSLER.

It's just so simple...


Agent00RAgent00R - 1/26/2010 10:12:29 PM
-1 Boost
But do you think THAT many Americans would appreciate the Delta's Italian styling?

Sure, a few would. But what about mass market appeal?


XYZZXYZZ - 1/27/2010 4:28:10 AM
+1 Boost
OOR--

they may or may not. more depends on STYLING and VALUE.

chrysler's Crossfire rebadge of a prior MB model apparently didn't work. hard to say if the cause was basic ugliness, or people felt it was still overpriced.

contrast that with the example of the camry and lexus ES.


Joe_LimonJoe_Limon - 1/27/2010 6:33:15 PM
+3 Boost
at least with the Crossfire, they based the rebadged car on a high end model, rather then the other way around as is found with the ES.


thstonethstone - 1/27/2010 5:45:31 PM
+4 Boost
Everyone knows that the Lexus ES comes straight from the Toyota Camry parts bins. Plastic is plastic, even if its fake wood grain plastic.


XYZZXYZZ - 1/30/2010 6:33:52 AM
+1 Boost
haha!

you guys love to dwell on the ILLUSION that the camry and lexus es are "low end" cars.

discounting the avalon, the camry is the TOP MODEL sedan of the u.s. toyota line. a full boat XLE camry is fully the equivalent of any other car in its SIZE class.

and in reliability, it SURPASSES THEM ALL, including all the euro iron. [the ONLY weak point now is the u.s. CTS supplied gas pedal linkage, soon to be fixed.]
ergo, the ES also surpasses all competitors.



Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC