Lincoln Steals Top Spot In Latest JD Power Vehicle Dependability Study

Lincoln Steals Top Spot In Latest JD Power Vehicle Dependability Study
Overall vehicle dependability has improved from 2010, with automakers succeeding in reducing problem rates in many traditional areas, but experiencing some challenges in overcoming problems with newer technologies and features, according to the J.D. Power and Associates 2011 U.S. Vehicle Dependability StudySM (VDS) released today.

The study, which measures problems experienced during the past 12 months by original owners of three-year-old (2008 model year) vehicles, includes 202 different problem symptoms across all areas of the vehicle.  Overall dependability is determined by the level of problems experienced per 100 vehicles (PP100), with a lower score reflecting higher quality.

The Vehicle Dependability Study is used extensively by vehicle manufacturers worldwide to help design and build better vehicles—which typically translates to higher resale values and higher customer loyalty. It also helps consumers make more-informed choices for both new- and used-vehicle purchases. Among new-vehicle shoppers, perception of quality and dependability is the most influential factor in their decision to purchase a specific vehicle model, according to J.D. Power and Associates.

In 2011, overall vehicle dependability averages 151 PP100—the lowest problem rate since the inception of the study in 1990—and improves from 170 PP 100 in 2009. Between 2009 and 2011, annual improvement for the industry has averaged 6 percent, which is slightly lower than historical rates of improvement. During the past decade, industry improvement has averaged 8 percent each year.

The slowdown in improvement is largely attributable to increased rates of problems with electronic features in vehicles, including audio, entertainment and navigation systems and new safety features, such as tire pressure monitoring systems.

“Automakers, as a whole, have made significant improvements in reducing traditional problems, particularly with vehicle interiors; engines and transmissions; and steering and braking during the past several years,” said David Sargent, vice president of global vehicle research at J.D. Power and Associates. “However, as manufacturers add new features and technologies to satisfy customer demand and new legislation, they face the potential for introducing new problems.”

According to Sargent, as newer technologies become more widespread, enhancing the dependability of these features has become an important point of differentiation among automakers.

Highest-Ranked Nameplates and Models?For the first time since the inception of the study, Lincoln leads the overall nameplate rankings in 2011. Lincoln improves by 13 PP100 from 2010. Lexus follows Lincoln in the nameplate rankings.  Rounding out the top five nameplates are Jaguar, Porsche and Toyota. The Porsche 911 has the fewest problems in the industry, with just 68 PP100.

Toyota Motor Corporation continues to perform well in long-term dependability and garners seven segment awards—more than any other automaker in 2011—for the Lexus RX, Scion xB, Toyota 4Runner, Toyota Prius, Toyota Sienna, Toyota Tacoma and Toyota Tundra. Ford Motor Company receives four model awards for the Ford Fusion, Ford Mustang, Lincoln MKZ and Lincoln Navigator. General Motors (Buick Lucerne, Cadillac DTS, and Chevrolet Tahoe) and Honda Motor Company (Acura RL, Honda CR-V and Honda Fit) each receive three awards. In addition, the following models also receive awards: BMW X3, Mazda MX-5 Miata, and Mercedes-Benz CLK.

The study finds that while domestic brands have closed the gap in initial quality with import brands, there is still a considerable difference between the two in vehicle dependability, with import brands outperforming domestic brands by 18 PP100 in 2011. This is consistent with findings of the 2008 Initial Quality Study,SM which examined the models included in the 2011 VDS after 90 days of ownership. While domestic brand cars have fewer problems (135 PP100, on average) than import brand cars (147 PP100, on average), trucks and crossover vehicles1 of import brands have considerably fewer problems than those of domestic brands.

In addition to affecting brand image and brand loyalty, long-term dependability also has a notable effect on dealership service and customer service spending. As the number of problems experienced increases, owners are increasingly likely to use non-dealer service facilities for paid service work. In addition, as the number of problems increases, the percentage of owners who say they “definitely will” return to their dealer for service diminishes. Among owners who indicate they have experienced no problems, 76 percent indicate they “definitely will” return to the dealer for paid service. This proportion decreases to 42 percent among owners who say they experienced six or more problems.

The 2011 Vehicle Dependability Study is based on responses from more than 43,700 original owners of 2008 model-year vehicles after three years of ownership. The study was fielded between October and December 2010.

Find more detailed findings on vehicle dependability as well as model photos and specs by reading an article and reviewing brand and segment dependability ratings at JDPower.com.

1The truck category includes both pickup trucks and vans, while the crossover vehicle category includes crossover vehicles, multi-purpose vehicles and utility vehicles.


2012 BMW 6-Series Coupe Photo Gallery

2011 Geneva Motor Show Photo Gallery

Lamborghini Showcase Photo Gallery

Audi Lightweight Tech Showcase Photo Gallery

2011 Geneva Motor Show Preview Photo Gallery



AutoSpies.com Photo Galleries

If you want to see your photos running on our homepage photo ticker, be sure to upload your photos on the go by sending them to Mobile@AutoSpies.com

Share on Facebook




SteveSteve - 3/17/2011 12:06:13 PM
+3 Boost
I just want to point out something that may not be obvious to you: The difference between the best car on the list (Lincoln) and the worst (MINI), is that with the best car, you're likely to experience 1 defect during the year, and with the worst, you're likely to experience 2.

That difference could be viewed as "100% more problems," in which case it's terrible, or you could view it as a difference of only one defect, which is not that big deal.

I choose to interpret this info as *all* the cars on this list being pretty good with respect to the lack of defects. But that's just me :-)

PS: What this doesn't tell us is the *severity* of the defects. For example, if you compare 1 transmission failure to 2 burned out light bulbs, the raw numbers are inconsequential.


Agent009Agent009 - 3/17/2011 12:35:36 PM
+4 Boost
Compound this to fact that defect can be a rattle in a dash. A defect yes, but not a dependability issue by any means


SteveSteve - 3/17/2011 1:05:27 PM
+5 Boost
Agent009 write "Compound this to fact that defect can be a rattle in a dash. A defect yes, but not a dependability issue by any means".

Indeed. And someone who pays $80K for a car is likely to be peaved by that annoying and persistent rattle that *shouldn't* be there in an $80K car, while someone who paid $15K for their car would likely have a different set of expectations and maybe not even notice it.

The greatest truth that I can share with you is: As you believe, so shall you perceive.


85bmw745i85bmw745i - 3/17/2011 10:31:33 PM
+2 Boost
People that would buy a Lincoln do not have standards as high, hence the little things that would irk us wouldn't bother them. They are too concerned with buying American and are likely to ignore the little things.


SteveSteve - 3/17/2011 12:08:45 PM
+3 Boost
BTW, shouldn't the headline read "Lincoln Steals Top..."?


Agent009Agent009 - 3/17/2011 12:33:43 PM
+1 Boost
My bad. it has been corrected


WhelanWhelan - 3/17/2011 1:51:44 PM
+4 Boost
It makes sense, the per 100 vehicles. Since Lincoln only has just over 100 new vehicles on the road right now. :-)


veyron1001veyron1001 - 3/17/2011 2:06:06 PM
+4 Boost
Well its harder to find a fault when they are sitting at a dealership. I bet the fault is a flat battery.


HoorayforpeepeeHoorayforpeepee - 3/17/2011 2:31:27 PM
+2 Boost
direct quote

Toyota Motor Corporation continues to perform well in long-term dependability and garners seven segment awards—more than any other automaker in 2011—for the Lexus RX, Scion xB, Toyota 4Runner, Toyota Prius, Toyota Sienna, Toyota Tacoma and Toyota Tundra.

not bad if you ask me !


HoorayforpeepeeHoorayforpeepee - 3/17/2011 2:33:11 PM
-2 Boost
Chrysler, Jeep and Dodge once again reminding us why American cars are better left scrapped


veyron1001veyron1001 - 3/17/2011 4:33:28 PM
+1 Boost
No if you want to buy the cheapest fleet, buy a Lincoln.


993Turbo993Turbo - 3/18/2011 5:23:13 AM
0 Boost
That's because Lincoln didn't sell enough cars to have many defects show up.


upwardsupwards - 3/18/2011 10:23:50 AM
+1 Boost
How many recalls did Lincoln have? how many recalls did Toyota/Lexus have?


freshseth83freshseth83 - 3/20/2011 5:59:47 AM
+2 Boost
how many cars did Lincoln make? How many cars did Toyota/Lexus make?

how many cars did Lincoln sell? How many cars did Toyota/Lexus make?

How many trolls hate Lincoln? How many trolls hate Toyota/Lexus?


RomanRoman - 3/20/2011 7:10:50 PM
+1 Boost
freshseth83 its by ratio and lexus lost get over it, Yes lexus had thousands and thousands more recalls than Lincoln.


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC