After Years Of Domination Lexus Falls To 4th Place In Latest JD Power Dependability Study

After Years Of Domination Lexus Falls To 4th Place In Latest JD Power Dependability Study
Twenty-five of 36 vehicle brands have improved in long-term dependability in 2010, compared with their performance in 2009, continuing a steady trend of industry-wide improvement.  However, for some of these brands, consumer perceptions have not kept pace with their actual performance, according to the J.D. Power and Associates 2010 U.S. Vehicle Dependability StudySM (VDS) released today.

The study, which measures problems experienced by original owners of three-year-old (2007 model year) vehicles, includes 198 different problem symptoms across all areas of the vehicle.  Overall dependability is determined by the level of problems experienced per 100 vehicles (PP100), with a lower score reflecting higher quality.

The Vehicle Dependability Study is used extensively by vehicle manufacturers worldwide to help design and build better vehicles-which typically translates to higher resale values-and by consumers to help them make more-informed choices for both new- and used- vehicle purchases. According to J.D. Power and Associates, among new-vehicle shoppers, perception of quality and dependability is the most influential factor in their decision to purchase a specific vehicle model.

The study finds that several brands that perform well in long-term dependability in 2010 are avoided at relatively high rates due to consumer concerns about dependability.1 Among brands included in VDS, Cadillac, Ford, Hyundai, Lincoln and Mercury have the greatest lags between dependability performance and consumer perception.

"Producing vehicles with world-class quality is just part of the battle for automakers; convincing consumers to believe in their quality is equally as important," said David Sargent, vice president of global vehicle research at J.D. Power and Associates. "It takes considerable time to positively change consumer perceptions of quality and dependability-sometimes a decade or more-so it is vital for manufacturers to continually improve quality and also to convince consumers of these gains."

According to Sargent, approaches that can help reinforce perceptions of high quality in consumers' minds include: providing extended warranties, which demonstrates a brand's faith in its products; incorporating features, materials and finishes in vehicles that have a rich feel; and ensuring that new models launch with better quality than their predecessors.  In addition, automakers need to increase communication efforts about their high quality and dependability through social media channels such as blogs, Facebook and Twitter, as well as through traditional channels.

Toyota continues to perform well in long-term dependability and garners four segment awards-more than any other nameplate in 2010-for the Highlander, Prius, Sequoia and Tundra. Honda receives three segment awards for the CR-V, Fit and Ridgeline. Lincoln captures two awards for the Mark LT and MKZ. In addition, Audi, BMW, Buick, Cadillac, Chevrolet, Ford, Lexus, Mazda, Mercedes-Benz and Mercury each receive a model segment award.

Porsche leads the overall nameplate rankings in 2010, which is consistent with its performance in the J.D. Power and Associates 2007 Initial Quality Study,SM which measures new-vehicle quality at 90 days of ownership. Lincoln improves by six rank positions from 2009 to follow Porsche in the nameplate rankings. Rounding out the top five nameplates are Buick, Lexus and Mercury. In addition, seven of the 10 models with the lowest incidence of problems in the industry are from Ford and General Motors, including the 2007 model-year Buick Lacrosse, Buick Lucerne, Cadillac DTS, Ford Five Hundred, Lincoln MKZ, Mercury Milan, and Mercury Montego. The Cadillac DTS has the fewest problems in the industry, with just 76 problems per 100 vehicles. This marks the first time in more than a decade that a model from a domestic automaker has achieved the lowest PP100 score in the Vehicle Dependability Study.

Overall vehicle dependability has improved by 7 percent in 2010 to an average of 155 PP100, compared with 167 PP100 in 20092-a rate that is consistent with historical industry gains. In addition to the improvement in overall dependability, the rate of component replacement has also been reduced from 2009. Approximately 65 percent of owners indicate they replaced a vehicle component in 2010, compared with 68 percent in 2009.

"The improvements in long-term dependability and component replacement rates are good news for both consumers and manufacturers," said Sargent. "Manufacturers benefit from lower warranty expenses, while consumers incur lower maintenance and repair costs, as well as less inconvenience."

The study also finds that long-term dependability has a significant positive effect on repurchase intent. Among owners who say they did not experience problems with their vehicle, 43 percent indicate they "definitely will" repurchase their current brand. This figure declines to 28 percent among owners who say they experienced at least one problem with their vehicle.

The 2010 Vehicle Dependability Study is based on responses from more than 52,000 original owners of 2007 model-year vehicles. The study was fielded between October and December 2009.






Geneva Motor Show Photo Gallery

2011 Hyundai Sonata Launch Photo Gallery

2010 Rolls-Royce Ghost Launch Photo Gallery

2010 Chicago Auto Show Photo Gallery

AutoSpies.com Photo Galleries

If you want to see your photos running on our homepage photo ticker, be sure to upload your photos on the go by sending them to Mobile@AutoSpies.com

Share on Facebook




david999david999 - 3/18/2010 11:23:54 AM
0 Boost

Remember that in 2007, Porsche, Buick, etc. introduced very few models in 2007 that would have new model problems (like any new model would experience).


Joe_LimonJoe_Limon - 3/18/2010 12:01:02 PM
+1 Boost
lol I like how you conveniently left out lincoln, Lincoln released the mxz and mkx in 2007

while Lexus only bored some engines bigger.


WorldofLuxuryWorldofLuxury - 3/18/2010 6:21:21 PM
+3 Boost
david999 does bring up a valid point, though. That was when Lexus introduced their new ES, updated the RX, and debuted the LS lineup (LS as a 2007 model and LSh at a 2007 auto show).


FanboyOfTheTruthFanboyOfTheTruth - 3/18/2010 11:28:22 AM
+6 Boost
I guess I can only depend on VW being at the bottom then.


carguy68carguy68 - 3/18/2010 11:37:27 AM
+3 Boost
Looks about right.


pushrod27pushrod27 - 3/18/2010 4:23:05 PM
+3 Boost
Especially when the real story is that according to this study, the Cadillac DTS (!) is the most reliable car in America. I like Cadillacs, but even I'm shocked.


Yonder7Yonder7 - 3/18/2010 12:06:08 PM
+2 Boost
Very amazing to see how many brands surpass my favorites in dependability...Mercedes Benz, BMW, and Audi, Jaguar,.....at least Porsche is the first but honestly I didn't expect that.


WillisWillis - 3/18/2010 12:12:43 PM
+6 Boost
I could care less about these dependability studies. One model can ruin it for an entire brand. My brother drives an '07 Jetta TDI and according to him he's never had any major problems that would make the car unreliable. At the same time, I hear that when a cupholder breaks in a Lexus their drivers suffer a heart attack because they're disappointed at the "poor quality"...


Joe_LimonJoe_Limon - 3/18/2010 4:21:01 PM
0 Boost
I agree, for all we know all of the Lexus issues could have been attributed to having the accelerator electronically pinning itself.


FanboyOfTheTruthFanboyOfTheTruth - 3/18/2010 4:30:44 PM
+3 Boost
"I could care less about these dependability studies. One model can ruin it for an entire brand."

And that's why the study result is also available with each model broken down, if you bothered to read the details on JD Power's official website, the link to which Agent009 curiously decided not to include with his post.


uaw_laxuaw_lax - 3/18/2010 7:33:41 PM
0 Boost
one model ruing it for one brand is usaly all it takes in real life.


XYZZXYZZ - 3/20/2010 3:55:13 AM
+2 Boost
vlad:

"For all I know, the bulb could go out on a Lexus, while Buick had wrecked tranny, or Lincoln had blown engine. This "study" would count them all equally as one problem."


exactly. this study is almost meaningless, if there is not an explanation of what exactly qualifies as a "problem."

seems i recall CR giving a figure for number of defects in their test cars, in the past. among the problems: low air pressure in ONE or more tires, ONE or more of the engine fluid levels not quite topped up, plus of course, the REAL problems we wouldn't question are indeed "defects!"

their microscopic scrutiny DID REFLECT the quality of assembly and final inspection. which is why they bothered to report it. but many were minor, and should've been taken care of at dealer prep.

lazy dealers could give mfgrs. a bad rep.


M35MTM35MT - 3/18/2010 12:28:08 PM
+10 Boost
Land Rover, as always, proudly bringing up the rear

18 months, 17.5k miles...no problems yet (keeping my fingers crossed)


ShredmoShredmo - 3/18/2010 12:39:46 PM
+2 Boost
My 2005 Subaru Forester has 55,000 miles on it. ZERO issues since I purchased it new in November of 2004. Subaru is considered average based on this study. The point I'd like to extrapolate, most cars are built pretty good these days.


JustaCarJustaCar - 3/18/2010 12:46:03 PM
+2 Boost
This data needs to be put into perspective. The graph reports problems per 100 vehicles. It shows that the difference between the very best and the very worst (as surveyed by JD powers) is 145 problems per 100 vehicles. This amounts to 1.45 problems per vehicle difference between the top and the bottom of the ranking. Hardly a deciding factor for most people when buying a car.


XYZZXYZZ - 3/20/2010 4:02:13 AM
0 Boost
nope. you're not interpreting it properly.

the worst car on the list is 2.3 TIMES MORE LIKELY to have a problem.


XYZZXYZZ - 3/20/2010 4:07:46 AM
0 Boost
and of course, the gap WIDENS over the years.

CR reports a similar ~2x difference at 3 years. as cars age (some more gracefully than others), the worst get close to THREE TIMES more problems than the best.


JustaCarJustaCar - 3/20/2010 9:16:35 AM
+2 Boost
XYZ - the graph clearly states "Problems per 100 vehicles". The data on the graph shows that the best, in this case Porsche, is likely to have 1.1 problems per vehicle while the worst, Land Rover, is likely to have 2.55 problems per vehicle. Sure the ratio between the two is 2.3 but, most importantly, the difference is just 1.44 problems.


theoptimisticpessimisttheoptimisticpessimist - 3/18/2010 12:48:05 PM
+3 Boost
Welcome to the wonderful world of tech laden modern cars.


bmwdrvrbmwdrvr - 3/18/2010 3:08:33 PM
+4 Boost
Wow Acura & Infiniti below Mercedes Benz interesting change of pace


merc07merc07 - 3/18/2010 3:25:40 PM
+2 Boost
Nice work Porsche and Mercedes! Nice
to see with all the innovations especially mb they are able to constantly improve quality and dependability! So much for the unreliable Mercedes benz!


XYZZXYZZ - 3/20/2010 4:13:23 AM
+1 Boost
yes, it seems Benz got an truly alarming, SHOCKING, wake-up call!

a few years ago, CR could not recommend even ONE car from their whole line-up! only the momentum of their reputation carried them over those years in darkness.


pushrod27pushrod27 - 3/18/2010 4:25:20 PM
+4 Boost
Ahem... the Cadillac DTS is the most reliable car in the industry.


DeutschlandDeutschland - 3/18/2010 6:49:00 PM
-5 Boost
What the hell does Japanese Power and Associates know? While they were busy giving Lexus high rankings their cars for busy starting the Toyota acceleration crisis.


XYZZXYZZ - 3/20/2010 4:21:12 AM
0 Boost
ah, they needn't bother.

as it is, TOYOTA outranks mb, acura, infiniti, cadillac, bmw, volvo, jaguar, AND audi.

who really NEEDS a snob-mobile when they can order the leather seats and other high zoot features in a CAMRY xle or avalon, and have A BETTER and more RELIABLE car?


enthusiastx11enthusiastx11 - 3/20/2010 12:58:03 PM
0 Boost
do you both realize that the difference between top-rated porsche and dead last land rover is equivalent to 1.45 problems with your car over a 3 year period?

with that in mind, please explain how the dependability difference between a mercedes and a toyota of 0.14 problems per car over the course of 3 years is significant...

also, since the mercedes has about 4x more technology and features than the average toyota, it's actually MORE reliable because there's a hell of a lot more sophisticated technology that could have problems...but doesn't.




XYZZXYZZ - 3/23/2010 7:29:24 AM
+1 Boost
"do you both realize that the difference between top-rated porsche and dead last land rover is equivalent to 1.45 problems with your car over a 3 year period?

"with that in mind, please explain how the dependability difference between a mercedes and a toyota of 0.14 problems per car over the course of 3 years is significant..."

no we do not realize that, because unlike you, we DO NOT FALL for heavily massaged stats that are somewhere between meaningless and ABSURD. esp. when the weasel words "equivalent to" are used.

1. please explain how it is possible to have "0.14 problem?"
2. there are several ways to TRULY interpret the "problems per 100 vehicles" stats. the most sensible to me, is finding out at what point a mfgr's vehicles reach the 100 problems for 100 cars. i.e., where on average, EVERY CAR has gotten a problem.

for most makers, this occurs after ~5 years. fords get there in 7. hondas in 10. toyotas at 15.

ergo, for many brands, EVERY CAR has had a problem by year 5. other brands may actually have several out of a 100, that have NO PROBLEMS AT ALL after 6, 9, or 14 years.

HUGE DIFFERENCE.

and since likelihood of problems accelerate as cars age, by fifteen years, the average car will likely have FAR MORE than 3x the problems a toyota will.


XYZZXYZZ - 3/23/2010 7:51:06 AM
+1 Boost
from the above chart, EVERY BRAND already has bet'n 110 to 255 "problems" by year three.

as mentioned earlier, jdp needs to define just what they count as problems. a burned out bulb? a dirty windshield?

the time lines i gave above are from CR charts. they at least DEFINE problems. REAL, costs money to fix problems.

jdp surveys are not TOTALLY worthless. but i only trust them to the extent CR comes up with similar results.


XYZZXYZZ - 3/23/2010 7:58:02 AM
+1 Boost
...110 to 255 PER HUNDRED cars...


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC