Jeep Grand Cherokee Out Scores Toyota 4 Runner In Latest Consumer Reports Tests

Jeep Grand Cherokee Out Scores Toyota 4 Runner In Latest Consumer Reports Tests
The redesigned Jeep Grand Cherokee midsized SUV earned a Very Good road test score and outscored its traditional rival, the Toyota 4Runner, which earned a Good score, in a recent face-off between the two vehicles conducted by Consumer Reports.

The Jeep's ride, quietness and interior won it points, though it was hampered by its emergency handling. By contrast, the 4Runner, redesigned for 2010, fell short on the road (though it showed terrific off-road prowess) and scored at the bottom of its class.

The Grand Cherokee is the first new model that Chrysler has released post-bankruptcy, and it's based on the next generation Mercedes-Benz ML.

"The Grand Cherokee is a big improvement over the previous model, with refinement on par with models that cost a lot more," said David Champion, senior director of Consumer Reports' Auto Test Center in East Haddam, Conn. "The 4Runner, which still uses a body-on-frame design, is disappointing on the road. The 4Runner doesn't let you forget you're driving a truck."

Prices for the vehicles were $39,010 for the Grand Cherokee and $37,425 for the 4Runner.

The Grand Cherokee is too new to have reliability data and the 4Runner scored too low in CR's testing to Recommend it. CR only Recommends vehicles that have performed well in its tests, have at least average predicted reliability based on CR's Annual Auto Survey of its more than 7 million print and Web subscribers, and performed at least adequately if crash-tested or included in a government rollover test.

The Grand Cherokee rides well and is quiet and steady on the highway. The Jeep Grand Cherokee Laredo X 4WD ($39,010 Manufacturer's Suggested Retail Price as tested), is powered by a 290-hp 3.6- liter V6 engine that is smooth and gets 18 mpg overall in CR's own fuel economy tests. During CR's emergency handling tests the Jeep was difficult to control in the avoidance maneuver. The five-speed automatic transmission is smooth and responsive. Braking is Very Good. Cargo room can be increased by folding the rear seatbacks.

The 4Runner's ride has constant body motions and body lean is pronounced in corners, even at a leisurely pace. Its overly light steering is slow to respond. The Toyota 4Runner SR5 4X4 ($37,425 MSRP as tested), is powered by a 270-hp, 4.0-liter, V6 engine that is punchy and gets 18 mpg overall. The five-speed automatic transmission is responsive. Braking is Very Good. Cargo room can be increased by folding the rear seatbacks.

INSIDE THE CABINS

The Jeep has the more upscale interior of the two SUVs, with soft-touch panels and nicely detailed leather seats. The Toyota is more utilitarian, with hard, cheap-looking plastics. The leather seats look like vinyl.

Drivers sit up high in the Jeep and have plenty of room. The tilt-and-telescope steering wheel helps most drivers to find a good position. The front seats are supportive but firm and have full power adjustments.

You sit close to the floor in the Toyota, and the seat's short cushion compromises thigh support. There is ample room, and the tilt-and-telescope wheel and driver's power, lumbar-support adjustment were appreciated. Headroom is tight even for average-sized drivers. The cabin's low roof and high dash encroach on visibility and make you feel a bit claustrophobic.

The rear seats of the Jeep and Toyota are roomy enough for two or three adults, but the Jeep's seats were more supportive. The seatbacks recline in each. The 4Runner offers a small third row as an option.

Gauges are large and backlit in the Jeep, and most controls are simple and straightforward. Radio and climate controls are mounted high and within easy reach, but the radio is controlled mostly by tapping an intricate and awkward touch screen instead of simple buttons.




2012 BMW 6-Series Convertible Photo Gallery

2010 LA Auto Show Photo Gallery

2011 Chrysler Group Photo Gallery

2010 LA Auto Show Preview Photo Gallery

2010 SEMA Auto Show Photo Gallery

AutoSpies.com Photo Galleries

If you want to see your photos running on our homepage photo ticker, be sure to upload your photos on the go by sending them to Mobile@AutoSpies.com

Share on Facebook



WhelanWhelan - 11/24/2010 12:59:57 PM
+3 Boost
"Doesn't mean you have to be lame." No, but it does mean your car has finally been proven inferior, as it always has been to a superior product. JEEP FTW!


pushrod27pushrod27 - 11/24/2010 1:47:49 PM
-1 Boost
the comparison is not odd at all. despite its unibody construction, the Grand Cherokee is a legitimate off-road capable SUV, it has high ground clearance and durable heavy-duty suspension and undercarriage components.
The Grand Cherokee is and always has been a capable off road 4x4, with the very same targeted abilities and customers as the 4-Runner and Pathfinder.
The current Range Rover is also a unibody vehicle, as is the Mercedes-Benz ML, and the Nissan Pathfinder has been unibody since 1996.
In fact, the original Grand Cherokee was the first unibody SUV and it has proven to be a pioneer in this area.

They are not body on frame, but these SUVs are very rugged and capable; not at all the same as crossovers like the RAV-4/Highlander, which are basically tall cars.


truckmantruckman - 11/24/2010 2:57:33 PM
-8 Boost
The Jeep has independent front suspension and solid rear axle, just like the 4 runner.


truckmantruckman - 11/26/2010 4:28:01 AM
+3 Boost
Ok the Jeep has fully independent suspension, I would have to go with the Toyota, At least it has a full frame and a solid rear axle, CR is just complaining that the 4 Runner isn't a complete princess like the Jeep.


richard112360richard112360 - 11/24/2010 1:14:37 PM
+10 Boost
Let's see how the Jeep Grand Cherokee is holding up after 3-4 years when the warranty is up, then we can talk.


uaw_laxuaw_lax - 11/24/2010 1:42:28 PM
-2 Boost
Yea the jeeps warranty is longer than toyotas to.


knowitall1985knowitall1985 - 11/24/2010 1:47:19 PM
+4 Boost
I would never buy a Jeep over a Toyota. I don't care what consumer report says. Wait about 10 yrs and see which one holds up the best and has best resale. Just more Toyota bashing to try and get people to take a chance on the Jeep. Won't work on me......


pushrod27pushrod27 - 11/24/2010 1:50:27 PM
-1 Boost
you should check them out in real life. the new Grand Cherokee is better than the 4-Runner in every way. Also, they are selling like hotcakes. The Grand Cherokee has its own fanbase, and the new model is a really good vehicle. Nobody needs to bash Toyota, the new Grand Cherokee stands on its own merits.


bmwdrvrbmwdrvr - 11/24/2010 1:51:38 PM
-6 Boost
some Jeeps especially the Grand Cherokees have good resale values, and your point is really useless when talking about the wrangler as they have high resale values and have proven very dependable. Its funny that people are so brainwashed, that even when/if proven wrong they still choose to believe nonsense. Its like the allegory of the cave......


pushrod27pushrod27 - 11/24/2010 1:55:07 PM
-6 Boost
... and any difference in resale value 10 years from now would be negligible, really. how much is anyone willing to spend on a 10 year old mass-market vehicle? Be honest, just say that you don't trust the Jeep because it's American. That would be honest and sensible. Your stated reasoning seems to be that of a know-nothing.


Yonder7Yonder7 - 11/24/2010 2:00:09 PM
+7 Boost
Let's see how the Jeep Grand Cherokee is holding up after 3-4 years when the warranty is up, then we can talk.

— richard112360
LOL , that's sad but true.


toyfantoyfan - 11/24/2010 2:32:11 PM
+7 Boost
Having family members that have bought used Grand Cherokees 5 yrs old with about 18k for $7k tells me they do not have good resale value!
Also seeing that they use the same 2 piston brake calipers as a car tells me that they are not better than a 4Runners 4 piston fixed calipers!!!
Does that mean anything in the real world? Absolutely!!! And it shows how much each brand really puts into the vehicle even if neither is taken off road! But its rather shocking that some one would tell me that they want me to take a vehicle off road with the pretension that it is the best, yet they put the cheapest brakes on it possible! Wait, didn't they also offer me a massive V8 that goes really fast?!
NO THANKS!
I've had several Toyotas with over 100k miles and have always been able to get over $10k out of them when I've sold them!

The Jeep looks good! But I'd rather look at it while I'm driving by in my Toyota!


WhelanWhelan - 11/24/2010 2:51:13 PM
-4 Boost
My family has been a Jeep family for awhile. From a 1996 Cherokee Classic, 1999 Cherokee Sport, currently a 2003 Grand Cherokee Laredo, and my fiance's 2005 Jeep Liberty Limited. If I had the means I'd own a new Jeep right now too.

People who buy Jeeps come from a different demographic, albeit in the same segment of vehicles as the 4Runner sells. I would take a Jeep anyday over any Toyota SUV/Crossover. Toyota sells boring better than anyone else (alongside Honda). Some people are happy with boring, I was for a time with my Matrix XR AWD, but now am tired of it and cannot wait to own it, sell it, and get something superior and more fun.


truckmantruckman - 11/24/2010 3:04:26 PM
-2 Boost
You have to take what CR says with a grain of salt, what they are saying is that the Jeep is a better car, I like them both as cars, but they both fall short in the off road ability department for me, for the off road nuts we have few options (Jeep Rubicon, Dodge Power Wagon, F-150 Raptor, and the Hummer H-3 T Alpha)if we don't want to spend the big $$ modifying to make it capable off road, there are other vehicles ok off road, but these I mentioned are much better than the rest, and I will look forward to seeing the long term reliability of both of these.


85bmw745i85bmw745i - 11/25/2010 1:31:28 PM
-3 Boost
A Land Rover will easily beat the above mentioned offroad except for the wrangler rubicon. The power wagon is also impressive for a truck with its diff locks. The H3 is probably the best pickup except for those thin tiny steering tie rods which break on the H2. I would put my 2002 Discovery against any of those vehicles and I bet the Rubicon and the power wagon would be the only one to keep up in the rough uneven terrain due to its swaybar disconnect to improve axle articulation.


truckmantruckman - 11/26/2010 4:19:55 AM
+3 Boost
I am not a fan of the H-2, but the H-3T alpha is great, locking transfer case and 2 selectable lockers, the suspension flex is the best in class but not as good as the Jeep or the Power Wagon or the Raptor, Does your Discovery have 2 selectable lockers factory? I am sure it is capable but you can't compare open diffed vehicles with off road vehicles with 2 fully locked diffs. It can be night and day in some off road circumstances.


0to600to60 - 11/24/2010 3:27:11 PM
+6 Boost
I would take the 4runner hands down. Resale alone would give the 4runner the crown for me.


knowitall1985knowitall1985 - 11/24/2010 4:11:48 PM
+4 Boost
I only base my no nothing comments of 23 years in the car business. Jeeps and any chrysler product are crap. Fool yourself into thinking anything you want,but auto pros know that TOYOTA is going to always be better than a jeep.......


FijianFijian - 11/24/2010 4:34:08 PM
-7 Boost
At least the Jeep wont try to kill you and maybe the engine will not blow up because of oil sludge.Toyota resale value what a joke this will be in a few years.Once all the facts are out Toyota will have no place to hide.Buying back cars to hide defects will catch up one day.The lawyers are arguing there is no facts.How can it be proven if Toyota secretly buys back cars and does their own testing.You think they will say yeah we found a problem with the throttle control system.Yeah right


theoptimisticpessimisttheoptimisticpessimist - 11/24/2010 4:35:50 PM
+3 Boost
Having owned 5 Jeep Grand Cherokee (all solid front a rear axles) I have trepidations of the new independent suspension GC. I buy a SUV first and foremost of their off road capabilities since that, for me, is its primary use. With the exception of the dismal last generation GC have been far more sophisticated and agile off road vehicle than the 4runner. Now both look to big and car like to travel deep in the back country, if I was choosing today I still like the Jeep more advanced 4WD options, but still find the 04 GC hard to beat.

The real off-road SUV is fast become a endangered species thanks the imbeciles’ at Consumer Reports that believe everything should be more Camry like. Can’t the stick to toasters.



toyfantoyfan - 11/24/2010 7:22:53 PM
+5 Boost
"if I was choosing today I still like the Jeep more advanced 4WD options, but still find the 04 GC hard to beat."

More advanced???
I won't deny it has great specs but it is NOT more advanced!
The 4Runner has systems that are as advanced if not more advanced than any jeep. . . And like I already mentioned, the difference in something as simple as the brakes tells me the jeep is NOT more advanced!



uaw_laxuaw_lax - 11/25/2010 12:37:27 AM
-6 Boost
To be fair I would wait to see the new 4runner.


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC